Tactics & Strategies | OpEds | John Rachel
PREFATORY NOTE
Neutralizing the damage that Trump can do to the US and the world is only the first stage in the people’s journey to establish a genuine democracy. Achieving that goal should not stop the movement. The movement should not disband and go home at that point but look beyond. It must continue to dismantle the corrupt status quo that makes creatures like Trump, Hillary, Bush, McCain and other political criminals the only political choices allowed in the supposedly democratic marketplace. Because of that, while this essay lays out very clearly the path of elections to gain more authentic popular power, it should not be construed as endorsing only the electoral route to the introduction of real change in American society. The electoral game is rigged and elections under the current rules rarely if ever allow for the election of genuine progressives to the Congress. Thus to play only the electoral game is like believing it is possible to reform the Democratic party—the graveyard of social change movements. But difficult does not mean impossible, so read on…
Demonstrations, street theater, petitions, boisterous editorials are all very satisfying exercises and create the impression that we are doing something about the alarming state of our nation. All are valuable in building awareness. But let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that the ruling class and those installed in positions of power are paying attention or care one whit. We can make all of the noise we want and our arrogant masters will not budge. They probably find all of our venting rather amusing. In this article, the author focuses on the pointlessness of the Dump Trump movement. He claims it’s a waste of time and energy, diverting valuable resources to something which will make no difference. Those in power only understand one thing, and that is power itself. Our power resides only in what we can do to replace these tyrants. The election of 2018 is at this point our only hope. 435 members of the House and 33 senators are up for election. Only replacing all of these corporate lapdogs to the last man and woman will change the direction of our nation. So demonstrate, ventilate, remonstrate as much as possible, but the truly serious enterprise is REGIME CHANGE in Congress. Herein is a strategy for accomplishing that.
I have been consistently and forcefully inveighing against wasting time and energy on impeaching Donald Trump. The main thrust of my argument has been that while our Chief Executive — i.e. the President of the United States — is certainly very powerful and we can expect Trump to do a lot of damage, targeting him directly is the least effective way to halt his diabolical agenda. Rather, a truly progressive Congress, one representative of both the needs of everyday citizens and the greater good of the country, could isolate him and counter one-by-one all of his fiercest dictatorial efforts to dismantle democracy and further the self-serving agenda of the ruling class. As an example, if the orange autocrat signed an executive order permitting fracking on school playgrounds, Congress would pass a law prohibiting fracking on school playgrounds. If he signed an executive order banning bicycle lanes, Congress would pass a law authorizing bike lanes. You get the idea.
Recognize . . .
An enlightened Congress would be a bulwark against the broader agenda of the neoliberal juggernaut, the war mongering militarism of the neocons, and the rule by fiat of the rich and powerful. An enlightened Congress could legislate what the country wants and needs, in spite of an antagonistic, uncooperative White House, and could even put an end to the anti-democratic meddling and chicanery of the Deep State.
Unfortunately, my appeal for “regime change” in Congress has fallen on deaf ears. Maybe the piercing din of shrill cries for the Trumpster’s ouster have drown out my call for cooler heads and what is obvious to me is a more sane and effective approach. Or maybe a lot of folks just never bothered to pay attention in high school civics class, thus don’t understand the way our government actually works.
But I haven’t given up. The only genuine, permanent fix to our ailing system is replacing at bare minimum 450 of the corrupt pay-for-play corporate lapdogs currently seated in the House and Senate.
That is a given and nothing anyone can say or do to distract us can change that fact.
However, a very sobering thought just occurred to me. I hope it will wake folks up.
What is the line of succession for the presidency?
That is, if Trump is impeached, who will replace him?
That would be Mike Pence, the Vice-President. Pretty scary thought!
If Mike Pence is impeached, who replaces him?
None other than Paul Ryan, Speaker of the House of Representatives. Ugh! Even scarier! Here’s a man whose insensitivity and cruelty to the everyday citizen makes Ayn Rand look like Mother Theresa.
Then if Paul Ryan is impeached, who replaces him?
Orrin Hatch, President pro tempore of the Senate. Wonderful! Here’s a guy vilified as much by his own party as he is by the Democrats. Just what we need, more gridlock and cage fighting.
And if Orrin Hatch is impeached, who replaces him?
Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson. Yep, the drill-baby-drill former CEO of Exxon-Mobil. We probably will see fracking in school playgrounds if he becomes president.
If we are not suffering from impeachment burnout, and Rex Tillerson is then put on the chopping block, who replaces him?
Former Goldman Sachs CIO and hedge fund manager, now Secretary of the Treasury, Steven Mnuchin! Perfect. Maybe he’ll streamline the monetary system and just have the investment banks print money for themselves instead of the U.S. Treasury.
So . . . are you getting the picture?
Granted, Trump is an easy target. But impeaching him accomplishes nothing. It merely sets up month-after-month, year-after-year of more impeachment hearings. What Trump represents will not go away just because he does. As they say in sports, their bench is very deep.
What’s the solution? Where do we channel our rage? What will truly turn things around and start to fix this unbelievable mess?
Regime change in Congress is the only option and the only viable place to focus our time, energy and creativity. There are 33 Senate seats and 435 House seats up for grabs in the 2018 election. That’s where our power resides. That’s how we achieve genuine change. That’s how we turn our nation around.
I see little redeeming value in returning any of the incumbents to office. That’s just me. Citizens need to decide for themselves. But recognize, we need to start this right now. Waiting until next year will be too late.
How do we decide?
I have proposed — for over four years now — a simple solution.
Candidate contracts.
Decide what we want done. Present candidate contracts which specify what we want done.
There’s a lot of critical issues to choose from: Social Security, Medicare; minimum wage; taxing the rich, eliminating tax loopholes and corporate welfare; reducing the military, ending pointless wasteful wars; electoral reform (e.g. Citizens United and term limits); rebuilding roads, schools, communities; guaranteeing good K-12 education. We can even probably add student debt relief, truly universal single-payer health care, home mortgage relief, and a few others to this list.
Most importantly, there is an enormous amount of agreement among the vast majority of citizens on these key issues. Having said that, the candidate contract is entirely flexible and can be configured to reflect the unique priorities and will of the voters in each congressional district and in each state where there is a senatorial contest.
The underlying principle, however, is the same . . .
If a candidate signs the contract, he or she deserves our vote. Simply because at least on the issues which are covered by the contracts, WE KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WILL GET DONE. The candidate contracts are bulletproof, ironclad guarantees of representation!
No excuses. No compromise. No negotiation.
On the other hand . . .
If a candidate waffles, slithers, slides, and avoids discussing and signing the contracts, we then know they are “business as usual” types — i.e. full of wonderful-sounding but empty rhetoric, peddling deceptive campaign promises, so when they arrive in Washington DC they will forget us, the very people who voted them into their cushy jobs in our nation’s capitol.
If a candidate will not sign on the dotted line, he or she does not get our vote.
This concept is simple, straightforward, powerful.
No contract = no vote!
This is how we take all of the guesswork out of voting.
So . . .
Dumping Trump is a satisfying thought but it will not get the job done. Impeachment will take enormous time and energy, monopolize all of the resources we need to achieve real reform, and just set the stage for the next autocrat to push the agenda of the ruling class.
There is only one realistic option . . .
A truly representative Congress is the key — the only sensible, effective path — to restoring some semblance of democracy in this country.
Described in detail in two recent books are my ideas for how we conduct a bottoms-up, community-based, grass roots campaign for restoring democracy in America.
“Candidate Contracts: Taking Back Our Democracy” was published June of 2015 and is available worldwide from all the usual suspects:
Amazon (Kindle) . . . amzn.to/1QJRiNZ
Amazon (Print) . . . amzn.to/1Cuq0du
Apple (iTunes) . . . apple.co/1BXnPcy
Barnes & Noble . . . bit.ly/1GpTTLq
Kobo (Indigo) . . . bit.ly/1OEI2xj
Smashwords . . . bit.ly/1B4DQCp
Direct from printer . . . bit.ly/1MGjDnN
“Fighting for the Democracy We Deserve” was published September 2015 and is available both in every popular ebook format and as a deluxe paperback:
Amazon (Kindle) . . . amzn.to/1VMf2Ft
Amazon (Print) . . . amzn.to/1L9SdIC
Apple (iTunes) . . . apple.co/1JD1YAg
Barnes & Noble . . . bit.ly/1ZUJUpn
Kobo (Indigo) . . . bit.ly/1IX6rO4
Smashwords . . . bit.ly/22PXWLf
Direct from printer . . . bit.ly/1i7ISFM
You can follow his adventures and developing world view at: http://jdrachel.com. "Scribo ergo sum." 
John Rachel has a B. A. in Philosophy, has traveled extensively, is a songwriter, music producer, neo-Marxist and a bipolar humanist. He has written eight novels and three political non-fiction books. His most recent polemic is "The Peace Dividend: The Most Controversial Proposal in the History of the World." His political articles have appeared at OpEdNews, Russia Insider, Greanville Post, and other alternative media outlets. Currently in development is a new novel set in Japan and another in Africa. Author Rachel has been traveling through and living in over thirty-three countries since leaving America August of 2006. He is now somewhat rooted in a small traditional farming village in Japan near Osaka, where he proudly tends his small but promising vegetable garden and sets his non-existent watch by the thrice-daily ringing of Shinto temple bells at a local shrine.
MAIN IMAGE: Trump graphic. So far there is no shortage of derogatory images.
Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com
We apologize for this inconvenience.
What will it take to bring America to live according to its own propaganda?
=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
Please see our red registration box at the bottom of this page
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Greanville Post, a publication of The Voice of Nature Network, Inc., (VNN), a not-for-profit 501 (c) (3) corporation, will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Greanville Post grants permission to cross-post original The Greanville Post articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of The Greanville Post articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
THE GREANVILLE POST contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues, and the furtherance of peace and social justice, the defence of our planetary ecosystems, and the prevention and eventual elimination of human abuse, exploitation,.and cruelty toward any and all non-human species The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries contact us at greanville@gmail.com
