Print this post.OpEds | BRETT ARENDS | Marketwatch
Where’s the outrage over other endangered species, or the consumption of lambs, chickens and cows?
TV host Jimmy Kimmel: ‘The big question is: Why are you shooting a lion in the first place? I mean, I’m honestly curious to know why a human being would feel compelled to do that. How is that fun?’
Everyone is up in arms over the murder of Cecil the lion in Zimbabwe.
Facebook is convulsed with fury. Twitter is in a tizzy. Jimmy Kimmel got choked up on national TV.
Minneapolis-area dentist Walter Palmer, who killed Cecil on a trophy hunt, has now gone into hiding, fearing for his life. He’s closed his dental practice. TV cameras are camping out on his doorstep. Protest marches are being organized against him.
Read: Want to shoot your own African Lion? It’ll cost you
Nothing could be more hideous than some rich Westerner murdering a defenseless animal for no good reason, right? Animals, as Mia Farrow pointed out on Twitter, are not trophies.
Protests Erupt Over Killing of Cecil the Lion(1:13) Protesters gathered outside the office of Walter Palmer, the American dentist accused of illegally killing a protected lion in Zimbabwe. The killing has drawn international condemnation. Photo: Reuters
Sure. I happen to agree with all of the above. But I just wanted to add one little thing.
Spare me. Please. Spare me the overweening, gigantic, appalling, ridiculous, farcical and sanctimonious hypocrisy.
There are more than 20,000 species worldwide at risk of extinction, and where is the outrage about them?
Killing animals for no good reason is an outrage? Really?
How’s that steak? Had any good lobster this summer? What about some finger-lickin’-good chicken or some baby back ribs?
Have you ever seen the inside of a slaughterhouse?
I like Jimmy Kimmel, but advertisers on his network DIS, +0.15% include pretty much every national chain restaurant and food company.
Within 24 hours of Kimmel getting upset on national TV, nearly a million people had gone on YouTube to share the moment.
Meanwhile, a video showing chickens being tortured at a U.S. chicken-processing plant was uploaded several weeks ago. Only a fraction as many have bothered to watch it.
But, hey, that’s different, right?
I come to this neither with clean hands nor any claim to perfection. Until last year I ate meat. For some time I had become increasingly uncomfortable with the idea of living creatures being killed so I could eat them. Then I paid a visit to a farm and found myself petting a disabled newborn lamb. (I’m sorry if this sounds utterly ridiculous. It is utterly ridiculous. But that’s how it happened.) Afterward I asked myself: How in hell could I ever eat lamb chops again?
Like many “vegetarians,” I still make occasional exceptions for fish, although less and less often. I question how self-aware a fish really is. But feel free to yell at me if you wish.
When I was growing up, our family at one point kept pigs. We named them all — from “Little Pig” to “Big Pig” to “Sneaker-Eater,” who would, as his name implies, nibble at the toes of your sneaker if you put them against the fence. It didn’t stop us from eating the bacon and ham when the time came. I view things differently now.
It’s easy to claim the case of Cecil the lion is “totally different” from the case of all the millions of defenseless animals we kill every year for food. (The phrases “totally different” and “completely different” —as in “Oh, but that’s totally different” — always crop up when hypocrites are trying to defend themselves against the charge of hypocrisy.)
Yes, lions are at risk of extinction, while cows, pigs and sheep aren’t. But the death of a single lion is hardly material in this regard. There are more than 20,000 species worldwide at risk of extinction, and where is the outrage about them? (Oh, and cattle farming is threatening the entire planet with extinction.)
U.S. dentist accused of killing beloved lion(1:43)
Others say that at least we eat the other animals we kill. Yes, indeed. But we don’t have to. And if Walter Palmer had eaten Cecil, would that have been OK?
Others point out that Cecil took many hours to die. No kidding. I share your outrage. But, then, the cruelty to animals in slaughterhouses, and in many industrial farms, is no joke, either. Lobsters get boiled alive. How ’bout that?
My favorite objection in this instance is that Cecil was a really popular, well-known lion on his game preserve in Zimbabwe. Palmer actually apologized for killing an animal that was a “known, local favorite.”
Um, what? Would it be OK if he was unpopular, or unknown? Do all the cows and lambs being sent to the slaughterhouse deserve their fate?
Nobody can fight the thundering herd of human hysteria when it gets into full stampede, and no one is going to stop this one, either. It will have to run itself out over the next few weeks. Every TV presenter who wants to copy Jimmy Kimmel is going to be chopping onions furiously in the commercial breaks to get the waterworks flowing.
If all this leads to some good, so much the better. But if it is just a short-lived and pointless festival of sanctimony, we might as well just skip it.
If Palmer is smart, he’ll stay in hiding and say absolutely nothing for the next month or two. Nothing he says or does will help him until this blows over. I hope he never hunts another animal again. But, then, I hope everyone else will stop pointlessly killing animals, as well. Fat chance, alas.
Enjoy your hamburger.
…
Editor’s Note: Perhaps reflecting the capitalist/speciesist bias of MarketWatch audience, seems like Brett Arendts got slugged. A majority of the comments were apparently filed by cynics, idiots or insensitive oafs. Most thought the story was sad, but par for the course. Some castigated him for deviating from his usual turf, “financial commentary.” A deep defeatist, status-quo-accepting streak was evident. Here’s some examples:
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
FACT TO REMEMBER:
IF THE WESTERN MEDIA HAD ITS PRIORITIES IN ORDER AND ACTUALLY INFORMED, EDUCATED AND UPLIFTED THE MASSES INSTEAD OF SHILLING FOR A GLOBAL EMPIRE OF ENDLESS WARS, OUTRAGEOUS ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, AND DEEPENING DEVASTATION OF NATURE AND THE ANIMAL WORLD, HORRORS LIKE THESE WOULD HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED MANY YEARS, PERHAPS DECADES AGO. EVERY SINGLE DAY SOCIAL BACKWARDNESS COLLECTS ITS OWN INNUMERABLE VICTIMS.
REBLOGGERS NEEDED. APPLY HERE!
Get back at the lying, criminal mainstream media and its masters by reposting the truth about world events. If you like what you read on The Greanville Post help us extend its circulation by reposting this or any other article on a Facebook page or group page you belong to. Send a mail to Margo Stiles, letting her know what pages or sites you intend to cover. We MUST rely on each other to get the word out!
And remember: All captions and pullquotes are furnished by the editors, NOT the author(s).
When I clicked to read I assumed perhaps you were mildly upset by the murder of unborn babies and the selling of their tissue and organs. Guess not. Did read something about chickens as I scanned the article for something meaningful. Where are your morals Mr Arends? Where is your disgust for the activity of abortion? Hello………..where is your outrage about abortion sir?! Spare us from YOUR Hypocrisy!
Who would have ever thought a MW writer would be able to turn a hot topic of the day about the illegal killing of a lion in Africa into a self serving and self righteous pontification about veganism, and at the same time rake in far more mouse clicks than he would ever get writing on a financial subject that is actually within his field of expertise.
Way to go, Brett! It’s all about the mouse clicks, right?