Guest Editorial: Who is speaking out for pigs & who is eating them

From ANIMAL PEOPLE,  July/August 2011:

South Korean quarantine officers throw live piglets, taken from a farm suffering from an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease, into a hole prior to burying them alive in Ansung, in this 2002 file photo.

Mercy for Animals,  having already produced more shocking undercover videos of mistreatment of animals on factory farms than all other U.S. animal advocacy organizations combined,   on June 29, 2011 shocked television and web viewers yet again with footage from inside an Iowa Select Farms facility in Kamrar,  Iowa.

Iowa Select Farms supplies Swift,  one of the biggest names in meatpacking.  

Agricultural trade journals also devote much page space to discussion of manure storage and disposal, air and water quality,  and pesticide use to control the insects typically infesting livestock and poultry barns.  These are all issues to which farmers must respond,  for farming to be profitable, albeit that the most profitable approach is usually to respond as little as possible.

Of course few agricultural trade journals editorially recognize having anything in common with animal and environmental advocates,  even though they are detailing and exposing the same problems.  Most agricultural trade journals denounce animal and environmental advocacy as fervently as revivalist ministers rail against sin.

one of the leading Chinese agricultural trade journals.  That he was invited to address the June 2011 Asia for Animals conference in Chengdu was a bit of a surprise,  though the conference was held in his home city.

 

PETA-South Korean activists protest treatment of animals in factory farms.

There were hints in the abstract that Wang Qian had a unique perspective,  considering his role,  but he spoke toward the end of a long afternoon session which had already left much of the audience numb.  So-Yeon Park of Coexistence of Animal Rights on Earth in the opening presentation aired video clandestinely obtained in December 2010 near her home in Pocheon,  South Korea,  near the North Korean border,  showing pigs being buried alive by the truckload in a futile effort to contain foot-and-mouth disease.

In all,  3.5 million pigs were buried alive between October 2010 and April 2011. This atrocity resulted from the combination of overcrowded and filthy conditions on factory farms plus the longtime stubborn refusal of the South Korean government to vaccinate livestock against foot-and-mouth disease,  since vaccinated livestock cannot be distinguished from livestock actually incubating infection and therefore may not be exported.

Killing was unnecessary

Most of the six million British livestock who were killed during a 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease were killed out of ignorant panic,  as were most of the 3.5 million pigs who were killed in South Korea, and most of the countless millions of other animals who have been killed during foot-and-mouth outbreaks worldwide,  all because in the 114 years since foot-and-moth disease was first discovered to be of viral origin,  no one had previously conducted a simple experiment to discover the etiology of transmission.

Even had her presentation been less visually shocking and emotionally charged,  So-Yeon Park might have been a difficult act to follow.  Three times in eight months her dramatic initiatives on other animal advocacy fronts have drawn global media notice.  So-Yeon Park has also attracted more favorable publicity within South Korea lately than the oligarchic South Korean media have ever extended to campaigners before her,  including the sisters Sunnan and Kyenan Kum, founders in 1982 and 1997,  respectively,  of the  Korean Animal Protection Society and International Aid to Korean Animals.

So-Yeon Park,  40,  has steadily sharpened her media skills and political savvy since abandoning a stage and singing career in 2000 to promote animal rights. Founding the CARE shelter in 2004, So-Yeon Park waged a successful campaign for passage of a law against animal hoarding in 2005.  She developed a depth of knowledge about South Korean agribusiness while monitoring response to the H5N1 avian influenza outbreak of 2006-2007.  In 2008-2009 So-Yeon Park exposed poor conditions at government dog pounds throughout South Korea and won passage of national pound regulations.  So-Yeon Park emerged as a media star in November 2010,  venturing to Yeonpyong Island to rescue animals who were left behind when the residents fled North Korean shelling that killed two South Korean marines.

