Macron’s ‘Pseudo National Debate’ Won’t Diffuse Yellow Vests Crisis – Journo


French President Emmanuel Macron’s willingness to listen to his people and curtail his arrogance raises doubts, French journalist Gilbert Mercier told Sputnik, commenting on the president’s national debate initiative. Dubbing the idea a “political theatre”, the journalist opined that Macron’s only option is to follow General de Gaulle’s example.

French President Emmanuel Macron’s “grand national debate” is largely a PR stunt, and an attempt to diffuse a wave of protests which is not fading away, says Gilbert Mercier, a French journalist, serving as the editor-in-chief of the News Junkie Post and the author of “The Orwellian Empire”.

“If you wish, it is political theatre, to show ‘his people’ that he is willing to listen,” Mercier told Sputnik. “However, the way it has been choreographed, shows that Macron is planning to do most of the talking, or at least direct the debate, listen to other elected officials, but certainly not open the debate directly with any Gilets Jaunes”.

On 13 January Macron announced a three-month national debate in his letter to the people of France.


​”In France, and also in Europe and the world, people are not just extremely worried, they are deeply distressed. We must respond with clear ideas,” the French president wrote.

However, it is doubtful that Macron is ready to listen and meet the people’s demands, according to the journalist.

“One thing has to be mentioned concerning the first event where Macron conveyed Mayors to attempt [a ‘reconciliation’]: the Gilets Jaunes were kept away from the town by a substantial number of Compagnies Républicaines de Sécurité (riot police) and Gendarmes. Some were even fined 135 euros for wearing a yellow vest. Is Macron willing to listen finally and curtail his natural arrogance? It is very unlikely judging by the first town hall type meeting of this so called national debate which is once again top-down,” Mercier elaborated.

The author emphasised that “in essence, Macron’s initiative of a pseudo national debate is to diffuse what his administration views as the Gilets Jaunes crisis”.”So far, it has not worked with the Gilets Jaunes and they will be in the streets again for Act 10 this coming Saturday very likely joined by labour unions,” he remarked.

On 18 January, protesters took to the streets of Souillac ahead of the French president’s arrival.

Earlier, on 12 January almost 84,000 yellow vest protesters took to the street across France. The ninth week of the nationwide unrest saw an upsurge in the number of demonstrators, comparing with 50,000 the week before.

Citizens’ Initiative Referendum

“The Gilets Jaunes’ agenda main point, beside the resignation of Macron, which is of course off the table for the French president, is the RIC or Referendum d’Intitiative Citoyenne [citizens’ initiative referendum]”, the journalist pointed out.

© Sputnik

The RIC is one of the main initiatives in the list of demands published in late November by the yellow vests protesters. According to it, any policy proposal gathering 700,000 signatures should be considered in a referendum.”This type of referendum, which is ground up, as I explained in my News Junkie Post article about the RIC is not something that Macron want to consider. It would likely put his job in jeopardy for one simple reason: If it was voted by the French parliament as a law, considering that Macron’s approval rating is right now at around 25 per cent, he would likely be out of office within a year,” Mercier explained.

Macron’s Tweet praising and thanking the armed forces and police, telling them to be proud…for  “being an example to our youth for defending France’s best values, and [through social  order] saving lives, protecting entire populations, and assuring progress through justice, liberty and justice.”

Macron Should Follow in de Gaulle’s Footsteps

“Act 10 this coming Saturday will bring new elements, but judging by the large mobilisation of Act 9, it seems that Macron’s repressive strategy is not working at all,” the author opined. “The use of brute police force is not a way to deal with a social crisis, especially in a country like France with a rich history of revolutions“.

Ahead of 19 January, thousands of French locals demonstrated enthusiasm regarding the participation in the upcoming Act 10 by liking and commenting on Facebook and Twitter, according to The Local France.

“It is very hard to tell what president Macron will do,” Mercier said when asked to share his prognosis on the French president’s next move. “Perhaps he should reflect upon what the founder of the Fifth French Republic did under the same type of predicaments. The name of this true state man, and one of France’s major historical figure of recent time, is of course General de Gaulle”.Referring to the social uprising of May 1968, Mercier recalled that president de Gaulle called upon a national referendum in April 1969.

“He lost, by a two per cent margin, and left office the next day,” the author stressed.

(The views and opinions expressed by the speaker and contributor are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.)

(En Français)
The video below is recommended. Gilets Jaunes supporter talks about the rising class consciousness binding many sectos of the struggle.

RT France

Published on Jan 19, 2019

Entretien du 19/1/2019 avec Jimmy Dalleedo, élu CGT cheminots et soutien des gilets jaunes. Il intervient sur le plateau de RT France pour commenter ce dixième acte de mobilisation.

Gilbert Mercier is founding editor of News Junkie Post.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License



Revolutionary wisdom

Words from an Irish patriot—


“There are three kinds of violence. The first, the mother of all the others, is the institutional violence, the one that legalizes and perpetuates the dominations, the oppressions and the exploitations, the one that crushes and flattens millions of men in its silent and well oiled wheels. The second is revolutionary violence, which arises from the desire to abolish the first. The third is repressive violence, the object of which is to stifle the second by making itself the auxiliary and the accomplice of the first violence, the one that engenders all the others. There is no worse hypocrisy to call violence only the second, by pretending to forget the first, which gives birth to it, and the third which kills it. ”

Dom Helder Camara, Brazilian Archbishop and liberation theologian



Make sure many more people see this. It's literally a matter of life an death. Imperial lies kill! Share widely.
  • 9

Leave a Reply