Chronicles of Inequality [TOO MUCH, 20 May 2013)

Too Much May 20, 2013
THIS WEEK
Oh, please, spare us any more pious declarations. After a week of “IRS scandal,” we simply can’t bear another bogus claim that we’re witnessing one of the “most shameful abuses of government power in 20th-century American history.”We’re witnessing no such thing. Let’s be clear about what’s really happened: An understaffed and overburdened IRS office responsible for handling applications for a tax-exempt status that lets political groups conceal their donors cut corners.This office took the “path of least resistance.” Staffers crudely targeted a “rickety raft of minor Tea Party groups” and ignored the “heavily lawyered-up big-money groups” that had already gained this special tax-exempt status. These billionaire-subsidized outfits would go on to pump over $250 million into the 2012 elections.The real scandal here? Our super rich, as campaign finance reformer Arn Pearson puts it, are continuing “to influence the outcome of elections while keeping their identities secret.” The real core problem here? The continuing concentration of America’s wealth in a precious few hands. More on that concentration — and its toxic impact — in this week’s Too Much. About Too Much,
a project of the
Institute for Policy StudiesProgram on Inequality
and the Common Good
Subscribe
to Too Much
Join us on Facebook
or follow us on TwitterFacebookTwitter
GREED AT A GLANCE
America’s fasting-growing income gap? That may well sit at America’s economic summit. Retail analysts spent last week bemoaning how Americans making just over $250,000 are now “thinking twice” before splurging. These affluents,complains luxury marketer Pam Danzinger, “have lost their exuberance.” Even worse, they’re behaving no better than Henrys — or “High Earner Not Rich Yet,” the marketing label for households in the $100,000-$250,000 annual income range — and buying Coach over Prada. But households worth over $5 million, luxury gurus say, aren’t slowing down at all. “Ultra-luxury” goods are actually booming. One sign of the times: a fierce demand for high-end hotel rooms. Paris alone now has four hotels where suites go for over $25,000 a night . . .Pope FrancisThe newly elected Pope Francis, the leader of the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics, last week delivered what the Vatican calledhis “first forceful speech on the economic and financial crisis.” His target: those ideologies that “uphold the absolute autonomy of markets and financial speculation” at the expense of the “common good.” This ideological mindset, the Pope told an assembly of diplomats, has led to corruption and tax evasion that have left the incomes of a minority “increasing exponentially” while incomes of the majority “are crumbling.” The resulting inequality, the Pope added, is extinguishing the “joy of life.” The “golden calf of old,” he continued, has found a new “heartless image in the cult of money” and an economy “lacking any truly human goal.”Some of us think June and see weddings. Deep-pockets, suggests a new Spectrem Group survey of wealthy Americans, think June and sign “pre-nups,” the legal papers that determine who gets what assets when a married twosome drifts apart and calls it quits. Over two-thirds of Americans worth over $5 million, Spectrem found, advise friends and family about to tie the knot to sign a pre-nup first. But many of these wealthy do that advising with some misgivings. Over half the affluents studied, 54 percent, feel that pre-nups “introduce a negative feeling toward marriage,” and nearly a third believe pre-nups “wrongly place an emphasis on money.” On the other hand, 34 percent see “no disadvantages” to pre-nups whatsoever, and 72 percent feel pre-nups definitely do “protect assets.” Quote of the Week“Billionaires with an axe to grind, now is your time. Not since the days before a bumbling crew of would-be break-in artists set into motion the fabled Watergate scandal, leading to the first far-reaching restrictions on money in American politics, have you been so free to meddle.”
Andy KrollBillionaires UnchainedTomDispatch, May 16, 2013
PETULANT PLUTOCRAT OF THE WEEK
Tim CookApple CEO Tim Cook will be testifying this week before a U.S. Senate panel probing corporate tax avoidance. Cook makes for an obvious witness. Apple is now parking $102.3 billion in cash overseas, deftly using tax havens to sidestep billions in state and federal corporate taxes. Last week, in advance of his Senate appearance, Cook made the media rounds for a pre-emptive strike against his accusers. Crowed Cook: “Apple has a very strong moral compass.” In fact, the unapologetic CEO added, “Apple is paying approximately $1 million an hour in just domestic income taxes.” That sounds fairly impressive — until you realize that Tim Cook alone, in his first year as Apple’s CEO, grabbed a personal pay package worth $378 million, more than $1 million per day. Like Too Much?
Email this issue
to a friend
IMAGES OF INEQUALITY
Swiss-watchCalifornia luxury retail CEO John Simonian says he’s doing a bang-up business of late on timepieces that run into seven figures. Pictured here: the new $2,452,710Grand Complication from the Swiss watchmaker A. Lange & Sohne. Web GemWal-Mart Subsidy Watch/ How the world’s biggest retailer is using taxpayer dollars, state by state and town by town, to grow billionaire fortunes.
PROGRESS AND PROMISE
In India, Wealth Comes under Tax ScrutinyIn India today, the ultra rich are gobbling up the penthouses that crown the residential towers now popping up in cities like Mumbai. These duplexes and triplexes can run up to $9 million each and exquisitely separate their wealthy owners from street-level poverty and pollution. As realtor Shri Hari put it earlier this month: “Nobody can touch you there.” Well, maybe somebody can touch you. Indian tax authorities have just launched a new offensive against rampant tax evasion. They’re requiring Indian affluents to report on their income tax returns all their financial, real estate, and “moveable” assets — vehicles, yachts, private jets, gold bullion, jewelry, and works of art. The new mandate aims to identify Indians with assets “disproportionate to their known sources of income.” Take Action
on InequalityWill the 99 percent outbid the billionaires trying to buy the newspaper chain that includes the Los Angeles TimesWatch the video, join the bid.
INEQUALITY BY THE NUMBERS
 OECD income gaps Stat of the WeekBack in 1996, the developed world’s top 10 percent took home 8.9 times the income of the bottom 10 percent. That gap in 2010: 9.8 times. Over those same years, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Developmentreports, the U.S. gap between top and bottom 10 percent rose from 12.5 to 15.9 times. 

