By Stephen Lendman
Crosspost with Global Research, December 11, 2016
“(W)hen it comes to the war against terrorists, I’m a hawk,” she said. “When it comes to counterproductive wars of regime change, I’m a dove.”
If Trump is serious about wanting more diplomacy and less war, his choice for secretary of state should be someone with likeminded views. A refreshing new face would be welcome, a woman polar opposite war goddess Hillary.
…
On December 8, a press release from her office said the following:
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard…introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists Act today. The legislation would prohibit the US government from using American taxpayer dollars to provide funding, weapons, training, and intelligence support to groups like the Levant Front, Fursan al Ha and other allies of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, al-Qaeda and ISIS, or to countries who are providing direct or indirect support to those same groups.
The legislation is cosponsored by Reps. Peter Welch (D-VT-AL), Barbara Lee (D-CA-13), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA-48), and Thomas Massie (R-KT-04), and supported by the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) and the US Peace Council.
On the House floor, Gabbard said “(u)nder US law it is illegal for any American to provide money or assistance to al-Qaeda, ISIS or other terrorist groups.”
If you or I gave money, weapons or support to al-Qaeda or ISIS, we would be thrown in jail. Yet the US government has been violating this law for years, quietly supporting allies and partners of al-Qaeda, ISIL, Jabhat Fateh al Sham and other terrorist groups with money, weapons, and intelligence support, in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government.
The CIA has also been funneling weapons and money through Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and others who provide direct and indirect support to groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda.
This support has allowed al-Qaeda and their fellow terrorist organizations to establish strongholds throughout Syria, including in Aleppo.
That is why I’ve introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists bill – legislation based on congressional action during the Iran-Contra affair to stop the CIA’s illegal arming of rebels in Nicaragua.
Gabbard’s legislation requires the Director of National Intelligence to identify nations, groups and individuals involved in terrorist activities or supporting them.
She endorses ending US interventionist practices against nations like Syria threatening no one. Her measure is a courageous act going nowhere in neocon infested Congress.
It’s also a shot across the bow to the incoming Trump administration to stop US wars of aggression on humanity.
Will it work, even partially? The fullness of time will tell. Likely a long shot at best
STEPHEN LENDMAN
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com
We apologize for this inconvenience.
=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
3 comments
She’s on a slippery slope. She says in the “war against terrorists,” she’s a hawk. But which people are terrorists? Her answers to that question seem a little better than Clinton’s, but I don’t trust her to always answer that question correctly. “Trust me” is not what I want to hear from a politician. So far, she has talked about Syria, but has she answered regarding Israel yet?
In 2008, Obama said he was “not against all wars, just stupid wars,” which was his way of saying “vote for me, I’m not Bush,” but that turned out to be a lie.
I think most people who understand who the REAL terrorists are, i.e., the Saudis and Washington’s proxy army comprised of ISIS, al-Qaeda, etc. will see those are the people Gabbard is talking about, and she clarifies it by her second predicate—”When it comes to counterproductive wars of regime change, I’m a dove.”
Who is behind “regime change” if not the US warmongering establishment, using as a loyal figurehead the war criminal Obama? One has to be really uninformed and dense not to get the meaning of Gabbard’s slogan.
Tulsi makes a very important distinction between hawk and dove…. She does not see things through the black or white lens of christianity. Her position requires subtlety, scrutiny and thought, qualities which are sorely lacking in America life.