by PATRICK COCKBURN
Once again the world has underestimated the strength and viciousness of Isis. The group has always retaliated against any attack by targeting civilians and killing them in a way that ensures maximum publicity. This happened most recently in Turkey on 10 October when Isis suicide bombers killed 102 people attending a pro-Kurdish peace demonstration. In Kobani in Syria at the end of June, Isis suicide squads avenged recent military defeats by the Syrian Kurds by murdering at least 220 men, women and children. In Iraq, the leader of the Albu Nimr tribe told this newspaper how 864 of his tribesmen had been killed over the previous year for resisting Isis advances.
It was always likely that Isis would retaliate against the Russian air campaign in Syria that is targeting its forces and al-Qaeda clones such as the al-Nusra Front and Ahrar al-Sham. But the carefully planned destruction of a Russian plane with 224 people on board by a bomb on 31 October has presented Western governments and media with a publicity problem. They had been relentlessly pursuing a propaganda line that the Russian air strikes in Syria have avoided hitting Isis and are almost entirely directed against “moderate” or “Western-backed” Syrian opposition forces seeking to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad. The fact that Syrian armed opposition in north-west Syria is dominated by al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham is seldom mentioned.
Isis evidently does not have any doubts about the Russian air strikes being aimed at itself and cannot have done so since the raids started on 30 September, because an operation such as getting a bomb on to a plane at Sharm el Sheikh airport would take weeks to set up. There is a further misunderstanding about the Russian attacks on Isis and other salafi-jihadi armed groups in Syria. They are much heavier than anything being carried out by the US-led coalition, with 59 Russian strikes on one day recently compared to the US launching just nine.
There is a limitation on the use of US air power in Syria which may not be immediately evident, even to those who study communiqués issued by the US defence department. Of nine strikes on 6 November, three are described as being near Hawl, an Arab town in north-east Syria where the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) are fighting Isis. Two strikes were near Hasakah, also in north-east Syria and, again apparently, in support of the YPG. The remaining four were near Abu Kamal, near the Iraqi border, said to be an Isis “crude oil collection point”.
This is in keeping with the US air campaign’s almost exclusive focus in Syria on helping the Syrian Kurds in fighting Isis, and also attacking Isis-controlled oil facilities in north-east Syria. There are seldom any attacks on Isis when it is engaged in fighting the Syrian army because this might be interpreted as keeping Assad in power in Damascus. [Why would the US care one whit about this?Its clear Washington does not respect world opinion.—Eds] But this does not make much sense because American and British policy is meant to be to remove Assad, but keep the Syrian state in being. This would be unlike Iraq in 2003 when the US-led invasion overthrew Saddam Hussein, but destroyed the Iraqi state in the process and opened the door to a Sunni insurgency and the rise of al-Qaeda in Iraq.
It would therefore make sense, and have made sense over the last year, for the US air force to attack Isis when it is advancing against the Syrian army. It is this army which is the most important institution of the Syrian state, and if Washington and allies such as the British do not want to repeat the disastrous fiasco of their intervention in Iraq, they should support it when fighting Isis.
Again, sensible policy decisions are blocked by a view of the situation on the ground in Syria that is largely shaped by sloganeering and propaganda. In this case, the Syrian opposition claim is that the Syrian army has never seriously fought Isis and, indeed, is complicit in its growth and expansion. This view has been widely credited, though it is demonstrably false because Isis has repeatedly fought and usually defeated the Syrian army in eastern Syria. It captured Palmyra in May and has since advanced to within a few miles of the crucial north-south M5 highway linking Damascus to Homs. For a few days recently, it cut the last government-held road into Aleppo before being driven back by the Syrian army supported by Russian air strikes.
Patrick Cockburn is the author of The Rise of Islamic State: ISIS and the New Sunni Revolution.
Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com
We apologize for this inconvenience.
Nauseated by the
vile corporate media?
Had enough of their lies, escapism,
omissions and relentless manipulation?
Send a donation to
The Greanville Post–or
But be sure to support YOUR media.
If you don’t, who will?
There are condemnations of ISIL and its cruelties from every angle, but nobody dares to expose what the raison d’etre for this Islamic movement is. Joined by the former Ba’atist Iraqi military and seemingly resistant to the intensive bombing by the West and now by Russia, it must surely depend on the full support of many in the region. As such it is so far the most effective anti-imperialist military reaction to the brutal imperialism from the West and Russia. It mirrors the atrocities committed by the West since the crusaders and intends to end the exploitation of the region’s… Read more »
The Arab army of ISIL is accused of unmentionable cruelties and indeed they are now as unrelentingly savage as the traditional assassins (Hashshashins) in medieval Syria trained by the Old Man of the Mountain (see the writings of William Burroughs). But the Christian West who is trying to destroy ISIL has a history of far more savageries than seen today in North Africa and the Middle-East, from the scalping of the American Indians (a Western invention) to the chopping off of heads during the French Revolution, from the burning alive of ‘heretics’ by the Roman Church Inquisition to the scientific… Read more »
Is the “Christian west trying to destroy ISIS” ? The US and its NATO appendages in Europe claim they are, but after 2 years of allegedly trying, they hadn’t done much damage. Then again after the CIA went to all the trouble and expense of creating ISIS and their fundamentalist compatriots, it would be bad sportsmanship for the same U.S. govt. to wipe them out (and not cost effective either) . I think its a waste of time trying to explain the world in mediaeval, nationalist, religious/ethnic terms anyway. The Sunni Muslim fanatics who rule the gulf monarchies are as… Read more »
The pity is that there are actually only a few major players who want war and domination. “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” – Mama Rothschild I always notice this statement in the righthand column of this website: “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” – Kissinger The people of any region, of any religion, are not all that interested in conquering, dominating, owning other people and other people’s resources. It is a few who do. When we generalize the world situation and make blanket statements about… Read more »
1. ISIL has been hard to eradicate because its ideology of driving foreigners out of their lands is shared by many inhabitants of the region. 2. It was not ‘created’ by the CIA as little as Bin Laden was ‘created’ by the CIA. These resistance movements were already there in the fifties after World War II in one form or another and are/were financed by Saudi-Arabia (despite propaganda not a friend of the West). 3. Having studied in Lebanon with Palestinians, it was clear to me that ethnic, religious and nationalist feelings weigh heavier than abstract Western Marxist theories. 4.… Read more »
Look at the destroyed homes behind the gentleman in the picture. It doesn’t look real, its more Hollywood imagination, but make no mistake, it is real and it is a direct result of American empire at its absolute worst! It is difficult for me not to hate Americans, but I don’t. I certainly hate what the do though.