Things to consider—

Since early 2011, Obama's been waging proxy war on Syria. Imported death squads masquerade as freedom fighters. The scheme's familiar. It repeats. It reflects US imperialism's dark side. In the 1980s, CIA-recruited mujahideen fighters battled Afghanistan's Soviet occupiers. Ronald Reagan called them "the moral equivalent of our founding fathers." He characterized Contra killers the same way. —Stephen LendmanFor over a century now US ambassadors have acted as fifth columns in the nations they are embedded in, their role chiefly to foster corporate and plutocratic power and coordinate machinations against any truly pro-democratic government.•••••"The dead end identity politics of SF Pride, which sells out a peace hero like Bradley Manning to curry favor with the American ruling class, is what I had in mind. The empire loves your tameness, irrelevance and cowardice, SF Pride. You don’t bother the American ruling class — a five foot two, 105 pound soldier does because he has a conscience and because he didn’t make comfort the guiding principle of his life...." —Randy Shields
Feb 232011
 

MARK VALLEN

[print_link] February 22, 2011

The Egyptian Museum became an improbable backdrop to Egypt’s ongoing revolution when on Jan. 25, 2011, pro-democracy protestors first occupied Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo, where the Victorian-era museum happens to be located. As the rebellion unfolded the rose-colored walls of the museum were seen on television and computer screens all across the globe; it was quite possibly the first time many non-Egyptians had ever heard of the museum, which holds the largest collection of ancient Egyptian artifacts in the world. An examination of the intrigues swirling around the museum, and by extension, taking a closer look at Zahi Hawass (Egypt’s Minister of Antiquities), reveals much about the current situation.

After the Egyptian Museum was broken into by looters on Jan. 28, I wrote an article refuting claims made in the mainstream press that attributed the looting to pro-democracy protestors. By now everyone knows about the ransacking of the museum, but few have paid attention to another distressing report; the Egyptian Museum has been used as a detention center where the army held, abused, and at times tortured protestors it arrested during the uprising. More on that later, but first let us reappraise Mr. Hawass, perhaps best known to Americans for appearing on the U.S.-based History Channel special called “Chasing Mummies.

As his country’s chief archaeologist, Mr. Hawass has served as the Secretary General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), and more recently was appointed Minister of Antiquities. There is no doubt Hawass has made major contributions to Egyptology, and I do not mean to denigrate his accomplishments. Nonetheless, it is impossible to overlook his ignoble side; Hawass is a loyal supporter of the ousted dictator Hosni Mubarak.

On Jan. 28, Mubarak ordered the ferocious police repression that resulted in crowds of infuriated protestors burning down the headquarters of his despised National Democratic Party (NDP). With the people taking to the streets to topple the Mubarak regime, Hawass went on state-controlled television to call on Egyptians not to believe the “lies and fabrications” broadcast about Mubarak on Al Jazeera. On Jan. 31, Mubarak appointed Hawass to the cabinet post of “Minister of Antiquities,” a special position the dictator created for Hawass. On Feb. 1, even as Mubarak’s hated secret police and hired goon squads were beating, torturing, and killing pro-democracy demonstrators, Hawass told the New York Times that protestors “should give us the opportunity to change things, and if nothing happens they can march again. But you can’t bring in a new president now, in this time. We need Mubarak to stay and make the transition.” On Feb. 6, 2011, Hawass appeared on the BBC to exclaim:

“The president would like to stay, he and all of us would like him to stay, not all of us as a government, but all of us as the majority of the Egyptian people, because we need President Mubarak to make the smooth transition of the government, he’s the only one who can do that. All of us of course agree with the people who did the marches, who asked for freedom and democracy, all of us would like that, but the only one who can continue and make the stability in Egypt is only one person – President Mubarak (….) He made the whole world respect Egypt, and he was a kind man and a good man, and I myself always respected this man, and I would like this man to stay.”

Also on February 6, Hawass posted the following proclamation on his official website:

“In these very critical moments of Egypt’s history, I believe that President Mubarak is capable of insuring a peaceful and democratic transition of power; especially since he has announced that he would not seek re-election. I also would like to remind everybody that Mubarak is a decorated war hero, and should be allowed to leave his office in dignity. I say that as an Egyptian who honors the war heroes of this country, but not as a cabinet member.”

LEFT: Screenshot of Zahi Hawass (left) giving NBC’s Richard Engel a tour of the Egyptian Museum, Feb. 9, 2011.

On Feb. 9, Richard Engel of the NBC Today show was given a tour of the Egyptian Museum by Zahi Hawass, who confirmed that artifacts damaged by looters were being restored.

NBC failed to describe Hawass as a Mubarak supporter, or as having accepted a high position in the dictator’s thoroughly discredited regime while the majority of Egyptians were calling for its abolishment. As a corporate news outlet NBC is not alone in rushing to conduct uncritical interviews with Hawass, which should give one pause over the state of U.S. journalism.

It has come to light that a dozen or more priceless artifacts were stolen from the Egyptian Museum on the night of Jan. 28. Hawass had previously told the press that objects at the museum had only been damaged, but after museum staff conducted an inventory it was found that a number of items were missing. This led Dan Murphy of the Christian Science Monitor to write that Hawass “appeared to have hid the extent of the damage done at the famed Egyptian museum.” Murphy quoted an unnamed acquaintance of Hawass, who said “I think he held the information back because he understood it would be catastrophic for the regime’s legitimacy.”

Al-Ahram (Arabic for “the Pyramids”) is the most widely read Arabic language newspaper in Egypt and it also runs a weekly English language website. Owned by the government, it has been a dubious source for news; its editors having been handpicked by the Mubarak regime, at least up until the present. The Feb. 10 weekly edition of Al-Ahram published “Not getting away with it,” an article about the looting of the Egyptian Museum. It reported that Irina Bokova, Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), had contacted Hawass over the condition of museums and archaeological sites during the violence. According to Al-Ahram, Hawass told UNESCO the museums and archaeological sites were “safe and sound” under his hand!

In addition, Al-Ahram reported the International Committee of Museums (ICOM) had decided to establish a committee to protect and monitor the Egyptian Museum; Hawass rejected this, saying “We don’t need any international supervision.” Sounding every bit as pompous as his despotic boss, Hawass said, “I want everyone to relax and to know that I am here and we are all watching with open eyes. I want people to know that after days of protest, the monuments are safe.” Yet on Feb. 17, Hawass would write on his official website that multiple archeological sites had been broken into and pillaged.

BELOW LEFT: State museum workers protest for higher wages in front of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, Feb. 9, 2011. Some of their signs read, “No to corruption, no to oppression,” and “Increase Pay.” AP Photo/Ben Curtis.

Enjoying the status of being Mubarak’s hand-picked Minister of Antiquities, Hawass is now in the position of having to contain labor unrest, as thousands of workers emboldened by the dictator’s departure go on strike for better working conditions and higher wages.

On Feb. 9 dozens of state museum workers and staff held a lively protest in front of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), where Hawass has his office. Rallying for higher wages, Hawass came out of the building to argue with the workers, telling them that their wages could only be increased after things returned to “normal.” Hawass appears unable to grasp the significance of what has happened in Egypt; a return to normal is untenable for the Egyptian people.

BELOW LEFT: Minister of Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, argues with state museum workers as they protest outside of the Supreme Council of Antiquities on Feb. 9, 2011. AP Photo/Ben Curtis.

On Feb. 14, the protests in front of the Supreme Council of Antiquities were aimed directly at Zahi Hawass himself.

Chanting “Get out!” nearly 200 graduates of Egyptian archaeology schools called for his resignation, denouncing him for corruption and for being a stooge of the Mubarak regime.

What particularly angers the archaeologists is that they are impoverished despite the fact that Egypt’s tourism industry, centered around the legacy of ancient Egypt and the pharaohs, generates billions of dollars. They are undoubtedly correct in believing the old regime and its many cronies simply made off with that money, and they suspect Hawass has been part of that wrongdoing.

BELOW LEFT: “Get Out!” Nearly 200 demonstrators chant a message to Hawass in front of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, Feb. 14, 2011. AP Photo/Ben Curtis.

Robert Mackey of the New York Times The Lede blog, interviewed archeologist Nora Shalaby, who helped organize the protest against Zahi Hawass.

Ms. Shalaby chided Hawass for referring to the revolution as “a black week” in Egypt’s history and for his close relationship with Mubarak’s wife, the “First Lady” Suzanne Mubarak, but Shalaby also lambasted Hawass for being “surrounded by a bunch of corrupt officials who have been sucking most of the SCA money.” At the protest, archaeologists complained about the salary the antiquities ministry pays them (an equivalent of $75 per month), and raised objections to “wasta”, or the arrangement of connections, pay-offs, and influence that secures a job.

 

BELOW LEFT: Protestors in front of the Supreme Council of Antiquities accuse Hawass of corruption and denounce him for being an underling of Mubarak, Feb. 14, 2011. AP Photo/Khalil Hamra.

When an army tank arrived at the front door of the SCA building, Hawass snuck out a side door to avoid the protestors. Though he managed to duck this militant demonstration, it certainly will not be the last of its kind.

The protest against Hawass by archaeologists was not the first time he has came under fire for abusing workers in his field. In Oct. 2009 the pan-Arab human rights organization, the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI), condemned Hawass for waging a campaign of intimidation against fellow Egyptologist and researcher, Ahmed Saleh. Mr. Saleh, who holds a Master’s degree from Manchester University in England, expressed different views from Hawass on the way Egyptian antiquities should be handled, which led Hawass to publicly mock Saleh in the state-run press.

Subsequently the Supreme Council of Antiquities, under Hawass’ leadership, launched no less than 42 investigations against Saleh. ANHRI “decided to adopt Saleh’s case and support him in the face of this injustice.” At last word in ‘09, the Egyptian court system was reviewing Saleh’s case against Hawass and the Supreme Council of Antiquities, but with the intervening revolution, the status of the case is unknown to this writer.

BELOW LEFT: A soldier cradling an AK-47 automatic rifle with a fixed bayonet, stands behind the locked gates of the Egyptian Museum. AP Photo.

All of the aforementioned pales in comparison to the report published by the Guardian on Feb. 9, detailing how the army used the Egyptian Museum as a detention center for pro-democracy demonstrators it had seized during the uprising.

Within its grounds, a number of captives were tortured, and some detainees remain unaccounted for. The Arabic Network for Human Rights Information has stated the army still holds “hundreds” of people arrested during the uprising, “but information on their numbers is still not complete.” The Guardian report raised serious questions about the army as a “neutral force” in Egyptian politics, but it also produced doubts about Mr. Hawass. As a Mubarak loyalist, the former Secretary General of Egypt’s Supreme Council of Antiquities, and now the Minister of Antiquities, he is the ultimate steward of the Egyptian Museum.

The Guardian reported “the Egyptian military has secretly detained hundreds and possibly thousands of suspected government opponents since mass protests against President Hosni Mubarak began, and at least some of these detainees have been tortured.” The paper went on to report that “some of the detainees have been held inside the renowned Museum of Egyptian Antiquities on the edge of Tahrir Square. Those released have given graphic accounts of physical abuse by soldiers who accused them of acting for foreign powers.”

One account of abuse came from a 23-year-old man who was seized and beaten by the army while delivering medical supplies to the free clinics protestors operated in Tahrir Square. He said soldiers tied his hands behind his back and beat him before moving him to a makeshift army post located at the back of the Egyptian Museum. He said soldiers “got a bayonet and threatened to rape me with it. Then they waved it between my legs. They said I could die there or I could disappear into prison and no one would ever know.” After 18 hours of imprisonment the young man was released but warned not to return to Tahrir Square.

On Feb. 13, 2011, the army cleared the remaining demonstrators from Tahrir Square, resorting to force when protestors resisted. The Guardian reported that “demonstrators said about 30 were arrested and taken to a military compound at the nearby Egyptian museum where detained protesters have previously been beaten and interrogated.”

Reports of the army using the Egyptian Museum as a detention center have been confirmed by Amnesty International (AI). On Feb. 17, 2011, AI released a report detailing the torture inflicted upon protestors by the army just prior to the fall of Mubarak, abuses that included whippings, beatings, electric shock, simulated drowning, along with threats of rape. An 18-year-old student from Cairo told AI that he and a friend were arrested by the army and taken to an “area of the museum which is controlled by the army and held us there in an outdoor area.” The two were beaten by soldiers before being transferred to another location where they were tortured with electric shock. In another case a 29-year-old detainee was arrested by the army and taken to an annex next to the Egyptian Museum, where soldiers beat him with a whip and a chair until he was unconscious. One must ask, has Zahi Hawass been unaware of the army using the campus of the Egyptian Museum in this way?

