MARGARET KIMBERLEY—Corbyn and his party were relentlessly targeted by the corporate media who worked in collusion with the Tories, the surveillance state, and rightwing forces in the country. He was accused of being a Russian agent and an anti-Semite. The latter charge was often used against him and the entire party. The smear was repeated quite often and created an endless need to respond.
ABOMINATIONSAMERICAN BRAINWASHAMERICAN DUPLICITYAMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISMAMERICAN PARTY DUOPOLYBRITISH DEVIOUSNESSBRITISH/ EU/ NATO COMPLICITY
BRITISH DEVIOUSNESSBRITISH/ EU/ NATO COMPLICITYMEDIA FRONTMEDIA SCOUNDRELSMEDIA SCUM
Corbyn was presented, relentlessly, as a moral monster, as a threat to humanity on the basis of miniscule, in fact non-existent, evidence. But Johnson and the Tories, and Corbyn’s Blairite enemies, escaped all scrutiny – for the simple reason that their very real crimes have been declared a non-issue by an awesomely corrupt system of media corporations serving the power of which they are an integral part.
ABOMINATIONSBRITISH DEVIOUSNESSBRITISH/ EU/ NATO COMPLICITYMEDIA SCOUNDRELSMEDIA SCUM
CAITLIN JOHNSTONE—These people aren’t like you and me. They don’t care about truth, and they don’t care about human beings. They rose to the positions they occupy within media and politics by consistently demonstrating that they’ll do whatever it takes to advance the interests of the oligarchic empire while giving the people the bare minimum possible to prevent an insurrection.
ANGLO-AMERICAN ALLIANCEBRITISH DEVIOUSNESSBRITISH/ EU/ NATO COMPLICITY
CRHIS MARSDEN—Millions of workers will be appalled by the election’s conduct and outcome, especially those who had looked to Corbyn to provide an alternative against such a widely despised figure as Johnson. Above all the reason for such a defeat must be understood.
ANGLO-AMERICAN ALLIANCEBRITISH DEVIOUSNESSBRITISH/ EU/ NATO COMPLICITYMEDIA SCOUNDRELSMEDIA SCUM
CAITLIN JOHNSTONE—Which means that plutocrats and government agencies indisputably interfered in the British election, to an exponentially greater extent than anything the Russians are even alleged to have done. Yet according to British law it was perfectly legal, and according to British society it was perfectly acceptable. It’s perfectly legal and acceptable for powerful individuals to have a vastly greater influence on a purportedly democratic election than any of the ordinary individuals voting in it.