2K

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

Judge Napolitano
| Traducir—Translate! | |
| Make fonts bigger>>> | Resize text-+= |
LIVE FROM TEHRAN: Foreign Pressure or Internal Crisis? : Prof. Seyed Mohammad Marandi
Judge Napolitano
Streamed live on Jan 14, 2026
Summary
Streamed live on Jan 14, 2026
Summary
The video presents a detailed discussion on the recent unrest in Iran, featuring Judge Andrew Napolitano and Professor Muhammad Morandi, an Iranian-American academic based in Tehran. The conversation challenges mainstream Western media narratives, highlighting the complexity and foreign interference involved in the protests, and emphasizing widespread domestic support for the Iranian government amidst violent riots.
Key Points and Insights
Origin of Unrest:
The unrest began with a sharp devaluation of the Iranian currency (estimated 30-40%), reportedly caused by foreign pressure on neighboring countries to block Iran’s currency access. This economic shock triggered initial peaceful protests by shopkeepers in several cities, including Tehran.Escalation and Violence:
Following the initial peaceful protests, rioters infiltrated the demonstrations, escalating violence significantly by Thursday night.Around 300 to 400 members of police, Basij, Guards, and riot police were killed, including approximately 100 police officers.
Injuries and deaths were primarily caused by small arms, often fired at close range, indicating coordinated and possibly planned violence from within the crowds.
Foreign Involvement:
There is clear evidence of foreign interference, including weapon supplies and coordination.
Israeli media openly acknowledged funneling weapons into Iran, whereas Western media largely denies such involvement.
Former CIA Director and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tweeted, acknowledging Iranian regime instability and foreign involvement, which was interpreted as a boast by intelligence agencies misjudging Iran’s stability.
Public Support for the Government:
Despite media claims of widespread uprising, massive pro-government rallies took place across Iran, with estimates of 2.3 to 3 million participants in Tehran alone, supporting the state, constitution, and leadership.
Ordinary citizens, including neighbors and students, actively resisted rioters, especially when rioters targeted mosques and other community institutions.
Polling data (including American-conducted polls) consistently show high legitimacy and support for the Iranian government.
Internet Shutdown and Impact:
The government’s shutdown of the internet significantly contributed to the rapid collapse of organized riots within 36 hours, as rioters lost communication with leadership abroad.
The internet blackout also served as a defensive measure against potential cyberattacks and to limit Western intelligence gathering.
U.S. Political Statements and Implications:
President Trump publicly encouraged protesters to continue and indicated “help is on the way,” raising questions about U.S. intentions and potential escalation.
Iranian officials interpret these statements as possible precursors to a major U.S. or Israeli attack, with Iran preparing for a strong military response.
There is concern about preemptive strikes and the high risk of miscalculation leading to wider conflict, likened to U.S.-Russia tensions.
Current Situation and Daily Life:
As of the interview, Tehran and other cities were quiet and calm, with a return to relative normalcy.
Universities have resumed activities, though exams are scheduled to be held on campus.
Communication and business remain hindered by internet restrictions, but restrictions are expected to be lifted gradually.
Timeline of Events
Date/Period | Event Description |
|---|---|
Initial days | Peaceful protests sparked by currency devaluation (~30-40%), no violence or arrests initially. |
Following days | Infiltration by rioters; escalation into violent clashes and destruction of property. |
Thursday night | Peak violence with dozens of police and security forces killed; rioters use close-range firearms. |
Early Friday morning | Internet shutdown by Iranian government; coordination among rioters disrupted. |
Saturday onwards | Riots collapse rapidly; situation stabilizes across major cities. |
Recent days | Large pro-government rallies occur nationwide, showing significant public support. |
Present | Calm in Tehran; universities preparing exams; internet partially restricted but gradually easing. |
Quantitative Data Table
Category | Estimated Number/Details |
|---|---|
Currency drop | 30-40% devaluation |
Protesters in initial peaceful protests | A few thousand across 2-3 locations |
Deaths among security forces | 300-400 (including ~100 police officers) |
Pro-government rally turnout | 2.3 to 3 million in Tehran alone, large numbers nationwide |
Public property damaged | Dozens of public buses, ambulances, fire engines, clinics, mosques |
Duration of riots | Several days, ended shortly after internet cut |
Key Terms and Definitions
Term | Definition/Context |
|---|---|
Basij | Paramilitary volunteer militia in Iran supporting the government. |
Riot Guards | Specialized police forces tasked with controlling riots. |
Mossad | Israeli national intelligence agency alleged to be involved. |
Internet Shutdown | Government-imposed blackout to disrupt communication and control unrest. |
Preemptive Strike | Military attack launched to prevent or respond to an imminent threat. |
Currency Manipulation | Economic tactic involving pressure on financial systems to destabilize a country. |
Core Concepts and Conclusions
Foreign interference and manipulation played a pivotal role in destabilizing Iran’s economy and sparking protests.
Violent elements exploited peaceful protests, resulting in severe casualties among law enforcement and damage to property.
Despite Western media narratives of widespread anti-government uprisings, significant public support for the Iranian government remains intact and visible through mass rallies and local community resistance to rioters.
Internet shutdown was a key strategic move by Iranian authorities that quickly diminished the protests’ momentum.
The rhetoric and actions from U.S. officials, including President Trump and Mike Pompeo, have escalated tensions and contribute to fears of potential military conflict.
The situation remains fragile, with both sides preparing for possible escalation but a temporary lull in violent activity and a return to everyday life in Iran.
Part 2
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs : An Unchecked Presidency
Judge Napolitano •
Streamed live on Jan 13, 2026
Streamed live on Jan 13, 2026
Summary
The video features Judge Andrew Napolitano hosting a discussion with Professor Jeffrey Sachs on January 13, 2026, focusing on the dangers of unchecked presidential power in the United States and ongoing U.S.-led regime change operations, particularly in Iran. The dialogue critically examines U.S. foreign policy, the erosion of constitutional governance, and the geopolitical implications of aggressive actions by the Trump administration.
Key Themes and Insights
Unchecked Presidential Power and Constitutional Crisis
President Trump publicly claimed he is constrained only by his “own morality” and mind, rejecting legal and constitutional limits.
This marks a shift from constitutional rule to a personalistic, imperial style of governance, undermining the system of checks and balances.
Trump regularly issues emergency decrees, bypassing Congress, which is described as ineffective and unwilling to check executive power.
Actions such as declaring tariffs and engaging in war are constitutionally prerogatives of Congress (Article I, Section 8), yet are unilaterally exercised by the president.
The Supreme Court’s role in defending constitutional order remains uncertain, hinging on figures like Chief Justice John Roberts.
The U.S. is portrayed as transitioning from a republic based on laws to an empire ruled by an “emperor.”
Regime Change Operation in Iran
The unrest in Iran is described as a deliberate, illegal, and violent regime change operation orchestrated by the United States and Israel, driven primarily by Israeli interests.
The U.S. employs “maximum pressure” tactics: economic sanctions, tariffs (including 25% tariffs on countries trading with Iran), asset seizures, and covert operations involving CIA and Mossad.
There are allegations of inciting protests through violent provocations, including urging agents to increase casualties to justify U.S. intervention.
Historical parallels drawn between current events and the 1953 CIA/MI6 coup that overthrew Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mossadegh, and the 2014 Ukraine coup.
Western media are criticized for ignoring U.S. responsibility and portraying Iran’s government as solely at fault for economic hardships.
The U.S. and Israeli governments are accused of preparing for potential direct military intervention if regime change efforts fail.
MI6’s involvement is not confirmed, but British support is implied.
The Iranian Foreign Minister alleges audio evidence of U.S. and Israeli involvement in orchestrating violence during protests.
Geopolitical and Military Risks
- An escalation of conflict between Iran and Israel is anticipated, with Israel likely to strike first but Iran expected to retaliate, potentially with more severe consequences.
- The June 2025 Israeli airstrikes on Iran decapitated some leadership but did not achieve intended outcomes and exposed vulnerabilities in Israel’s missile defense.
- The Middle East remains an epicenter of instability, with risk of broader war heightened by reckless U.S. and Israeli provocations.
U.S. Economic and Social Context
- The U.S. faces a $38 trillion national debt, rising inflation in essential goods, and a weakening dollar.
- Stocks are at record highs but are described as unsustainable.
- Gold is promoted as a safe asset amid economic uncertainty, highlighting distrust in the fiat currency system.
Trump’s Foreign Policy Contradictions
- Despite campaign promises to end wars and regime change interventions, Trump is engaged in traditional CIA-style regime change operations.
- His close alignment with Israeli interests and the Zionist lobby is emphasized as a driving factor behind aggressive policies.
- Trump’s declaration of himself as “acting president of Venezuela” is noted as a symptom of authoritarian overreach and delusions of power.
- His actions threaten to drag the U.S. into costly wars reminiscent of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Libya interventions with high human and financial costs.
Timeline of Key Points
| Time (approx.) | Event/Topic | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 - 00:02 | Introduction and critique of government force | Discussion of government’s preemptive wars and freedom risks |
| 00:02 - 00:06 | Iran regime change operation | U.S. and Israel’s covert and overt efforts to destabilize Iran |
| 00:06 - 00:11 | Historical context and involvement of MI6 | Reference to 1953 coup and possible British role in Iran crisis |
| 00:11 - 00:15 | Iranian Foreign Minister’s claims & regime change playbook | Evidence of U.S./Israeli incitement of violence during protests |
| 00:15 - 00:18 | Potential Iran-Israel conflict | Analysis of military strikes and retaliation risks |
| 00:18 - 00:24 | Trump’s unchecked power and constitutional issues | Trump’s rejection of constitutional limits and personal rule |
| 00:24 - 00:27 | Trump’s Venezuela claim and global threats | Authoritarian actions and risks of wider conflict |
Key Quotes
- “We are beyond the constitutional order in the United States. We are in personalistic rule.”
- “Trump behaves like he is an emperor of an American empire, not a president of a constitutional republic.”
- “This is a profoundly illegal and immoral operation.”
- “The U.S. crushes the Iranian economy and then blames the Iranian government for the people’s suffering.”
- “The regime change operation in Iran is a war of a particular kind that the CIA and Mossad have used repeatedly for decades.”
Conclusions
- The video highlights serious concerns about the erosion of constitutional governance in the U.S. under President Trump, who is depicted as wielding unchecked executive power in violation of constitutional and international law.
- It exposes the ongoing U.S.-Israeli-led regime change effort in Iran as a calculated and violent geopolitical maneuver with devastating consequences for Iranian civilians and regional stability.
- The historical pattern of covert operations and coups is used as a framework to explain current events, emphasizing the continuation of imperialist practices under a new guise.
- The risk of escalating military conflict in the Middle East is high, with potential for significant casualties and broader war.
- The economic backdrop of national debt and inflation compounds the urgency of political and social instability.
- The discussion calls for public recognition of these realities and a reconsideration of America’s role as a constitutional republic versus an empire governed by unchecked executive power.
BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]
Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and valuable.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License •
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS


