How Can Russia Take the Idea of Negotiation with Ukraine and the West Seriously?

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


OLIVER BOYD-BARRETT
SUBSTACK.COM

Resize text-+=

How Can Russia Take the Idea of Negotiation with Ukraine and the West Seriously?




MUST WATCH: MIDDLE EAST UPDATE – EPISODE 3 – ISRAEL ATTACKS SYRIA AND LEBANON

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Garland Nixon • Laith Marouf

Resize text-+=


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
If you find the above COMPELLING, pass it on! Become an "influence multiplier"! 
Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.

Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP... 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
It's super easy! Sign up to receive our FREE bulletin.  Get TGP selections in your mailbox. No obligation of any kind. All addresses secure and never sold or commercialised. 

 


[premium_newsticker id="211406"]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




IN DEPTH REPORT: Avdeevka Turns Critical as Iskander Strike Devastates AFU Staging Area

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



SIMPLICIUS THE THINKER

Resize text-+=

SITREP 2/13/24: Avdeevka Turns Critical as Iskander Strike Devastates AFU Staging Area FIRST RUN ON FEB 13, 2024

Another huge breakthrough has occurred in Avdeevka that may have put the final nail in the coffin of the bitterly disputed town. Though Avdeevka is smaller than Bakhmut, Mariupol, and many other captured towns, it actually—in some ways—represents a crowning offensive achievement of the war because it has been fought for continuouslythe longest, and as a consequence, was the most fortified of any town.

I posted ‘Sitrep’ maps and updates from literally 2015 before, showing how the same exact areas like Yasinovskaya to the east of ‘Tsar’s Hunt’ was being contested with footage of battles nearly a decade ago. So for Avdeevka to fall now would be a monumental and symbolically watershed moment of this conflict.

The latest news brings us confirmation from both sides that Russian forces have broken through to the ‘Industrial Avenue’ and beyond, which has entirely severed the city into two parts, cutting the supply route:

 

 

You can see above that since our last update here there have been other advancements and expansions of territory, particularly around the big lake area and the suburb zone of the salient.

A wider view with supply routes visible:

Rumors have abounded in the past few days that Syrsky had withdrawn elite units from the Rabotino and Verbove fronts to immediately reinforce Avdeevka. This includes more of the 47th as well as the 3rd Assault Brigade, better known as ‘Azov’.

Some rumors claimed Syrsky was getting ready to launch a major northern ‘unblocking’ attack, in order to pull Russian forces away from the center. It is precisely what he did previously in Bakhmut, attempting to assault areas around Berkhovka to pressure Wagner’s flanks as they were making their way through the city. But seeing how telegraphed such an assault would be this time, many are rightfully skeptical.

It's been four days since Syrsky withdrew from the southern front and transferred 3 brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to Avdeevka. The successes of this best elite assault brigade so far have been only failures.

Initially, I considered the actions of the 3rd OShBR on Avdeevka, and naively believed that they would be concentrated north of the city, and relying on the bridgehead in Ocheretino and Orlovka, they would try to “pull apart” the RF Armed Forces along the flanks, accompanying the assaults of 5-6 Btgr with artillery preparation.

But Syrsky’s command turned out to be “smarter.” They brought them into the city. And also in Berdychi and Tonenkoye, apparently to contain our “mites”. At the moment, yes. But not in the long run. Keeping the city and flanks in the fields with stormtroopers is a big deal.

What the above post is saying is, instead of using the new brigades to open up a new direction on Russia’s weaker flanks to the north, Syrsky instead threw the brigades directly into the center of battle. This was corroborated by a new video showing what is purported to be a 3rd ‘Azov’ Brigade MaxPro MRAP taking mortar fire precisely near the center of the AKHZ Coke Plant.

Geolocation:

What’s interesting though, is that reports claimed the ‘elite’ 47th was complaining that there aren’t any proper fortifications, and no time to set them up:

Avdiivka. The command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is increasingly throwing artillery and supplies from the rear into infantry battles in order to stop the offensive of the Russian Army. The 47th Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reports almost complete absence of fortifications and lack of time to equip them - round-the-clock attacks, they are more busy with evacuation and rotation. They sit in pits.

