INDRAJIT—The United States (along with Canada and Mexico) was chosen to host the FIFA World Cup in 2018, at which point it was already an obviously bad idea. By 2018, Donald Trump A) existed and B) had already signed a ‘Muslim Ban’, approved by the US Supreme Court about the same time as the World Cup bid. The signs were already there that this was a bad idea, but FIFA went ahead anyways and here we are. The 2026 World Cup is an offensive debacle before it’s even started.
PG—Seahorses face severe global threats. Millions are harvested annually for the traditional medicine and aquarium trades, while non-selective fishing (like bottom trawling) destroys the shallow coastal habitats—such as seagrass beds and coral reefs—that they rely on for survival.
Seyed M. Marandi & Larry Johnson: Iran Demands Lebanon Withdrawal as U.S. Pushes for Open Hormuz
byMohammed Marandi & Larry C. Johnson Approx. 1 Hr. 09 mins • Watch / readDW—The conversation shifts to the critical issue of the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). Established in 1983 with a capacity of approximately 740-800 million barrels, the reserve has been steadily depleted—currently at about 340 million barrels in total, but effectively closer to 190 million barrels due to structural limitations in salt caverns used for storage (which must retain at least 20% capacity for integrity).
Alastair Crooke: An Irreversible Blow to Israel
byAndrew Napolitano & Alastair Crooke Approx. 35 Mins • Watch / readJN—Alastair Crooke challenges the Vice President’s portrayal, condemning President Trump’s public threats during negotiations, including promises of a “decapitation strike” against the Iranian negotiating team—a statement that Crooke classifies as both a war crime and a serious violation of the recent agreement signed in Versailles. Crooke points out the asymmetry between Iranian and U.S. rhetoric: Iran’s threats are described as defensive and proportionate, warning of retaliation if attacked, whereas Trump’s threats are more extreme and counterproductive. Importantly, these aggressive statements contribute to worsening global perceptions and do not appear to intimidate Iran.
Can China Resist the Temptation of Empire?
by Einar Tangen & Glenn DiesenbyEinar Tangen & Glenn Diesen Approx. 67 Mins • Watch / readGD—Einar candidly addresses China’s historical awareness and structural safeguards that may mitigate imperial tendencies:
China’s leadership studies history intensively, learning from past empires’ mistakes.
Chinese officials remain philosophically grounded, pragmatic, and less ideologically assertive compared to the US.
The non-proselytizing stance on sovereignty and tailored development paths reflect a fundamental reluctance to impose models or resort to militarism for control.
The Chinese bureaucratic system produces leaders who have climbed rigorous ranks based on performance and service, contrasting with more populist, less-prepared US political paths.
While dangers exist in middle-tier hawkish sentiment, top leadership reportedly favors stability and peaceful progress, seeking to avoid unnecessary conflict.Trump and the Iran Deal – Another Programmed Deception
by Peter KoenigbyPeter Koenig 6 minutes readPK—The deliberate confusion on where to sign the “Deal,” first Geneva, then at Macron’s insistence in Evian where the G7 met (15-17 June 2026), then on the Swiss Buergenstock mountain (where the absurd May 2024 Ukrainian Peace Talk, without Russian presence, took place, and where the Bilderbergers often meet); and finally signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), not a Peace Treaty at all, on 17 June, finalized on 18 June 2026, in Versailles, near Paris.