 

IN FOCUS
Satisfaction and Smiles in an Unequal WorldIf President Obama played basketball with the king of Bhutan, would the world have a better shot at becoming a happier place?What makes us happy? A simple question. In America, we’ve been asking it ever since 1776, the year we declared for “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”Back in those days, Americans hoping to encourage happiness had little more than guesswork to go by. Today we have help: a new science of happiness, with years of research findings.John de Graaf, the executive director of the Seattle-based Take Back Your Timeand the co-author of What’s the Economy For, Anyway? has done as much as any American to share what this science has to offer. Too Much caught up with de Graaf last week for an exchange on the factors that make for happiness — and how inequality impacts them.John De GraffOur conventional global economic wisdom, of course, ignores any possible relationship between happiness and inequality. To make us happier, this standard wisdom assumes, we just need to grow economically. Higher GDPs will bring us higher levels of “life satisfaction” and “subjective well-being.”

In fact, as de Graaf points out, beyond a certain level of Gross Domestic Product — about the current GDP of Portugal — we have no research evidence that countries become happier as they become richer.

“We do have evidence that other factors — reduced stress and greater leisure time, good health and social connections — do contribute to greater happiness,” he adds. “And so does the opportunity to do meaningful work and live in a democratic society that fosters trust and personal safety, with access to education, arts, culture, and nature.”

Which societies in the world today rank highest on factors like these? The world’s most equal nations. These societies discourage the flaunting of wealth and encourage social connectivity. People in them have among the shortest working hours and the best “work-life” balance in the world.

“In the United States,” says de Graaf, “we have about the worst work-life balance among rich countries.”

In our society, nothing signals status and success more than personal wealth, and people labor ever longer hours to grab as much of it as they can. But this chase after fortune undercuts our ability to take the satisfaction that comes from leisure time and all the other quality-of-life dimensions so critical to happiness.

“When we gain personal wealth at the expense of these dimensions, our personal well-being suffers,” observes de Graaf. “When a whole society pursues personal wealth for the few at the expense of these dimensions for the many, that entire society suffers. That’s what we see in America today.”

We see a good bit more as well.

“Our ever-greater piling on of personal wealth,” de Graaf notes, “is threatening to leave future generations a barren planet.”

Americans are already exhausting the world’s resources and waste sinks more rapidly than they can naturally replenish. If everyone on earth lived the American consumer lifestyle, as the Global Footprint Network details, humanity would need five planets to provide the resources and absorb the wastes.

“We simply cannot grow on like this,” says de Graaf. “We need to find a different approach to well-being for the sake of the future.”

This sort of talk, he acknowledges, scares those Americans who believe that we have no alternative to the status quo if we want “the economy” to thrive.

“These Americans accept the notion that we’re here to serve the economy,” says de Graaf. “But the economy should be serving us.”

In Bhutan, the tiny Himalayan nation de Graaf recently visited as part of an international advisory group, policy makers have been working to re-orient their economy in this direction. Bhutan has become the first society on earth to make the pursuit of happiness its prime driver of public policy.

Over recent years, de Graaf relates, life expectancy, literacy, and happiness levels have all “increased spectacularly” in Bhutan. The nation ensures all workers a month of annual vacation. Small touches matter for happiness, too. In winter, workdays run from 9 to 4, to keep workers from having to travel to and from work in darkness.

The Bhutanese are now asking the United Nations to explore new progress markers — linked to sustainable well-being and happiness — that can replacetraditional GDP measures, and next year, in June, the young king of Bhutan will be traveling to the UN and the United States to help make that case.

Like this article? Sign up
to receive the Too Muchweekly in your email inbox.

Will anybody be listening? De Graaf certainly hopes so — and thinks a little basketball game might help. Turns out that Bhutan’s 33-year-old king plays a mean game of hoops, among the best in his country.

A game on the White House court with the king and President Obama, says de Graaf, just might attract some global media attention.

“Add a few celebrities and NBA stars to the game,” he dreams, “and you could have an international event of great import, an event that could get people talking about measuring ‘equitable and sustainable well-being’ instead of GDP.”

And that would be something to truly get happy about.

More from the Too Much interview with John de Graaf at Inequality.Org.

New Wisdom
on WealthHarold Meyerson, The Upside Down Economy,American Prospect, May 13, 2013. Two-thirds of the rise in corporate profits between the end of the dot-com bust and the collapse of 2008 came directly from the lower wages corporate execs paid their workers.Nathan Tankus, The Transit Coup: How Robber Barons got New York City to Bail Out Their Subway Lines,Naked Capitalism, May 16, 2013. A look back at classic plutocratic extortion.Paul Solman, Inequality Today: Worse than a Century Ago? The Business Desk, May 17, 2013. In the United States, yes, says this PBS correspondent.Sheila Krumholz and Danielle Brian, How Money Rules WashingtonMoyers & Company, May 17, 2013. A talk with two veteran public interest watchdogs.

Steven Harper, Ugliness Inside the Am Law 100,The Am Law Daily, May 17, 2013. Growing income gaps within big-time law firms are poisoning partnership.

Salvatore Babones, OECD: Inequality Rising Faster than EverInequality.Org, May 19, 2013. An analysis of the latest developed world income data.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Rich Don’t Always Win: The Forgotten Triumph over Plutocracy that Created the American Middle Class cover

Get a sense of the new bookby Too Much editor Sam Pizzigati. Read theintroductory chapter.

NEW AND NOTABLE
Where the Global Ultra Rich Most Enjoy LivingWealthInsightWorld City Millionaire Rankings, WealthInsight, London, May 2013.Which city in the world today hosts the most rich people? That depends on how you define rich, as this new research into global wealth data details quite nicely.No city anywhere holds more millionaires, as measured in U.S. dollars, than Tokyo. Japan’s largest urban center sported 461,000 millionaires as of this past December. In second place, New York, with 389,000.Move up a notch, and the story changes. London has more households worth at least $30 million than any other urban center. The London total: 4,224.

On billionaires, a different story still. New York — we’re actually only talking Manhattan here — leads the way with 70, with Moscow close behind at 64.

These city figures give the impression that the world has a variety of geographic high-wealth centers. But the figures by country — also conveniently provided in this new WealthInsight report — show that one nation clearly stands far above all the rest as a homeland for substantial fortune: the United States.

Some 5.23 million millionaires live stateside, a total that just about matches the millionaire population of the next four countries on the WealthInsight millionaire list — Japan, Germany, China, and the UK — all combined.

 

 

Like Too Much?
Email this issue to
a friend who might
want to subscribe

ABOUT TOO MUCH
Too Much, an online weekly publication of the Institute for Policy Studies | 1112 16th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036 | (202) 234-9382 | Editor: Sam Pizzigati. | E-mail: editor@toomuchonline.org | Unsubscribe. Subscribe to Too Much



Disconnect: Soaring Markets/Troubled Economies

by Stephen Lendman
Capitalism has succeeded in capturing governments around the world.

German DAX stock exchange board.

German DAX stock exchange board. The stuff that dreams are made of.

Forget everything you learned about markets, economics and finance. Perhaps Newton, Galileo, Copernicus, Darwin, Freud, Einstein, and other noted figures were wrong.  Central banks run today’s world. Major ones matter most. Money printing madness controls everything. Love doesn’t make the world go round. Liquidity-driven markets reflect the power of bankers to do it. 

They’re more powerful than standing armies. They can levitate markets. They can enrich themselves at the same time.  They can do it while economies crater. The power of massive liquidity infusions combined with market manipulation generates huge profits.

What can’t go on forever, won’t. What’s going on now defies reason. Disconnect barely explains it. US equity markets hit record highs. So did Germany’s DAX. Japan’s Nikkei reached a five and a half year high. One recent headline read “Central banks pop champagne corks as stock markets soar.” Another said “Which European Market Will Hit a Record High Next?”

Turkey’s BIST-100 topped 91,000 for the first time. Switzerland’s SMI has a ways to go. It’s headed in the right direction. Sweden’s OMX Stockholm 30 and the OMX Nordic are closer.  London’s FTSE 100 looks poised for a record high. It could do so in weeks. Who said defying gravity’s impossible? Markets are doing it with ease.  Record valuations bear no relation to economic reality. Today’s disconnect is unprecedented. Paul Craig Roberts expects an eventual triple bubble explosion. On the one hand, he says “rich elites are stealing everything for themselves.” At the same time, he cites “three of the biggest bubbles in history.”

“The bond market, stock market and the US dollar” are levitating. (S)omething is going to go. This is possibly one of the riskiest years in Western civilization.”

Combined with police state enforcement and imperial wars, it’s menacing.  Australian economist Steve Keen‘s Debtwatch web site “analyses the collapse of the global debt bubble.” He calls America’s stock market a giant one. It’s debt-fueled. Margin debt levels match 2000 and late 2007 highs, he says.

“Nothing can accelerate forever. At some point the acceleration stops, and when it does the market breaks.”   He believes trouble’s coming in one or two years. He thinks America’s stock market will burst the way Japan’s did in the early 1990s.

The key Nikkei Index peaked near 39,000. It did so on 1989’s last trading day. It fell 63% in less than three years. Rolling recessions and recoveries followed. It didn’t bottom until February 2009. It closed at 7,163. On May 17, it closed at 15,138.

According to Keen:

“I think we’re (heading for) a long slow bleed, much longer and slower than the Japanese stock market crash. The dynamics are similar.”

“In 500 years time,” he added, “people will look back and see this as the biggest debt-financed bubble in human history and ask, ‘why didn’t we realize it?’ ”  Bruce Kasting worked on Wall Street for 25 years. He’s no longer there. His blog site discusses financial issues. He calls Bernanke’s policy “reckless endangerment.”  He claims he can cease QE with no ill consequences. “It’s never been done before. Not by the Fed. Not by any Central Bank.”