Such an expensive defense by artillery was observed by the AFU in Bakhmut exactly a year ago, obviously it did not justify itself, but allowed for a short period of time to plug holes in the front line.

Avdeevka was the most fortified place in existence but Russian mass fires and airpower have been regularly destroying all such fortifications, leaving little time to rebuild or fashion new ones.

Pro-Ukrainian channels, even military-linked ones, are fairly disconsolate as they fear Syrsky will once again grind down the best men in pointless defenses. One of the largest pro-UA OSINTers:

Deepstate UA:

Ukrainian TG channel DeepState reports: "It is worth making decisions that will first of all save the most valuable thing - the lives of soldiers, and not turn Avdiivka into another "fortress" with songs and poems."

After witnessing the nightmare of Bakhmut, they now understand what awaits the soldiers in Avdeevka. But what’s most interesting, is you’ll recall that their narrative was previously that Bakhmut was a ‘successful operation’ because it allegedly ground down such a disproportionate number of Russian troops, that the city defense served its purpose. But when that truth is put to the test in reality, Ukrainians instead recognize that it’s actually them getting ground down amid desperate calls for withdrawal. If Bakhmut was such a ‘success’, then they would be happy to keep their men in Avdeevka and inflict another such ‘success’ against Russian attackers.

In fact, the Bakhmut comparisons are making the rounds even on French TV. The report below confirms how Russian forces have fire control of the supply routes, which is generating far more casualties in the past few days than ever before. Soldiers who fought in Bakhmut and other tough battles told the French team that Avdeevka is now worse than them all:

 

One of the cited reasons for it being worse than Bakhmut is the Russian airpower is far more active in Avdeevka. With the industrialization of the UMPK bombs, Russian planes are dropping them round the clock, upwards of 100 per day just here alone. In Bakhmut, there was no such firepower.

For instance, read this report from a Ukrainian volunteer below:

A Ukrainian volunteer reports that in the first third of February alone, the Russian Aerospace Forces dropped about 460 aerial bombs from UMPK on the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. This includes FAB-250/500/1500 and ODAB.

Here’s one view of Avdeevka from the south Tsar’s Hunt area, looking northward toward the AKHZ plant, through the Khimik highrise sector, with Fab bombs going off on AFU positions: (The original video does not play due to coding issues. We are replacing that with the following item, also coming from AFU sources):

Screenshot: The 3rd Separate Assault Brigade of the Defence Forces of Ukraine has posted a video from the cellars of the Avdiivka Coke Plant, where medics are stabilising the wounded and soldiers take shelter from Russian attacks. Quote: "This footage was shot by members of the 3rd Assault Brigade. They are sheltering inside the plant from the constant Russian attacks while medics stabilise the wounded – even as the ceiling crumbles from more attacks with KAB bombs." (Source: Press service of the 3rd Separate Assault Brigade/ Yahoo)


Here an AFU ‘defender’ in the AKHZ Coke Plant complains that Russia is raining down bombs on them 24/7 and not letting them ‘breathe’:

 

 

But it gets even worse for the AFU.

Amid rumors that Syrsky was planning a large-scale ‘unblocking operation’, the past two days were witness to several videos showing large AFU force concentrations allegedly ‘training’ somewhere in the rear area not far from Avdeevka:


The above video shows an AFU position in the coke plant.

 

It’s uncertain if it was meant as some kind of ‘threatening’ message toward Russian forces, but it may have instead precipitated something the Ukrainians didn’t expect.

Today, two devastating missile strikes occurred on Ukrainian troop concentrations. The first was a massive Iskander-M ballistic missile attack on precisely one of the ‘rear staging areas’ less than 30km from Avdeevka, in a town called Selidovo:

Sources began reporting that there were as high as 1,500 Ukrainian casualties because the Russian attack allegedly “triple-tapped” them by first hitting the gathering, then waiting until evacuation forces arrived and hitting them again—and most notably, some believe it was precisely the ‘Azov’ units that were there:

 

Even the top pro-UA accounts reported the potential for 1,500 casualties at once:

Rezident UA channel:

"Our source in the General Staff reported that Syrsky has ordered to suppress any information about losses at the training ground in Salidovo, the city was the main transit base for the reserves of the UAF, which were being gathered to unblock Avdeevka."

All kinds of reports flooded in from both sides, with one of the common themes between the two being that the entire city was locked down, with SBU allegedly searching for infiltrators who might have transmitted the data about the gathering:

As well as reports from Ukrainians in the area of mass amounts of ambulances flooding the hospitals there:

Ex-Aidar deputy commander Ihor Mosiychuk once more confirmed the news from his sources:

He mentions something corroborated in Russian reports: that Iskanders with cluster munitions were allegedly used on the troop gathering.

More:

“Russia only killed 200, not the claimed 1,500!”

Some of course have extrapolated that to mean 200 KIA with perhaps hundreds more wounded, but we may never learn the real amount. Needless to say, this was meant to be Avdeevka’s last stand and what is arguably an entire battalion was wiped off the face of the earth with a single strike. It’s a pretty demonstrative symbol of how Avdeevka is going.

If that wasn’t bad enough, on the same day there was another strike on Tsukirino, only 5km south of Selidovo at geolocation 48.090782, 37.290670:

Against the backdrop of a highly debated attack on the temporary deployment point of Ukrainian forces in the city of Selidovo, footage has emerged of a strike on a parking lot of Ukrainian equipment in the village of Tsukurino, which is located slightly to the south.

The enemy's position was identified from the air, and rocket artillery was used to attack the targets. The video shows that the Russian Armed Forces initially used shells with cluster warheads. After the equipment was evacuated, conventional ammunition was used.

Coordinates: 48.090782, 37.290670

Meanwhile, the content of the material sharply contradicts the claims made by propagandists of the Kyiv regime, who stated that only two two-story buildings were damaged during the shelling of the populated area. If we judge by this, then more than just a couple of these "buildings" will end up in Avdeevka, where they were intended to be sent to strengthen the troop grouping.


Editor's Note: 
INTEL SLAVA (RUSSIA TELEGRAM CHANNEL) reports as follows (13 Feb 2024):

Due to huge losses, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are throwing artillerymen and supplies into battle to stop the Russian army’s advance in Avdiivka, – The Kyiv Independent

 Soldiers of the 47th and other brigades say that there are almost no fortifications on the front line near Avdeevka, their positions are often just pits. The defense was poorly prepared for a major Russian offensive on Avdeevka. Since the Russian army is constantly conducting a massive assault, there is almost no time to build anything else.

A huge problem that is being talked about all along the front is a serious shortage of personnel, especially infantry.

To strengthen infantry forces after heavy losses, Ukraine is sending artillery and logistics fighters to infantry positions. This means that soldiers on the first line may not even know the basic survival skills of an infantryman, leading to even greater casualties.

20-year-old artilleryman Sergei said that out of his unit of 64 soldiers, 15 went into battle, and only 4 survived. They are artillerymen and “know nothing about serving in the infantry.”

“A year ago, soldiers of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Bakhmut spoke about this method of repurposing during a costly defense.”

The military personnel interviewed by the media also complain about the lack of ammunition and the active work of Russian artillery and aviation, due to which the Ukrainian Armed Forces are suffering huge losses.

“If Russian troops capture the villages of Stepovoye and Berdychi northwest of Avdeevka, the situation in the city will be critical,” says UAV operator of the 425th “Skala” battalion Vitaly .

However, I’m not aware of any real data on the losses in this strike, though you can clearly see that a concentration of vehicles and some buildings appeared to be hit.

 

As a last note on Avdeevka, the southern-most area near the old air defense base is pretty much in a boiler now:

If that falls, it will flatten the line and allow Russia to bring its forces to bear on the Khimik section with the highrises which connect to the last usable supply route—seen with yellow arrows below—for that semi-encircled southern grouping:

A more zoomed-out view shows that the cauldron is very close to shutting, and can trap the entire contingent of what’s said to be 2500-3000 remaining AFU in the main part of Avdeevka, leaving just the northern Coke Plant with its small supply lifeline toward Orlovka:

Rumors from about a week ago had already said that AFU knew Avdeevka was a done deal, and were merely delaying in order to build the secondary fallback line they could retreat to afterwards. One report states this line is roughly as follows:

The enemy creates reserve lines between Kurakhovo and Progress, as well as Kalinovo-Toretsk. The fate of Avdiivka has already been decided, the city is being held only to delay time for building a new line of defense for the summer of 2024.

As a result of the latest assaults by the Russian army, the supply corridor in the southern part of the city has narrowed to 1 km and is being completely shot through by our artillery and other means of destruction.

When it collapses completely north of the railway station, the APU will have to supply semi-surrounded units only through underground communications, and with such logistics they will not stand for a long time.

In the near future, an air defense unit is expected to fall on the southern front, after which our attacking units will connect with units in the area of Chernyshevsky, Sportivnaya and Sobornaya Streets, thereby creating conditions for an assault on the Khimik district. According to the most optimistic forecasts of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, they will begin withdrawing forces at the end of March, according to pessimistic ones, in 1-2 weeks.

The mentioned towns circled in yellow: Progres, Kalynovo, and Kurakhove:

If you look closely at the map north of Kurakhove and southwest and west of the circled Kalynove, you can see the towns of Selidovo and Tsukirino merely a few kilometers away. This shows they are the direct ‘rear staging area’ of the new defense line the AFU has designated for when the Avdeevka front falls.

One must recall that Russian forces have been making advances in both Pervomaisk, just south of Avdeevka, as well as Novomikhailovka, south of Marinka, and Georgievka just west of Marinka. For instance, as seen in the latest Suriyak maps, a major portion of east Novomikhailovka has already been taken:

This is pushing the entire front toward that yellow line in the map above. And when all those areas fall, the frontline will begin straightening out directly across from that claimed new ‘defense line’.

Some more info:

Avdiivka. The defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is being built in three echelons, and the main supply hub is located in the village of Novaya Poltavka-located between Konstantinovka and Pokrovsky. From Novaya Poltavka, through the village of Progress to the south, Novoselovka Pervaya and to Orlovka, supplies have been built. Ocheretino railway station is no longer used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces as it was at the beginning of the battle for the city.

Also, the head of public relations of the 110th mechanized brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ivan Sekach, said that currently, they do not have sufficient capabilities to hold Avdeevka, with some sources even claiming the 110th was forced to withdraw entirely due to heavy losses:

 

 

I mentioned that Russian forces have been advancing in Pervomaisk, Georgievka, and Novomikhailovka, all on the Donetsk front. However, there have also been big new advances on the northwest Artemovsk front with Russian Airborne forces pushing in toward Chasov Yar:

“Russian troops advanced south of the Popovsky forest and west of Khromovo in an area up to 1.55 km wide to a depth of 750 m,” they write, underestimating our advance by about a third on their maps and reports.

"To the east of Ivanovo, the Russian Armed Forces (11th Airborne Brigade) continue attacks to improve the tactical situation along forest belts, attacking with small infantry groups."

“The Russians advanced in the northern outskirts of Ivanovsky, occupying the lowlands,” write other Kyiv resources.

As well as reported advances in Kupyansk area, most notably in Belgorovka:

Ukrainian journalist Butusov confirms how Russian forces appear to be breaking through Ukrainian defenses on every front:

The defense of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is bursting at the seams along the entire front line. The panic sentiment is being dispersed by a Ukrainian journalist, a former adviser to the Minister of Defense of Ukraine Yuriy Butusov. According to him, a critical situation has developed for the Ukrainian Armed Forces along the entire front line due to the offensive of the Russian army. The Russian Army had a great advantage along the entire line of combat contact and went on the offensive “in almost all sectors,” and Kiev left the Armed Forces of Ukraine without reinforcements, Butusov summarized.

And an inebriated-looking Syrsky even told German ZDF channel that Russia is ‘advancing on every front’:


This is particularly notable given my upcoming Part 2 article, which will deal precisely with how Russian forces will continue taking up the next phase of offensives to exhaust and break Ukraine via the ‘death by a thousand cuts’ strategy, though there are some rumors to a few potential ‘surprises’ as well. Stay tuned for that ‘not-to-be-missed’ report in the next few days.

Lastly, most notable is during these advances of the past few days there has been a large uptick in captures of POWs, with at least half a dozen videos or more being seen, such as: Here, Here, and Here—and many more:

 

A last few sundry items:

A Ukrainian Mi-8 was spectacularly shot down by a Russian manpad in the Zaporozhye region:

 

Next:

On the topic of losses, here a Ukrainian soldier discusses his time on the Kremennaya front, and how 100+ per day simply disappeared in the Sebrensky (Silver) Forest there:

 

Next:

Commander of the infamous Nazi battalion ‘Da Vinci Wolves’ says Ukraine needs minimum 250,000 more soldiers or they simply won’t be able to fight:

 

Next:

The editor-in-chief of Rothschild-owned Economist rag, Bilderberg member Zanny Minton Beddoes, has some jaw-dropping words about Ukraine and Ukrainians:

 

In essence: “They’re being killed, not us! So let’s keep this racket going!”

Next:

Last time I reported about General Syrsky’s ties to Russia. Now there’s new videos showing the next door neighbor of his Russian parents, who live in Vladimir near Moscow. The neighbor says she overheard his parents having video calls with him every day, during which he openly told them he hates Ukrainians:

 

The mother and brother of Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Syrsky live on the outskirts of the Russian city of Vladimir. A neighbor of Vladimir and Galina Syrskikh said that they regularly call up via video link and General Syrsky himself speaks about the Ukrainians as follows: "They are cunning and sneaky. I can't stand them."

That’s not to mention this video of a family friend who states:

“This is grief for her” - Syrsky’s mother, living in Vladimir, cries after his appointment as commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, their friend said.

The friend told Ruptly that his parents are patriots of Russia. They are already elderly people and they lived their lives the way the whole country lived. So they are very sad. She's crying. It doesn’t matter what position he holds there, what matters is that they are on opposite sides now. When they found out what their son was doing in Ukraine, they were ashamed to look people in the eyes, another friend of the family told RT earlier.

And sleuths have apparently uncovered the video showing Syrsky taking part in the 1986 military parade on the Red Square as part of the Red Army:

 

The new Commander-in-Chief of the AFU, Alexander Syrsky, took part in a parade on Red Square in 1986. He was spotted on a video shot during the event.

At that time, Syrsky was a cadet at the Moscow Higher Combined Arms Command School.

It does begin to lend a case to the theory that perhaps he’s some kind of Russian plant tasked with sabotaging the AFU. After all, why would he be secretly telling his parents he hates Ukrainians while serving in the highest ranks of their military?

I’ll end on this more uplifting note, a video from the Chechen Akhmat forces showcasing the vast multiethnic and multiconfessional nature of Russia and its Armed Forces which together fight for one Fatherland:

They all fight for one FATHERLAND.

Special forces "AKHMAT" is a symbol of the unity of the peoples of Russia. Here, each warrior represents his people, centuries-old history, and wonderful culture. The flame of love for the Fatherland burns in their hearts, which unites them in a common desire to defend our Motherland. Here, among different cultures and nationalities, one can hear pride for one’s country, for one’s brothers in arms, for every flag raised and every task completed. Together they form an indestructible shield protecting our historical land. The AKHMAT special forces are, without exaggeration, the pride of Russia, which by their personal example shows that together we are capable of great achievements in the name of a great goal!

 

Your support is invaluable. If you enjoyed the read, I would greatly appreciate if you subscribed to a monthly/yearly pledge to support my work, so that I may continue providing you with detailed, incisive reports like this one.

Alternatively, you can tip here: Tip Jar

• Simplicius is the nom de guerre of an Slavonic geopolitical analyst. 

window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.

Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Avdiivka, Black Sea, and Navalny

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


OLIVER BOYD-BARRETT

OpEds


Resize text-+=
Avdeevka AFU Tank

AFU tank withdrawing from Avdiivka


Crisis for Ukraine in Avdiivka

Dima predicts a steady Russian move westwards to a line well beyond Tonenke and Sierverne to places like Prohas, Komichivka, Netilove and Pervovmaiorsk. While there are no significant updates (yet) on other areas of Russian advance such as in and around Novomykhailivka, Staramaiorske, or Robotyne, and noting also the virtual collapse of the Ukrainian adventure in Krynky, the immediate if not longer-term future of Ukraine looks dire. It is even more acute, given that Congress has left for vacation without voting through an arms package for Ukraine. Even if the House of Representatives were to vote for passage of the Biden arms package on their return to Washington in early March (and such a vote currently seems unlikely) the first installment of the package would not arrive until May (not to mention that the chances of the availability of newly produced weapons before the end of the year do not seem high). Germany is talking about giving $7 billion to Ukraine (even though it cannot afford the required 2% of GDP for its NATO dues), an amount which would hardly help Ukraine survive for another six weeks, and exacerbate Germany’s economic crisis. It would be hardly enough to give Ukraine’s RADA the confidence to vote through the mobilization of 500,000. Even Ukrainian analysts are saying that Ukraine cannot afford to deal with the mobilization and training of more than 250,000. All this may incentivize Russia to make what progress as soon as they can, especially in these latter and muddier stages of the Winter. This would likely point to a major advance in Lyman-Kupiansk-Kharkiv areas, especially given the significant concentrations of Russian forces there, and given the context of recent Ukrainian bombings of civilian targets in Belgorod, and the successful Ukrainian hit of the Russian ship, the Caesar Kunikov.

Russian Black Sea Weakness

 

A number of successful Ukrainian attacks on Russian ships many employing newer generations of maritime drones (including the Magura-5, with a range of 450 nautical miles) in the Black Sea has allowed Zelenskiy to claim significant success, overall, in establishing a Black Sea corridor for Ukrainian exports following the collapse last July of a Turkish-brokered deal (the Black Sea Grain Initiative) with Russia and Ukraine. According to Ukrainian and US sources, 22.6 million tons of Ukrainian cargo have moved through the corridor in the past seven months and more than 700 ships have used the passage to the Bosphorus and beyond to world markets. The same sources say that $1.9 billion worth of Ukrainian exports were shipped by sea (out of a total of $3.4 billion). Some ships have offset the risk by taking up insurance through a scheme called UNITY, created by the Ukrainian government together with a pool of insurance companies. Such shipping has not been subject to Russian attacks (which has chosen, instead, to focus on port and storage infrastructure). One-third of the Black Sea fleet has been disabled or destroyed. Remaining ships rarely venture into the western half of the sea. Following successful Ukrainian missile attacks on Sevastopol last August, Russia withdrew some of the fleet to safer ports on the Russian coast.


Editor's Note: Every major navy today faces the same problem: the inability to protect its ships from drone, rocket and missile attacks. The Russian navy entered the war with ships that, despite their modernity and capability in deep blue water zones outside the reach of drones, drone attack boats, missiles and rocketry, could not quickly develop efficient (technical and economic) countermeasures against such weapons. To date, no one has. That's why the US Navy, especially its carriers—big floating targets at the mercy of long-range missiles— could do little against Iranian missiles or even Yemeni  rockets. Same applies to US vessels challenging Russian or Chinese cities or installations near their shores. Big war navies are rapidly becoming obsolete due to the rise of these new technologies. —PG

Navalny

 

Scott Ritter today in an interview with Ania K says of him that he was not a good man, that he was a white supremacist (for example, he called Georgians cockroaches and advocated the shooting of Chechnyan Muslims) that he was a traitor to Russia who, in the 1990s, identified more with the West than with Russia. A lot of his funding came from non-Russian NGOs that were “democracy-promotion” fronts for Western intelligence. Ritter claims that Navalny was groomed, perhaps recruited, by the CIA at Yale (the paperwork that sent Navalny to Yale was signed off on, says Ritter, by then US ambassador to Moscow, Michael McFaul) with a view to returning him to Russia as an opposition figure whose purpose was to bring down Vladimir Putin. Navalny would have thereby weakened, not strengthened democracy in Russia, given Putin’s commanding position in all polls. Apart from the official Russian account, we dont know exactly how he died, but he had had medical problems for some time, and, when moved to a harsher prison within the Arctic circle (because of enhanced charges brought against him), doubtless found it difficult to adapt.

Satellites

 

window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.

Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




JOE LAURIA: RUSSIAN IMPERIALISM

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Joe Lauria
Consortium News 

Resize text-+=
Eurasia map

Does it look like Russia needs to grab more land?


