#BBCTrending: Camel abuse sparks outcry in China

•••BBC Trending

camel_sadcamel

[dropcap]P[/dropcap]ictures showing a mutilated camel being forced to beg on the streets of China’s south-eastern Fuzhou city, have prompted an outcry on Chinese social media.

The images were reported to have originated on Sina Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, and were soon picked up and widely circulated across various other social media sites. They drew fierce debate about whether the beggars had deliberately mutilated the animals to trigger public sympathy. The pictures seemed to show a camel whose limbs had been lost, tethered to two men who were begging for money. “These people have to be such soulless creatures to be able to do that to the poor beast and parade it around like that. What kind of society have we become, exploiting animals for profit and greed?” commented one Weibo user. “Their plan to buy sympathy has clearly failed: anyone would look at their act with disgust,” another said.

Wild camels are protected by law in China, but the unfortunate ones in the photographs have been identified as domestic Bactrian camels. These are commonly used across the country for transport and do not come under protection laws, activist John Hare tells BBC Trending. His charity, the Wild Camel Protection Foundation, aims to protect the animals in China and Mongolia, and has since circulated the images to the authorities. He has advice for concerned Chinese citizens: “If the public does not want any confrontation with the beggars, they should inform the authorities. But unfortunately as the pictures show, people tend to walk by, say nothing and do nothing.”

Several online petitions were also set up, demanding the perpetrators be punished. One petition, which was posted on Change.org, called for a street vendor caught abusing his camel to be prosecuted. Another petition, which drew close to 15,000 signatures, called for ‘urgent action’ from the Chinese government to create legislation against animal abuse.

Reporting by Heather Chen


NOTICE: YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS (SIGNUPS TO OUR PERIODICAL BULLETIN) ARE COMPLETELY FREE, ALWAYS. AND WE DO NOT SELL OR RENT OUR EMAIL ADDRESS DATABASES.  




American Unawareness

John Wayne in Sands of Iwo Jima (1949)

John Wayne in Sands of Iwo Jima (1949) / click to expand

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]s America’s folk image of itself derived from a cinematic narrative that defines its national character as one representing a ‘can-do-force’ fostering trade in the world for the common good? To date, American settler culture has tried to mould the rest of the world — unsuccessfully — into this ‘productive’ image of itself via hard power. The more the American Empire Enterprise garrisons the globe with military bases, the more skeptical the world community becomes. The time has come, it seems, for the spirit and energy of the American people to address itself more diplomatically to the world community. The task of creating a whole new soft power for the purpose of defining its relationship with the rest of the world is long overdue. The tertiary educated servants administering the status quo have let the system down by being merely compliant. Their focus, and that of the nation, has been too narcissistic for too long.

Perhaps the Hollywood Wax Museum is the real church of the American imagination, personifying the nation’s pioneering achievements in ways that aggrandize the power of individual identity and wealth, a value system John Wayne personified, a whole way of thinking about America. American cinema, in true Hollywood fashion, quickly applied itself to the task of crafting an ideological pedigree based on hard-power.

John Wayne was called “The American”. His style was muscular can-do, cold, calculated and macho in a way that stated what his fans would want America to be. Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, George Bush, Dick Cheney and Barack Obama were some who recalibrated their cultural stem cells to produce a working image of themselves that was compatible with America’s no nonsense unilateralism. Hubristic masculinity  became necessary in order to maintain a metaphoric bridge between the oval office and  America-The-Movieland — currently morphing into a video game. For historians, the realisation  that we can change the script-writer, but the folk context remains the same, is academic. We all star in the same movie, but for most of us, it is merely a bit-part or nothing at all. In cinematic parlance, America floats all boats…or so was the case until billionaire capitalism sucked the marrow out of the system.

John_Wayne - sands of iwo jimaWho, then, are the heroes who make it to folk status by virtue of their ability to mesmerise an audience by tapping into the desires and expectations inherent in this shared narrative?

The protagonist-hero, in the American folk milieu has a God-given right to traverse any boundary, disregard the sovereignty of any state, in his or her fortune-hunter’s self-righteous commitment to profiteer in the name of enterprise. This cinematic logic was developed in the twentieth century in America as a means of capturing the populist heartbeat and steroiding the national character into achieving fighting-fitness for the purpose of establishing Mr. Joe Sixpack as action hero with appeal for every Dirty Tom, Dick and Harry.

The seeds of American exceptionalism were sown in a technological medium that projected the message of super celebrity status and action-hero mythology via the silver screen to Mr. Joe Sixpack and Miss Plain Jane.  Later, when corporate America came along to introduce the expert as hero, the narrative went into free-fall.  The individual was abstracted, the “expert” became the medium within the message, a moving-finger-that-wrote the prescription that would separate the ‘folk’ from the shared narrative.  Thus a new alienated world came into being for the masses.

As the 20th century developed, John Wayne’s — “Talk low, talk slow and don’t say too much” — remained ‘par for the course’, at a time when boots-on-the-ground meant swaggering into town with two Colt 45’s at the ready and justice in the eye of the beholder. But along the way, American hardware became airborne and boots-on-the-ground gave way to a cock-pitted John Wayne version of sheriff America as lawman. Replete with aerial steed and super-duper-fast-action Hellfire Missile Colt replacements, the sheriffs of the sky were soon targeting civilians in the bad-lands that hadn’t as yet come under American control. Muslim and Asian populations were targeted in order to loosen their hold on assets that were potentially available to the American behemoth.

Come 1979, the cinematic narrative that mesmerised America, gave us Francis Ford Coppola’s APOCALYPSE NOW, starring Marlon Brando. John Wayne turned sociopath — to great acclaim. That it was applauded as a seminal moment in America’s introverted love of self via cinema and deemed culturally, historically or aesthetically significant, is significant in itself. No insights into why America was bombing the shit out of a military and political movement supported by the majority of the South Vietnamese peasantry, were ever offered. The mesmerised American public, comfortable on their couches in the stalls, and agog at the actions on the big silver screen, remained ignorant of what was happening off-screen.

Over time, the actions of the covert intelligence agencies, PR machines, cankerous lobbyist groups and other forms of institutional borse-creep became harbingers of secrecy, thus keeping classified information hobbled to the expert’s need for control in the elite echelons. The sense of centre that the silver screen had evoked, soon fell foul to the bunkered paranoia mentality of the Military Industrial Complex, a ‘big brother’ controlling the imaginative energy of a people through surveillance, meant that the ‘folk’ were pushed off the page.

Intelligence agencies alone now cost the American tax-payer in excess of $60 billion a year. Obama’s drone program is something else again and done in the name of cross-border security. From his oval hole, the peace laureate acts in secret, dispensing and remitting extrajudicial killings with a lurid contempt for accountability, while slaughtering innocents in far away places in order to make the homeland safer ..and like an institutional Wayne, comes across as self-contained and a big man doing a big man’s job.

Wayne’s on-screen persona was always backed up by fire-power as has been the case with all recent Presidents who so freely deferred to the bloviated military to project law and order, American style, outside its own borders. Wayne…”The American” was both impregnable and intractable. He stood like a force of nature. He relied on brute strength to win the day, so he never softened or capitulated . He didn’t much believe in community sensitivities either.  Henry Kissinger must have had a ‘Wayne’ moment when he bombed the poor defenceless Cambodian peasants to smithereens?

Richard M. Nixon once said that Wayne’s “Chisum” was a model for law and order. Nixon didn’t stay around long enough to see a Day-of-The-Triffids surveillance culture impose blindness on all who were seduced by the security-experts-de-jure-machine. So then,what’s new in the new-fashioned Eastern-Midwestern-far-Western-Middle-East that can have any meaning to your average Joe or Jane when it comes to understanding humanitarian homicide as a means of achieving peace in countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya etc?

Why does America continue to produce more than its fair share of wacky individuals? — piano-playing Condoleezza Rice, serendipity-painter George Bush, potty-mouth Dick Cheney — “Go f*ck yourself.” — to Sen. Patrick Leahy …and “There are things we don’t know we don’t know.” Donald (15 watt globe) Rumsfeld, as well as wolf-in-sheep-clothing AIPAC the Zionist muse — we-advise-on-regime-change. and you better listen because we get to wreak havoc in the Middle East. were allowed to shock and awe the bejesus out of Muslim countries under the rubric of liberation, while underhandedly sequestering their oily assets with venomous stealth.

So what does it take to begin to extricate ourselves from “There are things we don’t know we don’t know.” To acknowledge that American soft-power, at home and abroad, is on life-support because of the failure of the mesmerised multitude to deal with hard-power, requires immediate attention. To go along with the notion that experts are in charge — of everything — telling us what economic system to accept, or what foreign policy we must support, is to miss the point. If we were to stop and think for a moment, we would find that most experts are deficient in imagination. They are there to defend the status quo that feeds them. They are generally found wanting because they are talking from that place where the sun never shines.

The above collection of buffoons and their scriptwriters would have been laughed out of town in Shakespeare’s time. It was common practice to attend Elizabethan Theatre with a stash of over-ripe fruit for the purpose of hurtling squishy tomatoes at those who appeared egregiously callow, vain, or just plain stupid. Neo-Con-American Foreign Policy and its enablers come to mind as a deserving target to receive the fruity defecations of an irate public trapped in their stalls and captive to a monochromatic screen that only runs the shibboleths of the war party. Maybe the lesson we can learn from all this is, if we can’t throw squishy tomatoes at these mediocre people, we can at least work to throw them out of office and into the dumpster where they belong.

What has become apparent over time, is that America has near zero understanding of what constitutes the Middle East. Dick Cheney is on record as saying “We go where the business is.” when alluding to Iraq and its oil.  What he didn’t say was — after we overcame their resistance. We cannot fathom why the Muslim world might hesitate to forfeit their customs for ours.

So John Wayne has left the building, but his folk-imprimatur is still at the heart of the American Empire. The spirit of John Wayne is currently in every cockpit now over Iraq and Syria, serendipitously bombing the shit out of everything that moves in the hope of vanquishing all resistance to American hegemony. We don’t really know who we are bombing, but quantitatively speaking, there’s a lot to bomb, because there’s a lot of oil down there.

So when did ‘expertise’ — as in leave it to the specialists — become antithetical to the voice of the people; how did the social glue that kept the narrative alive, so easily slip into a fascination for celebrity-observation that left the masses mesmerised by the life-styles of the rich and famous. With screens of one kind or another proliferating, the mesmerised multitude slid seamlessly into anonymity as they ogled off the vapid lives in the entertainment loop. Entertainment relieved boredom while commodified reality became mesmerizingly desirable.

Then finally, what is the value of this American-style democracy that is being touted across the world? If it works as badly as it seems to do on its home patch, why would the rest of the world want to experience the grave inequality that renders so many of its citizens irrelevant? In February of this year, $24 billion was cut from the food stamp programme while $67 billion was added to the military as a way to BOMB away the national treasure.

But a final thought: maybe there is an awareness of some kind stirring in our better selves? A new mood formulating a cinematic trailer for the national psyche. A new form of born-againness waiting in the wings to reclaim a common shareable speech that consensually recognises the need for a change of direction. After all, we are a people, not a machine, and along the way, we might just discover that Muslims are people too, not amorphous collateral.


 

Originally published at Dissident Voice.

Denis A. Conroy is a retired businessman and journalist, and a voracious follower of matters political outside of the mainstream arena. Read other articles by Denis A..


NOTICE: YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS (SIGNUPS TO OUR PERIODICAL BULLETIN) ARE COMPLETELY FREE, ALWAYS. AND WE DO NOT SELL OR RENT OUR EMAIL ADDRESS DATABASES.  




Hong Kong’s Umbrellas are ‘Made in USA’

WILLIAM ENGDAHL | NEW EASTERN OUTLOOK

hong-kongProtestsNEO

Hong Kong may be in the grip of the latest US-manufactured (or abetted) “color revolution.” (click to expand)


[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he Washington neo-cons and their allies in the US State Department and Obama Administration are clearly furious with China, as they are with Russia’s Vladimir Putin. As both Russia and China in recent years have become more assertive about defining their national interests, and as both Eurasian powers draw into a closer cooperation on all strategic levels, Washington has decided to unleash havoc against Beijing, as it has unleashed the Ukraine dis-order against Russia and Russian links to the EU. The flurry of recent deals binding Beijing and Moscow more closely—the $400 billion gas pipeline, the BRICS infrastructure bank, trade in rubles and renminbi by-passing the US dollar—has triggered Washington’s response. It’s called the Hong Kong ‘Umbrella Revolution’ in the popular media. 

In this era of industrial globalization and out-sourcing of US industry to cheap-labor countries, especially to China, it’s worth taking note of one thing the USA—or more precisely Washington DC and Langley, Virginia—are producing and exporting to China’s Hong Kong. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China has been targeted for a color revolution, one that has been dubbed in the media the Umbrella Revolution for the umbrellas that protesters use to block police tear gas.

The “umbrellas” for Hong Kong’s ongoing Umbrella Revolution are made in Washington. Proof of that lies not only in the obscenely-rapid White House open support of Occupy Central just hours after it began, following the same model they used in Ukraine. The US State Department and NGOs it finances have been quietly preparing these protests for years. Consider just the tip of the Washington Hong Kong “democracy” project.

Same dirty old cast of characters…

With almost by-now-boring monotony, Washington has unleashed another of its infamous Color Revolutions. US Government-steered NGOs and US-trained operatives are running the entire Hong Kong “Occupy Central” protests, ostensibly in protest of the rules Beijing has announced for Hong Kong’s 2017 elections. The Occupy Central Hong Kong protest movement is being nominally led by a 17-year-old student, Joshua Wong, who resembles a Hong Kong version of Harry Potter, a kid who was only just born the year Britain reluctantly ended its 99-year colonial occupation, ceding the city-state back to the Peoples’ Republic. Wong is accompanied in Occupy Central by a University of Minnesota-educated hedge fund money man for the protests, Edward Chin; by a Yale University-educated sociologist, Chan Kin-man; by a Baptist minister who is a veteran of the CIAs 1989 Tiananmen Square destabilization, Chu Yiu-ming; and by a Hong Kong University law professor, Benny Tai Yiu-ting, or Benny Tai.


With almost by-now-boring monotony, Washington has unleashed another of its infamous Color Revolutions. US Government-steered NGOs and US-trained operatives are running the entire Hong Kong “Occupy Central” protests…


 

hong-kong-protest

No doubt some people are true believers in the causes of their revolution because the Chinese government could stand some improvement. Washington’s meddling, however, is not triggered by ethical considerations. (Click to expand)

Behind these Hong Kong faces, the US State Department and its favorite NGO, the US Congress-financed National Endowment for Democracy (NED), via its daughter, the National Democratic Institute (NDI), is running the Occupy Central operation. Let’s look behind the nice façade of peaceful non-violent protest for democracy and we find a very undemocratic covert Washington agenda.

Start with Chu Yiu-ming, the Baptist minister chosen to head Occupy Central. The most reverend Chu Yiu-ming is a founder and sits on the executive committee of a Hong Kong NGO– Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor (HKHRM). HKHRM as they openly admit on their website, is mainly financed by the US State Department via its neo-conservative Color Revolution NGO called National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

They state their purpose: “HKHRM briefs the press, the United Nations, local and overseas governments and legislative bodies on Hong Kong human rights issues both orally and through written reports.”  In their 2013 Annual Report, the NED reports giving Rev. Chu Yiu-ming’s HK Human Rights Monitor a grant of US$ 145,000. You can buy a boatload of umbrellas for that. Chu’s HKHRM also works with another NED-financed creation, the Alliance for Reform and Democracy in Asia (ARDA).

When Occupy Central top honchos decided to (undemocratically) name the very reverend Chu as leader of Occupy Central this past January, 2014, Chu said it was because “I have more connections with different activist groups, and experience in large-scale social campaigns.” He could have named NED as activist group and the CIA’s 1989 Tiananmen Square as a ‘large-scale social campaign,’ to be more specific. The Baptist preacher admitted that he was named de facto leader of Occupy Central by two other leading organizers of the civil disobedience movement, Benny Tai Yiu-ting and Dr Chan Kin-man, who wanted him “to take up” the role.

Benny Tai is also familiar with the US State Department. Tai, law professor at the University of Hong Kong and co-founder of Hong Kong Occupy Central, works with the Hong Kong University Centre for Comparative and Public Law which receives grants from the NED subsidiary, National Democratic Institute for projects like Design Democracy Hong Kong. The Centre Annual Report states, “With funding assistance from the National Democratic Institute, the Design Democracy Hong Kong website was built to promote a lawful and constructive bottom-up approach to constitutional and political reform in Hong Kong.” On its own website, NDI describes its years-long Hong Kong law project, the legal backdrop to the Occupy demands which essentially would open the door for a US-picked government in Hong Kong just as Victoria Nuland hand-picked a US-loyal coup regime in Ukraine in February 2014. The NDI boasts,

The Centre for Comparative and Public Law (CCPL) at the University of Hong Kong, with support from NDI, is working to amplify citizens’ voices in that consultation process by creating Design Democracy Hong Kong (www.designdemocracy.hk), a unique and neutral website that gives citizens a place to discuss the future of Hong Kong’s electoral system

The Hong Kong wunderkind of the Color Revolution Washington destabilization, 17-year-old student, Joshua Wong, founded a Facebook site called Scholarism when he was 15 with support from Washington’s neo-conservative National Endowment for Democracy via its left branch, National Democratic Institute and NDI’s NDItech project. And another Occupy Central leading figure, Audrey Eu Yuet recently met with Vice President Joe Biden. Hmmmm.

Cardinal Zen and cardinal sin…

Less visible in the mainstream media but identified as one of the key organizers of Occupy Central is Hong Kong’s Catholic Church Cardinal Bishop Emeritus, Joseph Zen. Cardinal Zen according to the Hong Kong Morning Post, is playing a key role in the US-financed protests against Beijing’s authority. Cardinal Zen also happens to be the primary Vatican adviser on China policy. Is the first Jesuit Pope in history, Pope Francis, making a US-financed retry at the mission of Society of Jesus founder (and, incidentally, the Pope’s real namesake) Francis Xavier, to subvert and take over the Peoples’ Republic of China, using Hong Kong as the Achilles Heel?

Vice President Joe Biden, whose own hands are soaked with the blood of thousands of eastern Ukraine victims of the neo-nazi civil war; Cardinal Zen; Reverend Chu; Joshua Wong; Benny Tai and the neo-conservative NED and its NDI and a bevy of other State Department assets and NGO’s too numerous to name here, have ignited a full-blown Color Revolution, the Umbrella Revolution. The timing of the action, a full two years before the Hong Kong 2017 elections, suggests that some people in Washington and elsewhere in the west were getting jumpy.

The growing Eurasian economic space of China in conjunction with Putin’s Russia and their guiding role in creating a peaceful and very effective counter-pole to Washington’s New World (dis-)Order, acting through organizations such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the BRICS, is the real target of their dis-order. That is really quite stupid of them, but then, they are fundamentally stupid people who despise intelligence.


 

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”
First appeared: 
http://journal-neo.org/2014/10/24/hong-kong-s-umbrellas-are-made-in-usa/


NOTICE: YOUR SUBSCRIPTIONS (SIGNUPS TO OUR PERIODICAL BULLETIN) ARE COMPLETELY FREE, ALWAYS. AND WE DO NOT SELL OR RENT OUR EMAIL ADDRESS DATABASES.