Home ALT MEDIATrump BOMBS Venezuela, U.S KIDNAPS Maduro as New War Erupts

Trump BOMBS Venezuela, U.S KIDNAPS Maduro as New War Erupts

Was there a military betrayal in Venezuela's army?

by Mark Sleboda
0 comments Approx 1 Hr 35 mins • Watch / read
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

Danny Haiphong
CHATS WITH
MARK SLEBODA
Traducir—Translate! [gtranslate]
Make fonts bigger>>> [wpavefrsz-resizer]

Trump BOMBS Venezuela, U.S KIDNAPS Maduro as New War Erupts | Mark Sleboda
 

Summary

The video transcript covers an in-depth discussion and analysis of a covert U.S. military operation conducted on January 3rd, 2026, which resulted in the kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The operation, carried out by the U.S. Army’s Delta Force with CIA involvement and under the cover of airstrikes, represents a significant and aggressive attempt by the Trump administration to forcibly remove the Maduro government. Maduro was flown to New York and charged with multiple offenses, including narco-terrorism and conspiracy. The video features host Danny Haiphong and analyst Mark Sleboda, who provide detailed commentary on the geopolitical, strategic, and domestic implications of the operation.

The operation involved an unprecedented military buildup by the U.S. around Venezuela, including naval and air forces. Despite the severity of the incursion, Venezuelan military and security forces notably offered no resistance, suggesting internal co-option or betrayal within Maduro’s ranks. The Venezuelan government condemned the attack as a flagrant violation of sovereignty and international law, while the U.S. framed the operation as a lawful law enforcement action.

The analysis explores the broader context of U.S. foreign policy retrenchment under Trump, which focuses on targeting weaker states aligned with Russia, China, and Iran rather than confronting these major powers directly. The seizure of Venezuela’s oil and lithium resources is underscored as a major motivation behind the government change, potentially shifting global energy dynamics and geopolitical power balances.

The video also highlights skepticism about the future stability of Venezuela post-operation, doubts about the legitimacy and effectiveness of the transitional government likely to be installed, and the potential for grassroots resistance or civil conflict. It critiques Western governments’ responses, which largely support U.S. actions despite breaches of international law, and reflects on the broader implications for U.S.-Russia-China relations and the international order. The discussion ends on a somber note about the enduring nature of imperialist power politics and the challenges ahead for multipolarity.

 


Key Insights

  • [00:00] 🚁 Covert Military Operation as government Change: The U.S. employed elite forces (Delta Force) alongside CIA coordination to abduct Maduro, marking a bold escalation in government change tactics that bypass traditional warfare or diplomatic channels. This reflects a shift toward more direct, extrajudicial interventions by the U.S. government, signaling diminishing restraint in foreign policy actions.
  • [04:31] 🌐 International Law and Sovereignty Ignored: Venezuela’s official response highlights the blatant violation of the UN Charter and international norms by the U.S., emphasizing the erosion of state sovereignty in the face of imperial ambitions. The operation destabilizes regional peace and sets a dangerous precedent for unilateral military interventions under the guise of law enforcement or anti-terrorism.
  • [09:41] ⚔️ Internal Subversion and Military Co-option: The absence of any Venezuelan military resistance strongly suggests systemic infiltration, bribery, or coercion of government and military officials. This mirrors historical U.S. covert operations in Syria, Libya, and Iraq, revealing a pattern where physical force is augmented or replaced by strategic manipulation of local power structures.
  • [15:02] 🛢️ Resource Control as a Primary Driver: The focus on Venezuela’s oil and lithium reserves underscores the economic motivations behind the operation. By controlling a significant share of global oil reserves, the U.S. aims to weaken rivals like Russia and Iran and assert dominance over global energy markets, further integrating geopolitical strategy with resource extraction.
  • [24:45] 📜 Revived Hegemonic Doctrine: Trump’s explicit rebranding of the Monroe Doctrine to the “Donrow Doctrine” signals a renewed and aggressive U.S. claim over the Western Hemisphere, asserting dominance and warning neighboring countries to align with U.S. interests. This doctrine formalizes an imperial policy of hemispheric control and interventionism.
  • [01:01:03] 🇺🇸 Imperialism Cloaked in ‘America First’ Rhetoric: Trump’s justification of “running Venezuela” in the name of “America First” reveals the imperialistic core behind nationalist slogans, where stability and energy security serve as euphemisms for direct control and exploitation of foreign nations. This marks a blunt and unapologetic assertion of U.S. hegemony.
  • [01:27:06] 🌏 Geopolitical Repercussions and Multipolarity Challenges: The operation exposes the limits of diplomacy with the U.S. for Russia, China, and Iran and highlights the erosion of international law as a constraint on power politics. It may prompt these powers to reconsider their engagement with global governance institutions and accelerate moves toward alternative alliances or blocs, potentially reshaping the global order.

Expanded Analysis

The transcript reveals a complex and multi-layered narrative about U.S. foreign policy, imperialism, and the fragility of Venezuelan sovereignty. The operation against Maduro is not an isolated event but part of a broader U.S. strategy to maintain global dominance amid rising multipolarity. The use of Delta Force and covert tactics, rather than open war, reflects an evolution in U.S. interventionism that prioritizes deniability and minimizes direct military casualties.

The Venezuelan response, condemning the violation of international law, contrasts sharply with the U.S. framing of the operation as a law enforcement action, exposing blatant double standards. The absence of Venezuelan military resistance is a critical revelation, suggesting that the Maduro government had been penetrated or undermined, which facilitated a near bloodless coup. This points to the potency of CIA operations and the vulnerabilities of governments under sustained economic sanctions and political pressure.

Resource control emerges as a central theme. Venezuela’s vast oil and lithium reserves are strategic assets coveted by the U.S., especially in the context of its ongoing rivalry with Russia, China, and Iran. By securing these resources, the U.S. not only aims to cripple adversaries economically but also to maintain leverage over global energy markets, influencing prices and supply chains.

Trump’s rhetoric around the Monroe Doctrine, now rebranded “Donrow Doctrine,” signals a frank admission of imperial ambitions. This doctrine asserts the U.S.’s right to intervene militarily and politically across the Americas, reinforcing a hegemonic order reminiscent of historical colonialism but adapted to 21st-century geopolitical realities.

The discussion underscores the futility of expecting meaningful change from U.S. electoral politics in altering imperialist trajectories. Both Republican and Democratic administrations are portrayed as instruments of hegemonic policy, with government change operations and covert warfare as standard tools. The transcript critiques naive hopes for reform within the existing political system, highlighting structural imperatives driving U.S. foreign policy.

Finally, the broader geopolitical impact is profound. The operation in Venezuela could further alienate Russia, China, and Iran from international institutions, driving them towards alternative alliances and more ruthless geopolitical posturing. It exemplifies the erosion of international law and norms, replaced by a realpolitik of “might makes right” and underscores the escalating global tensions defining the current era.

Conclusion

The kidnapping of Nicolás Maduro marks a watershed moment in U.S. foreign policy—an unapologetic, extrajudicial government change executed through covert military means and strategic subversion. It exposes the raw imperialist ambitions underpinning U.S. actions, particularly in pursuit of resource control and hemispheric dominance. The operation lays bare the fragility of Venezuelan sovereignty and the complicity or weakness of its institutions. It also signals a broader shift in global power dynamics, challenging the efficacy of international law and foreshadowing intensified geopolitical conflicts in a multipolar world order. The analysis presented is sobering, emphasizing the harsh realities of imperialism and the uncertain prospects for resistance or resolution.


BELOW: Venezuela Air Strikes: Video Shows Explosions in Caracas


BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]


Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and valuable. 

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

The Greanville Post