James Cogan
WSWS.ORG
Editor's Note: Reading political commentary and analyses written by Trotskyists can be frustrating, and this is yet another example that this is a frequent problem. Trotskyists are almost always passionate, highly motivated, and well educated self-described Marxists with a fairly good grasp of Marxist theory. Very often they can and do produce excellent analyses that any Marxist or serious social change activist can agree with. But almost just as often they simply (and rather inexplicably) they go off the rails. I don't have the time or inclination to engage in a polemic on Trotskyism here, or anywhere, but suffice it to say I find it extremely ill-advised for the author to put in the same stinking bag the likes of Trump and Boris Johnson, with the leaders of Russia and China, a case of perversely juxtaposed lucidity and obtuseness:
[Scott] Morrison epitomises the political type that has emerged to impose the dictates of the capitalist oligarchs. Like his counterparts internationally—from Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, and Shinzo Abe, to Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin and Narendra Modi—he tries to portray himself as a man of the people while ensuring that the wealthy few continue to amass their obscene riches.
This is the same mentality that dismissed,
• Fidel Castro, as a bourgeois nationalist,
• Salvador Allende, a vacillating socialist,
• Hugo Chavez, a bourgeois nationalist,
• Kim il Sung and his descendants, as mere Stalinists (that appellative suffices to damn anyone, no much explanation needed, although the formal crime is some sort of "bureaucratic betrayal" of the revolution akin to Bonapartism);
• Mao, an unreconstructed Stalinist;
• Deng, Xi and others of their ilk, as simply "capitalist traitors".
Well, you get the drift.
I think such positions betray a profound and narrow dogmatism fueled by subjectivism that virtually scuttles their possible impact. One feels like asking, "Why on earth did you do that? Where's your sense of proportion? What about the tactical and strategic priorities we have to live with in the real world?" Isn't that kind of consideration essential to authentic Marxism?
In general, most anti-imperialist leaders operating in the real world lack the wealth of choices enjoyed by the leaders of the top imperialist nations, especially the biggest of them all, the US hegemon. Such leaders frequently find themselves (and the political movement or current they represent) surrounded by enemies within and without, acting openly or covertly, seeking their destruction and defeat at almost any cost. Such people are almost always actively encouraged and protected by the greatest enemy of humanity, the US empire, representing the world's first and foremost contradiction. Examples of this abound in history, from Lenin and his bolsheviks —the capitalist world waged an unrelenting multifarious war on Moscow for the entire 70 years of life of the Soviet Union—to Ho Chi Minh, Salvador Allende, Kim il Sung, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and more recently the Iranian and Venezuelan struggles for a new and sovereign social order, led at this time by Ayatollah Khameini and Hassan Rouhani, in Iran, and Nicolás Maduro, in Venezuela. Most Trotskyists, objectively allying themselves with the liberals and rightwingers around the world baying for the blood of such leaders, have little good to say about such governments, regarding them as flawed or corrupt entities doomed to defeat by virtue of their putative ineptitude or corruption. Real world socialist leaders are rarely good enough for most Trots, who by leveling acerbic accusations at them, provide free validation to capitalist propaganda claims, while fomenting disunity and factionalism among revolutionaries.
Notice that in this brief accounting of anti-imperialist leaders I have not mentioned social democrats like the leaders of Syriza or Podemos, both classical examples of petit bourgeois pseudo left formations requiring little effort to unmask and dismiss.
In sum, as a Trotskyist, James Cogan exhibits in this piece many of the traits that distinguish Trotskyist literature and political analysis: lucidity, implacable argumentation and often solid foundations. That said, it also shows some of the traits for which Trotskyists are renowned, distrusted and frequently despised by many social activists, namely their tendency to use subjective, "perfectionistic" and voluntarist analysis conducive to factionalism.—PG
By James Cogan
First run on 8 January 2020
While Australian PM Scott Morrison hangs tough, throwing an occasional bone to his critics, more and more Australians are beginning to see the bushfires have lit up a rebellion against a corrupt status quo.
[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he duration and extent of the fires raging across Australia have shocked millions of people not only in the country itself, but around the world.
Since late August, an unprecedented 8.4 million hectares of bush and prime agricultural land has gone up in flames. Some 1,600 homes have been destroyed and at least 25 lives have been lost. Hundreds of millions of wild animals have been killed and incalculable ecological destruction wrought. And the January–March period of the fire season, when the worst and most destructive fires have historically occurred, has only begun.
Morrison (center) is well known for his steadfast defence of neoliberalism across the board.
For weeks, a large proportion of the population has been forced to go about their daily lives with the acrid smell of smoke containing hazardous levels of toxic particles. Cities such as Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and the national capital Canberra are regularly the most polluted urban centres on earth. Smoke from the massive Australian blazes is shrouding New Zealand’s cities and has reached South America.
Politically, however, the most significant and enduring aspect of the 2019–2020 fire crisis is that it has laid bare the gulf between the working class majority and the minuscule financial and corporate oligarchy that controls the productive forces and dictates the policies of government.
The representatives of the French aristocracy on the eve of the 1789 revolution are remembered for having advised a starving and rebellious population to eat cake. Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison will go down in history as the political leader who secretly went on holiday to Hawaii last month while the country burned.
Morrison epitomises the political type that has emerged to impose the dictates of the capitalist oligarchs. Like his counterparts internationally—from Donald Trump, Boris Johnson, and Shinzo Abe, to Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin and Narendra Modi—he tries to portray himself as a man of the people while ensuring that the wealthy few continue to amass their obscene riches.
Morrison has built his political credentials with the Australian ruling elite through right-wing demands for corporate and personal income tax cuts, the abolition of social programs, and the slashing of wages and working conditions.
For at least three decades, climate scientists have documented, with increasing alarm, how global warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions is fundamentally altering world weather patterns. In regard to Australia, warning after warning has been issued that the further drying out of large tracts of what was already the driest continent would vastly increase the regularity, scope and intensity of fire events.
Yet Morrison is notorious for dismissing these concerns and denying the need to reduce fossil-fuel use so as to protect the vested corporate interests of the coal and associated energy industries. For months, he continued to dismiss the fires as the natural cycle in Australia with no relationship to global warming.
BELOW: Australian media has been forced to reflect some of the pent-up popular anger, everyone asking for a solution to what is undoubtedly an epochal crisis. Maybe this calamity will prove a wake up call to many Australians about the true nature of their "democracy." But do not underestimate the ability of the media to defuse and dilute the challenge to authority, and in time enforce inaction and forgetfulness.
 |  |
 |  |
On his return from his holiday in Hawaii, Morrison denounced a tweet by teenager Greta Thunberg calling for greater emissions reductions as “reckless” and not in Australia’s economic interests—that is, the interests of the mining conglomerates and the banks that underwrite their vast operations.
On January 2, however, Morrison was brought face-to-face with the mass popular anger that is burgeoning over the inaction and indifference of his government and the entire political establishment towards the bushfire catastrophe. Working class residents in the fire-devastated town of Cobargo refused to shake his hand, shouted abuse and demanded that he leave.
The encounter in Cobargo revealed the state of class relations in Australia. The fire crisis is triggering the type of shift in popular consciousness that has led to mass struggles and protests in country after country—from France and North Africa to Chile and India—demanding the removal of governments and an end to the relentless attacks on the social position of the working class. Trust in the official establishment is collapsing.
In the days since Cobargo, Morrison has gone into damage control to try to shore up the credibility and authority of the government. He now claims to take the threat of climate change seriously and has promised to meet “whatever costs we need” to assist devastated communities. Most ominously, his discredited government has mobilised thousands of military personnel to try and take control of disaster relief in the most affected areas, where anger is the greatest and ordinary people have concluded they need to organise for themselves.
The political situation, however, has changed permanently. In the eyes of millions of workers and young people, Morrison and his government are not fit to rule. The opposition Labor Party has held power for 19 of the past 37 years and has proven it is just as beholden to corporate profit interests as the Coalition. It is just as culpable for the lack of any serious action on climate change and the rundown of essential services, including those involved in firefighting. For weeks, opposition leader Anthony Albanese has voiced only mild criticisms of the government over its handling of the bushfire emergency in the name of national unity.
A crisis always lays bare the essential character of class relations. The disdain and indifference of the Australian political establishment towards the lives and well-being of ordinary working people amid the flames engulfing entire communities finds it reflection around the world. It recalls President’s Trump’s attitude to hurricane-stricken Puerto Rico in 2017, which he initially dismissed as not being a real catastrophe, before flying in for a photo-op and tossing what he called “beautiful, soft paper towels” to desperate onlookers.
The capitalist elite everywhere, with the short-sightedness and indifference of outmoded and reactionary ruling classes throughout history, has insisted that their narrow, national profit interests must take priority over the interests of society as a whole.
The great political task in Australia and around the world is the development of an internationalist and socialist movement and leadership in the working class. None of the great threats and challenges that face the working class—social inequality, the destruction of democratic rights, global warming and its consequences and the immense danger of war—can even begin to be answered unless the capitalist profit system and nation-state divisions and rivalries are ended.
The working class must, and can, take matters into its own hands and initiate a conscious revolutionary struggle to achieve the transformation of global economic and social life, including the expropriation of the banks and major corporations into public ownership and democratic control and a vast redistribution of wealth.
This perspective is outlined in the New Year statement published by the World Socialist Web Site on January 3, “The decade of socialist revolution begins.” Now is the time for all those who agree with the fight for a socialist future to make the decision to join the International Committee of the Fourth International and the Socialist Equality Parties around the world.
—James Cogan
[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS
Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读
[google-translator]
Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.
And before you leave
THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN
The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.
Sign up with TGP so we can always reach you with our vital information. Don’t let the darkness win.
“Like…Xi Jinping… he tries to portray himself as a man of the people while ensuring that the wealthy few continue to amass their obscene riches.” While the share of public property in national wealth has declined to 0% or even less in United States, Britain, Japan, and Italy, where public debt exceeding public assets, the public’s share of national wealth in China seems to have strengthened since the 2008 financial crisis. The share of public property in China today (30 per cent) is higher than in the West during the mixed economy regime of the post-World War 2 decades (15-25… Read more »
The bigger picture here:
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/01/aloysius-fozdyke-fires-advance-chinese.html
and here:
http://planetization.org/The_Attack_on_US.htm
More dark and EVIL than you ever thought.
Australian Bush fires and Morrison. It never occurs to pundits that the locals [I live here] are the cause of climate change. Car drivers the majority in the cities leading to increased heat dispersion. 70% coal generated power. Suburbia which wastes energy through low population distribution over vast areas leading to even more car travel. Consider: Paris and Melbourne [4m] cover the same area. Except Paris manages to have 10m more people – and done well – in the same space. Then there are the -nature lovers- with their 4wd’s living in the bush among gum trees – full of… Read more »