
Gary Olson

| Traducir—Translate! | |
| Make fonts bigger>>> | Resize text-+= |
What Do We Know About Zelensky and the Seven Dwarfs' Visit to the White House?
With the usual qualifier that I could be entirely wrong, my sense is that both the Alaska Summit and Monday’s meeting at the White House were reality checks. They revealed that Putin was finally able to convince the “collective Trump” (Gilbert Doctorow’s term), that the war in Ukraine did not begin with the Russian invasion of February 2022 but with the February 2014 Maidan coup in Kiev that overthrew the democratically elected Ukrainian president Victor Yanukovych. It was part of the neocons’ grand strategy of using Ukraine in a proxy war to bleed Russia before taking on China. [1] This faction of the permanent government or Deep State has been defeated on the battlefield.
The filter to which to view recent events is that the other faction of the US ruling elite, the one to which Trump is nominally connected, “only” wants domination of one-third of the globe and they have correctly concluded that Russia has already won the war in Ukraine. Trump does not want to be associated with a war that ends like Vietnam or Afghanistan. Putin was offering Trump an exit and he pulled the plug on Ukraine or, to mix metaphors, took Ukraine off the neocons’ global chessboard.
At Monday’s White House meeting, the now neutered and obsequious Zelensky (who at least wore a coat) set a world record for uttering the words “Thank you, Mr. President” and the fact that Trump despises the back-stabbing, groveling European vassals was on full display as he humiliated them. I was reminded of disobedient school children sitting in the principal’s office. In any case, as each one offered his or her portion of the prepared script, the high (or low) point was when Merz pitifully raised the dead letter “ceasefire” demand for the umpteenth time and Trump pretended to listen before offering an offhand, patronizing comment.
The question arises why these Europeans will feverishly continue to sabotage the peace process? There might be a few leaders who believe the nonsense about a “Russian threat” but as Vijay Prasad has cogently argued, “European elites are primarily interested in protecting their legitimacy. They have invested too much political capital in their goal of ‘victorious peace’ to walk away.” As I’ve noted in previous posts, how else can the European ruling class justify massive increases in arms spending, which requires dismantling the welfare state if they can’t maintain the narrative that the Kremlin plans to invade Europe? More critically, how can they maintain their power and privilege if ordinary citizens realize they’ve been lied to over so many decades? In sum, this is the “existential threat” facing European governing elites and they’re living on borrowed time.
In the near future, Putin will meet with Ukrainian negotiators, probably in Istanbul but because both sides are so far apart, no compromise is possible. Putin will enforce a resolution of the conflict on Zelensky which will be a surrender, a capitulation. Trump won’t be there because he wants to evade responsibility when everything collapses.
Finally, Alaska and Washington were limited but positive first steps in transforming US-Russia relations, and that’s good news for those aware of the real danger of nuclear war. Further, there’s a better than fifty percent chance that the Ukraine war will end in the near future and that tens of thousands of lives will be spared. And lest I be misunderstood, this isn’t because Trump is a “good guy” or US imperialism is softening but because of the aforementioned, array of highly unusual circumstances the US was forced to retreat. If there are folks out there who miss the truth that at this narrow, isolated point in time that’s a positive development, I can only say “pity on them.” Of course, this “good news” must be quickly tempered by the fact that US “Project Ukraine” has already cost the lives of 1.1 million Ukrainians and Russians in a totally unnecessary war.
[1] Thomas I. Palley, “The War in Ukraine — A History: How the US Exploited Fractures in the Post-Soviet Order,” New Left Review, June 1, 2025; John J. Mearsheimer, “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs, September/October 2014. We know now there was a covert CIA plan by invade Ukraine by special forces as early as 1957. See, Kit Klarenberg, “Declassified: CIA’s Covert Ukrainian Invasion Plan,” MRonline, Aug 19, 2025.
Note: The entirely disingenuous question of so-called “security arrangements” must be taken up another day.
Yes, the Ruling Class Does Care About What We Think
My old friend and comrade Michael Parenti’s splendid response to the notion that the ruling class “don’t care about what we think.”

Ahh, what a wonderful life. Trump and the Clintons belong to the same privileged club, as effectively "front men" for the ruling class, even if they are not in the league of the real global ruling class by virtue of wealth size.
“But they don’t care about what we think. They turn a deaf ear to us,” some people complain. That is not true. They care very much about what you think. In fact, that is the only thing they care about that holds their attention and concern. They don’t care if you go hungry, unemployed, sick or homeless. But they do care when you are beginning to entertain resistant democratic thoughts. They get nervous when you discard your liberal complaints and adopt a radical analysis. They do care that you are catching on to what the motives and functions of the national security state and the US global empire are all about in so many corners of the world. They get furiously concerned when you and millions like you are rejecting the pap that is being served up by corporate media and establishment leaders.
Mike is suggesting that the ultimate nightmare for those who own the country is if the rest of us, some 80 percent of the citizens, began to realize how much we have in common and that we’re all being shafted by both political parties.
Today, a primary concern of the ruling class is that Gaza and the West Bank have exposed the obvious fact that the Zionist colonial state’s project to exterminate the Palestinians is a continuation of what began 77 years ago. It’s not about Netanyahu (as Bernie Sanders would have us believe) but the very nature and logic of Zionism itself. Our rulers are worried that people will see that resisting Israel’s genocidal intentions and US complicity is not anti-semitism but is wholly consistent with opposing Jim Crow, apartheid in South Africa and the Nazis in World War II. They’re concerned that 67 percent of young Jews in NYC support Zohran Mamdani’s bid for mayor. Mamdani has described Israel as an apartheid state; Israel should respect the rights of all its citizens; he supports Boycott, Divest & Sanctions; and he says Israel in committing genocide in Gaza. Mamdani would be the first Muslim mayor of New York City.
BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]
Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License •
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS






