Things to consider—

Since early 2011, Obama's been waging proxy war on Syria. Imported death squads masquerade as freedom fighters. The scheme's familiar. It repeats. It reflects US imperialism's dark side. In the 1980s, CIA-recruited mujahideen fighters battled Afghanistan's Soviet occupiers. Ronald Reagan called them "the moral equivalent of our founding fathers." He characterized Contra killers the same way. —Stephen LendmanFor over a century now US ambassadors have acted as fifth columns in the nations they are embedded in, their role chiefly to foster corporate and plutocratic power and coordinate machinations against any truly pro-democratic government.•••••"The dead end identity politics of SF Pride, which sells out a peace hero like Bradley Manning to curry favor with the American ruling class, is what I had in mind. The empire loves your tameness, irrelevance and cowardice, SF Pride. You don’t bother the American ruling class — a five foot two, 105 pound soldier does because he has a conscience and because he didn’t make comfort the guiding principle of his life...." —Randy Shields
Jul 242012
 
PrintFriendly and PDF

By Ruth Eisenbud
The struggle to expand ethical boundaries:
Is overwhelming force capable of creating a valid moral argument?

The debate on vivisection is one of the thorniest because it cuts so deep into our desire to be protected from dreadful diseases, not to mention that people, in general, have been conditioned to respect “medical science” as pretty much incontrovertible. That’s why so many ethicists, while objecting to hunting, meat-eating or fur coats give animal lab experiments a pass. It’s hot water, and they want no part of it.

In this article, Ruth Eisenbud takes us to the philosophical origins of our dominionist attitudes in the Judeo Christian tradition, comparing them with non-dominionist religions, such as Jainism, the most compassionate faith of all. She also explores the notion that desensitization to violence, acquired in the animal labs, may have played a role in James Holmes mental makeup. It’s conjecture, but worthy of a hearing.

Have we lost all sense of compassion in the name of pragmatism and expediency?

By Ruth Eisenbud

“Witnesses said a man wearing a gas mask opened fire after tossing a tear gas canister in the auditorium as movie-goers watched The Dark Knight Rises. A 24-year-old former neuroscience student was arrested in a car park outside the theatre in Aurora city.”  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18921492 Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
 Posted by at 3:51 pm
Jul 012012
 
PrintFriendly and PDF

Why the ObamaCare Ruling Stinks
by DAVE LINDORFF

Looking on the bright side, the Supreme Court has ruled that something that President Obama has done is definitively not unconstitutional.

That’s probably the best that can be said of the 5-4 decision by the High Court today in upholding the ironically named Affordable Health Care Act. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
 Posted by at 11:04 pm
Jun 272012
 
PrintFriendly and PDF

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig

The nutty thing about the health care debate that will play a prominent role in the next election is that most Americans want pretty much the same outcome: to control costs without sacrificing quality. And that’s not what either major-party candidate is offering. Few think that Obamacare, a Romneycare descendant that contains the same kind of individual mandate the then-governor of Massachusetts signed into law, will get us to that desired goal. Nor would Mitt Romney, who has been reborn as a celebrant of the old, pre-Obama system with a few nips and tucks. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
 Posted by at 2:56 pm
May 212012
 
PrintFriendly and PDF

By Paul Craig Roberts

While we think Obama's healthcare reforms are a betrayal of the public interest, and deserve to be scrapped to start anew with a clean slate, this absolutely deranged view of the program by tooconservative.com (a Northern Virginia Republican pod) is sheer and absolute nonsense. Leave it to the rightwing to turn reality upside down.

Growing up in the post-war era (after the Second World War), I never expected to live in the strange Kafkaesque world that exists today. The US government can assassinate any US citizen that the executive branch thinks could possibly be a “threat” to the US government, or throw the hapless citizen into a dungeon for the rest of his or her life without presenting any evidence to a court or obtaining a conviction of any crime, or send the “threat” to a puppet foreign state to be tortured until the “threat” confesses to a crime that never occurred or dies at the hands of “freedom and democracy” while professing innocence. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
 Posted by at 8:34 pm
Mar 262012
 
PrintFriendly and PDF

By Stephen Lendman


Ralph Nader was right in calling Obamacare a sellout to Big PhAMA and other healthcare giants.
.
Last November, the Supreme Court agreed to hear challenge arguments against Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) – aka Obamacare.   From March 26 – 28, oral arguments on PPACA’s constitutionality will be heard, especially certain provisions. A decision is expected by June.

Contentious issues include:

• mandating all adults have health insurance or be taxed to compensate;
• PPACA’s Medicaid expansion provisions; and

• whether the Anti-Injunction Act bars courts from reviewing the individual mandate until it’s effective in January 2014;

• “severability” also is also at issue: namely, whether one issue can be struck down while leaving others intact. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
 Posted by at 12:16 pm
Jan 272012
 
PrintFriendly and PDF

Well Duh! We needed a study to tell us that, especially when the media follows the Redumblican debates?

 

By Stephanie Pappas | LiveScience.com – Thu, Jan 26, 2012

There’s no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.

The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
 Posted by at 6:59 pm