Be Afraid … Be Very Afraid!


Alarm, fear, panic, hysteria, dread are loose in Washington DC. Here are sample headlines which sum up why our lawmakers have emptied the shelves of smelling salts in the local apothecaries:


U.S. could potentially lose a war against China or Russia

US military edge has eroded, study says



U.S. military might “struggle to win, or perhaps lose”

War with China or Russia, report says

Our “official” defense budget for 2019 is $716 billion — $686 billion earmarked for the Department of Defense. That’s four times the defense budget of China, ten times the defense budget of Russia.


What’s the explanation? We’ve got the best-equipped, most powerful military money can buy. We’ve got the largest navy, the most submarines, the largest air force, the most tanks and artillery. We have over 800 bases around the world. And we can’t win a war against Russia or China?

What’s going on? 

Glad you asked.

It seems that the peddlers of this paranoiac prattle, aka pitchmen for the MIC and all who profit from promoting war, left out two words.

What two words? 

The two words are … (drumroll) … ‘of aggression’.

That’s right we can’t win a war OF AGGRESSION against China or Russia.

What’s left out of the sales pitch for more astronomical increases in our defense spending is some simple straightforward talk, which would undercut the whole argument for more military might.

You see, neither China or Russia can win a war of aggression against the U.S. or Europe either. Somehow that didn’t get mentioned. So the truth is, right now we are at parity with these countries. We can’t win attacking them. They can’t win attacking us. 

I would think this would be a cause for celebration. But that’s just me … and maybe 300 million other sane people in this country.

The difference is that neither China or Russia are trying to build some colossal offensive war machine. The major thrust of the defense spending for both of those countries is to DEFEND AGAINST a war of aggression. That’s where they put their money. And it takes a lot less money to defend a homeland, than to prepare to attack another country. Or to police an empire that stretches across the entire planet. A lot less!

That’s not to say that Russia and China don’t have offensive weapons. They do. But they deploy those weapons in a defensive posture. There are two ways to defend a country. Either you go head-to-head with an invading force, which would not just include soldiers, tanks, artillery, but also anti-ballistic missile systems, electronic warfare (incapacitating the high-tech weaponry of the attacking force), whatever mechanisms, some very destructive and lethal, are needed to keep the invaders at bay.

The Chinese Navy is not doing “freedom of navigation” exercises in the Caribbean or off the coast of New England or California. Russia and/or China are not conducting huge war games in Canada or Mexico. There are NO Chinese or Russian bases anywhere in our hemisphere.
The other major defensive category is the ability to inflict so much damage on the aggressor nation, its aggression results in “unacceptable losses”. That can be personnel, military assets, but it can also be non-military assets. For example, taking down the aggressor nation’s power grid, internet, communications, even their satellites, all of which compromise the aggressor nation’s capacity to continue waging a war fall into this category.

Creating weaponry for those two purposes, that is, to defeat an invading military force or to discourage an aggressive attack, is predominantly what Russia’s and China’s military R&D and asset deployment has excelled at. This type of weaponry is much less expensive. Which explains in very simple terms why they can have such effective militaries at a fraction of the cost.

The handwringing, cold sweats, hyperventilation, allegedly caused by our WAR WINNING GAP — remember the missile gap of the 70s and 80s — are symptoms of the insanity which has infected both major political parties, destroyed any perspective and common sense, made completely impossible any rational conversation about the role our military should play in the world, and especially voided any discussion of how much of our nation’s resources should be diverted away from constructive social programs — including but not limited to quality universal education, investment in sustainable productive infrastructure, quality universal health care, and getting serious about addressing the climate crisis — to support the grand imperial project of world domination with even more military expansion.

Right now, no one can win a war of aggression. In all probability, considering the dismal record of our military since WWII, no matter how much the U.S. spends, it will NEVER BE ABLE TO WIN A WAR OF AGGRESSION. If we keep pushing for war, as they say, be careful what you wish for. Because neither Russia or China will back down. The risks of a major confrontation with either going nuclear are very high.

Don’t forget those two words: ‘of aggression’. Because when the lunatics now in power talk about our diminishing military capacity, they are referring to our decreasing ability to mount an armada and take on Russia and China OVER THERE, not HERE — that is, winning a war in “their immediate sphere of influence”.

If you have any doubts about what I’m saying, just check any map of foreign deployed military bases and track where the war games are taking place.

The Chinese Navy is not doing “freedom of navigation” exercises in the Caribbean or off the coast of New England or California. Russia and/or China are not conducting huge war games in Canada or Mexico. There are NO Chinese or Russian bases anywhere in our hemisphere. Moreover, while both Russia and China have conducted large-scale war games — important to note these are exercises in defending against large scale attacks from an aggressor — they on held in Russia and in China, not in bordering countries, and certainly not thousands of miles away in “our immediate sphere of influence”.

Andrei Belousov, deputy head of the Department of Nonproliferation and Arms Control at the Russian Foreign Ministry, recently made this statement: “Linguistically, this difference is in just one word, both in Russian and in English; Russia is preparing for war, and the US is preparing a war….Yes, Russia is preparing for war, I have confirmed it. We are preparing to defend our homeland, our territorial integrity, our principles, our values, our people — we are preparing for such a war.”

Let’s hope they never have to fight such a war. We must relentlessly work toward removing the lunatics now in power in the Washington DC bubble — more resembling an insane asylum with each passing day — who apparently are preparing to launch such a war OF AGGRESSION against Russia, and another against China.

In summary, the military analysts are correct in saying, we can’t win such a war now. But they can double, triple, quadruple the defense budget, and it will accomplish nothing. No amount of destructive weapons will ever produce a winner in such a conflict. An attack on either Russia or China could very well go nuclear, in which case there will be no winners. There will be no one around period to plant flags or declare victory.

John Rachel
 johnRachel7 Senior Contributing Editor John Rachel has a B. A. in Philosophy, has traveled extensively, is a songwriter and music producer, a novelist, a left-of-left liberal, and has spent his life trying to resolve the intrinsic clash between the metaphysical purity of Buddhism and the overwhelming appeal of narcissism. John Rachel has a B.A. in Philosophy, and has written eight novels and three political non-fiction books. His political articles have appeared at OpEdNews, Russia Insider, The Greanville Post, and other alternative media outlets. Since leaving the U.S. in 2006, he has lived in and explored 33 countries. He is now somewhat rooted in a traditional, rural Japanese community about an hour from Osaka, where he lives with his wife of five years. Daily he rides his bicycle through the soybean fields and rice paddies which sprawl across the surrounding landscape. As of the date of the release of his most recent book, “The Peace Dividend: The Most Controversial Proposal in the History of the World”, he has a small but promising organic vegetable garden which begs his attention. You can follow his writing and the evolution of his world view at: “Scribo ergo sum.”

horiz-long greyblack-horizontal
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]

Make sure many more people see this. It's literally a matter of life an death. Imperial lies kill! Share widely.
  • 770

12 thoughts on “Be Afraid … Be Very Afraid!

  1. “The Chinese Navy is not doing “freedom of navigation” exercises in the Caribbean or off the coast of New England or California. Russia and/or China are not conducting huge war games in Canada or Mexico. There are NO Chinese or Russian bases anywhere in our hemisphere.”

    All true, very true but still – heresy I say! Heresy!!! We are the “exceptional” nation. We are the “indispensable” nation. We are the “psychopathic” nation. We are the only nation on planet earth that is “above the law!” We are the “bat-shit” crazy nation.

    God wills it!!!!! God wills it!!!!!

    Sorry, sorry, I just watched the directors cut of the fine movie – “Kingdom of Heaven” about the crusades, and couldn’t help but thinking that today’s pentagon war-crazy felt very much like the Mother Church’s war-crazy from a thousand years ago.

    Amazing that we in the West are still on this mad path of world domination rather than accepting life on a what could actually be a peaceful planet. It truly must be some sort of dark collective unconscious death wish of some sort, because there is nothing remotely rational about it.

    1. The CIA has determined with high confidence that Chinese hackers are using fortune cookies to infiltrate the cyberspace of the U.S. and whenever you accept “cookies” from a website, you are playing right into their slimy pork-drippings-slick hands. Chop chop! Suey suey!

      1. The other day I ate in a Chinese restaurant, and when I went to pay they gave me a fortune cookie without a future inside. When I demanded another one, the future said “Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye, Yankee imperialist running dog.” Should I be worried?

    2. Yeah you say!But look at all the Chinese restaurants around the world.Very subtle,devious people.I know.My wife is I have never felt so blessed.

    3. The “West” was greedy and imperialistic even before they began to master the navigational and war technology to spread and conquer like the Black Death in the 1500s. Spain alone had been at war with the moors for 800 years. The Rnglish had been fighting the Scots (and the Irish off and on) for almost as long. France’s Louis XIV, le roi soleil, was an imperialist through and through who waged wars almost nonstop with the aim of expanding his fiefdom. Western feudalism, while not unique in its bloodsoaked DNA (just watch some Kurosawa films about Japan’s unceasing feudal brawls) was certainly far more far reaching and sociopathic, and that is to say somehting considering the standards of the age. Of course, such barbarism had been inherited by the feudals from the decaying Roman empire and other Mediterranean empires, including the Babylonian, Sumerian, Macedonian and even Israelite—all bloodcurlingly murderous to a fault. That’s why when successful chieftains, after much protracted war, intrigues and betrayals, established a peace at swordpoint, everyone rejoiced and gave that dynasty immense rewards until new challengers, drven by thirst for power again rose to topple them. It’s a ghastly heritage. The UNO was and remains a fine and even noble idea, to have a universal forum for humanity to resolved quarrels in a civilised way, but the indispensable nation, true to its bloody traditions of plunder and hypocrisy has wrecked that project almost totally.

  2. The United States of Aggression always accuses its opponents of what it is guilty of.

    Recently on a trip to Oceania to advance American military expansionism in the region (against China), Mike Pence laughably pronounced that there is no place for empire and aggression in the world.

    If this is truly the case, there is no place for America in the world–given that the American Empire has just under 1000 military outposts encircling the planet and has been waging its “defensive” wars of aggression against multiple nations like Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, or Yemen for decades.

    The entire American worldview is an “alternative facts” unreality, to use a favored Trumpian NewSpeak phrase.

  3. All this would be correct and sad at the same time, but unfortunately one deals here with the worst of God’s creations, the human race. Reading a little history shows that if indeed there had been only animal empires, like Mr. Swift wrote about (horses) then a rationality and an animal decency would be possible. But history teaches us about human strife and greed starting with the duo Cain and Abel and ever since cruelty and territoriality have been the fate of the human species. If it succeeds in placing self discipline on the wayward public, then maybe we could live in peace and sing hallelujah, but don’t hold your breath.
    The best one can hope for the earth it that humans destroy themselves and that the world will be a very peaceful one living in abundance and an intelligent balance.

Leave a Reply