Three Reasons Sweatshops Are Good for the Poor (sic)

EDITORIAL SUGGESTION: BRIAN STETTEN

Ahhh!!!!!!! This is such evil astroturf!!! …Yes…yo yo sweatshops is good….this psychotic video promoting LearnLiberty.org is literally promoting offshore sweatshops that force other populations into wage slavery. I wonder how much this actor behind “jerrylittlemars2” is getting paid to pretend to be a teenager that is so enthusiastic about extreme right wing libertarian ideology.

Let’s keep this award-winning site going!

Yes, audiences applaud us. But do you?If yes, then buy us a beer. The wingnuts are falling over each other to make donations…to their causes. We, on the other hand, take our left media—the only media that speak for us— for granted. Don’t join that parade, and give today. Every dollar counts.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




South American bloc adopts resolution on UK threats to Ecuador

A dispatch by RT News

The Ministers of Foreign Affairs of (L-R) Peru, Rafael Roncagliolo, Ecuador, Ricardo Patino, Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, and Colombia, Maria Angela Holguin, answer questions to the press after an extraordinary meeting of the Council of Ministers of UNASUR in Guayaquil, Ecuador on August 19, 2012 (AFP Photo / Rodrigo Buendia)

The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) has unanimously adopted a seven-point resolution supporting Ecuador’s right to grant Julian Assange asylum and condemning British threats to raid a sovereign state’s embassy in order to arrest him.

Foreign ministers of the 12-member bloc took part in an extraordinary meeting in Guayaquil, Ecuador’s largest city. A resolution was adopted just eight minutes after the session began, and was read out by Secretary General Ali Rodriguez.  Rodriguez’ readout of the resolution was met with loud applause.

The document reaffirmed the sovereign right of any country to grant asylum and condemned threats to use force, stating that the bloc’s foreign ministers had taken into account the aide memoire Britain sent to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on the eve of the announcement of the decision on whether to grant Assange asylum.

The resolution reiterated “the inviolability of embassies” and the Vienna Convention, saying that principles of international law could not be overridden by domestic laws, such as the Diplomatic and Consular Act of 1987, which grants the British Secretary of State discretion to revoke immunity to ambassadorial premises.

The organization vowed to encourage all parties to the Assange case to continue dialogue to find a solution within the framework of international law. The importance of refuge and asylum for the protection of human rights was also reaffirmed by the South American foreign ministers.

After the session, Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino addressed the press.

He noted that while the United Kingdom was a country far more powerful military-wise than Ecuador, the small Latin American country had the high ground in terms of its understanding of international law.

“Reason does not call for force,” Patino stated. “The force may be as different and as distant as a small country and a country which has atomic bombs. But here, reason is with us.”

Patino thanked fellow Latin American nations for firmly supporting Quito on the issue and said he was pleased with the fact that Julian Assange knows that the region respects international law, the right to personal integrity and the freedom of expression.

He also said he was waiting for a resolution expected to be adopted at a similar foreign-minister level meeting of the Organization of American States (OAS), which is scheduled to meet next Friday.

Ecuador convened a number of regional meetings following the threat to storm the country’s embassy in London.

On Saturday, representatives of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA) adopted a similar eight-point resolution condemning Britain for its “intimidating threats” to violate the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity.

On Friday, a special meeting of the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States, which comprises countries from North, Central and South America, voted to hold a meeting of the member states’ foreign ministers in order to discuss the same resolution filed by Ecuador.

Let’s keep this award-winning site going!

Yes, audiences applaud us. But do you?If yes, then buy us a beer. The wingnuts are falling over each other to make donations…to their causes. We, on the other hand, take our left media—the only media that speak for us— for granted. Don’t join that parade, and give today. Every dollar counts.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




Time to Boycott the Election

Don’t Vote, Don’t Fight … Go on Strike!
by LINH DINH

Here and now, voting is futile. Your vote doesn’t count, at least not for anything that you believe in and want done. Your vote is only an endorsement of an illegitimate system that persistently and viciously works against all of your interests.

This political machinery cannot serve you, since its funders, its masters, are the banks and corporations that demand the cheapest possible labor, and profits by any means necessary, with no regards for human rights, their host communities or the environment. With your negligible salary, unemployment checks, welfare or food stamps, you simply don’t count. You don’t matter. Just as you may find street beggars annoying, your government sees you only as a nuisance, to be tranquilized with lies on television. If it could, it would deport you wholesale to Chinese sweat shops, and trumpet it as “The Right to Work Overseas Act.”

As they eviscerate you, they flood your intellect and conscience with endless bilge, while charging you a monthly subscription for your own drowning, even. Today’s urgent items for discussion, “Gold Medalist’s Postworkout Foods,” “Bad Jeans Styles for Guys” and “Cyrus Shaves Her Hair.” Do ponder these while your house is taken away, your car is dispossessed, your crops wilt and the sea rises to your ankles, and higher.

Televised sports and amateur talent contests, American Idol, America’s Got Talent, X Factor, The Voice, So You Think You Can Dance, etc., try to convince Americans that life is still fair, that one would get ahead if only one could leap, sing, dance or reverse slam dunk better than one’s neighbors, but these pipe dreams of fame and fortune cannot disguise the fact that, for ordinary Americans, even the most lowly aspirations are becoming out of reach. A college graduate rolling burritos for Taco Bell will not move out of his mom’s garage, anytime soon or ever, by simply learning how to break dance, or wail like Otis Redding.

Your government wants rah-rah, cartoony subjects, not fully realized and conscious citizens, ones who know their history and rights, so the more American you are, in fact, the more superfluous you become to your illegitimate rulers, since, again, they don’t want thinking, responsible citizens, with Constitutionally-guaranteed rights, but only bodies, meat packages, to slave and to fight their many wars, and that’s why politicians of both parties will continue to usher in illegals to take your jobs, since they don’t have full rights, they keep wages impossibly low, and they distract you from seeing your real enemy, which is the military-banking complex and their lackeys, your government. With the world becoming increasingly desperate, largely thanks to American wars and financial manipulations, there is no shortage of cheap laborers willing to undercut even the lowest wages out there, so even immigrants will have their jobs taken by more recent, and more desperate, arrivals, many of them refugees escaping American drones and bombs. In a finite world of rapidly dwindling resources, starving, willing-to-work-for-anything workers will be the last abundant commodity.

Corporate bosses want maximum profits, naturally, which means maximum exploitation of workers, and since your politicians serve these corporate mafiosi, they must do all that they can to ensure your destitution. To do their jobs well, they must work against you. A recent headline from Business Insider, “Corporate Profits Just Hit An All-Time High, Wages Just Hit An All-Time Low,” and it’s all by design, naturally.

Keenly aware that Americans can’t stay docile forever, that sooner or later they will react to their rising impotence and plummeting standards of living, the government is nevertheless doing nothing to improve the situation. It is, however, putting all the legal and logistical apparatus into place to suppress, hard, any eventual explosion of discontent. Our police is becoming militarized, and the military itself is being used in civilian situations. More than a decade into this absurd War on Terror, no Muslim terrorists have appeared in the Homeland other than those propped up, manipulated and framed by the government itself, and yet it is ratcheting up its surveillance and arming itself even further, with machine guns, armored vehicles and futuristic weapons, all to combat you, ordinary citizens, should you decide to wave a fist in the direction of Goldman Sachs or Washington.

So vote only if you want more of this self-destructive madness. Vote only if you want more government suppression, more of your jobs sent overseas, bailouts for huge corporations and tax-funded bonuses for white-collar criminals. Vote only if you want to kill, die and be crippled in your overlords’ wars for profits. Vote if you hate yourselves, citizens. Both political parties consider you a fool when you register, stand in line, sometimes up to six hours, and vote, just to sanction their blatant lies.

During the last Presidential electoral charade, both candidates paused their rhetorical jousting when it came time to stump for the bank bailouts. Shoulder to shoulder they stood, Obama, McCain and Bush, like three stooges of big business, to funnel trillions to the too-big-to-fail banksters.

Oh the shame of it all! As the fraud was crowned, American intellectuals joyfully wept, and some are again campaigning for their sleek savior! Banished to an academic theme park, your average American intellectual is a timid poseur, careerist who’s best at congratulating himself for his feeble, half-baked protest, if he bothers to participate in public life at all. Look, ma, I’m chaining myself to my desk! When there are so many supple co-eds patrolling the halls, it’s hard to keep your postmodern mind on the goddamn Republic.

If an academic fancies himself a progressive or radical, even, then the trick is to adopt a contrarian posture, but without really disturbing anything, since he himself belongs to a ponzi scheme that thrives by colluding with the criminal banks. Like these, his university is also an outfit that profits by misleading borrowers, the students. To maintain his good standing, then, the American academic knows which topics are kosher to discuss, and which to best avoid, such as 9/11, the staged death of Bin Laden or the bogus War on Terror, etc.

Since the system is the problem, it’s time we starve it, first by not voting, but also by refusing to fight its many wars. Go AWOL, soldiers, for you are only destroying many innocent folks, as well as yourselves, by killing and maiming for oil companies, weapon manufacturers and banks. Those blood stains can never be bleached out. As you destroy your souls, at the very least, the fat cats are laughing at you. The medals you wear are badges of criminality, obviously, but also of idiocy, for only a fool risks his life, limbs, honor and conscience to purchase his contemptuous masters new mansions and yachts. As you dishonor yourself and nation, they flatter you with vapid praises, so go AWOL, all soldiers!

In TV commercials, returning soldiers are applauded by strangers as they pass through airports, but I have never witnessed that happen in person, and I’ve seen countless American grunts in many American airports, from Boston to Honolulu, in the last ten years. In Chicago, a panhandler showed me his discharge paper to prove that he was a vet. He said he had been in Iraq. Wanting to hear more, I offered to buy this Texan a beer, but he declined, saying drinking would only piss him off. He nearly teared up just talking to me, “People don’t even want to look at you, man. They don’t give a shit what you’ve gone through.” Well, most of them don’t, that’s for sure, and why is that a surprise? Agreeing with me that soldiers for oil wars are basically suckers, a Philly bar patron pointed out the obvious, “Every society uses its young men to fight its wars. Between 18 and 25, they’re aggressive and can be trained to kill. After that, they’ll start to think!”

There are those who reason that the right to vote has been so hard-earned, that it cannot be shirked, but when the entire electoral process has been thoroughly perverted and rigged, when cheating often occurs right out in the open, then it is our duty as citizens to boycott such a sick farce. A refusal to vote, then, becomes an indictment of the system itself, with the lower the turnout, the louder the accusation to the world, and posterity, that this system is fraudulent. What if they staged an election and no one came? No one but suckers and fools who were programmed to chew on empty slogans, that is. So will we be idiots, yet again, this November? Or will we respect ourselves by calling out these sneering imposters who have hijacked our country? Let’s collectively expose and discredit them.

Don’t vote, don’t fight, go on strike! It’s time.

Linh Dinh is the author of two books of stories, five of poems, and a novel, Love Like Hate. He’s tracking our deteriorating socialscape through his frequently updated photo blog, State of the Union.

Let’s keep this award-winning site going!

Yes, audiences applaud us. But do you?If yes, then buy us a beer. The wingnuts are falling over each other to make donations…to their causes. We, on the other hand, take our left media—the only media that speak for us— for granted. Don’t join that parade, and give today. Every dollar counts.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




Imperialist lawlessness and the witch-hunt against Julian Assange

By Chris Marsden
* This article co-written by Barry Grey

Assange has said, with every justification, that he fears for his life. Everyone but the willfully blind knows that Assange is the victim of a witch-hunt, yet this has not stopped the nominally liberal media from continuing to back extradition and denounce Assange.

::::::::

Those who are guilty of conducting wars of aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, waging a covert war against Syria, and carrying out targeted assassinations, rendition and torture have no compunction trampling on fundamental precepts of international law. These include the right to political asylum.

The UK’s Conservative-led coalition government has threatened to withdraw its recognition of the Ecuadorean embassy in London and send police to storm the premises and seize Assange. The imperialist arrogance of this threat was rightly denounced by Ecuador as “an unacceptable, unfriendly and hostile act and an attempt against our sovereignty.” Ecuador’s foreign minister added at a Thursday press conference announcing his government’s decision to grant Assange’s request for political asylum, “We are not a British colony.”

The Vienna Convention specifically defines a foreign embassy as sovereign space. Such a diplomatic post is considered the territory of the foreign nation.

Such legal trifles could not matter less to the British government and its American overlords. British Foreign Secretary William Hague reiterated his government’s rejection of safe passage for Assange and its determination to seize him the moment he sets foot out of the Ecuadorean embassy. He declared, “The United Kingdom does not recognise the principle of diplomatic asylum.”

Piling one contemptible lie upon another, Hague continued: “It is important to understand that this is not about Mr. Assange’s activities at WikiLeaks or the attitude of the United States of America. He is wanted in Sweden to answer allegations of serious sexual offences.”

The Swedish government — the willing accomplice in the imperialist frame-up of Assange — piped up to support Britain’s violation of the right of asylum. It had made use of highly dubious charges of sexual misconduct to demand that Assange appear in Sweden for questioning, providing the pseudo-legal pretext for his extradition. “It is unacceptable that Ecuador would want to halt the Swedish judicial process and European judicial cooperation,” said Swedish foreign ministry spokesman Anders Joerle.

There is no serious legal basis for the allegations of sexual abuse against Assange — the Swedish authorities have not even lodged formal charges against him. The accusations were made by two women who sought out Assange and had consensual relations with him.

In response to Ecuador’s granting political asylum, Claes Brogstrom, the lawyer for the women making the sexual assault claims, declared disingenuously, “There’s no demand from the United States that he should be extradited to the US.”

Not yet. But as Brogstrom is well aware, the Obama administration convened a secret grand jury to draw up charges against Assange. It is waiting for him to be shipped to Sweden to strike.

WikiLeaks has reported that special task forces have been established by US intelligence agencies and subpoenas issued compelling WikiLeaks associates to appear before a grand jury. Assange has every reason to fear sharing the fate of Private Bradley Manning, who is accused of disclosing classified military data to WikiLeaks and has already been incarcerated for more than 760 days, mostly under inhuman and abusive conditions.

A conviction on sedition charges could bring the death penalty. Alternately, Assange could be thrown into the black hole of Guantanamo or some other military prison. Assange has said, with every justification, that he fears for his life.

Everyone but the willfully blind knows that Assange is the victim of a witch-hunt, yet this has not stopped the nominally liberal media from continuing to back extradition and denounce Assange. The New York Times merely stated that “The Obama administration has refused to say what plan it has, if any, to seek Mr. Assange’s extradition to the United States.” It then gloated that “WikiLeaks has shrunk substantially in the months that Mr. Assange has been fighting his legal battle,” and denounced the organization as “an agency of the political left.”

The UK media is worse still. The Guardian issued a de facto lawyer’s opinion on behalf of Assange’s persecutors, editorialising that he had no “well-founded fear” of political persecution, but was merely seeking to avoid “allegations of sexual assault, which is in anyone’s language a serious non-political crime.”

The Independent’s editorial acknowledged that “both the UK and Sweden have reportedly refused to guarantee that he would not face extradition to the US,” before stating blandly that this “may fuel suspicion.” But it insisted, “In present circumstances, though, the US is a distraction. If Mr. Assange is to live up to the honesty and integrity he professes, he must defend himself in Sweden, then contest any US extradition on its merits.”

Not since the 1930s, with the triumph of fascism in much of Europe and the build-up to a second world war, has imperialism operated on the world stage with such brazen disregard for legality. Once again, the law of the jungle prevails in international relations. This is the external expression of the turn to unmitigated class war within the imperialist countries, driven by a global breakdown of the capitalist system.

The persecution of Assange being orchestrated by the US has united a gang of cutthroats, thieves and professional liars. They are collectively the political representatives of an oligarchy whose fabulous wealth is coined from the blood, sweat and tears of countless millions throughout the world.

The defence of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks requires the independent political mobilization of workers and young people against the offensive being waged by the ruling class and all its political defenders. Such a fight must be based on a socialist perspective, aimed at establishing workers’ governments committed to the reorganisation of society on the basis of social equality, freedom and genuine democracy.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Let’s keep this award-winning site going!

Yes, audiences applaud us. But do you?If yes, then buy us a beer. The wingnuts are falling over each other to make donations…to their causes. We, on the other hand, take our left media—the only media that speak for us— for granted. Don’t join that parade, and give today. Every dollar counts.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




Pussy Riot nonsense? Hold your opinions.

L’affaire des Pussies

Editor’s Note:  I copy below a HuffPo report on the “Pussy Riot” case, a strange development which, if true, certainly casts a bad hue on Vladimir Putin, and on the government’s appeal to nationalism—which may be necessary in his eyes at this point—through the support of organized superstition, in this instance, the still popular Russian Orthodox Church. If true, that’s bad, really bad, for its shows, as some have claimed (more on that below), that the separation of Church and state is blurring in Russia, precisely as it becomes, de facto, increasingly murky in the United States itself.

Meantime, the controversy about the infamous performance of the punk girl band at the Cathedral of Christ the Savior—and their sentence to a couple of years in jail—continues in Russia for three weeks already. By any reckoning it’s a confusing mess and it shows no signs of abating any time soon. 

To most Western eyes the reaction by the authorities to the prank ranges from ludicrous to alarming. All the appearances are damning, indeed. The trial and sentence—as reported in the West—is a deplorable, humorless example of judicial excess (dumb, too, in terms of national images, something at which the United States excels.)

Under normal circumstances I would be ready to pass my own condemnatory judgment on the situation, but there’s no “normal” anymore, and most of the news sources furiously peddling the story have a long history of invidious and tendentious reporting.  Not to mention that the whole thing has the stench of possibly a bold Western black op to embarrass Putin and Russia, in general. In the grand scheme of world politics, with Syria, Iran, and ultimately Russia itself at stake, ask yourselves: who stands to win by discrediting the Russkies? Outside Russia, who gains the most by assassinating the image of the Russian leader? It’s been said many times already that the US is out to destabilize Putin. The verdict against these women seems too damn convenient for the propaganda mills of the West. Which is not to deny, again, that a verdict like this is a tactless abomination.

While all the above may be true, caution is in order. Consider that when we look at this “Pussy Riot” from a broader perspective it undeniably has the aura of something we have seen before.  Remember the Kony brouhaha? That black propaganda effort also seemed to come out of nowhere, and quickly disappeared, but not without strengthening the hand for US intervention in Africa (which is happening stealthily anyway), and giving imperial assault in general a momentary facelift.

With these rockers, all the telltale signs are also there, and writ large, too: the outrageousness of the situation, the type of “black & white” moral case that  even a 5 year old can grasp; the mawkish choice of victims: with Kony, it was defenseless children, with this trial, smacking of the Inquisition, a bunch of harmless “ultra-liberated” feminist punk rockers—supposedly bent on dissing an established church—a big plus for many, including me.  Quickly add to this volatile mix the righteous parade of the politically clueless celebs: Madonna,  Paul McCartney and their ilk, all denouncing the punishment meted out as a mockery of justice (about which, for once, they may be right).  Lastly, throw in the spontaneous (?) demonstrations around the world in support of the accused, and, naturally, the Western media’s lynching mood.

Is there another way of looking at this? Apparently yes.  This is what Mikhail Sineinikov, writing for English Pravda, opines:

Other musicians, singers, directors and other professional intellectuals gladly took part in the Russian national pastime of writing collective letters. They signed a petition that said “the girls did not kill or rob anyone, they didn’t commit violence, nor did they destroy or stole someone else’s property.” “Russia is a secular state, and no anti-clerical actions, unless they fall under the Criminal Code, can serve as a cause for prosecution,” the petition said.

For signatories’ information, “anti-clerical actions” can serve as a “cause.” Read the law (signed by Boris Yeltsin, America’s favorite stooge, no less—Eds), “On Freedom of Conscience, Religion and Religious Associations” Article 3, Paragraph 6: “Holding public events, placing texts and images that offend religious feelings of citizens near the objects of worship is prohibited.”

Article 26 of the same law runs: “Violating legislation of the Russian Federation about freedom of conscience, religion and religious associations entails criminal, administrative and other responsibilities.” This is for those who may want to repeat the “heroism” of Pussy Riot, so that they do not say “We did not even expect …” afterwards.

And finally, here is a “parallel”, find-differences type of story. In June 1977, [the] British punk rock band Sex Pistols “glorified” the Queen of England (the Queen for Britons is almost like the patriarch and the president combined for Russians).

They “glorified” Queen Elizabeth II with the use of foul language, including these words: “God save the queen / A fascist regime / They made you a moron.” They performed the song on board a boat on the Thames. The boat stopped right opposite the Houses of Parliament. Very soon, the police arrested the singers right on that boat.

The story did not lead to considerable legal consequences for the musicians. They were fined, their concerts were banned. There were physical consequences, though. Five band members were severely beaten one by one, during a few days and in different places. One of them had his nose and leg broken, another one was cut with a razor, the third one had his arm crippled for the rest of his life. The fourth had 15 stitches on, and the fifth musician had his face disfigured. The criminals were not found, although a number of British publications received messages saying “Don’t you dare to insult our Queen!”

Daria Sivashenkova, also writing (poorly in translation) for Pravda.ru, advances an even more scathing analysis:

The forces that tried to benefit from the infamous punk prayer at the Cathedral of Christ the Savior emerged instantly. Russian so-called “liberals” (the pro-west chorus) are trying to set the young women up as they want the West to recognize them…as “prisoners of conscience” and even martyrs for freedom of speech.

“This is the first time in Russia when people were arrested on charges of blasphemy. Previously, such cases would be limited to only fines. This has destroyed the last barrier on the way to Russia’s transformation into the clerical state, in which a conflict with church policies is equated to criminal offense. In this case, investigation, prosecutors and court are used to attack the foundations of the constitutional system that guarantees the secular character of the state.

“This arrest shows that the church is merging with the state, and justice is turning into Orthodox Inquisition. We urge to immediately release the detainees and cease their criminal prosecution. We consider the arrested Maria Alyokhina and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova to be the prisoners of conscience. They are being persecuted for expressing their views. We call upon international organizations to recognize them as such. We urge everyone to launch a public campaign in their defense – as a pledge for return of our country to the norms of a democratic state.”

The above is the appeal to the West that was published on the website of the Movement For Human Rights. The message evokes very sad feelings indeed. No one will ever dare to bomb Russia, as they bombed Libya in the name of “the norms of the democratic constitutional state.” No one will dare to corner and blackmail Russia as they blackmail Syria. But the message from the “liberals” is obvious: save us from the evil state and the evil Church – save us from that at any cost.

It seems that the girls from Pussy Riot became a bargaining chip for the liberals, who are accustomed to ask “civilized” Europe for salvation.

Now, people, I’m not saying that I’m 100% convinced this entire embarrassing affair is not as reported by the Western media.  Call it stumbling upon the Unicorn, but it may well be.  Powerful as the American tentacles are across the globe, as far as I can tell they do not yet control the Russian judicial apparatus, nor for that matter, Putin’s position on this issue.  But we have been burnt before, sucker-punched way too many times, and we should know by now that when it comes to any major item concerning Russia, and countless other sensitive topics, the fix is in. The only question is how much spin is employed and for what purposes. This could well be a carefully mounted provocation. What if these women were paid an ungodly sum to stage this nonsense with the assurances that after serving whatever time they would be sprung to the West, to fame and a hefty bank account? It’s not as far fetched as it sounds. The economic situation in Russia is desperate for many. And gullibility is universal. Russia is now divided on this issue; Putin probably embarrassed. In the game of international politics, that would be—quite literally—a very cheap operation with a huge payoff.  If you were a Western intelligence chief, wouldn’t you be tempted?

—Patrice Greanville

Pussy Riot Trial: Feminist Punk Band Guilty Of Hooliganism, Motivated By Religious Hatred

 Protesters from Moscow to New York and musicians including Madonna and Paul McCartney condemned the prosecution of the three women, members of a band called Pussy Riot. Several countries, including the U.S., and even some Kremlin loyalists decried the verdict.

Protesters donned the colorful balaclavas that have become a symbol of the band in many European and U.S. cities, though no single protest outside Moscow drew more than a few hundred people.

For three hours as the judge read the verdict, the defendants stood in handcuffs in a glass cage in the courtroom, the same one where oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, another Putin opponent, was convicted two years ago.

The charges carried a maximum penalty of seven years in prison, though prosecutors had asked for a three-year sentence.

Governments including the United States, Britain, France and Germany denounced the sentences as disproportionate.

Mikhail Fedotov, the head of a presidential advisory council on human rights, voiced hope that the sentence will be repealed or at least softened. Mikhail Barshchevsky, a lawyer who represents the Cabinet in high courts, said that the verdict had no basis in Russian criminal law.

The Pussy Riot case has underlined the vast influence of the Russian Orthodox Church. Although church and state are formally separate, the church identifies itself as the heart of Russian national identity and critics say its strength effectively makes it a quasi-state entity. Some Orthodox groups and many believers had urged strong punishment for an action they consider blasphemous.

The case comes in the wake of several recently passed laws cracking down on opposition, including one that raised the fine for taking part in an unauthorized demonstrations by 150 times to 300,000 rubles (about $9,000).

Let’s keep this award-winning site going!

Yes, audiences applaud us. But do you?If yes, then buy us a beer. The wingnuts are falling over each other to make donations…to their causes. We, on the other hand, take our left media—the only media that speak for us— for granted. Don’t join that parade, and give today. Every dollar counts.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.