DDAVIS—Russia has reached the limit of her patience with the West—both with arch-hypocritical Washington, and currently with the US vassals in Europe, says Scott Ritter, noting that for all the provocations, insults, noise and posturing in Britain, Germany, Poland, France and other NATO countries, none is actually ready to confront Moscow in an actual serious conflict. Neither the US nor the treacherous, blabbering Europeans—who after 2 world wars in their home turfs have apparently learned nothing—possess at this time the requisite strategic depth, affirms Ritter, as they lack the industrial, economic, and military muscle necessary to defend themselves, let alone prevail in a war against Russia, and probably, inevitably, China and Iran.
The Greanville Post
Is Germany Helping to DEPORT Ukrainian Men to the Front Lines? Glenn Greenwald
Approx 15 Mins • /Watch/ readGG—Glenn Greenwald contrasts elite U.S. attitudes with President Obama’s more restrained stance, quoting Obama’s view that confronting Russia militarily over Ukraine would be “idiotic” because Ukraine is vital to Russia but not to the United States. He suggests that domestic political dynamics and historical antagonisms—dating back to Cold War fears—explain why American political players became so invested in opposing Russia, sometimes inconsistently and with opportunistic interventions in other countries’ politics.
DD—The speaker (Russell Dobullar) delivers a candid, often sarcastic commentary on a high-profile US-China summit, mocking simplistic partisan narratives while unpacking deeper geopolitical dynamics. He criticizes American commentators who reduce complex diplomacy to partisan talking points and ridicules the surreal optics—schoolchildren greeting Trump, officials awed by ceremonial trappings, and CEOs flocking to Beijing despite hawkish rhetoric at home. The core argument highlights a strategic divergence: China frames its rise as peaceful development (building infrastructure, trade networks, and institutions) while U.S. policymakers increasingly view that rise as a threat—a modern Thucydides trap. Quoting scholars and analysts, the speaker argues Xi’s invocation of Thucydides is a deliberate historical and legal framing: Beijing insists it is not the aggressor but a rising power provoked by fear-driven containment.
Prof. Glenn Diesen : Trump in China: What Can He Accomplish?
GLENN DIESEN—The discussion, led by Andrew Napolitano with guest Professor Glenn Diesen, centers on the strategic failures and geopolitical consequences of recent U.S.- and Israeli-led confrontations with Iran, shifts in European and global alignments, and the broader implications for U.S. policy toward Russia and China. Diesen argues that the perceived universal view among academics, think tanks, and diplomats is that the U.S. and Israel have failed to achieve their objectives against Iran. He cites commentary like Robert Kagan’s as signaling recognition of limits to U.S. power and warns that Iran will not revert to a pre-conflict status quo of crippling sanctions and vulnerability. With control of strategic chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz, Iran could retaliate economically and militarily in ways largely beyond U.S. control, bolstered by domestic industrial capacity and likely support from Russia and China.

