Losurdo, Chomsky, Brar: Highly Recommended Books & Documents

Please share this article as widely as you can.

editors log bluePATRICE GREANVILLE

TGP's Book & Docs Recommendations
Bulletin #1a:
Stalin and Hitler: Twin Brothers or Mortal Enemies?
Domenico Losurdo

Urval av de böcker som har vunnit Nordiska rådets litteraturpris under de 50 år som priset funnits

Recommended and annotated by Patrice Greanville

We recommend these materials for their unusual educational value. You may agree or disagree with our selections (no factionalism of any kind enters our endorsements), but their impact on the formation of a revolutionary mind is well-established. In many cases, we feature here free-of-charge materials that you might otherwise have trouble locating or might be forced to pay for in other venues.

In this bulletin's premier edition (divided in 3 sections), we bring to your attention the work of three thinkers who need little introduction: Harpal Brar, Domenico Losurdo, and Noam Chomsky. Despite their inevitable differences in focus and nuance, all three are eloquent critics of US imperialism. Please note that our highlighting of their work does not signify an uncritical approval of all their positions. This is particularly so in the case of Chomsky, whose hard-to-classify, often esoteric, anarchist tendencies and derogatory pronouncements against revolutionary leaders like Lenin, Castro, etc., render him for all intents and purposes an anti-communist. I think this makes sense since Chomsky, like Chris Hedges and other political actors of the same ilk, is essentially a left-liberal.

Losurdo

Losurdo fights deliberate political "confusionism" ushered (dishonestly) by Marxist Revisionism

Those aware of the huge damage done to the cause of true socialism by the longstanding, unchallenged theft of the "left" political label by liberals (an especially acute problem in the Anglo world), owe an immense debt to serious leftists like Losurdo who sought to expose the fraudulence and impact of revisionism, one of the fountainheads of this manufactured mess. Indeed, abetted confusion by the ruling orders has reached ridiculous levels in the US, given its mostly politically illiterate population. After all, this is a nation in which political paranoia on the right justifies idiocies like calling solid globalist imperialists like the Clintons, Barack Obama and even Joe Biden, "communists".  And not even millionaire clans or bankers are above suspicion. Many right-wingers still seriously believe that the Bolshevik revolution was financed by Western capitalists. The legend that WOKE identity politics—itself a cynical hoax of indecent proportions whereby anything that rocks established mores is described as "progressive" or "left"—has only exacerbated the confusion and further outraged the conservative masses. Obviously, if the masses cannot even identify their class enemy they are unlikely to remove it. A reliable political roadmap is urgently needed, but first, the real left must eliminate the pretenders, in this case chiefly the US Democrat party and the British Labour party, frequently inseparable twins in crime. That is a tall order. It will likely require a mini-class struggle of its own, and the ideal vehicle to wage it, a time-tested Leninist party is nowhere to be found. That's why thinkers like Losurdo, who have paid attention to these essential matters, deserve close attention.

The equation of fascism with communism has become popular in the West. The problem is that it is a complete fraud.

In Stalin: History and Critique of A Black Legend (2008), Losurdo stimulated a debate about Joseph Stalin, about whom he claimed is built a kind of black legend intended to discredit the whole of communism. Losurdo clearly saw that the nonstop demonisation of Stalin was simply the utterly cynical propaganda part of the West's multidirectional war on the Soviet Union, a war that the collective West had been waging on the Bolsheviks from the moment the revolution came to power in 1917. Indeed, by the time the West began to concentrate its gigantic machinery of malicious mass communications on Stalin, after its intel mavens had concluded it was far easier to demonise a leader, one person, than an entire system, it had already tried just about every form of imaginable hostility on Moscow without achieving its aim (the toppling of communism), except causing a great deal of suffering on the Russian people. Revolutionary Russia had been starved, sanctioned, invaded by 17 armies, thrown into a ferocious civil war, sabotaged, diplomatically isolated as if she were a new plague (the US refused formal recognition until 1933), and denied medical assistance. By 1941, via Hitler, the West would try its most formidable kinetic dagger at the still-enfeebled Soviet Union, a multinational fascist thrust that would cost the Soviets a quasi-destroyed infrastructure, thousands of towns and production facilities erased from the map, widespread starvation, and 27 million dead plus tens of millions of sick and wounded—a level of penury unimaginable in the West, especially the US. But, at the end of the day, we know how that turned out, don't we? It was the Red Army that planted its flag on the German Reichstag on 2 May 1945, two days after Hitler's suicide. And let's say it clearly and irrefutably: it was the Red Army that broke the back of the Nazi military machine. The West again had underestimated the Russians, communism and Stalin.  Too bad they haven't learned the lesson yet.

Stalin and Hitler: Twin Brothers or Mortal Enemies?
Domenico Losurdo

DOWNLOAD AND READ HERE THE WHOLE PAPER

All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors. 
YOU ARE FREE TO REPRODUCE THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED YOU GIVE PROPER CREDIT TO THE GREANVILLE POST VIA A BACK LIVE LINK. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

[premium_newsticker id="211406"]

 Don't forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days.