View From Vietnam: COVID-19 Reminds the World That Trump Has No Clothes

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

The Oaf in Chief telling the world how he will single-handedly save the American nation from disaster.


Editor's Note: Overall, this is a provocative piece on the Covid-19 crisis during the pathetically inadequate and often glaringly self-serving plutocratic administration of Donald Trump. It packs an eloquent portrait of the Oaf in Chief, who, for a variety of frustrating and very "American" reasons, is still supported by no less than half the country. (The other half supports con artists like Obama, more on that later). Trump has been called a malignant narcissist, a crook, a sociopathic liar, a political gangster, a war criminal, a sadist, and a card-carrying ignoramus. Yes, he's all of those things, and that's just the most obvious flaws. He's got many more.


But, here's the clincher: while the author, Mark Ashwill, sounding like a Never Trumper, paints Trump and his gang as unique manifestations of evil, a new vile species in an otherwise benign political order, he's none of the kind. Trump is not an aberration from the system he sprang from: he's just the ultimate and most disgusting exponent of it, a horrible, undeniable tumour—perhaps the most flamboyant ever— in the cancerous imperialist system mind managers insist on calling "neoliberalism".  And, here's the uncomfortable fact the "oppositional press" never mentions: Trump was made possible, in fact inevitable, by decades of betrayals by liberals in power, a disgusting record capped by the regime of smooth-talking charlatan and still unindicted war criminal Barack Obama.  The Democrats, who long ago abandoned the real working class (in America this social category is routinely camouflaged by politicians as "the middle class", yes, there are no poor or working stiffs in the USA) and chose identity politics over class struggle, literally paved the road for the rise of a Donald Trump or someone equally revolting, morally repugnant being now the clear and nonnegotiable requisite trait of all aspirants to the presidency of the American republic. (On this, see our post with Jimmy Dore dissecting Obama's endorsement for Biden.)


Are we being too extreme? I doubt it. Look around. Behind the theatrical chest-thumping and hair-pulling, Trump is constantly enabled by his supposed ideological foes, the Democrats, and numerous media shills. They are his policy collaborators rather than true opponents or critics. A fog of petty and by now tedious hostile rhetoric seeks to cover their treachery, but when it comes to truly important policies to the plutocracy that owns it, the duopoly acts like the one party it really is, and both wings, Dems and Rethugs, deliver for their billionaire masters. A bunch of millionaires in the political class and media delivering the goods for the billionaires who own everything worth owning and still want more—is that a nifty arrangement or what!


For proof (there are many) just look at their abject support of Trump's openly proclaimed gangster goals toward Iran, Iraq, Venezuela and a host of other nations, not to mention his highly disruptive war on China, a bipartisan imperial policy, mind you, initiated by Obama's mellifluous sounding "pivot to Asia". Or their but latest example of pious collaboration in ripping off the masses, the woefully mislabeled CARES act (it should be called the WHO CARES act), shoveling trillions to the already filthy rich and their corporations, while delivering a $1200 pittance (the "cheese in the mousetrap") to the desperate working stiffs.


More sobering, proving we inhabit an information world crammed with half-truths and often only partial or defective truth tellers, fake news, as the Trumpian broken clock constantly complains, do exist, and The Washington Post, which the author quotes without further warning or qualifier, remains one of their main shameless creators and disseminators, along with its binary partner, The New York Times, aped, as usual, by the rest of the less exalted mainstream media. Yes, it is NOT obscure publications of the left (or right) that represent the main danger of "fake news", for which there is really no cure, except learning how to think and patiently sift information sources, certainly not the kind of "inquisition panels" currently used by the likes of Facebook, proposed and endorsed by the Democrats (the Dems literally jawboned a reluctant Zuckerberg into setting up such panels). The Fake News "scare" fueled by the worthies in the mainstream press (not to be confused despite intersections with Trumpian alarms about the same) is a masterful example of a deception inside a grand hypocrisy: those who warn us against such crime are the actual perpetrators, and so have been for many generations. In fact, as the tragedies of Korea, Vietnam, Central America, Iran, China, and other notable instances of imperialist violence attest, just in the postwar period, the US media have been telling largely lies most of the time, and the simple proof is that such crimes could not have been committed if the media had been doing its job, "telling it like it is," as the revered Walter Cronkite used to say but failed to deliver. Ultimately, I guess, you can't ever have a truthful and dependable press inside a capitalist democracy, an oxymoron by definition. For at any given time, a "capitalist democracy" is in actuality only a plutocracy in varying degrees of disrobement.  From that fundamental lie stem all others, such gross power imbalance tainting all institutions.


So why believe anything The WaPo says about Trump or anything else of importance when this is the paper that—in open alliance with the lying intel agencies that crafted the Russiagate hoax—first fanned and still peddles this psyop and leads the cavalry charge, again in cahoots with the Democrats, to stamp out free speech and silence dissidents in the US and around the globe?  And by the way, equally cautionary are some of Mr Ashwill's other sources, like Foreign Policy, another spawn of the Hillary Clinton boosterist Washington Post.  In sum, keep these things in mind as you plow through this piece, which is certainly worth investing the time. I only wish Mr Ashwill—whose insight and information on Vietnam's experience re the CV19 challenge are highly valuable—had relied more on left critics of Trump rather than the usual gallery of Democrats. Perhaps his long absence from the shores of the "indispensable nation" has finally stunted his olfactory sense, which we wish it hadn't.  It does not help, either, that he has been apparently working for much too long with international agencies and corporations (such as GE) whose values and objectives are normally not quite conducive to a healthy society.—P. Greanville


Mark Ashwill
CounterPunch

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he famous 19th century fairy tale by the Danish writer, Hans Christian Anderson, could have been written about Donald Trump, a man-child who lives in a fantasy world of self-delusion and lies and who surrounds himself with sycophantic yes-people who value their positions and professional advancement over truth and justice. The damage caused by this corrosive mindset is limited when one is running an inherited family company but magnified and multiplied a thousand-fold when the same person is president of the United States during a global pandemic.


In his 2018 book, Rocket Man: Nuclear Madness and the Mind of Donald Trump, John Gartner, Ph.D., a psychologist who taught at Johns Hopkins University Medical School for nearly three decades, claims that Trump has malignant narcissism, a condition that combines narcissism with paranoia, sociopathy, and sadism. When combined, this perfect storm of psychopathology defines the “quintessence of evil,” according to (Erich) Fromm, the closest thing psychiatry has to describing a true human monster.”

Some examples related to Trump’s malignant narcissism, according to Gartner, are: 1) he knows “more about everything than anyone” and “has empathy for no one but himself.” 2) paranoia (“his demonization of the press, minorities, immigrants, and anyone who disagrees with him, are all signs of paranoia”); 3) sociopathy (“a diagnosis that describes people who constantly lie, violate norms and laws, exploit other people, and show no remorse”); and 4) sadism (“He takes gleeful pleasure in harming and humiliating other people. …undoubtedly the most prolific cyberbully in history.”)

A Full Throttle Misinformation Campaign

For malignant narcissists, the ends justify the means and lying becomes a perfectly acceptable tool. Trump is pathological liar in a league of his own. According to The Washington Post’s Fact Checker, he made a staggering 16,000+ false or misleading claims during his first three years in office. His lies about COVID-19 include “it’s totally under control,” ‘it will all work out well,” “it will disappear like a miracle,” “we pretty much shut it down coming in from China,” etc., ad nauseam.

This in spite of the fact that US intelligence agencies warned his administration in January and February about the severity of the epidemic in China and its potential to metamorphose into a global pandemic. A March 25th Foreign Policy essay entitled The Coronavirus is the Worst Intelligence Failure in US History claims that “it’s more glaring than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 – and it’s all the fault of Donald Trump’s leadership.”

During a visit to the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, the narcissism of this self-described “very stable genius” was on full display. When a reporter asked Trump how US hospitals can prepare for an outbreak if they have no idea how many patients to expect, here was his self-aggrandizing non-answer: “You know, my uncle was a great person. He was at MIT. He taught at MIT for, I think, like a record number of years. He was a great super genius. Dr. John Trump. I like this stuff. I really get it. People are surprised that I understand it. Every one of these doctors said, ‘How do you know so much about this? ‘ Maybe I have a natural ability.”

Malignant narcissists are also incapable of accepting responsibility for their mistakes because they don’t make mistakes, e.g., “I don’t take responsibility at all” for his government’s lack of preparedness. (This includes abolishing President Obama’s White House pandemic office.) Trump simply finds someone or something else to blame, be it China, “fake news,” people of color, or anyone who criticizes him. They don’t hesitate to throw gasoline on the smoldering embers of racial enmity and hatred as long as they achieve their goal of evading responsibility and finding a suitable scapegoat. The coronavirus becomes the “foreign” or “Chinese” virus.

The avalanche of Trumpian lies and obfuscations has made the US less safe and its citizens more vulnerable to the coronavirus. His inaction, inadequacy, and political game-playing represent a total abdication of leadership to the detriment of the people he was elected to serve. All of this has created a perfect storm in which the US has nearly 600,000 confirmed cases and nearly 25,000 deaths. “We’re #1!” is the mantra but in two most unenviable categories.

Like any crisis, but especially one that involves sickness and death, the coronavirus pandemic is a perfect breeding ground for charlatans and con-artists to crawl out from under their rocks and pick the low-hanging fruit that are the millions of desperate people looking for a quick fix and an easy escape from fear and uncertainty. As if to underscore the surreal atmosphere, it was reported that there are several well-known evangelical Christian pastors with links to the con man-in-chief who claim to be able to cure the coronavirus through prayer. One even told his TV show viewers that he could heal infected people who touched their TVs: “Put your hand on that television set. Hallelujah. Thank you, Lord Jesus. He received your healing.”

How sad that a country that landed astronauts on the moon, developed the personal computer, and gave the world the Internet, among many other scientific and technological breakthroughs, has people who believe that a highly contagious virus can be cured with prayer and by touching a TV screen. Like Trump, false hope and fraud are what these self-proclaimed men and women of god peddle. That’s where the USA is at in 2020, a problem exacerbated by COVID-19 but that won’t disappear whenever the virus and Trump do.

Looking ahead to the November election, Trump’s success depends in part on the health of the US economy. That’s one transparent reason why he’s so insistent that “we have to get back to work. We have to get our country open.” His statement that “we have the best testing system in the world,” reflects his abject ignorance that other countries such as Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Norway, Russia, Singapore, and South Korea have tested far more people per capita than the US, which still suffers from a widespread shortage of test kits, backlogs, and delays in test results. When a reporter asked him what metrics he’ll use to decide when to relax social distancing, he pointed to his head and said, “the metric is right here.”

While the COVID-19 in Viet Nam appears to be under control, thanks to the visionary leadership of the government and the overall cooperation of the people, it continues to spiral out of control in the United States. Those numbers represent suffering, death, and a devastating economic impact, including a soaring unemployment rate and surging personal debt in a society already drowning in consumer debt.

Viet Nam Makes History While COVID-19 Teaches the US a Tragic Lesson

The coronavirus lays bare on an almost daily basis the litany of faults and weaknesses of Donald Trump and the country he was elected to lead. A tiny viral enemy whose crown-like shape can only be seen under a transmission electron microscope is not fazed by denial, deception, rhetorical bravado, or faux optimism, and cannot be defeated with guns, bombs, jet fighters, drones, or aircraft carriers that are paid for by a nearly trillion dollar military budget.

It is single-minded, non-discriminatory, and merciless in its pursuit of more human hosts to infect and, depending upon the circumstances, kill. COVID-19 thrives on official arrogance, which is complemented by ignorance. It takes full advantage of opportunities to replicate itself in societies and communities that miss the containment boat and whose last gasp option is mitigation, as in the United States. Too little, too late – at inestimable human and financial cost.

With 91 active cases and 0 deaths vs. about 570,000 active cases and nearly 33,000 deaths in the US, as of April 16th, and a population of 97 million vs. 330 million in the US, Viet Nam offers myriad instructive lessons for other countries, starting with the dos and don’ts of how to cope with a global pandemic.  Vu Duc Dam, deputy prime minister, said last month that the total number of confirmed cases will not reach 1,000, if prevention measures are strictly adhered to.  While no one can predict the future, he may very well be right, if the recent past is prologue.  It is an extraordinary and potentially historic collective achievement worth aspiring to.

* * *

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Mark A. Ashwill is an international educator who has lived and worked in Vietnam since 2005.  He blogs at An International Educator in Viet Nam.



Puke if you must





[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.




Covid-19 is Bringing the Vulnerable U.S. Empire Towards Collapse

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Rainer Shea


Image by Cau Napoli Collettivo Autorganizzato Universitario di Napoli via Flickr

[dropcap]A[/dropcap]t an increasingly rapid pace, the globe is experiencing the greatest geopolitical shift since the fall of the British empire. The arrangement that the U.S. carved out during the 20th century to fortify its hegemony is falling apart piece by piece, with a thorough collapse of Western imperialism and a new wave of socialist revolutions being increasingly unavoidable outcomes.

Moving towards a breakup for the EU and NATO

Covid-19 is testing the stability of a European Union that’s already been on the decline during the last decade. Brexit has shrunk the EU while economically weakening Britain. The power of the EU has been eclipsed due to the rise of Russia and China. The Trump administration’s defiance of international treaties, along with his decision to start a trade war with China against the advice of Washington’s European allies, have weakened the EU’s connections to America. During Covid-19, these rifts within the EU have been furthered.

Germany and the Netherlands have been wary of giving “corona bonds” to Italy, France, and Spain. This disagreement over how to handle the virus has precipitated a capitalism-fueled breakdown in European solidarity, with EU countries either turning down requests for aid or confiscating each other’s medical supplies when they reach customs. It’s no surprise that Italy joined with China’s New Silk Road Initiative last month against the wishes of its allies. These events have given credence to the Serbian president’s statement from last month: “European solidarity does not exist. That was a fairy tale. The only country that can help us in this hard situation is the People’s Republic of China. For the rest of them, thanks for nothing.”

The shift towards a multi-polar world and the geopolitical effects of the pandemic have caused NATO in general to become less unified and coordinated. The supposed “Russia threat” has become less of a priority amid the urgency of Covid-19, at least for the countries that aren’t the most set on maintaining cold war military buildup.

Some key decisions have come from Germany, a country that’s integral to the effectiveness of NATO due to its location and economic strength. In recent years, Germany has been declining to contribute as much military spending as Washington prefers while turning to Russia for energy and China for technology. Then last month, when Covid-19 created a risk for Germany’s armed forces, it began declining to participate in NATO’s anti-Russian war games. Norway also cancelled military exercises last month, around the same time when the Pentagon cut funds for war games.

As assessed by Iztok Prezelj, the chair of Defence Studies at the University of Ljubljana, this all reflects a trend among the Western powers to prioritize focusing on Covid-19 over great-power conflict: “Security policy simply is about prioritization of threats and responses, it is impossible to focus on e.g. 5 threats at the same time. Russian threat is in fact put on hold, but it remains there in minds of politicians, strategists and planners. Strategic documents and threat assessments on Russia will not change in this phase of crisis management in the West.”

Iraq War architect and former Trump-era war planner John Bolton articulated the empire’s anxieties this week, tweeting: “North Korea launched yet another barrage of missiles, bringing their tests this year to five. While the world is busy fighting off a pandemic [North Korea] is rushing at an unprecedented pace to improve its missile and nuclear programs.” Bolton can also worry about the increasingly good military position that Venezuela, Iran, China, Russia, and the other regime change target countries are in.

Instability and uncertainty among Washington’s vassal states

Washington has been trying to continue its campaign of cold war escalations against the rival superpowers by expanding its military presence in South America to counter Chinese and Russian influence throughout the region. Yet even in what U.S. commander Craig Faller described in a recent testimony as “our hemisphere” and “our neighborhood,” the ground is shifting underneath imperial control.

Brazil, the superpower with a CIA-installed president that Washington has been using as a partner in militarily intimidating Venezuela, faces growing governmental instability. The issue isn’t just that Jair Bolsonaro will likely be impeached for his refusal to address the pandemic. It’s that even if he’s replaced with an equally pro-U.S. government, class conflict in Brazil is sure to keep escalating. Bolsonaro’s presidency has drastically accelerated the collapse of capitalism in the country, bringing extreme mass privatization projects that have destroyed Brazil’s educational system, relentlessly eroded social programs, and made 11 million people unemployed even before any quarantine started.

Now that Bolsonaro has led a death cult of Covid-19 denial and pushed to loosen quarantine restrictions, he’s both being threatened with impeachment over his mismanagement and has made the populace much more ready to rise up against the country’s capitalist class. Seeing the last year’s anti-austerity protests throughout Latin America, Bolsonaro’s government has been authorizing the army to shoot protesters in a terrified preemptive attempt at avoiding similar instability. These measures won’t hold back a revolt for long.

Amid Bolsonaro’s alarmed recent declaration that he’ll suspend the constitution if civil unrest breaks out over Covid-19, columnist Miguel Andrade has concluded that “These conditions can only lead to an explosion of class struggle. Bolsonaro’s ravings are an expression of the desperation of the Brazilian ruling class as it prepares for unprecedented acts of repression.”

A Brazil that’s fighting off an uprising won’t be in a position to assist the U.S. in military adventures. Brazil could become like Ukraine, which has been turning into a failed state since Washington installed a neo-Nazi regime in the country in 2014. Because Ukraine’s government has failed to provide funds for the military-tied Pavlograd Chemical Plant, the Ukrainian arms industry had to suspend productions of new missile systems this week. This will potentially open the country up to more Russian intervention, which would be a welcome alternative to the fascist-led hellscape that Ukraine is becoming.

This is how the collapse of neoliberal capitalism, now exacerbated by the depression that’s sweeping the globe, is weakening the regimes which U.S. imperialism depends on. Israel is no exception in this worldwide trend of hyper-capitalist countries that are unable to manage the pandemic. “The main risk is the country’s collapse,” columnist Meirav Arlosoroff has written about the situation in Israel. “The forecast, which the Finance Ministry has presented to the Knesset Finance Committee, addresses the effects of a full shutdown of the economy — the deficit will shoot up to 15.5% and the national debt will jump to 86.5% of GDP, which will contract by 17%…This is even worse than what happened during the Yom Kippur War.”

A similar fate is on its way for Australia, Britain, South Africa, Colombia, Bolivia, Japan, and all the other U.S.-tied capitalist powers that will be reeling from the effects of the economic collapse that’s begun.

Saudi Arabia is another example of this trend, though the current phase of its decline has more to do with the strategic foreign policy obstacles posed by Covid-19. Journalist Joe Lauria has assessed that “It is in the Saudis’ interests to stop a coronavirus outbreak in Yemen. Riyadh is spending $200 million a day on the war, with oil having fallen to below $30 a barrel. They have allied jihadis, and almost certainly intelligence agents operating inside Yemen, and Yemenis can find their way across the frontier.” For this reason, the Saudis have begun a ceasefire in order to end the Yemen war.

This Saudi retreat is part of a reaction to larger factors that threaten to destabilize the country’s regime. Saudi Arabia has been losing its oil price war with Russia, a war that’s put the country under increasing threat of collapse. If this collapse happens, it will be a long time coming amid years of growing isolation and vulnerability for the regime.

Signs of coming unrest and balkanization in the imperial core

The Trump White House has exploited Covid-19 to push for more war. It’s tightened sanctions on Venezuela and Iran, increased war efforts in Syria and Iraq, pressured U.S. allies into not accepting medical aid from Cuba, and staged provocations in the South China Sea as part of Washington’s hybrid war on China. The anti-China campaign is being especially prioritized, with Trump’s team coordinating with the right-wing media to proliferate the misleading claim that China is to blame for the pandemic. But these are desperate acts of reaction, ones that largely pertain to the empire’s desire to retain internal control during its accelerating external decline.

Helped by online censorship and the repressive measures of the Covid-19 era, the U.S. and the other core imperialist countries will try to keep their own people on their side in the geopolitical conflicts of this next decade. China, Russia, and Iran will continue to be presented as bogeymen that are behind the problems of the West. The media will still feed us stories about fabricated enemy outrages like Venezuelan “narco-terrorism,” Syrian “chemical attacks,” and North Korean “human rights abuses.” All this will do is keep the populace distracted while imperial power keeps shrinking and the corporatocracy keeps losing the profits it depends on.

Like in Brazil, living standards in the U.S. and the other neoliberal countries are going to keep declining until some sort of confrontation point is reached. France is the first core imperialist country to enter into a sustained phase of unrest, no doubt to be followed by protest movements and even riots within places like the U.S. and Britain.

What happens after these raw outbreaks of class outrage will depend on how successful the socialist and anti-colonial movements are at building an alternative political structure. If the Marxist-Leninist parties grow along with the escalation of class struggle, and while incorporating themselves into the general civil disobedience efforts, the tools will exist to overthrow and replace the vulnerable capitalist governments.

In any case, Washington is doomed to oversee a failed state, one which could lead to national balkanization amid ever-increasing class divides. The police state is the only thing the ruling class can turn to for hope of maintaining internal stability. And if the major capitalist powers become destabilized, the rich will have to retreat to the survival compounds that they’ve been building throughout the last decade or so.

Last year, the political writer Dmitry Orlov said: “I think that the American empire is very much over already, but it hasn’t been put to any sort of serious stress test yet, and so nobody realizes that this is the case.” Now that this stress test has come in the form of Covid-19, Washington is experiencing the fractured ally ships, weakening military power, and economic decline that are required to enormously speed up the fall of its empire. It will be our job to strike the killing blow to this beast, but the beast is nonetheless growing weaker.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
 Rainer uses the written word to deconstruct establishment propaganda and to promote meaningful political action. His articles can also be found at Revolution Dispatch.  If you appreciate my work, I hope you become a one-time or regular donor to my Patreon account. Like most of us, I’m feeling the economic pinch during late-stage capitalism, and I need money to keep fighting for a new system that works for all of us. Go to my Patreon here.

Follow Rainer on FacebookTwitterYoutube and Medium.



Puke if you must





[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.




Will this pandemic finally mark the end of the US carrier fleet?

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
.

This article is part of a series on disgusting US-led imperialism


 The Saker


The USN carrier fleet may be a trillion-dollar worth of militarily obsolete equipment only good to intimidate small nations in old colonialist style.


[dropcap]F[/dropcap]rankly, I have never considered USN carrier strike groups as a “Cold War capable” element of the US Navy.  Yes, in theory, there was the notion of forward deploying these carriers to “bring the war to the Soviets” (on the Kola Peninsula) before they could flush their subs and aircraft through the GUIK gap and into the Atlantic.  In theory, it should have been a 600 ship navy too, but that never happened.  In reality, of course, US strike groups were the ultimate “colony disciplining” instrument which Uncle Shmuel would park off the coast of a country disobedient to the demands and systematic plundering of the USA.  Since most countries in the 20th century could not sink a US carrier or prevail over the comparatively advanced aircraft deployed on them, this was, all in all, a very safe game to play for the USA.

As for “bringing the war to the Soviets”, the truth is that had it ever come to a real war, the US carriers would have been kept far away from the formidable Soviet cruise missile capability (delivered simultaneously by aircraft, surface ships and submarines) for a very simple reason: every time such an attack was modeled a sufficient number of Soviet missiles successfully passed through the protective cordon around the carrier and successfully hit it with devastating results (while sinking a carrier is not that easy, damaging it and making it inoperable does not take that many missile hits).

And that was long before hypersonic missiles like the Kinzhal or the Zircon!

Truly, as an an instrument to deter or defeat the Soviets the USN strike groups were already obsolete in the 1980s, that is long before the the Russians deployed their hypersonic missiles which, as my friend Andrei Martyanov explained in his books (see here and here) and on his blog (see here), basically made the entire US surface fleet obsolete not only to fight Russia, but also to fight any country which possesses such missiles.  Such countries already include India and China, but there will be many more soon, probably including Iran!

Today, however, I won’t discuss the missile issue, but what happened recently on the USS Theodore Roosevelt, which you probably know about: her captain got fired for writing a letter (according to his accusers, bypassing the chain of command) asking for help because his crew got infected by the virus.  His letter was published by the San Francisco Chronicle and you can read it here.

Interestingly, when the captain, Navy Capt. Brett Crozier, left the ship, his sailors gave him a standing ovation.



Next, Acting Navy Secretary Thomas Modly called Captain Crozier “stupid”.  That also became public, and he had to apologize and resign (clearly, Modly is not exactly a genius himself!).  Then even more of the crew of the carrier got sick, including Crozier himself!

This is what is known in the US military jargon as a “clusterbleep”…

There is, however, also a lot of interesting stuff coming out from this story.

First, the obvious: USN carriers cannot operate effectively under a bio-attack (a truly weaponized virus would both be much more transmissible than SARS-COV-2 and it would be far more deadly).  This also indicates that they would probably do no better under a real chemical warfare attack either.

Considering that in reality USN carriers are an instrument of colonial repression and not ships to be engaged against the USSR (which had real biowarfare capabilities), this makes sense (while most university labs & the like could produce some kind of virus and use it as a weapon, truly weaponized viruses, the kind effectively used in special delivery systems, can only be produced by a limited list of countries).  However, in theory, all the formations/units/subunits/ships/aircraft/armor/etc of a military superpower should be trained to operate in case of a nuclear, chemical and biological attack.  Clearly, this is not the case with US carriers, most likely because nobody in the USA really expected such an attack, at least not during the Cold War.

For the current situation, however, I think that the lesson is clear: the USN simply does not have an effective capability to operate under NBC attack conditions.

By the way, this appears to also be true of the French, whose only carrier has 30% infected sailors!

Second, I agree that going outside the chain of command is wrong, but let’s also consider the following here: the fact that the USS Theodore Roosevelt was having a large number of infected sailors is not something which could have been kept secret anyway, especially while in port.  Not only that, but how do we know that Capt. Crozier did not write other memos through the regular chain of command before he wrote the one which became public?  After all, any such memos could very easily be classified and never made public.

Finally, I will admit that my sympathies are squarely with the man who placed the lives of his men and women above all else, and not with the bureaucratic drone who put procedures and ruffled feathers above the lives of sailors and called the real officer “stupid” for his actions (wait! a USN carrier captain stupid?!  Somehow I don’t think so…..).

At the time of writing (April 14th) there have been 600 sailors from the Theodore Roosevelt who contracted the virus and one death.

Finally, over 4000 sailors have now been evacuated from the ship (1000 are still onboard to operate the nuclear reactor and other key systems).

In other words, the USS Theodore Roosevelt is now completely inoperable!

The quoted CNN article concludes with:

Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. John Hyten told reporters Thursday the US military needed to plan for similar outbreaks in the future as the Defense Department works to cope with the virus’ impacts. “I think it’s not a good idea to think the Teddy Roosevelt is a one-of-a-kind issue. We have too many ships at sea, we have too many deployed capabilities. There’s 5,000 sailors on a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. To think it will never happen again is not a good way to plan. What we have to do is figure out how to plan in these kind of Covid environments,” Hyten said.

Yet more proof that the USN never took a bioattack threat seriously.

To be honest, it seems that the US Army has similar problems, here is a map of affected US bases I found on Colonel Cassad’s blog:


It appears that the US-based forces never expected any real attack (other than maybe one by terrorists equipped with small arms) so NBC security was never a priority.

[Sidebar: Note, in Russia, at least so far (April 14th), there are zero cases of servicemen infected with the virus.  This will almost inevitably change in the future, but for the time being, this is true, in spite of having Russian military units helping to fight the virus both in Russia and outside.  Just saying…]

However, this is not a fair comparison.  First, bases located on land have far more interactions with the outside world than ships, even ships in port.  Second, and much more importantly, in case of a pandemic or chemical/biological attack, bases located on land can better isolate those affected, bring in more resources or quickly disperse the personnel to better protect them.  You can’t do that on a ship.  In fact, the bigger the ship, the more it looks like an “armed cruiseliner” which, as we now all know, is a gigantic Petri dish.

Questions such as those above will only increase in number as the pandemic finally sheds a much-needed light on the shocking reality about “the best! most powerful! best equipped! and best trained military force in the Galaxy!”: it can’t even protect itself from a relatively weak virus, never-mind defeat a competent enemy.

Will we get answers?  Eventually, probably yes.  But for the time being, the US is all about covering your ass while pointing fingers and blaming others (especially China, Russia and even the WHO!).  This strategy has been an abject failure for the past decades and it will be an abject failure in the future.

[Sidebar: Trump’s latest decision to defund the WHO (to whom the US already owes a ton of money anyway) is arguably his worst act of “international PR seppuku” which will further increase the disgust the USA already inspires worldwide.  As for our Israeli friends, they are proud that their Mossad actually steals medical equipment from other countries: after all, every Israeli know that Jewish blood is sacred, while goy blood is worthless.  Another case of self-inflicted “international PR seppuku” for “the only democracy in the Middle East”]

But since that is all US politicians know how to do, this is not stopping anytime soon.  Likewise, what is known as the “carrier fiction” will be upheld for as long as possible, especially since there is a lot of money involved for the US ruling classes.

—The Saker

 

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.






 


A WORD BEFORE YOU LEAVE:
THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.

[/su_spoiler]

The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff we publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for our website, which will get you an email notification for everything we publish.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
The Saker, a former NATO military analyst, is the nom de guerre of the founding editor of The Saker network of sites dedicated to geopolitical issues, and the repercussions of hegemonist US foreign policy. 





[premium_newsticker id=”213661″]


Creative Commons License
THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS



The Recovery Will Not Be V-Shaped

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

DISPATCHES FROM MOON OF ALABAMA, BY "B"
This article is part of an ongoing series of dispatches from Moon of Alabama



[dropcap]D[/dropcap]uring the last four weeks 22 million workers in the U.S. filed for unemployment insurance. Some 10 to 15 million additional workers were not eligible but also lost their jobs.

Michael Hudson extrapolates from there:

Ross: Ultimately, where does this end? Because if in 12 weeks time, people can’t afford to enter into the social norms, enter into the economy, live, put bread on the table, where does that logically finish?

Michael Hudson: With the American economy looking pretty much like Greece. It’ll be austerity. There will be people who don’t have jobs. They are going to be evicted from their apartments. They will have run through their savings. They will not be able to pay their credit card debt and other debts so arrears are going to rise. The banks would be squeezed, but Trump says that although we can’t save the people, we can save the banks. The Federal Reserve has enough money to keep all the banks afloat, even if they’re not getting the mortgage payments, even if they’re not able to collect on their loans. The banks can now make up for the money they’re not getting by having a huge new market: lending money to private capital and to the large companies to buy out these small businesses that are going under. It’s a bonanza.

A bonanza for the 1%.

But the oligarchs who rule the United States are probably miscalculating this crisis:

“U.S. stocks are pricing in a V-shaped economic recovery even more keenly than elsewhere in the world, so are vulnerable in the case that exits from lockdowns globally and in the U.S. prove more complicated,” said Edmund Shing, head of global equity derivative strategy at BNP Paribas SA.

The crisis will not be over before the fat lady sings. That lady has not even entered the house. A recovery will not be V-shaped. The economy will not spring back into action as soon as the lockdowns are over. It will be a long slog. The U.S. economy always depends on consumer resilience. But with more than 30 million people out of jobs there will be a huge fall of demand compared to before the pandemic.

It is also likely that there will be more than one wave of the pandemic. During summer the case numbers will probably recede but they are likely to go up again during the fall. In between the pandemic will slowly burn through more of the population but mostly out of view because of many asymptomatic cases. When it comes back it will be in a different way. During the first wave the infections started first in place A then in place B then place C all depending on traffic and contact pattern. But the second wave will likely come, as it did during the Spanish flu, as one big wall that will hit all places at the same time. That will make it more difficult to allocate resources.  

To expect a V-shaped return to a normal economy under these circumstance is foolish. The political consequences will be huge. A wide public demand for more social policies will come into conflict with a recalcitrant oligarchy. Can that conflict be solved within the current U.S. system?
Pandemics are, as Nassim Taleb and other have pointed outfat tail events where normal statistics no longer apply. They are not symmetric Gaussian distributions curves where the way down from high case numbers has a similar shape as the way up had. The way down is actually much longer and more of a very slow decline which might even include additional eruptions.

To expect a V-shaped return to a normal economy under these circumstance is foolish.

The political consequences will be huge. A wide public demand for more social policies will come into conflict with a recalcitrant oligarchy. Can that conflict be solved within the current U.S. system?

There are a few signs for hope. The first two vaccines developed in China are now in their first phase of human testing and more are coming. Some of them may actually work. A mass producible effective vaccine would mean that the fat lady has started to sing.

There is also the curiosity that most children not only do not fall ill with the Covid-19 disease but do not get infected at all. Further research into the phenomenon could point to a protection mechanism that might be exploitable for the protection of grown ups.

On the sad side the Economist has started to systematically cover 'excess death' from the pandemic and finds that all official death numbers are serious undercounts.

Posted by b at 17:49 UTC | Comments (26)



[premium_newsticker id="213661"]


 


About the author(s)

"b" is Moon of Alabama's founding (and chief) editor.  This site's purpose is to discuss politics, economics, philosophy and blogger Billmon's Whiskey Bar writings. Moon Of Alabama was opened as an independent, open forum for members of the Whiskey Bar community.  Bernhard )"b") started and still runs the site. Once in a while you will also find posts and art from regular commentators. You can reach the current administrator of this site by emailing Bernhard at MoonofA@aol.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
 ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

black-horizontal




Fiction, reality and the global crisis of capitalism

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Joseph Kishore & David North


 

The severity of the pandemic has not interrupted the market's feverish speculation. (Image: Elmhurst hospital workers dealing with huge influx of sick patients).


Dateline: First posted on 7 April 2020 • This is a repost

[dropcap]O[/dropcap]n Monday there seemed to be two different worlds: one based on reality and the other on fiction.

In the real world, the COVID-19 pandemic continued its deadly rampage within the United States and around the globe. The news was dominated by reports of overcrowded hospitals, exhausted doctors, nurses and support staff, and sick and dying patients.

But in the fictional world of global stock exchanges and finance, a mood of uncontrollable euphoria prevailed among investors, who, as if staging an orgy at a funeral, poured billions into equities and drove the Dow Jones Industrial Average up by nearly 7.5 percent. Substantial gains were also recorded by the German DAX (up 6 percent) and the British FTSE (up over 3 percent).

What motivated this shameful and shameless celebration?

On Monday, the US death toll surpassed the 10,000 mark. Despite a very slight decline in the daily total of new deaths in New York City on Sunday, there is no clear evidence that the virulence of the pandemic has peaked in this critical urban center.

Moreover, it is absolutely certain that other major urban centers and, more generally, large portions of the United States, are still to experience the full force of the pandemic. The level of testing remains so disorganized and primitive that there exists no objective data upon which reliable predictions can be made about when it will be possible for workers to return safely to their jobs.

The economic situation is dire and is deteriorating. Former Federal Reserve Chairperson Janet Yellen said in a CNBC interview on Monday that the US is in the midst of an “absolutely shocking” downturn. Unemployment is as high as 13 percent, Yellen estimated, and the overall contraction of the US economy is already at 30 percent.

Yellen’s views were seconded by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who, in his annual shareholder letter released on Monday, wrote that he expects a “bad recession.” According to Dimon, the gross domestic product could fall as much as 35 percent in the second quarter, and the downturn will probably last through the rest of the year.

Large sections of the global economy, beyond the US and Western Europe are in free fall. India, home to 17 percent of the world’s population, remains in lockdown, threatening global supply chains and food production. Former Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan said yesterday that the country faces “perhaps its greatest emergency since independence.”

In Japan, a dramatic rise in coronavirus infections has finally compelled Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to declare a state of emergency, which will result in a shutdown of large portions of the country’s economic activity.

To the economic and health care crisis is added a deepening political crisis. In the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Boris Johnson, having been infected by the coronavirus, was hospitalized and placed in intensive care on Sunday evening. Almost simultaneously, the 93-year-old Queen Elizabeth grimly addressed the entire country in a televised speech for only the fourth time (outside of the annual Christmas event) in her 68-year reign.

One might have expected that the hospitalization of an extremely sick prime minister in London, the financial center of Europe, would have sent the stock exchange into a tailspin when it opened for business on Monday morning.

But nothing of the sort happened. Investors plunged into the market with gusto and did not pause for even a minute to shed a tear for their ailing prime minister.

How can one explain the exuberance in global markets amidst such tragic and threatening conditions?

First, whatever anxiety Wall Street may have about the spread of the pandemic is offset by the expectation that the US government will continue to support its speculative activities with countless trillions. In fact, the direct transfer of resources into the markets, particularly by the Federal Reserve central bank in the US, is well underway. The Federal Reserve balance sheet increased last month by $1.6 trillion, approximately equal to the entire monthly gross domestic product of the United States. Every day, tens of billions are being digitally manufactured to buy up assets and debt from banks and corporations.

In other words, the policies that were implemented following the crash of 2008 are being taken to a new level. For more than a decade, the speculative mania on Wall Street has been financed through the infusion of cash from the US Federal Reserve in the form of “quantitative easing” (money printing) operations and low interest rates. In the aftermath of the 2008 crisis, the Fed added $4 trillion to its balance sheet by buying up mortgage-backed securities and other assets held by the banks.

To this was added the unending stream of money plowed into the markets in the form of corporate stock buybacks. The Wall Street Journal writes in an article published over the weekend:

Corporate buybacks, in fact, have been the only net source of money entering the stock market since the financial crisis in 2008, according to Brian Reynolds, chief market strategist at research firm Reynolds Strategy. Buyback programs, through which companies repurchase their own shares on the open market, can help boost share prices by reducing the amount of stock outstanding and lifting a company’s per-share earnings, though not its overall profit.

Since the beginning of 2009, Mr. Reynolds estimates, buybacks have added a net $4 trillion to the stock market. Contributions from all other sources—including exchange-traded funds, foreign buyers, pensions, hedge funds and households—netted out to roughly zero, he concluded, based on the Federal Reserve’s quarterly flow funds reports. The S&P’s 500 market value is $20.9 trillion.

To sum up, through the mechanism of buybacks, the price of shares could be endlessly driven up even without an increase of profit levels. The new intervention of the Federal Reserve, following the bill passed by Congress, has reassured Wall Street that there will be endless liquidity available to support rising share values under conditions of severe economic contraction.

The Fed is already buying up corporate debt, and Yellen raised yesterday the possibility that it might begin direct purchases of stocks for the first time in history. Yellen also indicated that officials at the Federal Reserve, with whom she remains in contact, are thinking about purchasing very risky corporate “junk bonds.”

The second factor behind Wall Street’s rise is its enthusiastic reaction to the international campaign by the political establishment and the media for a speedy return to work.

In the final analysis, the edifice of fictitious capital—wealth created through the massive and inflationary expansion of credit and debt—cannot be entirely liberated from a real productive process involving and requiring the exploitation of the labor power of the working class. If that real process stops, for whatever reason, the structure of fictitious capital collapses.

This is why the calls for a return to work—regardless of the state of the pandemic—have been taken up internationally by the capitalist media. The prospect of an early return to work, under conditions of intensified exploitation, generated Monday’s euphoria.

Of course, the euphoria may not last long. Reality, not fiction, determines the course of events.

The class conflict and the logic of the opposing classes are starkly posed: For the ruling class, it is a question of securing its wealth, returning the workers to the job under unsafe conditions, and tearing up whatever remains of social programs. For the working class, it is a question of saving lives, stopping all nonessential production, and restructuring economic life on the basis of social need, not private profit.

The one path leads to authoritarianism, the other leads to socialist revolution. This is the irrepressible social and political logic of the fundamental reality of our epoch: the global crisis and death agony of world capitalism.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
The authors are senior editorial writers with wsws.org. a Marxian publication. 

While using Marxian methods of historical analysis, and working toward a non-capitalist future, The Greanville Post does not endorse Trotkyism or any other specific faction. Thus we republish only those views we regard as useful and largely free of sectarian distortions. In a world in which truth and the correct path to social change, equality and peace are increasingly difficult to discern due to the proliferation of ideologies, information and disinformation sources, and the confusing imperfections and contradictions of many progressive voices, we try hard to give our audience the most reliable roadmap to effective struggle. 



Puke if you must





[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.