[su_spoiler title=”Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise. ” open=”yes” style=”fancy” icon=”arrow-circle-1″]
Dialogue Works
HOST:
Nima R. Alkhorshid
in a chat with
DMITRY ORLOV
| [wpavefrsz-resizer] |
Surprising answers to problems of literal life and death for billions.
Dialogue Works
Please go to https://boosty.to/cluborlov and subscribe to Dmitry’s blog or send a tip to support Dmitry.
Leading Russian geostrategic analyst Dmitry Orlov provides some answers to the question many people are pondering lately: Are NATO’s constant escalations liable to trigger a nuclear war? When will Putin decide that enough is enough and respond in kind? What happens if NATO and its toxic puppet Ukraine score major hits in Moscow and other major Russian cities, or in key defence spots? Orlov suggests that Russia’s way of responding to such dangerous insults may be far less spectacular than blowing up a bunch of Western cities in retaliation (which Russia certainly can do) and far more effective and indirect, attacking, in effect the vital points of the West’s economic organism: electric power, transportation fuels, strategic arms production materials, and so on.
Dmitry Orlov was born in Leningrad, USSR, into an academic family, and emigrated to the US in the mid-1970s. He holds degrees in Computer Engineering and Linguistics, and has worked in a variety of fields, including high-energy physics, Internet commerce, network security and advertising. He is the author of several previous books, including Reinventing Collapse and The Five Stages of Collapse.
[/su_spoiler]
[t4b-ticker id=”6″]
Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License •
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS
1 comment
What a ‘normal’ and insightful interview. No US hysterics or bloviations but a well-balanced view of a tough situation. Of course, the arch villain Putin is not immediately throwing nuclear bombs but will reduce ingrown war-like impulses at their weakest energy-demanding points. And that is where the US becomes more and more vulnerable in its ever more intricate technical developments. Faster to bring out of balance. But Orlov’s most significant remark was that the US should stay on its side of the Atlantic which most humans feel (think of Italy after the war “Yankee go Home!”) which is not even hostile but expresses the desire for not being interfered with.