Things to consider—

Since early 2011, Obama's been waging proxy war on Syria. Imported death squads masquerade as freedom fighters. The scheme's familiar. It repeats. It reflects US imperialism's dark side. In the 1980s, CIA-recruited mujahideen fighters battled Afghanistan's Soviet occupiers. Ronald Reagan called them "the moral equivalent of our founding fathers." He characterized Contra killers the same way. —Stephen LendmanFor over a century now US ambassadors have acted as fifth columns in the nations they are embedded in, their role chiefly to foster corporate and plutocratic power and coordinate machinations against any truly pro-democratic government.•••••"The dead end identity politics of SF Pride, which sells out a peace hero like Bradley Manning to curry favor with the American ruling class, is what I had in mind. The empire loves your tameness, irrelevance and cowardice, SF Pride. You don’t bother the American ruling class — a five foot two, 105 pound soldier does because he has a conscience and because he didn’t make comfort the guiding principle of his life...." —Randy Shields
May 302011
 

By Edward S. Herman

As usual, Herman underscores, the mainstream media play a vital and—let’s say it—utterly evil role in fanning out and propping up the counter-revolution. It’s quite obvious that the countless overpaid mediocrities that populate the corporate media never read these analyses, and should they stumble upon one (unlikely, given their superficiality) they will swiftly dismiss it as a mere “leftist rant”. In that manner, day after day bourgeois ideology and careerism win the day, as the “white picket fence” is placed above any other personal priority or goal. But whether these people know it or not, they’re fully complicit in truly horrific crimes, and some day some accounting will be necessary.—Eds.

Edward S. Herman

We are in the midst of a counterrevolution and intensifying class war, one that proceeds in fits and starts but is today advancing impressively. What makes its present efflorescence so striking is that it is taking place under the presidency of Barack Obama,  a man elected in good measure by an aroused mass base, that is now taking its lumps. The power structure no longer permits serious attention to the welfare of that mass base. The great upward redistribution of income, the increased importance of money in elections, the centralization of  corporate and media control and the media’s rightward drift, globalization, outsourcing,  the weakening of organized labor, and the permanent war system, have all combined to effectively eliminate a “populist” option in politics. The Democrats invariably betray their voting base, but not their investor base. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 302011
 

ARCHIVES: Materials you should have read, watched or listened to the first time around, but didn’t.

By Edward S. Herman. Edited by Emily Schwartz Greco, March 19, 2009

This is part of a strategic dialogue on Yugoslavia. See John Feffer’s opposing argument here, and their respective responses here.

The successful demonization of the Serbs, making them largely responsible for the Yugoslav wars, and as unique and genocidal killers, was one of the great propaganda triumphs of our era. It was done so quickly, with such uniformity and uncritical zeal in the mainstream Western media, that disinformation had (and still has, after almost two decades) a field day.

The demonization flowed from the gullibility of Western interests and media (and intellectuals). With Yugoslavia no longer useful as an ally after the fall of the Soviet Union, and actually an obstacle as an independent state with a still social democratic bent, the NATO powers aimed at its dismantlement, and they actively supported the secession of Slovenia, Croatia, the Bosnian Muslims, and the Kosovo Albanians. That these were driven away by Serb actions and threats is untrue: they had their own nationalistic and economic motives for exit, stronger than those of the Serbs. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 302011
 
Antiwar.com |   May 27, 2008
David R. Henderson

The media, including the pseudoleft media, like the HuffPo, not to mention Obama, all pay obeisance to the "nation's heroes" on dates like Memorial Day, without ever mentioning the fact that most wars are waged to protect and expand the interests of a puny minority.

Yes, there is a debate. On one side are those who say that the purpose of Memorial Day is, or should be, to honor soldiers who have fought, or are fighting, for our freedom. This is the view we hear a lot on and around Memorial Day. We hear it from presidents, governors, congressmen, mayors, military officers, and military analysts. On the other side are those who say that the purpose of Memorial Day is to mourn those who lost their lives in wars and to reflect on how to prevent this from happening in the future. We hear this view from antiwar activists and those who, more generally, are fairly skeptical of governments’ motives and actions.

I would love not to have such a debate. And that’s why I waited. There are a lot of people in the United States whose relatives or friends died or were wounded in foreign wars. It must be hard for them to hear or read armchair analysts like me talking about the “real meaning” of Memorial Day. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 302011
 

The scripted presidency marches on.

By Patrick Martin, WSWS.ORG | 30 May 2011

Obama comforts a Joplin survivor. A gifted artist of the photo-op, he's a natural for this type of exhibition.

President Obama’s visit to Joplin, Missouri Sunday was his third tour in a month at the site of a monumental natural disaster. He visited Tuscaloosa, Alabama April 29 after a spate of tornadoes struck across the South, then spoke with victims of the Mississippi River flooding in Memphis, Tennessee May 16.

The appearances follow what is now an established ritual. The president arrives and is shown scenes of devastation by local dignitaries. He shakes hands with disaster relief workers and hugs survivors. He then speaks before a local audience assembled for the purpose, usually invoking religious consolation and promising federal aid.  Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 302011
 

More manure from the nation’s leading demagog.

By Stephen Lendman

Promising change after eight Republican dominated years, Obama betrayed the public trust by special favors given business at the expense of essential growing needs.

Spurning them, in fact, he shows contempt for the things he rhetorically supports, proving he’s no different from the worst of the bipartisan criminal class, serving wealth and power interests only.  Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
May 302011
 

By Digby, Hullabaloo
Posted on  May 30, 2011

Roger Aisles

If you only have time to read one thing this week-end, this is the piece: How Roger Ailes Built the Fox News Fear Factory. In the fable Ailes tells about his own life, he made a clean break with his dirty political past long before 1996, when he joined forces with Murdoch to launch Fox News. “I quit politics,” he has claimed, “because I hated it.” But an examination of his career reveals that Ailes has used Fox News to pioneer a new form of political campaign – one that enables the GOP to bypass skeptical reporters and wage an around-the-clock, partisan assault on public opinion. The network, at its core, is a giant soundstage created to mimic the look and feel of a news operation, cleverly camouflaging political propaganda as independent journalism.   Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it: