Things to consider—

Since early 2011, Obama's been waging proxy war on Syria. Imported death squads masquerade as freedom fighters. The scheme's familiar. It repeats. It reflects US imperialism's dark side. In the 1980s, CIA-recruited mujahideen fighters battled Afghanistan's Soviet occupiers. Ronald Reagan called them "the moral equivalent of our founding fathers." He characterized Contra killers the same way. —Stephen LendmanFor over a century now US ambassadors have acted as fifth columns in the nations they are embedded in, their role chiefly to foster corporate and plutocratic power and coordinate machinations against any truly pro-democratic government.•••••"The dead end identity politics of SF Pride, which sells out a peace hero like Bradley Manning to curry favor with the American ruling class, is what I had in mind. The empire loves your tameness, irrelevance and cowardice, SF Pride. You don’t bother the American ruling class — a five foot two, 105 pound soldier does because he has a conscience and because he didn’t make comfort the guiding principle of his life...." —Randy Shields

Taking liberties

 CLASS STRUGGLE  Comments Off
May 022011
 

The royal wedding will bolster the monarchy’s popularity once again. But after the bunting is put away, the powers of the institution still need a thorough examination

Prince Charles: the presumptive heir to the throne.

One of the very first things Eric Pickles did on his arrival at Eland House, the headquarters of the department for communities and local government, was not to draw up a list of charities he wanted to drive out of business. No, it was to insist that pictures of Her Majesty the Queen were affixed to the office walls. As an ardent royalist, he views himself as a minister of the crown, serving in a cabinet which is, in effect, a sub-committee of the Queen’s privy council. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 022011
 

The Anti-Empire Report

May 2nd, 2011
by William Blum
www.killinghope.org

Incredibly, things were much better under Saddam.

Iraq: Let us not forget what “humanitarian intervention” looks like.

Libya: Let us not be confused as to why Libya alone has been singled out for “humanitarian intervention”.

On April 9, Condoleezza Rice delivered a talk in San Francisco. Or tried to. The former Secretary of State was interrupted repeatedly by cries from the audience of “war criminal” and “torturer”. (For which we can thank our comrades in Code Pink and World Can’t Wait.) As one of the protesters was being taken away by security guards, Rice made the kind of statement that has now become standard for high American officials under such circumstances: “Aren’t you glad this lady lives in a democracy where she can express her opinion?” She also threw in another line that’s become de rigueur since the US overthrew Saddam Hussein, an argument that’s used when all other arguments fail: “The children of Iraq are actually not living under Saddam Hussein, thank God.” 1 Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 022011
 

Patrick Martin and Alex Lantier | 2 May 2011

Obama's approval is likely to bounce upon the death of "America's" arch-enemy. Apparently, not even a Harvard law professor remembers that there is such a thing as an international court of law for all putative criminals.

President Barack Obama announced Sunday that US special forces had killed Osama bin Laden, the long-time leader of Al Qaeda, in a raid on a residence in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

Obama issued the statement after 11.30 p.m. Eastern time in the United States, more than an hour after the major media news networks announced that he would be making within minutes a major statement relating to national security.  Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 022011
 

Osama bin Laden

Editor’s Note: We publish this piece because we approve of the author’s revulsion at the crass jingoistic celebrations supposedly cropping up all over America upon the death of Osama bin Laden. The death of a human being is no cause for crass celebration. We note, however, that if really dead, (a) it’s not proven that Osama died as officially declared, and (b) that his guilt for 9/11 is similarly not fully established. Many people around the world doubt in good faith that Osama and his band of suicide attackers was really behind the tragic events of 9/11. That Osama did hate the US, there’s little doubt. He also hated the Russians, and for similar reasons. bin Laden hated any and all civilizations that would defile his idealized Islamic world.  Inasmuch as he hated what he justly regarded as “occupiers” of his world, he was more morally in the right than our government, by any measure a brutal invader. Indeed, with the US leading the pack of criminal meddlers in the Middle East and Central Asia, he found the ultimate antagonist. But all of that fails to prove that he was in fact the chief cause of 9/11.  Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 022011
 

BY GLENN GREENWALD |  THURSDAY, APR 28, 2011 09:29 ET

Gen. David Petraeus

The first four Directors of the CIA (from 1947-1953) were military officers, but since then, there has been a tradition (generally though imperfectly observed) of keeping the agency under civilian rather than military leadership. That’s why George Bush’s 2006 nomination of Gen. Michael Hayden to the CIA provoked so many objections from Democrats (and even some Republicans).

The Hayden nomination triggered this comment from the current Democratic Chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Dianne Feinstein: “You can’t have the military control most of the major aspects of intelligence. The CIA is a civilian agency and is meant to be a civilian agency.” The then-top Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman, said “she hears concerns from civilian CIA professionals about whether the Defense Department is taking over intelligence operations” and “shares those concerns.” Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it: