Eric Arthur Blair

EAB—Take home message: “normal” sized oil field discoveries are of no importance, our oilconomy requires the discovery of new GIANT conventional oil fields which by their definition, by their size, are the easiest to discover seismically but…

THERE ARE NO MORE CONVENTIONAL GIANT OILFIELDS TO BE FOUND in any accessible locations and anybody who disputes this, such as the “drill baby drill” MAGAs, are simply dumb, baby, dumb. I will later explain the drilling paradox, which HAS PROVEN IN REAL LIFE that no amount of money thrown at any drilling frenzy will EVER tap any sizable economically extractable oil ANYWHERE.

Note that current global oil consumption is reported as 100 million barrels per day. That means if a brand new giant oilfield with 500 million barrels of economically extractable oil is found, it will last the world just five days!

ERIC BLAIR—Fast forward to 2012 when Obama declared his “Pivot to Asia”. This Orwellian term was far from benign and China was well aware that the real aim of the USA was to turn its gunsights on China to prevent its rise. If the USA could not compete on a level playing field, its default mode was to resort to sabotage of perceived competitors, whether economic or subversive (colour revolutions, sponsorship of separatist terrorists, etc) or military. The fact that the USA subsequently placed 60% of its entire military assets in the Pacific theatre, based in three concentric “island kill chains” surrounding China (US doctrinal language), validated China’s concerns.

ERIC BLAIR—Neoliberal/neoclassical economics in particular, despite being steeped in recent decades in fancy next-to-incomprehensible mathematical equations conjured up by necromancers and celebrated by a fake Nobel economics prize (= Bank of Sweden prize for liars and Empire apologists), has been shown to be repeatedly wrong (yet “coincidentally” always benefits the rich, especially them bankers). This has resulted in economics being called for at least a century the “dismal science”, but of course, as Yanis Varoufakis says, economics is not a science at all. It is simply dismal.

ERIC BLAIR—When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour, all three US aircraft carriers, the kingpins of Pacific power projection for the US, just “happened” to be away at that time, hence were untouched by the raid. Many historians believe that Roosevelt had ample foreknowledge of the Japanese attack, that it was NOT a surprise attack, that it was engineered for a convenient time the USA knew their carriers would be out of port and that Roosevelt allowed it to happen to force the USA to join the war. It has also been argued that the true puppetmasters behind it all, who were interested in instigating worldwide war-for-profit, were the US bankers (“all wars are bankers wars”). Such an argument is utterly compelling if you “follow the money” and ask Cui Bono? regarding these world events.

EAB—Parts 1 to 4 focus on geopolitical economics, which are social “sciences” or more accurately pseudosciences, because hypotheses cannot be proven in the same way that the hard sciences (Physics, Chemistry, Biology) can prove them using real-world empirical measurements, observations, hypothesis formation and experimentation to validate or refute theories. Neoliberal/neoclassical economics in particular, despite being steeped in mathematical equations conjured up by necromancers and celebrated by a fake Nobel economics prize (= Bank of Sweden prize for liars) has been shown to be repeatedly wrong (yet “coincidentally” always benefits the rich, especially them bankers).