Apr 012010
 
OBUMMER-ADVENTURE

What else could we expect from a polity drowning in engineered confusion?

By Steven Jonas. MD, MPH

Crossposted with BuzzFlash on Thu, 03/04/2010  [print_link]

OBUMMER-ADVENTUREFirst came the “Birthers.” President Obama is not a citizen.  He’s a Kenyan, he’s a Muslim, he’s an Indonesian, he’s a Kenyan-Indonesian-Muslim (dunno which is worse so might as well throw them all in), a Hawaiian (oops, didn’t know that Hawaii is a US possession, OH, you mean it’s a state!?!), a Martian (shhh!  He’s blaaack).  Show them birth certificates, published birth announcements, nah, es macht kein unterschiedung (that’s German for “it makes no difference”).  They know what they know when they know it.  And after all, they are egged on by a mass media that treat the “controversy” as a legitimate one (unlike the way the controversy, which has science behind it, over the causes of the 9/11 tragedy is treated, of course).  So why not?

Then came the “Deathers.”  These folks include a former Lieutenant Governor from one of the largest states and a former Governor from one of the smallest (how’s that for coverage and veracity?).  They were convinced that a provision for paying physicians for what many already do — counseling for rational end-of-life care WHEN REQUESTED BY THE PATIENT OR THE PATIENT’S FAMILY — was really a provision for government-imposed euthanasia. Again, as Josef Goebbels was so fond of saying, facts make no difference when you’ve got a hot political message to exploit.  And again, the mass media gave them some traction by treating the matter as a legitimate controversy.

Now the “-ers” are preceded by the “tenth,” as in “Tenthers.”  In this context, “tenth” refers to the 10th Amendment to the Constitution, which states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor pro­hibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  Generally ignoring Articles I, II, and III, which give a host of powers to the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of the Federal government, they conclude from the wording of the Tenth that the Federal government has no powers whatsoever, except perhaps to wage war on the President’s say-so and to criminalize any belief as to when life begins other than that it does so at the time of conception.

It should be noted that in the Constitution itself not too much power is given to the Judicial branch.  But we all know how much power it has acquired since John Marshall’s if-then-if-then-if-then very big stretch in the Marbury v. Madison case of 1803.  Those powers include some that folks of the Tenthers’ ilk hate, like declaring school segregation unconstitutional, but many that quite a number of Tenthers just love, like placing non-elected Presidents in office and considering corporations to be people.  Of course these folks, all madly anti-Obama, also didn’t seem too bothered when Bush-Cheney-Addington-Yoo were reading dictatorial powers into the Commander-in-Chief clause, but that’s another story.

But you know, when trying to figure out what the Federal government is all about, what powers it really has and, even more importantly, what types of problems the Founders invented it to deal with, it is a really good idea to take a hard look at the very first words of the Constitution.  Those are found in the Preamble.  Generally ignored, it just happens to be the Statement of Purpose of the Constitution and indeed for our nation itself.

The Preamble states: “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more per­fect Union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the com­mon defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Consti­tution for the United States of America.”  Fascinating stuff.

Note first that the Constitution for the United States is established by “we the people of the United States.”  That’s not “we the people of the 13 states [to come]” or “the 13 former colonies of the United Kingdom,” or “the 13 independently sovereign entities regardless of what the rest of the document says, that can split off or reject Federal legislation they don’t happen to like any time they want to.”  It’s the United States.  That’s a unity and it is the people of that unity, not of its separate parts, that are laying out the powers for its national government in the document that follows.

That’s the first point.  The Constitution makes it clear that we are one nation, not a group of them.  Then the Preamble goes on to say that those powers are bestowed on that national government for a rather broad set of purposes.

1.  To perfect the Union, that is not to split it up, hither and yon, to suit given purposes at given times.

2.  To establish justice, that is for the “people of the United States.”  Why that might even include the application of the equal protection clause to, gulp, homosexuals who want to take advantage of the civil laws that govern marriage in every state.

3.  Insuring domestic tranquility might cover such matters as civil rights legislation, rational regulation of private weapons ownership that is already provided for under any plain reading of the Second Amendment (which either applies just to militias or provides for regulation of weapons ownership broadly), and environmental protection.

4.  The common defence, but yes, not the uncommon defence, such as having 700-plus military bases around the world and engaging in “preventive war” which happens to be proscribed by Article 51 of the UN Charter, which is a treaty of the United States and thus under Article VI of the Constitution itself is part of the highest law of the land.

5.  Promote the general welfare might even include something like, dare I say it, a national health care financing system that covers all citizens, that is actually run by the federal government.

6.  Securing the blessings of liberty might actually include such things as preventing a President from abrogating the Fourth Amendment on whim and actually punishing folks who come up with a rationale to justify the use of torture, also prohibited by treaty under the terms of Article VI.

Oh dear, what a range of power and responsibility, before one ever gets to the Tenth Amendment.  So how about not trying to debate the “Tenthers” using facts and logic about what that amendment really means, which don’t seem to work very well with such folk and even less so with their corporate and political backers?  How about simply starting a movement of our own, calling it, for starters,  “The Preamblers?”

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH is a Professor of Preventive Medicine at Stony Brook University (NY) and author/co-author/editor of 30 books. In addition to being a columnist for BuzzFlash, Dr. Jonas is also Managing Editor and a Contributing Author for TPJmagazine; a Featured Writer for Dandelion Salad; a Contributor to TheHarderStuff newsletter; a Contributor to The Planetary Movement; and a Contributing Columnist for the Project for the Old American Century, POAC.

http://blog.buzzflash.com/jonas/185

Did you like this? Share it:
Apr 012010
 
paulCraigRoberts_color

Good-Bye

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS March 24, 2010 [print_link]

Editor’s Note: We have enjoyed publishing a number of essays by Paul Craig Roberts, a powerful writer whose remarkable ability to speak out clearly, authoritatively and courageously on the issues of the day is not easily matched by other contemporary analysts.  That said, Roberts has been something of a puzzle for us. Here is a man, a lifelong Republican, who cheerfully served in Ronald Reagan’s criminal administration, and who, as seen in a passage below, continues to apologize for his former superior in a manner totally at variance with his demonstrated capacity to see through the cynical bullshit routinely dispensed by the highest echelons of American power.  The contradiction in Roberts, who at times sounds like a Marxist (which we applaud), is profound because Ronald Reagan was as much a scoundrel as those he has so eloquently castigated in recent years.  Reagan was a highly successful shill for this nation’s plutocracy, a complete hypocrite or nicompoop, or maybe both, and the perfect salesman for alarmingly antisocial policies ranging from the heightening of tensions in the Cold War to the near-complete dismantlement of governmental agencies tasked with protecting citizens and the environment. Reagan’s reign, too, ended with a huge numbers of big players indicted or in jail, and became notorious for the Iran-Contra scandal, which brought to the fore the felonious nature of bourgeois parties, and the fact that Reagan, like Nixon, had been engaged in building a stealthy “parallel government” outside even the ludicrous restraints imposed by Congress, and which constituted a de facto self-inflicted coup d’etat. Lest we forget, it is to Reagan and his team that we also owe the plunging of Central America into a  bloodbath,  and the  organization of the first administration in American history fully run on the basis of cynical p.r. techniques. All American presidencies, entrusted with carrying out imperialist and plutocratic agendas, require a fair amount of manipulation of the hoi polloi to make them look “democratic” but Reagan went well beyond such established parameters of Kabuki theater between the ruling class’ major players.  Indeed, it’s Reagan who deserves the dubious honor of having opened the floodgates to the increasingly polluted regimes that came later in the name of the “Conservative revolution” (sic), and which eventually permitted a grotesque improbability like that of George W Bush, to gain the top spot. Nonetheless, like all lucid analysts of history, Roberts makes important points, and from that perspective the stilling of his pen is to be regretted. —P. Greanville

paulCraigRoberts_color

Paul Craig Roberts

There was a time when the pen was mightier than the sword. That was a time when people believed in truth and regarded truth as an independent power and not as an auxiliary for government, class, race, ideological, personal, or financial interest.

Today Americans are ruled by propaganda. Americans have little regard for truth, little access to it, and little ability to recognize it.

Truth is an unwelcome entity. It is disturbing. It is off limits. Those who speak it run the risk of being branded “anti-American,” “anti-semite” or “conspiracy theorist.”

Truth is an inconvenience for government and for the interest groups whose campaign contributions control government.

Truth is an inconvenience for prosecutors who want convictions, not the discovery of innocence or guilt.

Truth is inconvenient for ideologues.

Today many whose goal once was the discovery of truth are now paid handsomely to hide it. “Free market economists” are paid to sell offshoring to the American people. High-productivity, high value-added American jobs are denigrated as dirty, old industrial jobs. Relicts from long ago, we are best shed of them. Their place has been taken by “the New Economy,” a mythical economy that allegedly consists of high-tech white collar jobs in which Americans innovate and finance activities that occur offshore. All Americans need in order to participate in this “new economy” are finance degrees from Ivy League universities, and then they will work on Wall Street at million dollar jobs.

Economists who were once respectable took money to contribute to this myth of “the New Economy.”

And not only economists sell their souls for filthy lucre. Recently we have had reports of medical doctors who, for money, have published in peer-reviewed journals concocted “studies” that hype this or that new medicine produced by pharmaceutical companies that paid for the “studies.”

The Council of Europe is investigating the drug companies’ role in hyping a false swine flu pandemic in order to gain billions of dollars in sales of the vaccine.

The media helped the US military hype its recent Marja offensive in Afghanistan, describing Marja as a city of 80,000 under Taliban control. It turns out that Marja is not urban but a collection of village farms.

