WITNESSES TO HISTORY

Even after losing its wars in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, in 2014 the United States organised and financed a violent, anti-democratic regime-change operation in Kiev, at a cost of $5 billion to the US taxpayer. It had now finally bitten off more than it could chew. As a result, the Russian Federation, a Superpower, though mocked and despised at the time by the arrogant Obama as a political and economic ‘regional’ minnow, had to take back the Crimea after its 60-year loan to the Ukraine. Otherwise, it would have lost its key Black Sea naval base in Sevastopol to the Pentagon, just as it had briefly lost it to the Anglo-French Fascists in 1856 and the German Fascists in 1942. It also had to defend Russian-speaking Eastern Ukraine by setting up a buffer zone, so buying itself time to prepare for a possible full-blown campaign of liberation there.

After innumerable provocations and attacks by the Hegemon, direct and by proxy, Iran is responding in kind, as she should. Every instance of gross illegality enforced by the empire of lies, like asking a vassal state like Greece to do something dirty on its behalf, is one move notch in the chain of events that will lead to its utter destruction. The world is fed-up.

The west’s narrative around the Ukraine-Russia conflict is that NATO is merely interested in helping plucky, democratic Ukraine fend off an attack from Russia and its war criminal president, Vladimir Putin. But peek behind the facade and it becomes apparent that the real reason for the war is much simpler: money. And now the United States has inked a deal to sell liquified natural gas to the European Union to replace a substantial amount of the natural gas previously provided by Russia. Jimmy and journalist Caleb Maupin discuss the financial incentives that are more likely driving NATO’s stance in Ukraine than any possible moral considerations.

CYNTHIA CHUNG—The people of Donbass have understandably asked for independence from Ukraine, yet the Ukrainian government has refused to allow this nor intervene for a peaceful resolution. What does this mean? The war can only end when one side is fully dead.

Not only is it publicly known that the US and NATO have been funding and training neo-Nazis, but they have also been supplying a massive supply of arms (as previously mentioned). It got to such a point where in 2018, Congress had to ban the United States from sending further arms to Ukraine militia linked to neo-Nazis, specifically mentioning the Azov Battalion. For some reason this ban was to only last for three years thus it is apparently fair game now? But you may say, what about Russia’s crimes against the Ukrainian people, aren’t they far worse than even vicious neo-Nazis? Namely the bombing of the Mariupol theater and the Bucha massacre. Thorough journalistic investigations have already been done on the former, which can be found here, that conclusively shows the bombing of the Mariupol theater was a false-flag. Ditto for the Bucha “massacre”.

I was born and raised in Ukraine. I remember it being quiet, radiant, kind, and wealthy. Ukraine, in which there was peace and respect between people. But after the Soviet Union was destroyed, various degenerates and paranoiacs started to slither out from some dark crevices towards the light of day, poisoning everything around them with crazy ideas and wild hatred. It is precisely they who started to methodically, year after year to make people mad, bringing them to a mass psychosis.

Individuals who worship the leader of the Galician Nazis Stepan Bandera, on whose order Banderists brutally massacred tens of thousands of civilians in Western Ukraine, including women, children, and the elderly, became the avant-garde of Ukrainian degenerates and paranoiacs…