“To think that such a daunting task can be accomplished without negative consequences is foolish,” said Kasting.

PIMCO’s Bill Gross sees bubbles everywhere. It doesn’t mean they’ll pop immediately.  Speculators assume Fed policy will remain accommodative “over the long-term and under the assumption that the US economy is doing better than most economies.”  Lots of money is chasing lots of risk, says Gross. Central banks are “blowing bubbles. When that stops, there will be repercussions. Not just in the bond market but in the stock market as well and a developing one in the hous(ing) market.”

Gross warned that the multi-decade US bond bull market ended. Higher interest rates will eventually follow. A 1% rise means over $100 billion in more interest. It’s negative for economic growth. Most developed countries have debt to GDP ratios above 100%.   They’re manageable with record low interest rates. Higher ones risk default in troubled economies. European PIIGS countries are most vulnerable (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain).

Marc Faber warns that “something will break very badly.”

“In the 40 years I’ve been working as an economist and investor, I have never seen such a disconnect between the asset market and the economic reality.”

“Asset markets are in the sky and the economy of the ordinary people is in the dumps, where their real incomes adjusted for inflation are going down and asset markets are going up.”

Graham Summers warns “It’s official: Stocks are in a bubble.” It’s worse than anything he’s seen in his career.  Stocks rallied every Tuesday for 17 straight weeks. Traders “are now conditioned to play for this move.”

It’s “POMO day.” The Fed pumps markets with liquidity. Doing so drives stocks higher.

“The market is beyond overstretched. We have not had a 5% correction in six months. Stocks have gone almost straight up for 89 days (we haven’t had a 3+day correction in that long).”

“This is an all time record. The last time stocks rallied without a 3+ day correction was in the buildup to the Crash of 1987.”

“Copper is great at predicting economic growth.” It’s trending lower. Stocks are poor predictors. Major divergences between them will be resolved sharply.

Rampant insider selling continues. Stocks are disconnected from reality. They’re “totally out of control.” Most days hit record highs. It’s unprecedented.

“At this point, no long term investor in their right mind should be buying. This is especially true given that the S&P 500 is now not only totally disconnected from economic reality, but is disconnected from every other asset class.”

Stocks diverged from bonds, gold, copper and oil. They’re last to react. “This bubble will end as all bubbles do: in disaster.”

Main street conditions are worse than during the Great Depression. Europe’s as disconnected as America. More on that below.

Paul Craig Roberts calls offshoring US jobs a greater threat than terrorism. It’s been ongoing for years. It’s most felt when jobs are scarce. Good ones are fast disappearing.  Politicians remain in denial. Millions more jobs remain vulnerable. Displaced employees “left unemployed or in lower paid work have a reduced presence in the consumer market.”

Outsourcing jobs erodes US economic strength. China, India, Brazil and other developing countries gain at America’s expense.  Instead of using the nation’s resources for economic growth, Washington prioritizes militarism, permanent wars, and corporate giants’ interests at the expense of ordinary people.

It’s madness. It’s self-destructive. It sacrifices longterm economic health for short and intermediate term gains. WW III already started. So far, it’s unlike WW I and II. It’s international, unconventional, asymmetric, disruptive, anti-democratic, lawless, low to higher intensity, political, psychological and financial.

Financial schemes involve:

  • massive wealth transfers from ordinary people to corporate giants and super-rich elites;
  • bail in confiscation of assets;
  • lawless sanctions, embargoes and blockades;
  • schemes to control natural resources, trade and money;
  • entrapping nations in unrepayable debt;
  • manufacturing financial crises, and more.

On May 16, the Global Europe Anticipation Bulletin (GEAB) headlined “Systemic crisis 2013: with record exchange highs, the planet’s imminent plunge into recession.”   Prevailing calm is deceptive. It often precedes the storm. “(S)everal signals show that a reversal in the economic situation is imminent.”

Economies never recovered from 2008. Conditions continue to deteriorate. Europe’s in recession. More on that below. China’s growth is slowing. It exports are declining.  Australia’s export dependent economy makes it a good indicator. It’s “struggling. Consumers are also marking time. US wholesale and retail sales are on the decline.”

Most “US benchmark indices are swinging into the red.” Major banks know a storm looms. They’re using “all the means at their disposal (legal and illegal) to shelter themselves.”

BRICS countries are some of the world’s fastest growing. They have their own strategy. They’re gradually moving away from the dollar.

They’re “building a (multipolar) world system where they would have greater representation.” They’re doing so at the expense of America and other Western countries.  America’s economy is troubled. Four years of QE haven’t worked. Pushing on a string defines Fed policy. Money sits on bank balance sheets as excess reserves. Credit expansion’s anemic. Manufacturing’s contracting. Fiscal tightening exacerbates things.

Europe’s in recession. Southern Europe’s in Depression. Eurozone economic data are negative. In Q I, Italy contracted 0.5% from the previous quarter.  Seven straight quarterly declines reflect its troubled economy. It’s been so longterm. From 2000 – 2010, it expanded an anemic 2.5%. The current trend is negative. Protracted decline appears likely.