And there is the global warming scandal, in which  NGOs. the UN, and the nuclear industry colluded in concocting  a doomsday scenario in order to create profit in pollution.

Wherever one looks, truth has fallen to money.

Wherever money is insufficient to bury the truth, ignorance, propaganda, and short memories finish the job.

I remember when, following CIA director William Colby’s testimony before the Church Committee in the mid-1970s, presidents Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan issued executive orders preventing the CIA and U.S. black-op groups from assassinating foreign leaders.  In 2010 the US Congress was told by Dennis Blair, head of national intelligence, that the US now assassinates its own citizens in addition to foreign leaders.

When Blair told the House Intelligence Committee that US citizens no longer needed to be arrested, charged, tried, and convicted of a capital crime, just murdered on suspicion  alone of being a “threat,” he wasn’t impeached. No investigation pursued. Nothing happened. There was no Church Committee. In the mid-1970s the CIA got into trouble for plots to kill Castro. Today it is American citizens who are on the hit list. Whatever objections there might be don’t carry any weight. No one in government is in any trouble over the assassination of U.S. citizens by the U.S. government.

As an economist, I am astonished that the American economics profession has no awareness whatsoever that the U.S. economy has been destroyed by the offshoring of U.S. GDP to overseas countries. U.S. corporations, in pursuit of absolute advantage or lowest labor costs and maximum CEO “performance bonuses,” have moved the production of goods and services marketed to Americans to China, India, and elsewhere abroad. When I read economists describe offshoring as free trade based on comparative advantage, I realize that there is no intelligence or integrity in the American economics profession.

Intelligence and integrity have been purchased by money. The transnational or global U.S. corporations pay multi-million dollar compensation packages to top managers, who achieve these “performance awards” by replacing U.S. labor with foreign labor. While Washington worries about “the Muslim threat,” Wall Street, U.S. corporations and “free market” shills destroy the U.S. economy and the prospects of tens of millions of Americans.

Americans, or most of them, have proved to be putty in the hands of the police state.

Americans have bought into the government’s claim that security requires the suspension of civil liberties and accountable government. Astonishingly, Americans, or most of them, believe that civil liberties, such as habeas corpus and due process, protect “terrorists,” and not themselves. Many also believe that the Constitution is a tired old document that prevents government from exercising the kind of police state powers necessary to keep Americans safe and free.

Most Americans are unlikely to hear from anyone who would tell them any different.

I was associate editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal. I was Business Week’s first outside columnist, a position I held for 15 years. I was columnist for a decade for Scripps Howard News Service, carried in 300 newspapers. I was a columnist for the Washington Times and for newspapers in France and Italy and for a magazine in Germany. I was a contributor to the New York Times and a regular feature in the Los Angeles Times. Today I cannot publish in, or appear on, the American “mainstream media.”

For the last six years I have been banned from the “mainstream media.” My last column in the New York Times appeared in January, 2004, coauthored with Democratic U.S. Senator Charles Schumer representing New York. We addressed the offshoring of U.S. jobs. Our op-ed article produced a conference at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. and live coverage by C-Span. A debate was launched. No such thing could happen today.

For years I was a mainstay at the Washington Times, producing credibility for the Moony newspaper as a Business Week columnist, former Wall Street Journal editor, and former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury. But when I began criticizing Bush’s wars of aggression, the order came down to Mary Lou Forbes to cancel my column.

The American corporate media does not serve the truth.  It serves the government and the interest groups that empower the government.

America’s fate was sealed when the public and the anti-war movement bought the government’s 9/11 conspiracy theory. The government’s account of 9/11 is contradicted by much evidence. Nevertheless, this defining event of our time, which has launched the US on interminable wars of aggression and a domestic police state, is a taboo topic for investigation in the media. It is pointless to complain of war and a police state when one accepts the premise upon which they are based.

These trillion dollar wars have created financing problems for Washington’s deficits and threaten the U.S. dollar’s role as world reserve currency. The wars and the pressure that the budget deficits put on the dollar’s value have put Social Security and Medicare on the chopping block. Former Goldman Sachs chairman and U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson is after these protections for the elderly. Fed chairman Bernanke is also after them. The Republicans are after them as well. These protections are called “entitlements” as if they are some sort of welfare that people have not paid for in payroll taxes all their working lives.

With over 21 per cent unemployment as measured by the methodology of 1980, with American jobs, GDP, and technology having been given to China and India, with war being Washington’s greatest commitment, with the dollar over-burdened with debt, with civil liberty sacrificed to the “war on terror,” the liberty and prosperity of the American people have been thrown into the trash bin of history.

The militarism of the U.S. and Israeli states, and Wall Street and corporate greed, will now run their course. As the pen is censored and its might extinguished, I am signing off.

Surprisingly enough, Paul Craig Roberts was an editor of the Wall Street Journal and an Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury under Ronald Reagan.  His latest book, HOW THE ECONOMY WAS LOST, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com


Did you like this? Share it: