Commentary: “Militarized” refugees – a success story.
Current events in Syria and the broader Middle East have brought forth the idea of “militarized” refugees. This is not a new concept but its present incarnation comes most clearly from General Breedlove – a misnomer if there ever was one – who said,
This whole statement is essentially a lie. The military weapons being used by al-Assad may be imprecise, but the targeting by Russian forces has displayed accurate and effective attacks against ISIS and al-Qaeda associated terrorists. It is certainly not within their plans to create a wave of refugees as that could have considerable blowback (I’ll revisit this idea later) towards Russia in both the European and the Caucasus regions.
SIDEBAR
Zionist terrorism has been swept under the rug, relegated to the “fog of history.” But the facts remain irrefutable.
Irgun recruiting poster: a man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. The guy with the bigger propaganda bullhorn wins.
The King David Hotel, hit by the Irgun gang in 1946. Menachem Begin, eventually a PM of Israel, was a prominent member of the group.
New York Times headline. Notice the Times conceals the fact that the blast killed 93 people by relegating 52 to the status of being merely “buried in debris.”
Cartoon critical of the Zionist underground organizations after the explosion at the palatial King David Hotel. Public opinion was momentarily shocked and revolted by the terrorist act (July 22, 1946), but pro-Zionist propaganda soon gained the upper hand once more. The target was the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[9] of the hotel in Jerusalem. The blast killed 93 and injured 41, many seriously.
Monument to the Irgun, in Israel.
(Left) The bomb the demolished much of the King David Hotel in 1946 was concealed in a milk can.
Defining “militarized” refugees
[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he main point however is the weaponizing – referred to by others in politics and the press as militarizing – of the refugees. This carries two aspects: first that the refugees themselves are the weapon, as indicated by Breedlove, in order to “overwhelm” social and economic structures of the EU; second, that some of the refugees are trained and armed for terrorist attacks.
It could well be true that there are militarized refugees in the EU arriving from the Middle East, but the source is certainly not the Syrian government nor the Russian military. If there is a source one only need examine the actions of Turkey over the past several months to realize that Turkey is the initiative behind the migration. For Turkey it is an effort to blackmail the EU and NATO into supporting Turkey’s goals in the Middle East which is essentially to establish a new mini-Caliphate supported by ISIS in Syria and Iraq.
Concept in history
The militarized refugee concept is not a new historical construct. An online search will bring the reference up in mostly academic papers in all areas of recent conflict from Rwanda to Yugoslavia and over to Vietnam. These papers also carry the same two ideas about refugees: one, that the refugees themselves are the weapon; and that refugees are militarized once they are in a foreign country.
Both these ideas have elements of truth to them, but only elements. For the latter point, it is mainly an academic-social construct. For the former point – that is Breedlove’s – it is pure propaganda over an opportunistic Turkish government’s not so well planned idea.
There is one area that I could not find a reference about any militarized refugees even though that area is by the above definitions the most singularly powerful example of militarized refugees being used to “overwhelm…structures and break…resolve.”
Besides being a major nuclear power, Israel not only receives but manufactures highly sophisticated weapons, including tanks. The country has more tanks than France, a large and state-of-the-art air force, and many other defense capabilities, aside from unconditional US protection.
“Smoke rises into the air from central Gaza as Israeli soldiers take positions after crossing the border into the Gaza Strip on January 4, 2009. Israeli troops pushed deeper into Gaza and clashed in fierce battles with Hamas fighters today as Israel upped its deadly offensive on the Islamists in their overcrowded stronghold.” So read an AFP report. [PHOTO/JACK GUEZ/AFP)
It started at the political level, mainly in the UK. The British imperial interests recognized the value of the Middle East oil reserves as an energy source for the Royal Navy. This coincided with its colonial India interests and thus in maintaining a peaceful transit route through the Suez Canal. The British government makes reference to a Jewish state as an “outpost” of western control in the region, couched in the usual imperial terms of civilization and freedom. The declarations within the Balfour letter, while not a legal nor international document, helped create the support for a Jewish state in Palestine.
At first the historical record is mostly passive, with occasional riots and attacks as the Jewish immigrants set about to control as much land and as much political space as they could. At this point the main military action descended from the British forces. Before WW II in the late 1930s a large rebellion by the Palestinians was put down by British military forces, aided by Jewish partisans.
As momentum gathered towards WW II, the Irgun (formed in 1931), the Haganah (1921), and the even more militant Stern Gang (1940) undertook many “militarized” actions. Much of that was directed at the British who at the time considered the groups to be terrorists. Thus, even before WW II, the situation in Palestine consisted of highly militarized refugees attempting to “overwhelm…structures and break…resolve.”
Postwar militarization
WW II of course significantly changed the momentum of the creation of Israel. In postwar Europe there were masses of refugees and displaced persons, many of whom were Jewish survivors of Nazi attempts to eliminate them.
They were militarized to a great degree by the politics of the day, as the U.S., Canada, and other untouched countries severely limited immigration of Jewish refugees. This is in part due to the influence of Jewish pressure on various governments to encourage the Jewish refugees to go to Israel.
The U.S. became the world superpower and its Jewish lobby supported the creation of Israel for the same reasons as the UK: to create an outpost of “civilization” in the Middle East, an outpost that would continue to control the region’s resources and people. It was also to serve as a bulwark against the burgeoning Cold War and the imagined threat from the Soviet Union.
In the above sense, the refugees themselves were a military weapon. More importantly and often left out of the narrative is the nature of the actual militarization by armed force of the Jewish national interest.
Militarized Judaism
[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he Haganah, Irgun, and Stern Gang were militarily trained units already operating within Palestine (paramilitaries). They had superior organization and superior weaponry to anything the Palestinians had. After the war they morphed into the Israeli Defense Forces (1948) a conscript army to which all Israeli citizens (excepting some religious sects) had to join. Adding to this military superiority were the large number of seasoned and well trained personnel returning from action in WW II.
The Jewish narrative of a small population being overwhelmed by a superior Arab force is simply a myth as per more recent research into the IDF archives. The Jewish forces were numerically superior after the war, with most references giving them a three to one advantage over the Arab forces. The yishuv had already created its own small armaments industry, had taken over the structure and supplies left by the British, and were continually importing military equipment and supplies from Europe.
Even before the war of independence, some of these forces had started the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. After the war officially began and the other Arab countries entered the war, the ethnic cleansing continued unabated and the Arab forces were in most cases readily defeated.
Blowback
[dropcap]B[/dropcap]ecause of Israel’s success, and the ongoing pursuit of global dominance by the U.S./NATO/EU partnership, there have been millions of displaced persons and refugees in the Middle East and South Asia over the past several decades. As a result of western military depredations against these other formerly stable – if autocratic – governments – most specifically in Libya, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan – a mass migration movement should not be a surprise.
What has not been recognized is that the current “militarized” refugee crisis is not caused by Russia or Syria, but by previous wars initiated by the west. When the pressure became too great for Turkey, they opened the gates towards Europe and allowed the refugees to flow out.
Israel is the greatest global success story concerning militarized/weaponized refugees. The current refugee crisis ‘aimed’ at Europe is blowback from that success.
Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com
We apologize for this inconvenience.
=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
[email-subscribers namefield=”YES” desc=”” group=”Public”]
Nauseated by the
vile corporate media?
Had enough of their lies, escapism,
omissions and relentless manipulation?
Send a donation to
The Greanville Post–or
But be sure to support YOUR media.
If you don’t, who will?