It’s not alone. ECB policy hasn’t worked. Mario Monti’s no more effective than Bernanke. Markets are disconnected from economic reality.  The Eurozone’s in recession. Nine of its 17 countries have negative growth. They include Italy, France, Greece, Spain, Cyprus, Portugal, Belgium, Finland and the Netherlands.

So do EU members Hungary and the Czech Republic. Expect more to follow.  Slovenia’s deeply troubled. It looks like the next Cyprus. Britain teeters on recession. So does Germany. Monetary madness achieved little. Force-fed austerity is self-defeating.

Confiscating bank deposits is the new normal. It’s a diabolical plot. It’s consolidating financial power. It’s price is economic decline. Equities are the last asset class to react. When it does, watch out.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.  His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com




Can America Come to Terms with Boston Bombing Suspect’s Stated Motives?

Consortium News [1] / By Ray McGovern [2]
comments_image

Shocking as it is for most self-righteous, chauvinist Americans to recognize the logic behind the Boston's bombers motives, it is there for all to see.

The surviving “Boston bomber.”

Quick, somebody tell CIA Director John Brennan about the handwriting on the inside wall of the boat in which Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was hiding before Boston-area police riddled it and him with bullets. Tell Brennan that Tsarnaev’s note is in plain English and that it needs neither translation nor interpretation in solving the mystery: “why do they hate us?”

And, if Brennan will listen, remind him of when his high school teachers, the Irish Christian Brothers, taught him the meaning of “handwriting on the wall” in the Book of Daniel and why it became an idiom for predetermined, imminent doom.

CBS senior correspondent John Miller, who before joining CBS served in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, broke the handwritten-note story [3] Thursday onCBS This Morning. He described what Dzhokhar Tsarnaev scribbled on the side of the boat as he lay bleeding “from multiple gunshot wounds” in the boat. Here, according to Miller’s sources, is what Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s note said:

“The [Boston] bombings were in retribution for the U.S. crimes in places like Iraq and Afghanistan [and] that the victims of the Boston bombing were collateral damage, in the same way innocent victims have been collateral damage in U.S. wars around the world.  Summing up, that when you attack one Muslim you attack all Muslims.”

[pullquote] Shocking as it is for most self-righteous, chauvinist Americans to recognize the logic behind the Boston bombers’ motives, it is there for all to see. Defeatism “terrorism” requires a simple thing: stop meddling in other nations’ lives, destroying their societies, robbing their resources, and killing their men, women, and children under false pretexts.  But that’s something that a corporate-dominated political class is not about to do. Terrorism (by foreigners) is just a natural reaction to our rapacious, military-tipped, global corporatism. End of the story.[/pullquote]

My experience with now-CBS-This-Morning’s Charlie Rose is that he does listen closely. Thus, I believe it is to his credit that he seemed determined, with his follow-up question, to drive home what I think is by far the most important point:

Co-anchor Charlie Rose: “Does it [the note] answer questions about motives?”

Miller: “Well it does … there it is in black and white – literally.”

Co-anchor Norah O’Donnell: “But they still believe he was self-radicalized and not part of a larger group, right?”

Miller: “That’s right. …”

Note to CIA Director Brennan

If you didn’t understand much about such motives three years ago, after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to down an airliner over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009, here’s a chance to learn. I actually felt embarrassed for you when you – then-White House counter-terrorism adviser – were asked on Jan. 7, 2010, two weeks after the almost-catastrophe over Detroit, to explain why people want to kill Americans. I’m sure you remember; it turned out to be Helen Thomas’s swan song.

It took the questioning of the then-89-year old veteran correspondent Thomas to show how little you were willing to share (or how little you knew) about what leads terrorists to do what they do. As her catatonic White House press colleagues took their customary dictation, Thomas posed an adult query that spotlighted the futility of government plans to counter terrorism with more high-tech gizmos and intrusions on the liberties and privacy of the traveling public.

She asked why Abdulmutallab did what he did: “And what is the motivation? We never hear what you find out on why.” It was a highly revealing dialogue; this is how it went. Remember?

You: “Al-Qaeda is an organization that is dedicated to murder and wanton slaughter of innocents. … They attract individuals like Mr. Abdulmutallab and use them for these types of attacks. He was motivated by a sense of religious sort of drive. Unfortunately, al-Qaeda has perverted Islam, and has corrupted the concept of Islam, so that he’s (sic) able to attract these individuals. But al-Qaeda has the agenda of destruction and death.”

Thomas: “And you’re saying it’s because of religion?”

You: “I’m saying it’s because of an al-Qaeda organization that used the banner of religion in a very perverse and corrupt way.”

Thomas: “Why?”

You: “I think this is a — long issue, but al-Qaeda is just determined to carry out attacks here against the homeland.”

Thomas: “But you haven’t explained why.”

Actually, there is a ton of information explaining why people try, for example, to explode bombs in Times Square, in airliners over Detroit, in remote CIA outposts in Afghanistan just to kill Americans, even when it means killing themselves. [See, for example, Consortiumnews.com’s “Answering Helen Thomas on Why [4].”]

It was painful to watch you suggest on Jan. 7, 2010, that, apparently in some mysterious way, some folks are hard-wired at birth for the “wanton slaughter of innocents,” and your contention that – in the case of Abdulmutallab – al-Qaeda/Persian Gulf was able to jump-start that privileged 23-year old Nigerian, inculcate in him the acquired characteristics of a terrorist, and persuade him to do the bidding of al-Qaeda/Persian Gulf.

