How (and Why) Americans Were Taught to Hate Atheists

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


By John Follis
Church & State


The true story behind America’s demonization of atheism

First posted on 10 January 2019


[dropcap]I[/dropcap]f you asked Americans to list the most negative labels to give someone “atheist” would probably be on that list. For the majority of Americans being an atheist is akin to being amoral and unAmerican. Growing up, that’s certainly the message I got. Sunday School made it clear that atheists were bad, Godless people.

What most Americans don’t know is that if you grew up in the 50’s or 60’s you didn’t need to attend Sunday School to be taught to fear and hate atheists. Because in the early-50’s the US government initiated a massive, multi-pronged, multi-year campaign to demonize atheism — and it worked very well.

The GODification of America.

The 1950’s was the height of The Cold War when the omnipresent threat to America was Communism. As the fear of Communism and the Soviet Union grew stronger President Eisenhower felt the need to do something big to help unify and bolster the country. At the strong encouragement of multiple ministers, religious politicians, business leaders, and his influential Evangelist pal Billy Graham, Eisenhower agreed on a bold strategy: Demonize Communism by demonizing a main tenet of Communism: Atheism. The idea was to make the ‘US vs Soviet Union’ a Holy War and draft God as America’s #1 Commie Fighter.

Eisenhower has a better image than most US presidents, but he was as much of an imperialist anticommunist as the rest.

To facilitate that Eisenhower took aggressive executive action. First, he got Congress to add “One nation ‘under GOD'” to The Pledge of Allegiance — a pledge recited daily in every classroom in America. Then he got Congress to replace “E Pluribus Unum” (the US motto since 1782 meaning “Out of many, one”) with IN GOD WE TRUST.

After that he got Congress to approve posting IN GOD WE TRUST in court rooms, government buildings, public schools, on postage stamps, and on all US currency. Even some comic books of the day talked about “Godless Communism”. And New York State created a school prayer specifically designed to “counter the spread of Communism.” As if all that wasn’t enough the Administration teamed up with The Advertising Council, the major religious institutions, and corporate America to create something called the Religion in American Life campaign. With an annual budget of 200K (over $2M in today’s dollars) the campaign goal was to encourage Americans to attend church. It was a well-coordinated, unified effort that in 1956 alone included 5,412 highway billboards, 9,857 bus, train, and railroad station posters, and 59,590 ad cards inside buses, trains, subways, and streetcars. In addition, movie theaters ran PSA’s imploring the public to “Attend the church of your choice next Sunday.” It’s fair to say that during the 50’s nothing in America was marketed better than God, and nothing was demonized more than Communism and atheism.


BELOW: Stalin and Lenin—both atheists, of course— plotting revolution: the sneaky bastards! How dare they.  Click on image for best resolution.

Evidently, the end of the Cold War and the passing of 60-years has not softened America’s attitude toward atheists. According to a 2016 University of Minnesota study, Americans have actually sharpened their negative views. It showed that atheists are still perceived as cultural outsiders who “have rejected cultural values and practices understood as essential to private morality, civic virtue, and national identity.” They were chosen “the most disliked religious minority” in the U.S. Clearly, Eisenhower and company embedded an anti-Atheist cultural bias that still remains strong today.

Yet, in one religion-related sense Americans are becoming more tolerant. When the same survey asked if it’s a bad thing that increasing numbers of Americans claim no religious identity, 60% of the respondents said it’s either “a good thing” or “neither good nor bad.” And, while most Americans still have a problem with atheists more Americans are actually becoming atheists. A 2014 Pew Research Study reports that the number of Americans who identify as atheist doubled in the 7-year period from 2007 to 2014. And now, for the first time ever, “Nones” (no chosen religion) have become the largest “religious group” in America. Even clergy members are increasingly coming out as atheists as reported by Daniel Dennett and Linda LaScola who published their initial findings in 2010. The award-winning documentary “Leaving God” (2017) which explores these shifting attitudes can be viewed online for free.

Unfortunately, most biases, be they racial, gender-based, sexuality-related, or religious, tend to die hard. Which is why it’s so important to continue having open forums to help educate and enlighten the public.

Religiosity and smug piety permeate America. The capitalists long ago discovered that making religion an intrinsic part of "the American Way of Life" (capitalism), they would erect a firewall to protect the business system.

Reprinted with permission from the author.

LEAVING GOD: Why I left God and why so many others are too

Interview with John Follis on his award-winning film: “Leaving God”

We’ve Reached the End of White Christian America

Be sure to ‘like’ us on Facebook


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
John Follis spent a 30-year career on Madison Avenue creating award-winning ads. Now he’s creating award-winning films. His latest documentary “LEAVING GOD: Why I left God and why so many others are too” won a “Best First-Time Filmmaker” award from the Hollywood International Independent Documentary Film Festival.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.




Iran’s Security Systems Detect 29 Million Cyber Attacks Since May

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


APPEARING ON
FORT-RUSS

Last updated Sep 1, 2019

TEHRAN – The 4 systems of cyber-security launched by the Iranian Ministry of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in May, have so far detected more than 29 million cyberattacks against the country, including over 19 million attacks conducted from 24 countries.

In May 2019, Iranian ICT Ministry unveiled a cybersecurity project codenamed Digital Fortress (Dejfa in Persian) to shield the country from increasing cyber threats targeting Iran’s infrastructure and online businesses.

A report published on Sunday detailed the performance of 4 systems working under Dejfa since the cybersecurity project was launched in May:

  1. Dejfa Teleware System has identified 19 million cyberattacks against Iran from 24 countries. 10 million attacks were launched from inside Iran.
  2. Kavoshgar System has analyzed 3,000 suspicious files and evaluated 140 applications. The system issued warning on 322 cases, and contacted vulnerable sections on 2,550 other cases.
  3. Dana System with a nationwide coverage of the country’s IP addresses has identified 20,000 vulnerable facilities inside the country.
  4. Detection and Countering System has identified 39 million cyberattacks, suspicious or illegal activities. The system has also identified 18,000 malwares.

According to Deputy ICT Minister Hamid Fattahi, Dejfa has improved monitoring and detection of cyber-threats by 200 percent. Late in June, ICT Minister Mohammad Javad Azari Jahromi said in a tweet that US cyber-attacks against Iranian missile control systems had failed to cause any disruptions.

“The media ask whether the alleged cyber-attacks against Iran did take place,” Azari Jahromi said in a tweet on June 24.

“They try hard, but they have yet to carry out a successful attack,” he added.

The attacks came shortly after the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) shot down a US Navy RQ-4A Global Hawk drone that had entered Iranian airspace in the Persian Gulf region to gather intelligence, using Khordad 3 indigenous surface-to-air missile system.

“We have been facing cyber-terrorism for a long time…Last year we neutralized 33 million attacks with the (national) firewall,” Jahromi noted.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.




America’s Manufactured Culture War

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

W.J. Astore


[dropcap]S[/dropcap]o much of what passes for America’s Kulturkampf (culture struggle) consists of phony, made up, manufactured issues.  Consider the following sign, sent to me by a friend as he toured the wilds of Pennsylvania:

It is supposedly “politically incorrect” to say Merry Christmas, to state the Pledge of Allegiance (“one nation under God”), to salute the flag, and to thank the troops.  Those who do all these things apparently take pride in their alleged outspokenness and their love of all things American.

Sigh.

Forgive me for stating the obvious, but it’s never been politically incorrect to say Merry Christmas.  Virtually all Americans say they believe in God or some higher power.  Nearly all Americans respect the flag (even those who kneel in protest, I’d argue), and America’s respect for the military has never been higher.

But this sign with its false narrative encapsulates much of the Republican/Trumpian message: We’re the real Americans.  And anyone who says “Happy Holidays” or who suggests separation of church and state or who sees protest as legitimate free speech is obviously un-American and should leave the country.

I just wonder at all those Americans who buy signs like this, thinking that by doing so they’re showcasing their bravery at being non-PC and their pride in being so “American.”

One thing is certain: this manufactured culture war is a great way to distract and divide the commoners as the rich and powerful continue their looting of America.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
William J. Astore, a retired lieutenant colonel with the U.S. Air Force, is a TomDispatch regular. He has taught at the Air Force Academy and the Naval Postgraduate School, and now teaches history at the Pennsylvania College of Technology.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.




A Society Is Only As Free As Its Most Troublesome Political Dissident

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Caitlin Johnstone



[dropcap]Y[/dropcap]ou wouldn’t know it from any western mass media reporting as of this writing, but musician Roger Waters is about to perform the iconic Pink Floyd song “Wish You Were Here” in front of the office of British Home Secretary Priti Patel in order to draw attention to the persecution of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Earlier this year, billionaire Richard Branson staged a “Live Aid”-stye concert in Colombia near the Venezuela border with the purported goal of helping the Venezuelan people. In reality the stunt was nothing other than a ploy to advance the entirely false narratives that President Maduro was blockading bridges and turning away all foreign aid, and the funds raised ended up being embezzled by the Trump-backed regime change opposition group led by US puppet Juan Guaido. The British mass media, however, went absolutely bananas over the story. Each word in this sentence is hyperlinked to a different story about the concert from mass media outlets in the UK alone. And that was a concert on the other side of the planet, while the Assage event is happening right in London, in front of the office of a prominent British official, featuring one of the greatest British rock musicians of all time.

This discrepancy tells you everything you need to know about the so-called “free press” in western society, and indeed about western society itself.

 

A society is only as free as its most troublesome political dissident, which today means that you are only as free as Julian Assange. As long as you live in a society which can give rise to a coordinated multi-governmental campaign to lock up a journalist for the rest of his life based on bogus charges because he exposed US war crimes, you are not free, and you should not agree to pretend that you are.

The old saying “actions speak louder than words” resonates with people because words can lie while actions cannot. And while the millionaire pundits of the billionaire media continually assure us with their words that we live in a free society, the actions of the people who wield official and unofficial power over us tell us that we actually live in a society which tortures and imprisons dissident journalists for telling inconvenient truths.

The persecution of Julian Assange tells us so much more about our society than the authorized narratives we’re sold:

The persecution of Julian Assange tells us about the real function of the mass media. The discrepancy between the news media coverage of the Assange benefit event and Richard Branson’s regime change propaganda party are just one of many, many examples we could discuss about the way those outlets reliably slant their coverage in favor of agendas which just so happen to align with the interests of the CIA and the US State Department. Every time Assange’s plight makes headlines, social media lights up with ambitious blue-checkmarked media aspirants posting snarky quips about him in an attempt to show the operators of the billionaire media just how far they’ll go to defend the status quo. We are told with words that the mass media are here to tell us the truth about what’s going on in the world, but we are told with actions the exact opposite.

The persecution of Julian Assange tells us about the mechanics of empire. Assange was pried out of the embassy and imprisoned by an extremely obvious collaboration between the US, UK, Sweden, Ecuador, and Australia, yet they each pretended that they were acting as separate, sovereign nations completely independently of one another. Sweden pretended it was deeply concerned about rape allegations, the UK pretended it was deeply concerned about a bail violation, Ecuador pretended it was deeply concerned about skateboarding and embassy cat hygiene, the US pretended it was deeply concerned about the particulars of the way Assange helped Chelsea Manning cover her tracks, Australia pretended it was too deeply concerned about honoring the sovereign affairs of these other countries to intervene on behalf of its citizen, and it all converged in a way that just so happens to look exactly the same as imprisoning a journalist for publishing facts. You see this same dynamic constantly, whether it’s with military interventions, trade deals, or narrative-shaping campaigns against non-aligned governments.

The persecution of Julian Assange tells us about the kind of society we actually live in. We are inundated from early childhood with feel-good slogans about freedom and democracy, which we are told must be spread to everyone on earth as forcefully as necessary even if we have to kill every last one of them. In reality we live in a society made of lies and led by liars, who violently persecute anyone who exposes the truth. These people are your oppressors. These people are your prison wardens. Their sneering faces tell you that you are free from behind prison bars, and that they’ll end you if you disagree.

This is going to have to change.

_________________________

The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitterthrowing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypalpurchasing some of my sweet merchandisebuying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

This is a dispatch from our ongoing series by Caitlin Johnstone

About the Author

Caitlin Johnstone
is a brave journalist, political junkie, relentless feminist, champion of the 99 percent. And a powerful counter-propaganda tactician.
 


 Creative Commons License  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 





Be sure to get the most unique history of the Russo-American conflict now spanning almost a century!


Nuclear Armageddon or peace? That is the question.

And here’s the book that answers it.
Get the definitive history of the Russo-American conflict today!


black-horizontal




“I won’t eat animals,” little girl tells her mother. Zada’s mind is made up.

Another important dispatch from The Greanville Post. Be sure to share it widely.


Patrice Greanville


[dropcap]L[/dropcap]ittle Zada below does not know it, but she is already immersed in one of the most monumental and maligned struggles in the history of this planet.

Her moving words, however, show us that even a toddler can have instinctive empathy for the pain of other beings. It is testimony to the fact that our insensitivity to massive animal suffering is a cultural acquisition, implanted in most of us at birth, as the "way things are."  But traditions, as we have seen at least in the last two centuries, have a lot of very dark corners and things to answer for. The fact that a custom (or ideology) is embraced by umpteen millions doesn't make it right. In our own home turf, the history of suffering in our own species, for millennia slavery was regarded as "natural" and many even thought it harmless and imperative to "civilisation". In part because of such attitudes, traditions are often enormously hard to break or eliminate. Pious southern ministers and other opinion leaders in the US Confederacy rarely if ever rose to denounce slavery. And we all know that it took a veritable bloodbath—the death of more than 620,000 soldiers— to break the "peculiar institution" in the American South, and even with the South defeated, African Americans did not exactly gain equal rights or actual freedom at the moment of their much awaited formal emancipation. A very long and painful and ugly slog lay ahead, one with many heroes and martyrs, and it's obvious that more than 150 years after the war between the states ended, much of African America is still partially in chains.


Reem Makhoul
First published on Sep 1, 2016
Realising, to her horror, that meat is made from animals, five-year-old Zada tells her mother she's a vegetarian. And her mind is made up.


Bad traditions and customs die hard
The American experience with slavery is a harsh reminder that no matter how awful a custom may be, whether political, religious or economic (always a reflection of the political and vice versa), or one whose origins are lost in the mist of history, it takes a great deal of effort and pain to eliminate it. Humans are animals of habit. And often the problem is deeply embedded in the culture because a strong or dominant segment benefits directly from it. The history of humanity's evolution and pursuit of freedom from various forms of oppression—slavery, feudalism, capitalism, sexism, racism, male chauvinism, etc.—shows that victories, such as they are, are hard, and that even when an evil has been largely unmasked and uprooted, many remnants stay behind, sometimes adopting new forms and still making life miserable for countless victims.

Human slavery is one of the oldest and most persistent and diverse evils in history, and it's clear the American south had plenty of breathtakingly ugly and brutal models to draw upon. In this context, the Spartans stand out for their studied cruelty toward their slaves (the Helots), whom they employed, as all "master races" do, to do all sorts of grueling and dangerous work in their society, from growing food, to taking care of construction jobs, and even serving as human shields to Spartan warriors in various battles. Owing to their own numerical inferiority— there were about 7 helots to one Spartan— Spartans were always preoccupied with the fear of a helot revolt. The ephors (Spartan magistrates) each year on entering office declared war on the helots so that they might be murdered at any time without violating religious scruples. During these massacres, which for younger Spartans became a coming of age ritual, they concentrated on murdering the youngest and strongest among the captive population.

There are different accounts of how this horrid relationship ended. Some chroniclers claim that after a particularly ferocious revolt which took the Spartans more than a decade to put down, the Spartans—standing on a very tenuous victory—agreed to a truce—and freedom for the helots, provided the latter accepted banishment to Sicily. Another version, advanced by revisionist historians, notes that after several intermittent revolts starting c. 660 BC, and after two or three attempts over 300 years, the helots finally succeeded in defeating and disbanding the Spartans, thereby wiping out Sparta from the map as a feared Peloponnesian power. This is supposed to have happened c. 464 BC.  Whichever version we choose, it's irrefutable that the slave revolts weakened Sparta considerably and made it vulnerable to conquest by rival powers among Greece's city states. Sparta's defeat by Thebes in the Battle of Leuctra in 371 BC ended Sparta's prominent role in Greece.

The struggle for any form of liberation usually raises moral consciousness. Every great social revolution seeking to expand the rights of the oppressed has had an inherently superior moral component fueling much of the struggle. There have been no exceptions to this rule. Thus the fight to overcome ancient slavery, feudalism, serfdom, capitalism, colonialism (a form of racism in action), male domination, malignant imperialism, and these days even speciesism—the subjection of all living nature to the cruel whims of humans—all have been and are animated by successively broader and deeper ambits of moral lucidity. Assuming we manage to overcome the fascio-capitalist monster and its cancerous imperialism, along with its plethora of social vices and still very much alive different strains of human oppression, all in time to turn things around to spare the world an ecological implosion or a nuclear catastrophe, the struggle against speciesism may be the last of the great battles in the moral history of our species. —PG

 

This post is part of a series on humans' destruction of the natural world.


About the Author
Patrice Greanville is The Greanville Post's founding editor.



black-horizontal

The Russian Peace Threat examines Russophobia, American Exceptionalism and other urgent topics




Antifa: A Look at the Antifascist Movement Confronting White Supremacists in the Streets

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

A crosspost with Dandelion Salad, site of first iteration


Image by Karla Cote via Flickr

with Chris Hedges
RT America on Sep 30, 2017

Mark Bray, author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook discusses the resurgence of the movement to counter the rise of the far-right and responds to Chris Hedges’ critique of the violent tactics used by the activists. RT Correspondent Anya Parampil looks at the origins of Antifa.

Antifa: A Look at the Antifascist Movement Confronting White Supremacists in the Streets

Democracy Now! on Aug 16, 2017

https://democracynow.org – President Trump is facing widespread criticism for his latest comments on the deadly white supremacist protest in Charlottesville, Virginia. Speaking at Trump Tower on Tuesday, Trump said the violence was in part caused by what he called the “alt-left.” President Trump’s comment were widely decried. Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney wrote on Twitter, “No, not the same. One side is racist, bigoted, Nazi. The other opposes racism and bigotry. Morally different universes.” We look at one of the groups who confronted the white supremacists in the streets: the antifascists known as antifa. We speak to Mark Bray, author of the new book, Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook.

Part 2 || Antifa: A Look at the Anti-Fascist Movement Confronting White Supremacists in the Streets

https://democracynow.org – President Trump is facing widespread criticism for his latest comments on the deadly white supremacist protest in Charlottesville, Virginia. On Tuesday Trump said the violence was in part caused by what he called the alt-left.

We continue our conversation with Mark Bray. He is a lecturer at Dartmouth College. His new book is Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook.

from the archives:

Abby Martin: Voices From People’s Congress of Resistance

Abby Martin: From 1776 to Trump: White Mobs, Racist Heroes and Hidden History

The Road to Charlottesville: Reflections on 21st Century U.S. Capitalist Racism by Paul Street

Creative Anti-Nazism by David Swanson + Confederate Statues Come Down in Baltimore and Durham

Charlottesville is a Call to Action Against Fascism + Deandre Harris on Attack by White Supremacists


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.