<span style="color: #ff0000;">World headlines announced Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz’s death. At age 90. After being hospitalized on December 31. Suffering from pneumonia.
His half-brother Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud succeeds him. Aged 79. Reportedly suffering from dementia or Parkinson’s disease.
Initially Reuters headlined “New king, same oil policy.” Changed to “New Saudi king seen holding the line on OPEC policy to keep oil output high.” The Wall Street Journal headlined “Death of King Unlikely to Alter Saudi Oil Policy.”
The Financial Times headlined “Saudi Arabia’s new King Salman bids to reassure markets.” AP headlined “Saudi King Abdullah, a Gradual Modernizer, Dead at 90.” BBC headlined “Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz dies.” Saying prior to announcing his death, “Saudi television cut to Koranic verses, which often signifies the passing of a senior royal.”
He died on Thursday at 22:00 GMT (5:00 PM New York time). The Washington Post called him “a wily king who embraced limited reform.” The New York Times said he became “a force of moderation.” A litany of praise followed for one of the world’s most repressive rulers heading a ruthless regime.
James Petras commented earlier. Calling the Kingdom infested with “all the vices and none of the virtues of an oil rich state like Venezuela.” “The country is governed by a family dictatorship which tolerates no opposition and severely punishes human rights advocates and political dissidents.”
It “finances the most fanatical, retrograde, misogynist version of Islam, “Wahhabi” a sect of Sunni Islam.” Prince Bandar bin Sultan masterminds Saudi’s terror network, said Petras. Partnered with high-level “US political, military and intelligence officials.”
State terror enforces repressive policies. No opposition is tolerated. Elections when held are farcical. Ruling family dictatorship thugs run things. Expect no meaningful change under Salman. Repressive business as usual continues. Human Rights Watch called Abdullah’s so-called reforms “largely symbolic.” He “failed to secure the fundamental rights of Saudi citizens to free expression, association and assembly.”
Obama paid tribute to his “valued” ally. Saying “(t)he closeness and strength of the partnership between our two countries is part of King Abdullah’s legacy.” One rogue leader praised another. Obama ludicrously claimed Abdullah “took bold steps” for regional peace. Rogue leadership best describes him. A longstanding destabilizing influence. Partnered with Obama’s war on Syria. Supporting extremist takfiris against Assad. Supplying them with chemical and other weapons. Relatively few in number IS beheadings make headlines. Longstanding Saudi practice gets practically no attention.
A rare October 2014 Newsweek article headlined “When It Comes to Beheadings, ISIS Has Nothing Over Saudi Arabia.”
America’s “closest Arab ally,” said Newsweek. Kingdom “decapitations are routine.” For “crimes including political dissent.” “(A)nd the international press hardly seems to notice.” Dozens of people have “their heads lopped off” annually.
On average, one every four days. Along with other horrendous forms of punishment. Including whippings involving hundreds of lashes. Sometimes 1,000. Administered about 50 at a time. Too many at once assures extremely painful death.
Newsweek said beheadings occur in public. “People…gather to watch…” British author John R. Bradley calls them the “only form of public entertainment” besides football. One Saudi executioner, Mohammed Saad al-Beshi, said he beheaded up to seven prisoners a day. Calling it “God’s work.” Newsweek’s article is the exception proving the rule. Virtually none of this makes Western headlines. Especially in America.
Absolute monarchal rule is despotic, lawless and brutal. Police state ruthlessness writ large.
Horrific Saudi crimes aren’t reported. Obama turned truth on its head calling US/Saudi ties a “force for stability and security in the Middle East and beyond.” The State Department publishes annual human rights reports on over 190 countries. Its latest in April 2014.
Discussing Kingdom “human rights problems. (I)including torture and other abuses…”
“(O)vercrowding in prisons and detention centers…”
“(H)olding political prisoners and detainees…”
“(D)enial of due process; arbitrary arrest and detention…”
“(A)rbitrary interference with privacy, home, and correspondence.”
“Violence against women, trafficking in persons, and discrimination based on gender, religion, sect, race, and ethnicity (remain) common.”
“Lack of governmental transparency and access made it difficult to assess the magnitude of many reported human rights problems.”
Known abuses include “arbitrary and unlawful deprivation of life.” State-sponsored kidnappings and disappearances.
“Torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.”
Horrific prison and detention center treatment. Arbitrary arrests and detentions. “Denial of fair public trial(s).”
No due process or judicial fairness whatever. Thousands of political prisoners with no rights whatever. “Arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home or correspondence.” No human or civil rights whatever allowed. Saudi “civil law does not protect human rights, including freedom of speech and the press.”
Internet freedom is verboten. None whatever exists. Nor academic freedom. Nor free cultural expressions. Nor free peaceful assembly and association. Nor freedom of religion. Nor freedom of internal movement, foreign travel and repatriation.
Asylum granted only “if public interest so dictates.” Refugees and asylum seekers prohibited from legally seeking work. Or have access to education, healthcare, public housing, legal services or other social ones. Significant numbers of Saudi residents are legally stateless. Mostly native born ones.
Saudi citizens have no right to change their government. Saud family members maintain total control. Political parties and similar groups are forbidden. So is the right to organize politically. Collective bargaining rights are banned. Discrimination against women excludes them from most aspects of public life. Government is rife with corruption.
Transparency is nonexistent. Internal and international human rights groups are banned. Consensual same-sex conduct is punishable by death or flogging. Civil and human rights abuses are rampant. Absolute monarchal rule is despotic, lawless and brutal. Police state ruthlessness writ large.
An October 2014 Amnesty International (AI) report is titled “Saudi Arabia’s ACPRA: How the Kingdom Silences its Human Rights Activists.” It explains how Saudi officials harass, detain and abuse human rights workers. Going to “extreme lengths to hound critics into silent submission,” said AI.
ACPRA is the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association. Founded in October 2009. Dissolved in March 2013. On March 9, 2013, a so-called Saudi court sentenced two of its leaders to 15 years in prison. For “offenses that included sedition and giving inaccurate information to foreign media.”
According to AI’s Middle East and North Africa program deputy director Said Boumedouha:
“The Saudi Arabian authorities have consolidated their iron grip on power through a systematic and ruthless campaign of persecution against peaceful activists in a bid to suppress any criticism of the state in the aftermath of the 2011 Arab uprisings.”
AI’s report focuses on 11 ACPRA activists. Saudi authorities targeted its founding members. Three currently serve 15-year prison terms. Two are incarcerated without charge. Three others awaited trial when AI’s report was published. Another three were tried. As of last fall they were free. All 11 were harassed. Most were detained short-term or imprisoned for months or years.
Charges besides the one listed above included one or more of the following:
“(B)reaking allegiance to and disobeying the ruler.”
“(I)nciting public opinion against the authorities.”
Equating peaceful demonstrators and dissenters with “terrorism.” According to AI’s report:
“ACPRA members spoke out repeatedly against the detention practices of the Saudi Arabian authorities and were especially critical of the Ministry of Interior and its feared security and intelligence branch, the General Directorate of Investigations (GDI) or al Mabahith, whose officers wield extensive powers and are able to arrest, detain, torture and abuse those they suspect with impunity.”
“(V)irtually all the country’s leading human rights activists are the imprisoned victims of an unrelenting official crackdown on criticism, dissent and other exercise of the right to freedom of expression.”
“Saudi Arabia has long evaded effective international scrutiny for its dire human rights record.” It’s a longstanding US ally. One rogue state supports another. Dirty business as usual continues. Expect no meaningful change ahead.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.