In a Feb. 16 post to Hawass’ official website concerning the search for missing antiquities inadvertently dropped on the museum campus by looters, it was stated that a meticulous search had just been conducted, and that a “full and thorough search of the museum and its grounds” continues. In all of this rummaging around no one has noticed any evidence of a temporary military compound on museum property? The web post on Hawass’ blog rather ominously states that, “museum staff is not yet able to move freely within the museum, and has, until now, had to walk in groups of 10-15 people, accompanied by soldiers. Unfortunately, this has slowed down the search, and made it very difficult to carry out a final inventory. The army is allowing very few people into the museum, and the first time the museum’s office staff was allowed in was on 6 February 2011.”

Zahi Hawass might be one of the more innocuous members of the Mubarak cabal, but he is nevertheless part of the old regime. With Mubarak’s departure the components of that old order – the corrupt judiciary, state-controlled media, security forces, government ministers, crony capitalists, and above all the army – remain intact and in control; it is Mubarakism without Mubarak. An authentically democratic Egypt can only be achieved if there is massive and constant pressure from below applied to the upper echelons of power. That process, now fully underway, must eventually erode and completely dismantle Mubarakism for democratic governance to be successful. It is for that reason that Zahi Hawass must resign from his position as Mubarak’s Minister of Antiquities – sooner rather than later.

MARK VALLEN serves as Arts and Culture editor for The Greanville Post. His artworks may be examined at his main site ART FOR CHANGE (http://art-for-a-change.com/)

Filed in: Museums | Mark Vallen | February 22, 2011

Comments are closed.

Did you like this? Share it:
Feb 232011
 

By BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon

Created 02/23/2011  [print_link]

C H I C A G O ‘S  D A L E Y  R E G I M E was a half century orgy of arrogance, racism and plunder. Thanks to President Obama, it not only continues with the succession of Rahm Emanuel to the fifth floor office of Chicago’s mayor, but with nationwide implementation of diastrous policies toward housing, schools, infrastructure and public workers, all pioneered in Chicago.

For 43 of the last 56 years, some guy named Richard Daley has occupied the fifth floor office in Chicago’s City Hall.”

Last month, at the installation of the new White House chief of staff Bill Daley, President Obama declared the man had “public service in his DNA.” What Obama actually meant was that Daley, a lobbyist and JP Morgan Chase [7] exec who helped write NAFTA [8], hailed from the predatory family of wolves that have ruled Chicago for two generations and who helped launch his own career.

For 43 of the last 56 years, some guy named Richard Daley has occupied the fifth floor office in Chicago’s City Hall. And now Barack Obama has enabled the wolvish Daley clan to elect its own successor, Rahm Emanuel.

In the last two decades, Chicago’s property tax levies have been Jim Crowed so that revenue collected in wealthy areas is not shared with poorer ones. When combined with the pervasive residential segregation that is the U.S. norm, the so-called “tax increment financing,” or TIF system pioneered in Chicago, provides an ostensibly color-blind and race-neutral way to achieve this goal, that has been imitated nationwide.

The city’s public assets have been looted, leased and privatized, and its once extensive public transit system shrunken and starved for funds. Aggressive condemnation and demolition of private housing pursued almost exclusively in black areas from the 1960s onward, followed by the eradication of public housing beginning in the 1990s has driven hundreds of thousands of black residents from the city, while keeping rents and housing prices painfully high for those who remain. In 1983 Chicago was more than 42% African American. Now the percentage is under 30%.

Corporate school reform: Made in Chicago

Chicago was the testing ground for neoliberal experiments that handed dozens of schools over to the Gates and Broad Foundations for reckless experiments that crippled the education of thousands of children, and literally cost a few of them their lives [9]. Public schools in some areas were apparently closed to facilitate gentrifying real estate speculators, and hundreds of experienced, qualified black teachers, rooted in the communites they served, were fired. Chicago public schools “CEO” Paul Vallas went on to help wreck public education in Philadelphia, and post-Katrina New Orleans, where he fired all the city’s teachers [10] and closed all the public schools to make it more difficult for poorer, blacker residents to return, and to make the place safe for profitable private charter schools [11] and their contractors.

Paul Vallas, who had never taught a half hour in any classroom, was succeeded as Chicago Public Schools CEO by an equally unqualified Arne Duncan [12], a former pro basketballer who played the occasional game with then state senator Barack Obama. With the support of wealthy foundations, city Hall and the city’s business elite, Duncan ignored mounting public outcry from parents and teachers to ramp up the demolition and privatization of public education. When his basketball buddy became president, Arne Duncan took the policies that wrecked public education in Chicago national as Secretary of Education.

War on Public Workers? Made in Chicago

Chicago, where Democrats have been in power forever, has seen its brand of corporate neoliberalism toward workers in the public sector become bipartisan national policy. Outgoing mayor Richard Daley last year suggested that cities and counties should simply default on their pension obligations [13], to see what happens, and “renegotiate,” while President Obama has also declared war on the wages and benefits of public workers [14].

In Wisconsin, only 50 miles from downtown Chicago, the Republican governor proposes bans on financing unions via dues checkoffs, and automatic decertification elections [15] in every local public employee union, every year. Could such a thing be possible if Democrats like the mayor of Chicago and the president hadn’t already come more than half way in the same direction?

Rearranging the political landscape

In 1983, Chicagoans elected not just the city’s first black mayor, but a genuine leftist reformer, with a powerful grassroots movement behind him in Harold Washington. Sadly, Washington died in his fifth year in office. The e powers that be have aggressively redesigned the city’s political landscape to make the emergence of a similar movement more difficult.

Harold Washington narrowly won a three way Democratic primary election against an Irish incumbent mayor, Jane Byrne, and Richard Daley, with less than 35% of the vote. Since then the city’s elite business and opinion leaders have scrapped partisan primaries for nonpartisan elections, in which the will of poor and disaffected residents can be more easily overridden by the power of big money. Candidates in Chicago used to need valid voter signatures on nominating petitions circulated by enighborhood residents. Laws were changed to let big money candidates import mercenary petition circulators from anywhere, again amplifying the power of big money over local grassroots organizing. And a quarter of the city’s African American population was driven from the city in two decades by the demolition of public housing and the fact that practically nobody built any affordable rental units.

Impotence, Irrelevance of Chicago Black Leadership

What passed for the city’s cohort of black leaders had learned nothing and forgotten plenty since the 1980s. Blinded by narrow nationalism and oblivious of local history or current conditions, they convened a farcical process to select a “consensus black candidate” for mayor. Among much else, they all forgot that Harold Washington (and Carol Moseley Braun in 1992 also) was elected with an overwhelming majority of Chicago’s Latino vote. Lacking the vision, the skill and the will to forge ties in that direction, their efforts were doomed from the start.

In fact, the Daley regime spent two decades feeding and unleashing its own brown Machine, the HDO, or Hispanic Democratic Organization. Mayoral candidate Gerry Chico, who finished second to Rahm Emanuel with a quarter of the vote, is a product of HDO.

The genuine progressive candidate in the mayoral race was former state senator Miguel del Valle, who finished with just under 10% of votes cast [16] in a lackluster 40% turnout. Del Valle was overwhelmed by the power of big money, which monopolized access to media, and the fragmentation of black and Latino Chicago, the destruction of most grassroots organized infrastructure, and the sheer weight of what Chicagoans call “the Machine.”

Chicago’s Daley regime was a half century circus of arrogance, racist inequality and corruption. Thanks in part to President Obama, whom Daley launched toward the White House, the Machine has been allowed to succeed itself in the person of Rahm Emanuel. Chicago’s new boss will look and act a lot like its old bosses. Chicago’s near term future, too, looks a lot like its past, but with fewer resources left to steal and privatize.

But that’s OK. The Daley Machine has cloned itself, donned blackface, and gone national. May the gods help us all.

BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon is a native Chicagoan who now lives in exile near Atlanta GA. He is on the state committee of the Georgia Green Party, and can be reached at bruce.dixon@blackagendareport.com.

 [17]

Source URL: http://blackagendareport.com/content/rahm-emanuel-barack-obama-neo-liberalism-are-daleys-gifts-chicago-and-nation-thanks

Links:
[1] http://blackagendareport.com/category/education-public-education/public-education
[2] http://blackagendareport.com/category/african-america/black-misleadership-class
[3] http://blackagendareport.com/category/life-america/chicago
[4] http://blackagendareport.com/category/us-politics/democrats
[5] http://blackagendareport.com/category/political-economy/privatization
[6] http://blackagendareport.com/sites/www.blackagendareport.com/files/rahm_obama_daley_machine.jpg
[7] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/10/william-daley-jp-morgan-stock_n_807161.html
[8] http://www.counterpunch.org/clinton03082008.html
[9] http://www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=914
[10] http://www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=362
[11] http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=219×22966
[12] http://www.blackagendareport.com/category/us-politics/arne-duncan
[13] http://dailycensored.com/2010/12/15/chicago’s-mayor-daley-says-let-pension-funds-go-bankrupt-communities-are-failing-across-america/
[14] http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/clinton-obama-and-collapse-black-economic-stability
[15] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/22/AR2011022207620.html
[16] http://www.chicagoelections.com/dm/general/SummaryReport.pdf
[17] http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Frahm-emanuel-barack-obama-neo-liberalism-are-daleys-gifts-chicago-and-nation-thanks&linkname=Rahm%20Emanuel%2C%20Barack%20Obama%20%26%20Neo-Liberalism%20are%20the%20Daleys%27%20Gifts%20to%20Chicago%20and%20the%20Nation.%20%20Thanks.

Did you like this? Share it:
Feb 232011
 

The treason of the media has been evident for generations…but what else could we expect from such vital resources being owned by the plutocracy, the chief originators of society’s problems? And media maggots like Joe Klein and Tom Friedman are always in plentiful supply. 

Editor’s Note: As seen in this important story by editor Lendman, the media always play a huge role in the outcome of social struggles. That’s why developing our own media is critical to the survival of democracy in America (remnants, actually). The left’s tardy realization of this simple reality conceded a major strategic resource to the Right. As long as there’s no countervailing power to neutralize their message, the corporate media will go on:

• Disregarding all important stories, or upend their meaning (present people or institutions that fight for the public interests as villains or pariahs pursuing antisocial ends. This naturally includes unions.)

• Squandering precious media time on idiotic stories socially irrelevant to the lives of people, the more idiotic the better. 

• Presenting enemies of the public interest or democracy as heroes or champions of society (i.e., Reagan), or treat their actions and words reverentially and with kid gloves. The latter of course includes top politicians, business tycoons, etc. 

• Instead of explaining the actual roots of a problem, the real job of a journalist, trotting out the supposedly two opposing views of an issue and let people figure out the truth, all this in the name of fairness and “objectivity”.

Many other unwritten rules of corporate media behavior could be added to this short list, all perfectly logical considering the nature of their ownership. The corporate media are toxic to society, no better than state controlled media, and the American media are probably the world’s worst as befits a nation where hypocrisy and the art of deception have reached unparalleled heights. 

Wisconsin: Ground Zero to Save Public Worker Rights

By Stephen Lendman

 [print_link]

Ronald Reagan was right saying: 

“Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem.” 

His type governance, that is, and from administrations that followed, Democrats as ruthless as Republicans.

For decades, bipartisan consensus [has] governed lawlessly, waging imperial wars, trashing human rights and civil liberty protections, unabashedly backing monied interests, letting them loot the federal treasury, fleecing working Americans, and targeting organized labor for destruction.

Washington is ground zero for government’s assault. Outside the beltway, it’s Wisconsin, but spreading fast to other states and cities. An unfair fight pits major media-supported federal, state and local governments allied with union bosses against American workers, largely on their own, relying on their grit and resourcefulness to survive in a very hostile environment. 

Threatened are hard-won worker rights, including secure jobs, a living wage, essential benefits, and the right to bargain collectively with management to protect them. They’re going, going, and soon gone unless mass grassroots activism saves them, what’s so far absent. Wisconsin worker heroics are impressive, but not enough.

Much more is needed  – there and across America, because workers in all states and communities are threatened, their rights being trashed and have been for decades, especially since the Carter administration drafted plans Reagan implemented:

Firing over 11,000 PATCO workers, jailing its leaders, fining the union millions of dollars, and effectively busting it for monied interests. It was a shot across organized labor’s bow, a clear message to Wall Street and other corporate favorites – supported by then AFL-CIO president Lane Kirkland, one of many labor bosses who betrayed rank and file trust. They still do for their own self-interest. No wonder organized labor is a shadow of its former self, headed for extinction unless stopped.

Reagan’s administration set the pattern. Union bosses conspired with management against their own membership. During bitter coal miner, steel worker, bus driver, airline worker, copper miner, auto worker, and meatpacking worker strikes, they denied rank and file support, assuring them defeat. At decade’s end, trade unionism in America was decimated and kept declining since, heading for oblivion with little pressure to stop it.

Obama’s war on labor shows he matches Republican harshness. He abandoned US auto workers for management forcing:

• plant closures;

• jobs shipped abroad;

• permanent ones lost;

• lower wages;

• gutted work rules, including on-the-job health and safety protections; and

• forfeited security through lost benefits and pensions, including for retirees, besides everything lost in 2007 under Bush.

Obama also abandoned the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) after promising support. If enacted, it would have been labor’s most impressive triumph since passage of the landmark 1935 Wagner Act, letting labor bargain collectively for the first time with management on even terms. 

It would have mandated good faith bargaining as a fundamental right, protected from management or government interference. 

It also would have strengthened Wagner Act provisions to unionize, bargain collectively through chosen representatives, and provide other worker protections. It would have leveled the playing field to empower them more than since Taft-Hartley weakened them significantly. 

It would have affirmed the 1937 Supreme Court Virginia Railway Co. v. Railway Employees decision that “employees (have) the right to organize and bargain collectively through a representative of their own selection, doing away with company interference and ‘company union.’ “

Also, the Courts 1937 National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation ruling that J & L engaged in unfair labor practices by “discriminating against members of the union with regard to hire and tenure of employment, and was coercing and intimidating its employees in order to interfere with their self-organization.” It said union representation “was essential (to) give laborers opportunity to deal (equally) with their employer,” public workers afforded the same rights as private ones.

No longer. We’ve come a long way from New Deal policies and fair Justices. Today’s Democrats, Republicans, and courts are supremely pro-business, especially the Roberts Court, selected to be anti-labor, in the tank for monied interests, and it shows.

Big Media Bashes Labor

On February 17, Media Matters headlined, “Right-Wing Media Freak Out Over Union Protests,” quoting Fox News hosts and guests saying:

Glenn Beck calls union protests “riots” and “uprisings,” adding that “Evil (is) spreading around the globe;”

• Hard-right commentator Michelle Malkin said protesters “stormed” the Capitol, using students as “kiddie human shields….sacrificial lambs,” also calling demonstrators “union thugs;”

• Republican strategist Kate Obenshain told Sean Hannity: “We see something that’s going on, say, in Wisconsin, where they have the rallies for the teachers, where teachers are yanking kids out of the classrooms and calling in sick – totally lying…;” and

• Fox’s Tracy Byrnes called Wisconsin protests “actually, borderline gonna get violent, it sounds like” when, in fact, they’ve been remarkably peaceful unlike how extremist right-wingers agitate.

CNN is just as bad, competing with Fox for bottom-of-the-barrel honors, but nothing on corporate TV or radio has merit. Nor in print; to wit, Time magazine’s Joe Klein (left) in his February 18 article headlined, “Wisconsin: The Hemlock Revolution,” saying:

In the Middle East, “protesters are marching for democracy; in the middle west, they’re protesting against it….trying to prevent a vote….(trying) to stymie majority rule….”

Republicans won, said Klein. “In a democracy, there are consequences to elections and no one, not even the public employees union, are exempt from that.” Even labor contacts aren’t sacrosanct he believes. “We hold elections to decide” those things. “And it seems to me that Governor Scott Walker’s basic requests are modest ones….”

If Time prints this anti-labor screed and similar op-eds, why should Fox surprise? America’s entire corporate establishment, including big media, is united against labor rights, targeting them for destruction.

Even the New York Times opposes closed schools and public services blocked for any reason, no matter how important doing it is to force change, what’s never possible without it and much more. Timidity yields nothing but tears.

Like other Wall Street Journal writers and its editorial staff, Steven Malanga is no friend of labor, his February 22 WSJ article headlined, “The Showdown Over Public Union Power,” saying:

“Public unions (are) among the biggest players in national politics,” contributing millions compared to billions from corporate donors way out-muscling them. “If Gov. Walker succeeds….other reformers will follow (to) restrict public-sector” union power. It “would give opponents around the country a new playbook to follow in countering the rich resources and deep influence of public unions over taxes and spending.”

No wonder observers call WJS opinion writers the print version of Fox News, both Murdoch owned, his editorial policy rigorously enforced.

In spring 2009, the corporate media enthusiastically embraced Obama’s assault on auto worker rights for decent jobs, a living wage and essential benefits, including pensions. The New York Times took the lead, supporting General Motors’ “government-backed bankruptcy process,” saying it would let GM “discard (its) liabilities and unwanted assets and produce a profitable, albeit smaller, car company,” with thousands fewer employees. 

The Financial Times agreed, listing preferred “liabilities” to be shed, including “legacy” ones, meaning pensions and healthcare benefits. The Washington Post said it’s “important that the president did not flinch in demanding even deeper concessions from workers.” The Wall Street Journal said it was “glad the Administration is at least talking a tougher line on bankruptcy than Mr. Bush (to) force the companies and their unions to make the hard decisions that politics may still let them avoid.”

The unanimity of corporate managed news offered support then and now against worker rights they disdain, and why not. They’re giants with large workforces they want without rights, beyond minimal ones too little to matter.

On August 20, 1999, New York Times writer Tom Friedman headlined, “Foreign Affairs; An American in Paris,” saying:

“The most important thing (Ronald) Reagan did was break the 1981 air traffic controllers’ strike, which helped break the hold of organized labor over the US economy.” Crushing workers gave US corporations greater flexibility to invest in new labor-saving equipment, technology and methods to cut staff, pay less, and achieve great cost savings, said Friedman. He practically gloated about the collapse of labor rights, weaker now after a decade under Bush and Obama.

More recently on May 8, 2010, Friedman headlined, “Root Canal Politics,” denouncing workers for believing in the “tooth fairy,” expecting government services without paying for them. Baby boomers, he said, had “eaten through all that abundance like hungry locusts.” After getting their way for decades, “it’s now going to be, mostly, about taking things away. Goodbye Tooth Fairy politics, hello Root Canal politics.” He barely concealed joy, crowing over worker pain like all pro-business columnists, even ones claiming progressive credentials.

On February 21, The Times featured commentaries from anti-union advocates like Professor Daniel DiSalvo headlining, “Hitting the Unions Where It Hurts,” saying:

Walker wants “to dismantle (the) dysfunctional, circular relationship between unionized government employees, the politicians they help elect, and the rising wages and benefits to which they commit government.” In fact, wages have stagnated for over three decades, and essential benefits have eroded. 

Nonetheless, DiSalvo took sides, saying, “If successful, Walker’s plan may (make) Wisconsin (more) like Texas or Virginia (where) most collective bargaining in the public sector is illegal and the percentage of unionized public employees is paltry.” He hopes Wisconsin “will have as bright a fiscal outlook” as those states, affording workers there few or no rights.

Christian Schneider also got space headlining, “Fiscally Modest, Politically Bold,” saying:

Walker only asks workers to “accept modest changes to their benefits, or face losing their jobs.” False, layoffs are coming and without collective bargaining power no job or essential benefit is safe. “Public employee unions will continue to protest,” said Schneider, “even though (Walker) is the first politician who has told them the truth in ages.” In fact, Obama backs the same policies, enforcing them since taking office.

Even the hard-right Heritage Foundation got space, James Sherk headlining “FDR Warned Us,” saying:

“Government workers….don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax money.” In fact, like private sector ones, they deserve similar rights. Moreover, unlike corporate predators, they earn, not steal what they get, what Sherk noticeably side-stepped. Instead, he hailed Walker’s plan, saying it “reasserts voter control over government policy,” perhaps forgetting public workers also vote and deserve officials treating them equitably.

A Final Comment

Mass protests in Wisconsin continue. Tuesday was day eight. Involved are over 200,000 state workers and supporters, including students and teachers. Key is preserving collective bargaining rights without which no others are safe. Neither side so far is budging, Walker ordered by Republican leaders to hold fast. Other states are watching, governors there to grab all Walker gets, or more like in Ohio where Governor Kasich’s bill is even more draconian.

Though major demonstrations continue, the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC), representing 98,000 teachers, told its members to return to work. Other unions also expect the bill’s passage, perhaps before week’s end. So far, absent Democrat senators remain secluded in neighboring Illinois, denying Republicans a quorum. They continue being hardline. Sooner or later expect Democrats to concede. When they return, Walker can declare victory.

Nonetheless, rank and file opposition remains strong, including among teachers, students and supporters traveling long distances to march and protest in Madison. The University of Wisconsin-Madison Teaching Assistants Association (TAA) called for a “teach-out,” replacing a walkout saying, “We are calling for instructors to use their discretion to cancel classes, reschedule them or hold them off campus.”

Demonstrations around the country support them from Maryland and New Hampshire to Nevada and Olympia, Washington, knowing workers there can expect their own moment of truth. It’s spreading everywhere, pitting bought-and-paid-for-pols allied with union bosses against working Americans. They’re fighting for hard-won rights fast eroding toward elimination unless mass activism draws the line and holds it, no matter what. Their choice now is fight or lose. There’s no middle ground against forces unwilling to yield.

Senior Contributing Editor Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Did you like this? Share it: