America’s Rapacious Aristocracy and WW3

horiz grey line
horiz grey line

The disenchanted Reagan Administration official and much-honored economist and political scientist, Paul Craig Roberts, headlined on April 27th, “Washington Plans to Nuke Russia and China” and stated an impressive case that this radical conclusion is realistic, no mere alarmism. Roberts even said in it that “Russia and China cannot simply sit there and await America’s preemptive nuclear strike,” which is an extremely bold and even courageous thing to assert in a country that the rest of the world labels as being overwhelmingly “the greatest threat to peace in the world today” (and this U.S.-government-sponsored global poll was taken only once, in 2013, and because of its finding was never repeated, nor was it mentioned in the government-controlled media).

.
Dr. Roberts employed his trademark unflinchingly unambiguous style to state that, “The US military/security complex has clearly prevailed over Trump’s intention to normalize relations between the US and Russia, and anti-Russian venom continues to pour out of NATO and Washington’s European vassal states. The majority of the American people seem to have accepted the propaganda that Russia is the number one threat to the United States. With propaganda controlling the explanation, Washington’s aggressive actions are explained as defense against a threat and not as a policy that will end life on earth.”
.

But how can this possibly be true, given that a war between the U.S. and Russia would ultimately release 15,000 nuclear warheads before the ‘winner’ would even be able to contemplate what he had ‘won’, and the ‘winner’ would almost certainly die from radiation sickness within, at most, a decade, if not from starvation or illnesses or injuries produced by the nuclear-destroyed planet, occurring within even less time than that? We’ll get to that question; he has an answer to it.


The majority of the American people seem to have accepted the propaganda that Russia is the number one threat to the United States. With propaganda controlling the explanation, Washington’s aggressive actions are explained as defense against a threat and not as a policy that will end life on earth.


Roberts focused mainly upon summarizing today’s news and recent historical events, rather than on hypothesizing an explanation for them, but he did note that, “The neoconservative claim of American exceptionalism is the identical claim made for Germans by Hitler,” and he blamed “the insanity that is Washington” and basically argued that yesterday’s Nazis are today’s Americans: America is today’s champion of invasions. Hitler was arrogant and reckless; so is today’s U.S. regime. The facts support Roberts’s view that the analogy holds.
.
Whereas Hitler ceaselessly repeated his countrymen’s “Deutschland über alles” (meaning that Germany was the world’s most important country), Obama repeated his countrymen’s calling America “the one indispensable nation,” such as on 28 May 2014, when he told graduating cadets at West Point Military Academy:
.
From Europe to Asia, we are the hub of alliances unrivaled in the history of nations. America continues to attract striving immigrants. The values of our founding inspire leaders in parliaments and new movements in public squares around the globe. And when a typhoon hits the Philippines, or schoolgirls are kidnapped in Nigeria, or masked men occupy a building in Ukraine, it is America that the world looks to for help. (Applause.) So the United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come.
.
But the world is changing with accelerating speed. This presents opportunity, but also new dangers. We know all too well, after 9/11, just how technology and globalization has put power once reserved for states in the hands of individuals, raising the capacity of terrorists to do harm. Russia’s aggression toward former Soviet states unnerves capitals in Europe, while China’s economic rise and military reach worries its neighbors. From Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums.
.
Not only does the U.S. aristocracy, which recent U.S. Presidents have actually been representing (no longer the public), view this country to be the only nation that’s “indispensable” (and all others thus as being “dispensable”), but America’s soldiers, whom the American public fund through paying taxes, are being instructed by this agent for the U.S. aristocracy, to view themselves as being agents, themselves, for the global dominance of U.S. international corporations, over those headquartered in any economic upstart countries, such as Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — the BRICS nations, which Obama was thereby casting as being not only an economic threat, but the enemy nations that these cadets are bound by their future career as U.S. military leaders to subdue or else to conquer.
.
What America’s aristocrats, the individuals who control the U.S.-headquartered international corporations, are more concerned about than anything else, is dominating the world. This motivation is consistent with the empirical findings in Social Psychology and Personality Psychology, that the richer a person is, the more psychopathic he/she tends to be. If you’re a billionaire, then getting tax-write-offs and university buildings named after you for ‘philanthropy’ will be fine, but your real obsession will be to win, to dominate everything — by hook or by crook, and no matter what, but this is for real, it is none of the mythology. It’s no different in today’s America than it was in Nazi Germany.
.
Roberts’s reference to “Washington’s European vassal states” is too narrow, however, because Japan, Australia, and many other nations outside of Europe, are likewise run by aristocracies that are vassals of the U.S. aristocracy. It’s an international gangland operation, and the local aristocracy has adjudged that its best chances for being with the winner will be for their country to buy U.S. weaponry and otherwise to be allied with the U.S. gang. But worldwide, there are fewer than 3,000 billionaires; so, any of them whose main concern isn’t merely to be, or to be with, ‘the winner’, could probably organize any other such dissenters to resist the present escalating trend toward nuclear annihilation — unless there are no such dissenters among them, such as currently seems to be the case. Any of them who controls a major news-medium could have an impact, if such a person is not first declared to have died from ‘an unfortunate accident’.

About the author

EricZuesseInvestigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

 


Appendix



Why contributing to the Greanville Post is urgent and makes sense.

CLICK ON THIS BAR AND FIND OUT





DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER NOTE. CLICK HERE.


horiz-long grey

uza2-zombienationWhat will it take to bring America to live according to its own self image?


black-horizontal[huge_it_share]

If YOU don't share this, who will? Break the system's disinformation machine. Share!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

2 thoughts on “America’s Rapacious Aristocracy and WW3

  1. It is useless to compare the US to Nazi Germany because what is happening in the US is a  further pattern of applying
    a corporate model of society to the nation as a whole. Trump is but the penultimate phenomenon of big business interests overriding all public ones, which is a normal progression of capitalist patterns. Corporations are by their nature hostile to democratic rules and implant this on the US government by the constant interplay between the US government and large enterprises through interchange of personnel.

    What we see is the imposition of a corporate pattern on the government whereby power gets to be concentrated more and more in the top. The public is simply the rank and file employees of a system that is by itself anti-democratic and by which the usual miscreants profit. Because it offers participation in exploiting the mass of the less powerful, it becomes a popular method exported to many areas of the globe and spreads like a new technology in every nook and cranny of the developing areas as well.  It is therefore a far more dangerous modus operandi than Social Nationalism which can only profit from the discontent of the ruled masses and is restricted to a nationalist theory. Fascism is defined as the exercise of a strong centralized authority which uses racist and authoritarian tendencies in the populace to bind it in a centripetal form of government.

    This is not entirely the case with the US and I therefore would propose a term like Corporatism rather than Fascism as the present structure. Because it lacks any kind of emotional cathexis in its application, it is comparable to the predictions of writers like Kafka and Orwell. The future in other words as a complete machine works without much of a humanist input. That is what destroys the world because it has no consciousness of consequences nor recognizes any empathy. It is the triumph of materialism which leaves little room for resistance and though Marxism and other means towards liberation provide the theoretical basis for change, the chances for it remain shadowy exactly because of the restricted mechanical rationale for solving life’s problems as inculcated in the schools. Instead of teaching how to reason and how to think clearly, schools impress on their victims a rote learning of practical thinking which is now even the Gestalt of radical resisters in contrast to the freewheeling imagination prevalent in the 1960’s anti-bourgeois children’s rebellion. It is the creeping phenomenon of the closure of human minds that predicts an abyss.    
       

  2. PS

    Mechanical thinking is rote thinking and it invades all political discourse. Rote thinking is much divorced from reality. The repeated clichéd and personalized accusations against Trump do nothing to clarify the noxious laws he strengthens nor the ongoing march of the above mentioned Corporatism that he promotes. On the contrary it facilitates the neglect of knowledge about what is being instituted.

    Rote thinkers never change their judgment because the basic premises are set, much like the Church teachings are dressed so now and then in more “humane” garb while underneath with some smart probing it is clear that the usual preconceptions stay in place. Thus is the case in much of radical thought and consequently it fully serves in fact to keep corporatist Capitalism intact. A deconstruction of traditional political resistance is sorely needed to rid people’s minds of the usual shibboleths and obstacles of clear realist thinking. The references to former social structures like National Socialism are useless and unproductive because those abnormalities are redundant
    and we face the far more insidious problem of technocratic rule. That is the hand maiden and facilitator for the political and economic power blocks, which allow them to control and direct popular opinion by impoverishing rational thinking. Each improvement in medicine seems to be accompanied by an advance in weaponry so that we can destroy more effectively what medicine could heal and prevent. 

    The problem is really not that the US appears to be the last empire but that it is the gatekeeper for redundant mechanical thinking and reactionary actions, while the world tries to move on. Humans respond to adversity and it may well be that it will soon become the only remedy available for this nation to bring about a realization of its lack of contemporaneity and that goes for all its social factions.  
       
       

Comments are closed.