Your words were a real stretch as to how the well-heeled Abdulmutallab, without apparent prior terrorist affiliations, was suddenly transformed into an international terrorist ready to die while killing innocents.

Perhaps no one told you that the young Nigerian had particular trouble with Israel’s wanton slaughter of more than a thousand civilians in Gaza the year before, a brutal campaign defended by Washington as justifiable self-defense. You ought to take the time to learn about these things.

Till next time, Ray.

How to Spin This One

An important element in intelligence analysis is to understand the why, what’s the motive. That doesn’t mean you sympathize with what someone did. It does mean that you understand that knowing why is an important starting point for future prevention of similar acts.

Yet, virtually no one in the U.S. political/media hierarchy has dared to discuss, in a candid way, the issue of motivation. All the American people normally get is boilerplate about how al-Qaeda evildoers are perverting a religion and exploiting impressionable young men.

There is almost no discussion about why so many people in the Muslim world object to U.S. policies so strongly that they are inclined to resist violently and even resort to suicide attacks. So how will the media spin Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s handwritten note?

Well, we’ve already watched CBS’s Norah O’Donnell come up with the familiar “self-radicalization” shibboleth. She tied the concept to a lack of ties with a larger group, but “self-radicalization” is normally employed to create the impression that hard-wired “violent Muslim extremists” simply look in the mirror one day and say to themselves, My, this looks like a good day to self-radicalize.

Also regularly trotted out is the “homegrown-violent-extremists” moniker employed as recently as Thursday by FBI Director Robert Mueller III in Senate testimony.

Other “mainstream media” and government officials will keep blaming terrorism on Islam, as the Wall Street Journal does Friday in repeating the claim that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev told the FBI earlier that he and his dead brother “were acting as jihadists motivated by Muslim religious anger at the U.S.” (In other words, pay no heed to what he scribbled on the side of the boat as he thought he was dying.)

Rarely has there been any official or quasi-official acknowledgement of the main problem. But there was a major exception in the fall of 2004 in an unclassified study published by the Pentagon-appointed U.S. Defense Science Board. Directly contradicting what President George W. Bush was saying at the time, the board stated:

“Muslims do not ‘hate our freedom,’ but rather, they hate our policies. The overwhelming majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights, and the longstanding, even increasing support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies, most notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan, and the Gulf States.”

That’s not spin. That’s the assessment of professionals who were reading the handwriting on the wall.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

Source URL: http://www.alternet.org/world/can-america-come-terms-boston-bombing-suspects-stated-motives

Links:
[1] http://www.consortiumnews.com
[2] http://www.alternet.org/authors/ray-mcgovern
[3] http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57584771/boston-bombings-suspect-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-left-note-in-boat-he-hid-in-sources-say/
[4] http://www.consortiumnews.com/2010/010810b.html
[5] http://www.alternet.org/tags/terrorism
[6] http://www.alternet.org/tags/boston-marathon
[7] http://www.alternet.org/%2Bnew_src%2B




IRS Scandal Headlines: More Than Meets the Eye

by Stephen Lendman

The rot is systemic, bipartisan.  Both JFK and Nixon set up "enemies" lists to harass via the IRS and other agencies. They are not the only presidents to do so.

The rot is systemic, bipartisan. Both JFK and Nixon set up “enemies” lists to harass via the IRS and other agencies. They are not the only presidents to do so.

More than targeting political enemies is involved. More on than below. The practice is longstanding. Republican and Democrat administrations use the IRS abusively.  During the Coolidge administration, Republican Senator James Couzens investigated the IRS’ predecessor – the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). 

Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon sued him. University of Virginia Law Professor George Yin called doing so the “greatest tax suit in the history of the world.” At issue was political intrigue, backstabbing, and unintended consequences.

Franklin Roosevelt targeted William Randolph Hearst, Louisiana Governor Huey Long, and anti-administration critic/popular radio host Father John Coughlin. IRS officials investigated their finances.  In the 1940s and 1950s, hundreds of IRS employees were sacked and/or indicted for involvement in widespread corruption and bribery.

San Francisco officials colluded with organized crime. The St. Louis office head, a practicing attorney, represented a client on a tax issue. Doing so was a clear conflict of interest. The Kennedy administration created an Ideological Organizations Audit Project. It did so to investigate conservative groups. It challenged their tax exempt status. Targets included the American Enterprise Institute and Christian Anti-Communist Crusade.

Nixon’s Opponents List and Political Enemies Project became known as his Enemies List.  His administration created the Special Services Staff. It targeted political opponents and activists.  According to his White House Counsel John Dean, it “deal(t) with persons known to be active in their opposition to our Administration; stated a bit more bluntly – how we (could) use the available federal machinery to screw our political enemies.”

In the 1990s, the Senate Finance Committee accused the IRS of “Gestapo-like” conduct. In 1998, the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act followed. At issue was curbing IRS enforcement powers. Little more than doing so nominally was achieved.  Shortly before the 1992 election, the Binghamton, NY Branch Ministries ran full-page newspaper ads. They claimed Clinton promoted policies “in rebellion to God’s laws.”

Doing so was illegal. Tax law prohibits 501c 3 organizations from engaging in electoral politics. In 2001, statistical evidence showed voters in key electoral districts experience disproportionately fewer election year audits.

During the 2004 electoral campaign, a Pasadena, CA All Saints Church minister criticized Bush’s attack, invasion and occupation of Iraq. An IRS investigation followed.  Obama’s accused of using the IRS against conservative non-profit groups and others seeking tax-exempt status. Organizations with “tea party,” “patriot,” or “9/12” in their names were targeted.

So were others challenging Obamacare or federal electoral integrity. All government critics are vulnerable. It’s true under Republican and Democrat administrations. In 2012, former IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman lied. He told House members “there’s absolutely no targeting. This is the kind of back and forth that happens to people.”

The IRS now claims targeting conservative groups was “in no way due to any political or partisan rationale.”

Some NGOs operate legitimately. Others don’t. No more than 49% of a group’s resources can be used for political purposes. Strict rules govern doing so.  In January 2013, Pro Publica discussed five conservative dark money groups. They were active during the 2012 election. The IRS illegally released information about their tax exempt status petitions. Doing so is a felony.

Former Obama Council of Economic Advisors chairman Austan Goolsbee divulged confidential Koch Industries tax information. After not levying gift taxes for decades, the IRS told five donors to conservative NGO advocacy groups that past donations could be taxed. Doing so retroactively raises legitimate concerns.

FOIA-obtained information revealed that the IRS “has long taken the position that (it) can read your emails without a warrant.” Doing so violates the Fourth Amendment.  Once Obamacare’s fully implemented in 2014, the IRS will enforce 47 new tax provisions. Doing so promises to be nightmarish. Giving the agency power over healthcare is scandalous. Enormous harm is likely.

After the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, NGOs became more politically active. At the time, Ralph Nader denounced the decision, saying:

It “shreds the fabric of our already weakened democracy by allowing corporations to more completely dominate our corrupted electoral process.”

“It is outrageous that corporations already attempt to influence or bribe our political candidates through their political action committees (PACs), which solicit employees and shareholders for donations.”

“With this decision, corporations can now also draw on their corporate treasuries and pour vast amounts of corporate money, through independent expenditures, into the electoral swamp already flooded with corporate campaign PAC contribution dollars.”

“This corporatist, anti-voter decision is so extreme that it should galvanize a grassroots effort to enact a Constitutional Amendment to once and for all end corporate personhood and curtail the corrosive impact of big money on politics.”

“It is indeed time for a Constitutional amendment to prevent corporate campaign contributions from commercializing our elections and drowning out the civic and political voices and values of citizens and voters.”

“It is way overdue to overthrow “King Corporation” and restore the sovereignty of “We the People”!  Dark money infests politics. America’s political system is scandalous. Duopoly power corrupts it. Voters get the best democracy money can buy.

Corporations, NGO advocacy groups, and other powerful interest groups decide everything. Ordinary people have no say.  Today’s scandal is bipartisan. For example, Senator Pat Toomey (R. PA) accused the IRS of tactics “akin to an enemies list.” In his 2010 senatorial race, conservative NGOs contributed millions of dollars to his campaign.

The criminal class in Washington is bipartisan. Both sides of the isle share guilt. Big spenders flout the law repeatedly. Most do with impunity.  After Citizens United, the IRS struggled to determine which NGOs deserved “social welfare” status. The ruling lets corporations and unions raise and spent unlimited amounts of political money.

Other groups can accept undisclosed contributions as long as their “primary purpose” is apolitical.

House and Senate committees announced investigations. Capitol Hill is rife with corruption. Legislation if enacted won’t improve things. It hasn’t before. It won’t now.  After Watergate, the White House was legally barred from contacting the IRS about tax matters. The agency can only release information about petitions for tax exempt status after they’ve been approved or denied.

On May 16, Public Citizen said the IRS controversy doesn’t “diminish the need for fair and balanced disclosure of corporate political spending.”

According to Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division director Lisa Gilbert:

“The IRS controversy is about partisanship, not disclosure. Tying the IRS’s problems to the SEC rulemaking on corporate political spending is the height of political theater.”

Public Citizen’s Craig Holman added:

“The real issue with the IRS controversy is whether the agency was enforcing the tax code in a partisan, discriminatory manner, not whether electioneering nonprofit organizations should disclose the sources of their campaign funds.”

The Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) headlined “The Real IRS Scandal,” saying:

It’s not about targeting tea party or other conservative groups. It’s “the shocking lack of much scrutiny at all of the vast majority of politically active nonprofits that poured hundreds of millions of dollars into our elections over the last four years.”

CRP executive director Sheila Krumholz and chairman Robert Weinberger explained, saying:

“The majority of the organizations that appear to be most politically active – from groups that run their own ads, like American Action Network and Americans for Prosperity, to the mysterious Center to Protect Patient Rights, which distributes money to other political groups – already have exempt status.”

“There’s little evidence that the IRS is looking into these groups.”

The current scandal will make it harder to do so. Groups targeted “received more scrutiny and suspicion than they deserved.”

“(M)ore regrettable is the long-term damage to the credibility of the IRS as an impartial arbiter of whether organizations merit tax-exempt status.”

“With the surge of dark money into politics, we need to ensure that the IRS is capable of rigorously enforcing the law in a nonpartisan, but also more effective, way.”

“While we focus on the rickety raft of minor Tea Party groups targeted by the IRS, there is an entire fleet of big spenders that are operating with apparent impunity.”

Obama faces a trifecta of scandals. Perhaps more will surface. Cover up followed last September’s Benghazi killings. The official narrative doesn’t wash.  Institutional spying targeted AP. Manufactured national security threats violate press freedom. Doing so is rife.

First Amendment rights are threatened. Dissent increasingly is criminalized. Obama’s targeted more whistleblowers than all previous administrations combined. He’s heading America toward full-blown tyranny. The IRS scandal shows the dark side of electoral politics. America’s system is scandalous. It mocks democracy. It lacks legitimacy.

Monied interests control things. Duopoly power rules. Wealth, power and privilege alone matter. America’s broken system is too corrupted to fix. Change requires tearing it down and starting over.

A good start entails excluding money from politics and creating a level playing field for all political parties and aspirants.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached atlendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.  His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.” http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com




Syria Endgame Approaching Fast

The Fate of the Middle East in the Balance
by SHAMUS COOKE

"Free Syrian" female fedaheyin: who knows the truth about such images anymore in an age of professional fabrications?

“Free Syrian” female fedaheyin: who knows the truth about such images anymore in an age of professional fabrications?

The tempo of events in Syria has accelerated in recent weeks. The government forces have scored significant battlefield victories over the rebels, and this has provoked a mixture of war provocations and peace offers from the U.S. and its anti-Assad allies.

With Obama’s blessing Israel fighter jets recently attacked Syria on three occasions; in one massive air strike on a military installation in Damascus 42 Syrian soldiers were killed. Shortly thereafter Obama finally agreed to a peace conference with Russia, which had been asking for such talks for months.

Obama is entering these talks from a weakened position; the Syrian government is winning the war against the U.S.-backed rebels, and success on the ground is the trump card of any peace talks. Obama and the rebels are in no position to be demanding anything in Syria at the moment.

It’s possible that Obama wants to avoid further humiliation in his Syria meddling by a last minute face-saving “peace” deal. It’s equally likely, however, that these peace talks are a clever diplomatic ruse, with war being the real intention. It’s not uncommon for peace talks to break down and be used as a justification for an intensification of war, since “peace was attempted but failed.”

And Obama has plenty of reasons to pursue more war:  he would look incredibly weak and foolish if Syria’s president were to stay in power after Obama’s administration had already announced that Assad’s regime was over and hand picked an alternative government of Syrian exiles that the U.S. — and other U.S. allies — were treating as the “legitimate government of Syria.”

Here’s how the BBC referred to Obama’s Syrian puppet government:

“… the Syrian opposition’s political leadership – which wanders around international capitals attending conferences and making grand speeches – is not leading anyone. It barely has control of the delegates in the room with it, let alone the fighters in the field.”

If an unlikely peace deal is reached, these Syrian exiles — who only a tiny minority of the rebel fighters actually listen to — will be the ones to sign off on the deal.

Many politicians in the U.S. are still clamoring for war in Syria, based on the unproven accusation that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against the rebels. In actuality, however, the UN so far has only indicated that the exact opposite is true: there is significant evidence the U.S.-backed rebels used chemical weapons against the Syrian government:

Of course this fact only made the back pages of the U.S.media, if it appeared at all. Similarly bad news about the U.S.-backed rebels committing large scale ethnic/religious cleansing and numerous human rights violations didn’t manage to make it on to the front pages either. And the numerous terrorist bombings by the U.S.-backed rebels that have indiscriminately killed civilians have likewise been largely ignored by U.S. politicians and the media.

The U.S. position is weakened further by the fact that the majority of the rebel fighters are Islamic extremists, who are fighting for jihad and sharia law, not democracy. The Guardian reported recently:

“Syria’s main armed opposition group, the Free Syrian Army (FSA), is losing fighters and capabilities to Jabhat al-Nusra, an Islamist organization with links to al-Qaida that is emerging as the best-equipped, financed and motivated force fighting Bashar al-Assad’s [Syrian] regime.”

The New York Times adds:

“Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of.”

But even with all these barriers to the U.S. dictating its terms to the Syrian government, Obama has trump cards of his own: the U.S. and the Israeli military.

It’s possible that the Israeli airstrikes on Syria were used as a bargaining chip with the proposed peace conference in Russia. If Obama threatened to bomb Syria into the Stone Age there is plenty of evidence —Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya — to back up this threat.

Following through with this kind of threat is actually considered intelligent foreign policy to many politicians in the U.S., since a country not aligned with the U.S. will have been weakened and fragmented as an opposing force, lowering the final barrier to war with Iran.

U.S. foreign policy is now completely dependent on using the threat of annihilation. As U.S. economic power has declined in relation to China and other countries, the economic carrot has been tossed aside in favor of the military stick. Plenty of U.S. foreign policy “experts” are demanding that Obama unsheathe the stick again, lest this foundation of U.S. foreign policy be proven to be just talk and no action.

This is the essence of U.S. involvement in Syria, which is risking regional war that could include Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq, Israel, Iran, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia with the potential to drag in the bigger powers connected to these nations, the U.S. and Europe on one hand and Russia and China on the other.

The fate of the already-suffering Middle East is hanging in the balance.

Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action (www.workerscompass.org)  He can be reached at shamuscooke@gmail.com