Amongst the condemnations that were hurled at Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin even before their interview was aired, was this gem from an unnamed European foreign affairs spokesman to The Guardian

“A spokesperson for the European Commission said it anticipated that the interview would provide a platform for Putin’s ‘twisted desire to reinstate’ the Russian empire.

‘We can all assume what Putin might say. I mean he is a chronic liar,’ said the EU’s spokesperson for foreign affairs. …

‘[Putin] is trying to kill as many Ukrainians as he can for no reason. There is only one reason for his twisted desire to reinstate the now imperialistic Russian empire where he controls everything in his neighbourhood and imposes his will. But this is not something we are able to tolerate or are willing to tolerate in Europe or the world in the 21st century.’” [Emphasis added.]

The article warned that Carlson’s interview could actually be deemed “illegal” under last year’s European Digital Services Act.  The Guardian says:

“The law is aimed at stamping out illegal content or harmful content that incites violence or hate speech from social media. All the large platforms, bar X, have signed up to a code of conduct to help them accelerate and build their internal procedures in order to comply with the law. …

The onus is on platforms to ensure content is lawful, said a spokesperson for the digital tsar, Thierry Breton. … If a social media platform does not comply with the new EU law it can be sanctioned with a hefty fine, or banned from operating in the EU.”

The Russians Are Coming … Again

Military parade on Moscow’s Red Square, May 2017. (kremlin.ru, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

After the interview, the Western media predictably dismissed it for a variety of reasons, including that it promoted Russian “imperialism.”  The Economist wrote that Putin’s

“obsession — Russia’s historical claim to Ukraine — is backed by a nuclear arsenal. … He denied any interest in invading Poland or Latvia (though he previously said the same about Ukraine).”  

Western rhetoric about a resurgent “Russian imperialism” dates back to 2014, when Russia assisted Donbass in resisting the U.S.-backed unconstitutional change of government in Kiev. Western officials sought to characterize Russia’s action as an “invasion” that was part of a grand scheme by Putin to reconstitute the Soviet Empire and even threaten Western Europe. 

In March 2014, a month after the coup without making any reference to it to explain Russian actions, Hillary Clinton compared Putin to Adolf Hitler.  The Washington Post reported:

“‘Now if this sounds familiar, it’s what Hitler did back in the ’30s,’ Clinton said Tuesday, according to the Long Beach Press-Telegram. ‘All the Germans that were … the ethnic Germans, the Germans by ancestry who were in places like Czechoslovakia and Romania and other places, Hitler kept saying they’re not being treated right. I must go and protect my people, and that’s what’s gotten everybody so nervous.’” 

March 19, 2010: U.S. Secretary of State Clinton, Ambassador Beyrle and Under Secretary Burns with Russian Prime Minister Putin during a meeting at the Novo-Ogaryovo just outside Moscow. (State Department, Public Domain)

Clinton later tried to talk down any comparison to Hitler beginning his conquest of Europe by saying Putin was not that irrational. But the notion that the Russian president is trying to reconstruct the Soviet Empire — and then threaten Western Europe — is often repeated in the West. 

forefront of keeping this idea afloat. 

Reconstituting the Soviet Empire would involve bringing the Central Asian Republics, Azerbaijan and Armenia, let alone the Baltics and the former Warsaw States, now part of NATO, under Moscow’s control. 

The Inevitable Fall of Putin’s New Russian Empire;” and Salon: “How Russian Colonialism Took the Western Anti-Imperialist Left for a Ride.”

The absurdity of the notion of a threat to the West by Russian “imperialism” is underscored every time many of these same Western leaders and media ridicule how disastrously Russia has performed on the Ukrainian battlefield and how, in the words of Ursula von der Leyen, the EU Commission president, Russia must resort to washing machine parts to keep its military going.

How can Russia be so weak and incompetent and yet be such an imminent and menacing threat at the same time? 

The late Russia specialist Stephen F. Cohen dismissed these fears as a dangerous demonization of Russia and Putin. Cohen repeatedly explained that Russia had neither the capacity nor the desire to start a war against NATO and was acting defensively against the alliance.

“How can Russia be so weak and incompetent and yet be such an imminent and menacing threat at the same time?” 

This is clear from the decades-long Russian objection to NATO expansion (which Putin raised with Carlson), coming in the 1990s when Wall Street and the U.S. dominated Russia, asset-stripping the formerly state-owned industries and impoverishing the Russian people, while enriching themselves.

It is clear from Russia backing the Minsk Accords, which would have left Donbass as an autonomous part of Ukraine, and not rejoined to Russia.

And it is clear from the treaty proposals to NATO and the United States offered by Russia in December 2021 intended to avert Russian military intervention. The West rebuffed Russia on all three diplomatic initiatives.


Dec. 7, 2021: U.S. President Joe Biden, on screen during video call with Putin. (Kremlin.ru, CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)


While realists in Washington and Europe increasingly admit Ukraine is losing the war, neocon fantasists, desperate to keep it going, have revived the theme of the Russian threat to the West to counter congressional reluctance to throw away more money and more lives.

Trumped-up fear of Russia has served U.S. ruling circles well for more than 70 years. The first three National Intelligence Estimates of the C.I.A., from 1947 t0 1949, reported no evidence of a Soviet threat, no infrastructure to support a sustained threat, and no evidence of a desire for confrontation with the United States.

“Trumped-up fear of Russia has served U.S. ruling circles well for more than 70 years.”

war scare was drummed up to save the U.S. aircraft industry, which had nearly collapsed with the end of the Second World War.

Then came the 1954 bomber gap and 1957 missile gap with the Soviet Union, now accepted as deliberate fictions.  In 1976 then C.IA. Director George H.W. Bush approved a Team B, whose purpose was again to inflate Soviet military strength. 

George Kennan, the former U.S. ambassador to Moscow and America’s foremost expert on the Soviet Union tried to counter such exaggerations, including late in life when he opposed NATO expansion in the 1990s. 

Now we are being asked again to believe another fictional story of a Russian threat to the West in order to save U.S. and European face — and Joe Biden’s presidency. 

It is instead a projection to cover up its own authentic imperialism and the West’s perceived threat to Russia, a big part of what Putin was trying to get across in the Carlson interview. 

The Donbas status referendums in May 2014. (Andrew Butko, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons)

The issue at hand is the fundamental difference between imperialism and revanchism. Western critics purposely or ignorantly confuse the two to serve their interests.

Succinctly, the difference is this:  imperialists take control of a country that does not want them there and resists.  A revanchist wants to absorb former imperial lands where the population is largely the same ethnicity and welcomes the revanchist power to protect them from an outside threat.

Yes, Hitler was being revanchist in his defense of the German-speaking Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia. But it was a first step in an imperial design to conquer countries that ultimately resisted him.  Clinton’s effort to roll back her comments to say Putin is not as irrational as Hitler was her attempt to tamp down a suggestion that Putin wanted to conquer Europe as Hitler did. 

“The issue at hand is the fundamental difference between imperialism and revanchism. Western critics purposely or ignorantly confuse the two to serve their interests.”

To call Putin’s move on Ukraine “imperialist” is to say Russia had never conquered those lands before and that he might indeed keep going to conquer lands Russia has never controlled: i.e., Western Europe.

Russian imperialism in Ukraine took place nearly 250 years ago under the reign of Catherine the Great. That was when the Russians defeated the Turks and occupied what came to be known as Novorossiya.  Putin went back further than that to make Russian claims and he has been open about his feeling that those lands and Russia are one.  He spoke at length about it in his interviews with Oliver Stone in 2017.

Putin was acting both to defend Donbass’ Russian speakers (who were under imminent renewed attack in February 2022) and also saw the opportunity to reunite the old imperial lands with Russia. That opportunity was seen in the Kremlin as a necessity because of the West’s rejection of Moscow’s diplomatic efforts to avoid conflict. 

Given the results of the four regional referendums in 2022, plus the one in Crimea in 2014, it is clear the people of those regions wanted to rejoin Russia after the coup and the revival of Ukrainian extremism.  

One can condemn or criticize revanchism, but one cannot call it imperialism.


SOURCE: Joe Lauria, Consortium News. See full bio below in author's box. 
He can be reached at joelauria@consortiumnews.com and followed on Twitter @unjoe

 

window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.

Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS