BP oil spill hits Gulf coast

Reaping the fruits of unfettered capitalism.

The obsession with growth and short-term profits combined with the complete corruption of the political system have finally rendered the environment defenseless against the worst excesses of the plundering corporate class. Meanwhile, the environmental movement —and the public at large—largely co-opted and in disarray, seem overwhelmed by the enormousness of the assault…The paternity for this unspeakable crime is clear. The Obama administration buckled before BP and oil industry pressure, failing to implement new safety and environmental regulations under consideration last fall.  A BP executive wrote a letter to the administration stating that self-regulation was adequate. Why is it that humanity can’t seem to learn the obvious lessons when great fortunes stand in the way?

By Tom Eley 1 May 2010  [print_link]

ON FRIDAY, an oil slick caused by last week’s explosion and sinking of a British Petroleum oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico began washing ashore in Louisiana near the mouth of the Mississippi River, threatening catastrophic economic and environmental damage.

The Deepwater Horizon oil rig, located about 50 miles off the Louisiana coast, erupted in flames on April 20 when a concrete sealant failed and oil moved up piping from the ocean floor, about a mile beneath the surface of the water. The disaster claimed the lives of 11 workers and critically injured four more.

After burning for two days, the floating rig sank, buckling beneath it the piping connecting it to the oil well and causing at least three ruptures. A mechanism used to seal the well in the event of a blowout failed to activate, and crude oil has been gushing into the Gulf of Mexico at an estimated rate of 5,000 barrels, or 210,000 gallons, a day.

BP and the Obama administration at first claimed that there was no oil spill. After a slick on the ocean’s surface increased to an area of about 320 square miles, BP said that 1,000 barrels were pouring forth. On Thursday BP admitted that the Coast Guard estimate of 5,000 barrels was more likely.

On Friday morning the BBC reported that the oil slick was roughly equivalent in size to Jamaica, and growing. It appeared set to continue washing ashore in Louisiana, and was likely to spread east along the gulf coastline in Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida.

Efforts to contain the spill and prevent further oil from reaching the ocean surface have achieved little. On Friday attempts to ring the slick with booms and administer controlled burns were hampered by wind and choppy seas. A high tide is expected Friday night, likely pushing oil further up delicate marshlands in the Mississippi delta.

Ultimately the spill must be stopped at its source near the oil cap and crushed piping located 5,000 feet beneath the ocean’s surface. Valves designed to shut the cap and remote controlled submarines have been unable to stop the hemorrhaging. Other methods—including placing a structure over the leaks or drilling holes nearby to divert oil from reaching the existing well—are experimental and would take weeks or months to implement.

In the meantime, the collapsed rig will likely continue to pump out about 210,000 gallons per day into the Gulf of Mexico. At this pace the Deepwater Horizon spill would by mid-June eclipse the disaster resulting from the sinking of the Exxon Valdez, which in 1989 dumped its payload of 10.8 million gallons of crude oil into remote Prince William Sound in Alaska.

In the worst case scenario oil could flow from the well until its supply is exhausted, which would likely result in a spill many times larger than the Exxon Valdez.

The economic impact of the Deepwater Horizon spill will be severe. The coast’s multi-billion dollar fishing and tourism industries will suffer major losses, which will result in layoffs and job cuts. It is possible the slick could block shipping from the port of New Orleans—the nation’s busiest in terms of freight tonnage. Shrimp and oyster fishermen have launched lawsuits against BP, rig operator Transocean, and Halliburton Energy Services, who subcontracted work on the drill hole.

“This might be our last day,” oyster farmer Mitch Jurisich told the Associated Press. “This is who we are and what we do.”

“If it gets in oyster reefs and grass beds—terribly productive areas—you don’t exactly run a vacuum cleaner over it,” said George Crozier, a marine biologist with the Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama. “The grass beds are particularly fragile in our part of the world. So even trying to clean it would probably destroy them.”

The environmental impact is incalculable. The estuaries, islands, and bayous of the Mississippi Delta—the area likely to be hardest hit by the spill—contain 40 percent of all US wetlands and are home to hundreds of animal species.

“It is of grave concern,” said David Kennedy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “I am frightened. This is a very, very big thing. And the efforts that are going to be required to do anything about it, especially if it continues on, are just mind-boggling.”

For nearly a week the Obama administration said virtually nothing about the disaster—besides reiterating that the “incident,” as Obama called it, would in no way lessen its support for the lifting of a moratorium on offshore drilling up and down the Atlantic Coast. Two days after the explosion, when the fate of the missing 11 men was still unknown, a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs if Obama had yet “reached out to anyone in Louisiana over the oil rig explosion.” Gibbs responded, “Let me check on that. I don’t believe so.” The next day, Gibbs told reporters, “In all honesty I doubt this is the first accident that has happened and I doubt it will be the last.”

Finally, on Friday morning, senior Obama advisor David Axelrod admitted that the oil spill was a disaster that might temporarily delay further seabed oil exploration. Later in the day, Obama told a Rose Garden press conference that he had ordered Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar to report to him within 30 days if any new safeguards are needed for deap sea oil rigs.

Obama’s statement was “a largely symbolic gesture,” according to the Associated Press, since “no new leases are scheduled for the coming months.” Its transparent purpose was to protect Obama’s “planned expansion of offshore drilling,” according to the AP.

On Friday, the Obama administration dispatched two air force planes and a number of warships to assist in containing the slick, and Louisiana Governor Bobbie Jindal requested a call-up of about 6,000 National Guard soldiers. However, experts have said that miniature submarines used by the Navy would be of no help in stopping the leaks. Due to the topography and biology of the Mississippi Delta—muddy and rich in water vegetation—cleanup will prove difficult

The parallels with Hurricane Katrina are striking. As that massive storm system approached the Gulf Coast in 2005, the Bush administration could not be roused to take elementary steps to assist area residents. Then, after Katrina struck, a stunned nation watched on television as desperate residents begged for relief. The Gulf Coast has never recovered from Katrina, and now some experts have predicted that the Deepwater Horizon spill could prove more economically devastating.

The Wall Street Journal wrote of “a growing sense among many in Louisiana that the government failed them again, just as it did during Hurricane Katrina five years ago.”

“They lied to us,” fishing guide Cade Thomas told the Journal. “They came out and said it was leaking 1,000 barrels when I think they knew it was more. And they weren’t proactive. As soon as it blew up, they should have started wrapping it with booms.”

Why BP and the federal government did not take immediate precautions to cordon off the explosion area in the immediate aftermath of the explosion is just one of many questions that have emerged.

It has also been revealed that the Obama administration had buckled before BP and oil industry pressure, failing to implement new safety and environmental regulations under consideration last fall. A BP executive wrote a letter to the administration stating that self-regulation was adequate.

Among the regulations that BP and other oil concerns were able to block was the inclusion on all oil rigs of a device called an acoustic switch—commonly used in other oil-producing nations—that sends impulses through the water that can trigger an underwater valve to shut down the well in the event of a blowback. BP found the costs of these units, about $500,000, excessive.

The oil giant reported $5.598 billion in profits for the first three months of 2010.

TOM ELEY is a senior writer with the World Socialist Web Site.

ALSO HIGHLY RECOMMENDED:

The Stupidity of Obama’s Drill-Drill-Drill Offshore Oil Policy http://www.greanvillepost.com/?p=5711

Capitalism on a collision course with nature  http://www.greanvillepost.com/?p=5750

BONUS FEATURE: EVEN ABC NEWS NOW DIGS UP THE DIRT ON BP

printlogo.jpg

BP Fought Safety Measures at Deepwater Oil Rigs

Owner of Louisiana Oil Well Objected to System That Would Have Shut Off Spill

By MATTHEW MOSK, BRIAN ROSS and RHONDA SCHWARTZ

Apr. 30, 2010 —

BRITISH PETROLEUM (BP), the company that owned the Louisiana oil rig that exploded last week, spent years battling federal regulators over how many layers of safeguards would be needed to prevent a deepwater well from this type of accident.

One area of immediate concern, industry experts said, was the lack of a remote system that would have allowed workers to clamp shut Deepwater Horizon’s wellhead so it would not continue to gush oil. The rig is now spilling 210,000 gallons of oil a day into the Gulf of Mexico.

In a letter sent last year to the Department of the Interior, BP objected to what it called “extensive, prescriptive regulations” proposed in new rules to toughen safety standards. “We believe industry’s current safety and environmental statistics demonstrate that the voluntary programs&continue to be very successful.”

CLICK HERE TO READ THE LETTER

That was one in a series of clashes between the industry and federal regulators that began during the Clinton administration. In 2000, the federal agency that oversaw oil rig safety issued a safety alert that called added layers of backup “an essential component of a deepwater drilling system.” The agency said operators were expected to have multiple layers of protection to prevent a spill.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE SAFETY ALERT

But according to aides to Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat who has followed offshore drilling issues for years, the industry aggressively lobbied against an additional layer of protection known as an “acoustic system,” saying it was too costly. In a March 2003 report, the agency reversed course, and said that layer of protection was no longer needed.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE REPORT

“There was a big debate under the Bush administration whether or not to require additional oil drilling safeguards but [federal regulators] decided not to require any additional mandatory safeguards, believing the industry would be motivated to do it themselves,” Carl Pope, Chairman of the Sierra Club told ABC News.

A second area of focus emerging Friday involved the cement casing that was supposed to seal the well and prevent gaps from opening between the outside of the well pipe and the inside of the hole drilled into the sea floor. If cement is not poured properly, oil and natural gas can escape  a cause of more than a dozen previous well blowouts in the Gulf.

House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman Friday sent a letter to Halliburton, the company responsible for pouring the cement seal, asking company executives to brief committee investigators on conditions at the rig, and preserve all documents relating to their work on the sea floor.

Elmer Danenberger, an expert on offshore drilling who retired from the U.S. Department of the Interior in January, told ABC News he is worried that “lack of attention” during the pouring of the cement could be to blame.

“With these cementing operations it’s just a matter of not being attentive enough,” he said. “What you want is a closed system. You want the cemented pipe totally sealing the well bore. If you don’t have that, you have problems.”

Because the well us under more than a mile of water, it may be some time before investigators have more clarity on what exactly went wrong. But Brent Coon, a lawyer who sued BP over a previous deadly oil facility explosion, said he has obtained a restraining order to prevent the company from doing anything to cover up the cause of the accident.

“BP stands apart, heads and shoulders above all the rest of them, with respect to their conduct,” said Coon, who represents a 24-year-old roustabout who was working on the rig at the time of the blast. “It’s like they just don’t care.”

BP issued a release saying it had launched its own investigation into the cause of the blast, and would cooperate with federal efforts.

“Losing 11 of our industry colleagues is a tragedy for the offshore community,” said BP Group Chief Executive Tony Hayward in the statement. “As an industry, we must participate fully in these investigations and not rest until the causes of this tragedy are known and measures are taken to see that it never happens again.”

Click Here for the Blotter Homepage.

Copyright © 2010 ABC News Internet Ventures

If YOU don't share this, who will? Break the system's disinformation machine. Share!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •