Tiny kitten who was attacked by a crow wears heart-melting crocheted costumes that – believe it or not – are aiding her recovery

By James Nye, Mail Online

kittenWounded001
The saga of Wasabi-chan

What could be cuter than a tiny, wee kitten dressed up as a button mushroom?

Nothing of course – and when you realize that this adorable creature isn’t just wearing the outfit for the ‘awww’ factor, but for her own good, it might just make you lose your cool.

Wasabi-chan, the adorable Japanese rescue kitten, was attacked and seriously injured by a crow who fractured her jaw and ripped her tongue in two.

kittenWoundedCute5

 

kittenWoundedCute

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2360017/Cute-button-Tiny-kitten-injured-crow-wears-heart-melting-crocheted-costumes-believe-aiding-recovery.html#ixzz2YrVIuONB




Obama called “war criminal” & “hypocrite of the century” in Irish Parliament

It takes the genuinely righteous to rise to tell the truth. Brave, lucid Clare Daly almost by herself redeems the Irish people, so badly compromised by the Republic’s ill-advised politics of opportunistic collaboration, along with the EU, with the American empire. Note that during her speech, supporters of the alliance with Obama look discomfited, bored or annoyed, frequently trying to shut her down.

http://youtu.be/QIMucHfUMyg




Statement by Edward Snowden to human rights groups at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport

With Breaking News analysis by Dave Lindorff (see addendum)

By Edward Snowden

snowden-cia3.jpg.1000x297x1

Edward Joseph Snowden delivered a statement to human rights organizations and individuals at Sheremetyevo airport at 5pm Moscow time today, Friday 12th July. The meeting lasted 45 minutes. The human rights organizations included Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch and were given the opportunity afterwards to ask Mr Snowden questions.

::::::::

The Human Rights Watch representative used this opportunity to tell Mr Snowden that on her way to the airport she had received a call from the US Ambassador to Russia, who asked her to relay to Mr Snowden that the US Government does not categorise Mr Snowden as a whistleblower and that he has broken United States law. This further proves the United States Government’s persecution of Mr Snowden and therefore that his right to seek and accept asylum should be upheld. Seated to the left of Mr. Snowden was Sarah Harrison, a legal advisor in this matter from WikiLeaks and to Mr. Snowden’s right, a translator.

Transcript of Edward Joseph Snowden statement, given at 5pm Moscow time on Friday 12th July 2013. (Transcript corrected to delivery)

snowdenpresser


Hello. My name is Ed Snowden. A little over one month ago, I had family, a home in paradise, and I lived in great comfort. I also had the capability without any warrant to search for, seize, and read your communications. Anyone’s communications at any time. That is the power to change people’s fates.

It is also a serious violation of the law. The 4th and 5th Amendments to the Constitution of my country, Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and numerous statutes and treaties forbid such systems of massive, pervasive surveillance. While the US Constitution marks these programs as illegal, my government argues that secret court rulings, which the world is not permitted to see, somehow legitimize an illegal affair. These rulings simply corrupt the most basic notion of justice — that it must be seen to be done. The immoral cannot be made moral through the use of secret law.

I believe in the principle declared at Nuremberg in 1945: “Individuals have international duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience. Therefore individual citizens have the duty to violate domestic laws to prevent crimes against peace and humanity from occurring.”

Accordingly, I did what I believed right and began a campaign to correct this wrongdoing. I did not seek to enrich myself. I did not seek to sell US secrets. I did not partner with any foreign government to guarantee my safety. Instead, I took what I knew to the public, so what affects all of us can be discussed by all of us in the light of day, and I asked the world for justice.

That moral decision to tell the public about spying that affects all of us has been costly, but it was the right thing to do and I have no regrets.

Since that time, the government and intelligence services of the United States of America have attempted to make an example of me, a warning to all others who might speak out as I have. I have been made stateless and hounded for my act of political expression. The United States Government has placed me on no-fly lists. It demanded Hong Kong return me outside of the framework of its laws, in direct violation of the principle of non-refoulement — the Law of Nations. It has threatened with sanctions countries who would stand up for my human rights and the UN asylum system. It has even taken the unprecedented step of ordering military allies to ground a Latin American president’s plane in search for a political refugee. These dangerous escalations represent a threat not just to the dignity of Latin America, but to the basic rights shared by every person, every nation, to live free from persecution, and to seek and enjoy asylum.

Yet even in the face of this historically disproportionate aggression, countries around the world have offered support and asylum. These nations, including Russia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, and Ecuador have my gratitude and respect for being the first to stand against human rights violations carried out by the powerful rather than the powerless. By refusing to compromise their principles in the face of intimidation, they have earned the respect of the world. It is my intention to travel to each of these countries to extend my personal thanks to their people and leaders.

I announce today my formal acceptance of all offers of support or asylum I have been extended and all others that may be offered in the future. With, for example, the grant of asylum provided by Venezuela’s President Maduro, my asylee status is now formal, and no state has a basis by which to limit or interfere with my right to enjoy that asylum. As we have seen, however, some governments in Western European and North American states have demonstrated a willingness to act outside the law, and this behavior persists today. This unlawful threat makes it impossible for me to travel to Latin America and enjoy the asylum granted there in accordance with our shared rights.

This willingness by powerful states to act extra-legally represents a threat to all of us, and must not be allowed to succeed. Accordingly, I ask for your assistance in requesting guarantees of safe passage from the relevant nations in securing my travel to Latin America, as well as requesting asylum in Russia until such time as these states accede to law and my legal travel is permitted. I will be submitting my request to Russia today, and hope it will be accepted favorably.

If you have any questions, I will answer what I can.

Thank you.

For further information, see:

http://wikileaks.org/Statement-from…

http://wikileaks.org/Statement-by-J…

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Edward Snowden, an example for the rest of humanity, is the famed NSA leaker who fled the USA to Hong Kong, then Moscow. 

ADDENDUM


RT-TV Reports that Snowden has Accepted Russian Asylum Offer

Fri, 07/12/2013 – 10:57
Breaking News:
by Dave Lindorff

Russian TV is reporting that Edward Snowden, the bete noir of the US national security state, who has leaked information that the National Security Agency is spying on all electronic communications of Americans, and on hundreds of millions of others around the globe, as well as on the leaders and the embassies of even many US allies, is accepting an offer of political asylum that has been extended by Russia, where he has been spending weeks in limbo in Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport, unable to fly to asylum elsewhere.

According to the RT-TV report [1], Snowden, in accepting the Russian offer, will have to abide by a condition set by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he not continue releasing documents harmful to the US.

This deal leaves a lot of questions unanswered:

First of all, Snowden has already turned over a huge amount of information to reporters at the Washington Post and the Guardian newspaper in the UK, as well as lesser amounts of documents to Der Spiegel magazine in Germany and to other publications in other countries. It is not clear whether he can control, at this point, whether or not those news organizations continue to publish articles based on the documents in their possession, It is also unclear what the Russian government response would be concerning Snowden’s protected status should any of those organizations continue to publish embarrassing or damaging disclosures about the NSA. Asked by reporters at an airport press conference whether he would continue to release details about the NSA himself while in Russia, Snowden’s answer was an ambiguous, “My job is done.” That job, though, was providing the leaked information to reporters. Snowden himself has not publicly disclosed the information.

Snowden also correctly pointed out the distinction between “damaging America,” and exposing the NSA. “No actions I take or plan are meant to harm the US… I want the US to succeed,” he said in answer to a question. Would Putin consider further leaks about the US government’s spying on its own citizens “damaging” to America? Open question.

In any event, Putin has made clear that Russia would never extradite Snowden. As he put it, “Russia has never extradited anyone and is not going to do so. Same as no one has ever been extradited to Russia.” Besides, the cat’s already out of the bag, in terms of the big revelations Snowden made public.

The RT-TV report also suggests that Snowden and Russia may be looking at the asylum grant as less than a lifetime arrangement. It appears to be a way for Russia to get him out of the airport, into Russia, to further tweak the US, and to put Snowden in an official status where he could be provided with travel documents as a matter of course, as would an asylum grantee in the US

This could enable him to quietly leave Russia later for another location after some time has passed. The RT story significantly quotes Tatyana Lokshina of Human Rights Watch, as saying Snowden is seeking to stay in Russia because he “can’t fly to Latin America yet.”

Three Latin American countries so far–Venezuela, Bolivia and Nicaragua– have offered Snowden asylum without conditions, but he has been unable to safely travel to any of them, given the already demonstrated US threat to force his plane to land. (American authorities exerted pressure on French, Portuguese, Italian and Spanish governments to refuse their airspace, in violation of international law, to a presidential plane carrying Bolivia’s leader, Evo Morales, to fly home from a state visit to Russia, forcing it to land in Austria, where the government was pressed to illegally inspect the plane, which the US incorrectly suspected was transporting Snowden to asylum in Bolivia.) At the airport conference, Snowden said he had accepted all three offers of asylum, as well as Russia’s. “I announce today my formal acceptance of all offers of support or asylum I have been extended and all others that may be offered in the future,” Snowden said after meeting with human rights lawyers earlier.

The likelihood that Russia’s offer of asylum with conditions limiting his further leaking of documents is part of some behind-the-scenes maneuver by the US with Russian support seems mighty slim to me. It already hands Russia a huge propaganda coup as it preemptively blocks further US criticism of Russia’s human rights shortcomings and violations.

If anything, the Obama administration and the commissars of the US security establishment surely have to view the prospect of Snowden’s staying in Russia with his stack of laptops loaded with NSA secrets — which he claims he has never opened up or provided to Russian or Chinese intelligence experts — as deeply worrying. More likely, the initial offer from Putin was a way to end the awkward circus at the airport, while on Snowden’s part, it was a way to end his surely frustrating weeks-long airport purgatory.

It is hard to imagine that Snowden would be accepting becoming trapped inside Russia for life, so I expect he will end up being provided with full rights of travel (Russia is, after all, a free-travel country now, not the old Soviet Union with its closed borders), so I assume he will be issued a travel document as a matter of course as part of the asylum process. That would simply push back the time that he might decide to move on to get out from under any onerous conditions on his stay in Russia. (Once he’s had time to put on weight, grow his hair long and maybe change the color, get fitted for a pair of contacts, maybe of a different eye color, grow a good Russian physicist’s beard, and once he has a Russian travel document, which the US would not have the ID number for, it would be fairly easy for him to hop a Russian commercial flight with official Russian permission and assistance, and to fly via Cuba to Venezuela, Bolivia or Nicaragua. The US ability to constantly monitor all flights visually and to spot a disguised Snowden are actually quite limited.)

As Snowden said at a meeting with 13 representatives of human rights organizations from Russia and around the world [2] who assembled at the airport, as reported in RT’s article, “I ask for your assistance in requesting guarantees of safe passage from the relevant nations in securing my travel to Latin America, as well as requesting asylum in Russia until such time as these states accede to law and my legal travel is permitted.”

The Snowden story, and the ongoing exposure of the NSA’s spying outrage, is clearly not over. Stay tuned.


Source URL: http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/1863

Links:
[1] http://rt.com/news/snowden-asylum-formal-status-019/
[2] http://wikileaks.org/Statement-by-Edward-Snowden-to.html




In the land of hypocrites and moral imbeciles: on religion and hunting

Prefatory Note: For all the smugness that churches and the religious command, most if not all claiming to represent the will of a good, compassionate deity, organized religion has been absent from the struggle, and often complicit in  most major human crimes, from wars between humans, to various forms of slavery, and the all-out war on nature and defenceless animals.

Opportunistic to a fault, the record of churches almost everywhere  has not been to question or denounce the status quo (which normally represents the most backward and criminal segments of humanity), but to support it.  From antiquity to our times, religion and the priesthood have been quick to claim a share of the power by bestowing the seal of legitimacy on regimes that —under elementary morality— should have prompted a forceful rebuke. Leaving aside ancient times when barbarism was commonplace, some of their modern alliances have been notorious. Far from opposing slavery in the antebellum South, most pastors preached a chauvinist and racist creed that facilitated the war, their stance mirroring the poisonous and misguided posture of many Christians during the Inquisition, and the mutually savage sectarian warfare that tore Europe apart for centuries. Under Nazi Germany, the record was mostly shameful, at best mixed.

Today, with the imperial state the new unofficial deity, with corporatism eating the planet like a ravaging cancer, with rapidly expanding inequality injecting unneeded suffering upon billions, American religion remains a powerful accomplice, at times vocally endorsing the self-flattering myths that sustain the nation’s repulsive chauvinism, and many other times simply saying nothing in the face of enormous institutionalized crimes. It’s telling and typical that neither the leading protestant churches nor the Pope and his representatives in the US have said anything audible about Edward Snowden or the goals and methods used by the imperial cliques to accomplish their goals. Against this backdrop, it’s not surprising that religions here and elsewhere have said little and done less to temper the pervasive brutality of the human species toward its weaker brethren. All this rot may one day be swept away. But when—and if—that day comes, it won’t be because institutionalized religion did anything major to hasten that joyous date. —Patrice Greanville

“You’re right, she [instigator of a cull] is not a hypocrite, she is true to her religion. And you should also know that in at least a couple of towns around here who are killing deer en masse some churches volunteered their property as a killsite.” —animal activist [/pullquote]

In a climate where violence to animals is a cherished right associated with dominion over the animals, hunting is passed down from one generation to the next, sometimes even as a religious rite of passage. Young children who still want to caress a deer rather than shoot him, are taught to hunt and kill. Too often this terrible violence, both to the well-being of the child and the animal victim occurs in a religious framework.

At Christian Youth Hunting Ministry camps young children must witness and perhaps even participate in carrying out the dictates of dominion. The damage done to the deer is clear. The harm done to this child, though not as visible, will take its toll, for he has learned he has the divine right to kill the weak and defenseless.

Such brutality to children and animals is allowed for it serves a presumably greater purpose: The Outdoor Mission Camp was created to bolster up Christian membership, by bringing participants closer to Christ, as it destroys compassion in children and innocent animal lives.

http://www.outdoormissioncamp.org/?page_id=21

“Founded by Ruffin and Jamie Shackelford in 1998, Outdoor Mission Camps fulfills a life long preparation to lead youth to Christ through a Christ centered wilderness experience
Through the marvelous grace of God, Ruffin turned his life to Christ after witnessing the majesty and awesomeness of His creation. Jamie surrendered to the Lord after facing various challenges in life. However, both of them grew up loving the creation as they backpacked, paddled, hunted and fished while spending time with their fathers in wilderness settings.” 

The well-being of a child and the life of a deer may be sacrificed to the lofty goal of recruiting converts. The excuse sometimes given that children must learn gun safety, quickly turns into an oxymoron when they are taught to kill:.

  http://www.outdoormissioncamp.org/?page_id=21

 ‘loving the creation’, is made possible by the judeo.christian view of animals: animals may be used or killed for a higher cause: in this instance increased fellowship and membership to fund and support religious institutions.

Another organization: Outreach Outdoors, is completely explicit:

Outreach Outdoors is a Christian hunting ministry aiming to spread the message of Jesus Christ to non-believers and challenge Christians to live a life of purpose”
(http://www.outreachoutdoors.com/christian-hunting.php)

A life of purpose: to build up membership, based on violating the sensibilities of young children and killing defenseless animals is questionable, though both are sanctioned by the intention of dominion. Ideally religion deals with the spiritual realm, but when the goal is political dominance, then it is necessary to entice recruits with the carcass of an animal.

 ours just happens to be hunting – but whatever it is, God wants to use it to draw people to Him. So, Christian hunting is, to us, going out on stand with the goal of experiencing God and making Him the goal, versus leaving disappointed that you went home empty-handed once again.”

It could not be more clear: ‘ -” It does not matter what harm is done to gentle animals. Whatever it takes. the institution comes first, as was the case with the cover-up of child sexual abuse by the Catholic Church.

Building a Christian Empire with dominion over the entire United States is in part the intention of hunting for Christ. It would seem the militarization of religion is contingent on teaching young children to kill: 

It is no wonder that those most in need of self esteem feel compelled to hunt down harmless animals, often with high powered rifles that do every thing but pull the trigger. It is no wonder they participate in canned hunts, where tame animals are released to be shot close range as non-moving target. It is no wonder that every animal from wolves to geese to prairie dogs may be culled with the proper excuse. Only those in doubt of their true worth would feel the need to prove their dominion over the animals by murdering them, then call it sport or a cull:

‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. The fear and dread of you shall rest on every animal of the earth, and on every bird of the air, on everything that creeps on the ground, and on all the fish in the sea; into your hand they are delivered. Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you; and just as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.’  genesis

No matter how much we plead or reason with those who claim the god given right to hunt, very little will change until we acknowledge the influence of dominion religions. As long as we ourselves cooperate with these religions, we too are complicit in promoting the violence we so detest.