Sudden celebrity helped So-Yeon Park to expose the live pig burials more intensively than any animal welfare issue has ever before been exposed in South Korea.  Her efforts may have been politically aided by circumstantial evidence that the South Korean foot-and-mouth disease outbreak apparently spread from North Korea, hitting first a pig farm near Pocheon.

Wang Qian discussed the suffering of pigs on factory farms. He mentioned the loss of dignity among both pigs and pig farmers that he perceives inherent in factory farming conditions.  But,  true to the outline of his speech,  Wang Qian spoke most about how pigs are fed,  as compared to how they ought to be fed to maintain good health.  Wang Qian described disease outbreaks,  such as foot-and-mouth and the mysterious blue ear disease that killed more than 20 million Chinese pigs in 2007.  Proper nutrition and exercise, Wang Qian suggested,  could enable pigs to better withstand infections that fell whole herds in close confinement.

Other international animal advocacy organizations with offices in China have addressed factory farming in various ways, among them ActAsia for Animals,  the Animals Asia Foundation, Compassion In World Farming,  Humane Society International, International Fund for Animal Welfare,  and the Royal SPCA of Britain.

The pro-vegetarian and pro-vegan message at Asia for Animals 2011 was amplified by speakers from a variety of pro-vegetarian and vegan societies,  chiefly headquartered in India and South Korea. The major international organizations were conspicuously quiet about the whole matter.

Amid hundreds of vegetarian and vegan delegates from more than 25 Asian nations,  and others in Europe and North America,  some representatives of the major international animal charities were observed eating pork sausages and bacon in the breakfast hall.

Several speakers from the floor expressed profound disappointment in this behavior at the closing session,  among them Asian Animal Protection Network founder John Wedderburn,  M.D .

••••
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Merritt Clifton is a world-renowned ecoanimal journalist and editor in chief of ANIMAL PEOPLE, based near Seattle, WA.  Kim Bartlett, also prominent in animal questions, serves as publisher for the periodical. 

Merritt Clifton
Editor,  ANIMAL PEOPLE
P.O. Box 960 | Clinton,  WA  98236
Telephone:  360-579-2505
Cell:  360-969-0450
Fax:  360-579-2575
E-mail:  anmlpepl@whidbey.com
Web:  www.animalpeoplenews.org

Don’t Miss a Single Article!
Subscribe to our reports by signing up below.
It’s easy, safe and quick.
JUST CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW

Subscribe to Animal People (The HTML Edition) by Email

 

 ADVERT PRO NOBIS
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

IF YOU THINK THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA ARE A DISGRACE AND A HUGE OBSTACLE
to real change in America why haven’t you sent at least a few dollars to The Greanville Post (or a similar anti-corporate citizen’s media?). Think about it.  Without educating and organizing our ranks our cause is DOA. That’s why our new citizens’ media need your support. Send your badly needed check to “TGP, P.O. Box 1028, Brewster, NY 10509-1028.” Make checks out to “P. Greanville/ TGP”.  (A contribution of any amount can also be made via Paypal and MC or VISA—see our right column for that.)
THANK YOU.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________________
PROMOTIONAL MESSAGE
A TOOL IS USELESS IF IT’S NOT USED.
Don’t just sit there…introduce a friend or relative to The Greanville Post and help us expand the reach of remedial ideas and information. If each of you brings merely ONE additional reader to the table, we will be able to double our circulation!

____________________________________________________________________




The animal front: Germany bans foie gras (at last!)

French outrage as German food fair bans foie gras

F

A farmer in France (force) funnels corn into a duck in the production of foie gras paté. In some cases the animals have their feet nailed to the tables or restrained in other terribly painful ways.  France is simply wrong about this issue. 

A high-level diplomatic spat has broken out between France and Germany, but this time it is not about saving the euro or European integration. Instead, it is foie gras that is causing the fallout.  Angry missives have flown between Paris and Berlin after the decision by organisers of a leading German food fair to ban the French delicacy, which is made from the liver of fattened geese or ducks.

Foie gras producers are incensed after being told their liver pâté will be not welcome at the biennial Anuga food fair in Cologne in October.  

Whatever the arguments, including the economics of the issue, the whole thing boils down to a choice between one more hedonistic choice and animal cruelty. Period. 

Fair organisers bowed to pressure from animal rights campaigners who claim foie gras production is cruel.

The production of the pâté involves the force-feeding of ducks or geese, known in French as gavage, to create fatty livers. The birds, usually made to swallow food through a tube, end up with livers swelling up to 10 times normal size. The practice is banned in Germany, though the consumption of foie gras is not.

“To our great astonishment the organisers of the fair just let us know that from now on we cannot present or offer tastings of foie gras during the Anuga fair,” Alain Labarthe, president of the organisation Vive le foie gras!, told French journalists.

The French agriculture minister, Bruno le Maire, wrote to his German counterpart, Ilse Aigner, asking her to overturn the ban and threatening to boycott the opening ceremony.

“It is important for the French foie gras sector to be present at a fair visited by numerous buyers in the period before the end of the year celebrations,” Le Maire wrote. “If this exclusion is confirmed, I cannot see how I will be able to take part in the opening.”

Le Maire insisted that France “rigorously applied all [European] community regulations regarding the well-being of animals“.  Aigner replied that it was up to the organisers to decide on the issue.

The affair has provoked a flurry of letters from those for and against foie gras. Animal rights activist Brigitte Bardot wrote to the German minister calling on her not to give in to pressure to overturn the Anuga ban. “France does not apply the community regulations regarding animal welfare,” she said.

Animal rights campaigners claim that only 15% of French foie gras producers have implemented the EU rule that ban keeping birds in individual cages where they are unable to move their wings, a rule that came into effect at the start of 2011.

Alain Fauconnier, a Socialist member of France’s senate, also wrote to the German ambassador in Paris asking him to intervene. “It’s unbelievable. It’s like banning German sausages in France. The economic cost is enormous for us because Germany is an important market,” he wrote.

About 37 million ducks and 700,000 geese are slaughtered each year to make French foie gras. The force-feeding practice is said to date to 2,500BC, though it is unlikely the ancient Egyptians took to fattening their fowl on the industrial scale found in France, where foie gras and its controversial production method is enshrined in law as part of the country’s so-called cultural exception. Article L654 of the 2006 rural code states: “Foie gras is part of the protected cultural and gastronomic heritage of France. By ‘foie gras’ is meant the liver of a duck or a goose specifically fattened by force-feeding.”

France produces about 75% of the world’s foie gras; other sources include the US and China.

___________________________________________________________________________________________
PROMOTIONAL MESSAGE
A TOOL IS USELESS IF IT’S NOT USED. Don’t just sit there…introduce a friend or relative to The Greanville Post and help us expand the reach of remedial ideas and information. If each of you brings merely ONE additional reader to the table, we will be able to double our circulation!

_______________________________________________________________

If you liked this article, why not support The Greanville Post by buying our T-shirt, a mug, a mousepad, or any other item now in our store? That way you donate a few dollars and also get a nice gift. It’s a win-win formula!

Created By CrankyBeagle for The Greanville Post
This and many other items at our store. Stop by today!




Time to rethink that hamburger, pardner! [VIDEO]

Mercy For Animals presents Farm to Fridge.
The Disturbing Truth Behind Meat Production
Intro by Patrice Greanville 

James Cromwell, with his co-star in the film classic, BABE.

* Check out meat substitutes from Morningstar Farms, for example:

http://www.morningstarfarms.com/msfhome.html
and this discussion page: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080221064747AA9JBR7 
The Net has thousands of sites now devoted to this topic, and the arrival in the near future of an even more advanced generation of non-meat substitutes will certainly blot out all vestiges of excuses to remain a consumer of real meats. 

___________________________________________________________________________________________

PROMOTIONAL MESSAGE
A TOOL IS USELESS IF IT’S NOT USED. Don’t just sit there…introduce a friend or relative to The Greanville Post and help us expand the reach of remedial ideas and information. If each of you brings merely ONE additional reader to the table, we will be able to double our circulation!
___________________________________________________________________________________________

If you liked this article, why not support The Greanville Post by buying our T-shirt, a mug, a mousepad, or any other item now in our store? That way you donate a few dollars and also get a nice gift. It’s a win-win formula!

Created By CrankyBeagle for The Greanville Post
This and many other items at our store.  Stop by today!




ESA protection lifted, wolf killing accelerates

The Editors say: Wolves have been betrayed by the Obama administration and the courts. How many times can a depraved humanity bring an species to the absolute brink of extinction, only to rescue it and then put it again in mortal jeopardy?  And for what? To placate bloated ranching interests in reactionary states?

From ANIMAL PEOPLE,  June 2011—
BY Merritt Clifton

Their lot has been endless victimization.

WASHINGTON D.C.–“Interior Announces Next Steps in Protection,  Recovery,  and Scientific Management of Wolves,”  Kendra Barkoff of the U.S. Department of the Interior and Chris Tollefson of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service headlined a May 17,  2011 joint press release.

What “protection,  recovery,  and scientific management” meant was that wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains,  western Great Lakes region,  and Oregon may now be shot,  trapped,  poisoned,  and strafed from aircraft as state governments see fit,  so long as they do not actually reduce wolf populations to the verge of regional extinction.

Wolves in most of the Lower 48 states where they exist were removed from Endangered Species Act protection by Congress through an April 14,  2011 budget rider.  The rider was challenged as unconstitutional on May 5 by the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Friends of the Clearwater,  and WildEarth Guardians,  and was subsequently challenged in a separate filing by the Center for Biological Diversity.  The cases were judicially consolidated. Friends of Animals then filed a Motion to Intervene on May 27.

Expecting the case to fail,  the Montana Fish,  Wildlife,  & Parks Department tentatively approved a plan to allow hunters to kill as many as 220 wolves in fall 2011,  about 40% of the present estimated state wolf population of 566.   “It would be Montana’s second wolf hunt since 2009,  when 72 wolves were killed,”  wrote Scott Volz of Associated Press.

The Idaho Department of Fish & Game was reportedly also considering setting a quota of 220.  About 705 wolves are believed to inhabit Idaho.  Like Montana,  Idaho authorized a wolf hunt in 2009, with a quota of 220.  Idaho hunters actually shot 188 wolves.  While the Idaho quota will not be finalized until August,  the Department of Fish & Game started the killing early by hiring USDA Wildlife Services to shoot wolves from a helicopter in an area where wolves are blamed for an elk population decline.  “Gunners killed five wolves before the helicopter was grounded because of costs and because of difficulty targeting radio-collared wolves under the cover of trees,”  wrote Laura Zuckerman for Thomson/Reuters.

“The state has recruited outfitters to kill another 55 wolves in the area,”  Zuckerman added.  In addition,  Zuckerman wrote,  “The state of Idaho has authorized sheriff’s deputies to kill a pack of about seven wolves near Elk City,  a community of 200 residents in north central Idaho.”

Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife personnel killed a young male wolf on a ranch near Joseph on May 17,  the very day of the Department of the Interior “next steps” announcement,  shot another 10 days later,  and in between issued permits to 12 ranchers that allow them to shoot any wolf they see in the acts of biting, wounding,  or killing livestock.

Congressional Representative Candice Miller (R-Michigan) meanwhile on May 10 introduced legislation which would remove all wolves in the Lower 48 from federal protection.  “Backed by extremist groups like Sportsmen for Fish & Wildlife and Big Game Forever,” fumed Defenders of Wildlife president Rodger Schlickeisen,   “this shows what a dangerous path we are on.  Congress should uphold America’s commitment to protecting imperiled wildlife,” Schlickeisen said,  “rather than trying to appease radical special interest groups that are working against the public interest.”

No longer responsible for wolves in most states,  the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service quietly dropped a policy introduced during the administration of former President George W. Bush which allowed endangered species listing decisions to vary from state to state. Allowing wolves to be downlisted in Idaho and Montana,  while remaining protected in Wyoming,  the policy was successfully challenged in a federal court lawsuit by a coalition of 13 environmental advocacy groups and the Humane Society of the U.S., who argued that political boundaries have no relevance to conservation status.  The August 2010 ruling,  by federal District Judge Molloy,  led to the Act of Congress that stripped most wolves in the Lower 48 of Endangered Species Act protection.

Merritt Clifton
Editor,  ANIMAL PEOPLE
P.O. Box 960 | Clinton,  WA  98236
Telephone:  360-579-2505
Cell:  360-969-0450
Fax:  360-579-2575
E-mail:  anmlpepl@whidbey.com
Web:  www.animalpeoplenews.org

Don’t Miss a Single Article!
Subscribe to our reports by signing up below.
It’s easy, safe and quick.
JUST CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW

Subscribe to Animal People (The HTML Edition) by Email

___________________________________________________________________________________________
PROMOTIONAL MESSAGE
A TOOL IS USELESS IF IT’S NOT USED. Don’t just sit there…introduce a friend or relative to The Greanville Post and help us expand the reach of remedial ideas and information. If each of you brings merely ONE additional reader to the table, we will be able to double our circulation!
___________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

If you liked this article, why not support The Greanville Post by buying our T-shirt, a mug, a mousepad, or any other item now in our store? That way you donate a few dollars and also get a nice gift. It’s a win-win formula!

Created By CrankyBeagle for The Greanville Post
This and many other items at our store.  Stop by today!




WHOEVER SAYS SPECIESISM SAYS FASCISM

(Essay reposted as a result of specific requests by various readers. This article first ran in February of 2007.)

(Art by Sue Coe)

Adventures in the left blogosphere while trying to introduce a discomfitting issue—

It’s a little known fact that factory farms produce more greenhouse gases and land pollution than ALL modes of transportation combined. To be a defender of animals you only need to be a serious environmentalist.

By Patrice Greanville

In general, pigs are clean, intelligent, social animals. However, factory farms frustrate their natural desires to exercise, explore, play, root, stay clean, and socialize normally. (Courtesy: Compassionate Action for Animals)

[dropcap]N[/dropcap]OT TOO LONG AGO I posted, mostly on impulse, as a result of hearing about yet another execrable crime committed against helpless animals (by the usual suspects)…a plea for “progressives” to consider amplifying their scope of moral consideration to include all sentient beings subject to tyrannization. As a lifelong leftist and animal liberationist I am well acquainted with the temperament and idiosyncrasy prevailing in both tribes, and knew quite well that the “left”—however we may define it, has been less than helpful in the struggles to introduce a modicum of compassion in the brutal interactions between humans and non-humans. I know that it seems inane to ask people who are already horribly busy and overstretched coping with the constant tsunami of crime and idiocies produced by this system by the hour…to take yet another “cause” on their shoulders. I am also quite clear about the fact that the Left has never weaned itself off of the 19th century hangover proclaiming “man” (generically speaking) as the measure of all things and therefore center of the universe. This victory of secularism and democracy with a very small “d” was in fact the result of long centuries of struggles against church and king to give rationality and the “common man” a legitimate place at the table of societal decision making. This impromptu essay, therefore, reflected some of these theses.

I posted the blog, as a trial balloon, on SmirkingChimp and DailyKos, large sites occupying what we might call the centrist-liberaloid part of the spectrum. The vast majority of the folks who visit (and participate in) the sites probably see themselves as far more progressive in their politics than they really are, as their commentary reveals a preponderance of mainstream Democrats, ABBrs (Anyone But Bush), Obamabots, a sprinkling of social democrats, and a vociferous contingent of extreme centrists (who naturally never see themselves as extremists). Refreshingly, most of the featured writers seem to be well to the left of the audience (at least at these sites).

He who says speciesism says fascism—

(DailyKos diary at http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/2/2/22518/25695)

Fri Feb 02, 2007 at 08:22:40 PM PST

By Patrice Greanville

We have become indeed not only the most appalling tyranny over every other sentient creature on this planet, including many segments of our own breed, but also a raging, self-righteous cancer extending itself with impunity to every corner of the earth.

Time to do some rethinking

Confined and overcrowded on factory farms. Pigs often become frustrated, bored, aggressive, stressed and more susceptible to disease.

Today, as a result of a voracious industrialism, ecological destruction (to which meat production contributes a significant share) and other related issues, self-defined progressives can’t afford to go on pretending that suffering on such egregious scale is just a peripheral issue, the concern of kooks or affluent diettantes with little interest in other social issues.

Due to a deeply embedded and largely unexamined 18th Century heritage of philosophical “superhumanism” (“man is the measure of all things”) and the rest of that self-celebratory rubbish, which, we should mention in passing, arose as a reaction to a greater form of human stupidity, the one granting God and King total control over human agency, the Left continues to endorse or acquiesce in human supremacist attitudes toward animals.

This moral blindness is inexcusable for those who rightly see themselves as the moral vanguard of humanity. [Check this article, for example: Rethinking Revolution: Animal Liberation, Human Liberation, and the Future of the Left by STEVEN BEST . It’ll probably challenge many of your assumptions.] The bottom line is that speciesism—an underhanded and primitive form of fascism applied to animals and nature in general—is by far the oldest and most pervasive form of enslavement known on our planet. I don’t use the word “fascism” as purely hyperbole in this context or for dramatic effect. I wish it were mostly hyperbole, but the similarities run too deep. Fascism, which worships institutionalized violence, is distinguished for its unilateral proclamations of superiority by a certain race or breed, with such spurious superiority endowing said race with the “right” to dominate, exploit, and annihilate at will any group deemed “inferior.” If that pretty much doesn’t describe eloquently our despicable behavior toward non-human animals, I don’t know what does.

This pig was found dead with frozen blood discharging from his nose and mouth, and several abrasions and cuts on his face, neck, and front legs.  The large amounts of blood suggest that this animal was still alive when abandoned outside in the Minnesota winter. The way the blood is splattered also suggests he was unable to move, yet struggled, flinging his head around before finally dying.

But such narrow-minded and intellectually lazy positions will surely be exposed—sooner rather than later—for the pretentious sham they truly are. For now, in the age of an utterly deranged industrialism, with a global system blatantly proclaiming as its organizing principle the pursuit at any cost of infinite growth in what to any sensible person is a very finite and fragile planet, the tyranny of humans over nature has acquired monstruous proportions. The colossal dimensions of animal exploitation by the industrial method and the death of one species after another grimly attest to that.

COMMENT BY PAUL DONOVAN—[WhatsLeft]

The Status Quo Never Knows Best

This quote sums up the violent opposition met by narrow-minded thinkers on this thread. We are destroying this planet at a rapacious rate, and animals are just as entitled to live in it as we are.

Moreover, you all think you can have your cake and eat it too, and go on living the American nightmare without an ounce of accountability.

I am a leftist, way further to the left than most of you, but I almost hope the Republicans win, just so you will learn your lesson that you can’t support mediocrity and get real results. The animal struggle is no different than the struggle against Bush. These problems of ignorance and mass stupidity are systemic, and the sooner you learn it, the better off we will all be.

To stand against global morality, equality for all (not just a select few as usual), and truth, is to be a reactionary.

Centrism is the problem!

•••

*Paul is here referring to a guy who taunted me by saying he owned TWO beaver hats and was mighty proud of that.—PG

Notes
(1) The precise figure is difficult to ascertain due to the immensity of human/non-human interactions of an exploitive kind, but 75bn creatures of all kinds is currently regarded as extremely conservative, especially now that growing affluence in China, South Korea and even Vietnam, have pushed the consumption of meat and other animal foods to new heights.