Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity. APPENDIX “If you want, it’s actually help for the terrorists the US is fighting, declaring that they are conducting a counterterrorism policy,” the official added. Ryabkov added that he believed the strike “should be first of all regarded as the continuation of the US agenda of neglecting the norms of international law. Regardless of who has power in Washington, people there are used to the fact that there are circumstances allowing them to arrogantly look down on – and in some situations, to openly ignore – the basics of international relations.” Source: RT [premium_newsticker id=”154171″]
RT.com and Al Masdar also report that the downing of a Syrian jet fighting ISIS in the Raqqa region by US-led “Coalition” aircraft (actually an F-18 Hornet), is an act of lawless aggression. Apparently Moscow and its allies had just about enough of US continued meddling, criminality and hypocrisy and decided to draw the line. See report below.
Moscow sees U.S.-led coalition downing Syrian jet as ‘an act of aggression’
In international law, and as recognized by the U.N., Syria has been invaded by the United States, was never invited into the country but is instead there as an invader. Russia was invited in; Iran was invited in; but the U.S. are only invaders. And, now, Russia and Syria will start treating the U.S. as such.
Russia Announces No-Fly Zone in Syria — War Against U.S. There
462
About the author
(RT) Moscow views the US-led coalition’s attack on the Syrian government military jet as an act of aggression and assistance for the terrorists that the US is [supposedly] fighting against, according to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov.
“What is it then, if not an act of aggression, an act directly in breach of international law,” Ryabkov told journalists in Moscow.
previous post
What do you do with political rebels who survive defeat on the battlefield. After the Spanish American war, Teddy Roosevelt ordered his attorney general, was it, (remiss to recall his name), to machine gun 5000 Philippine rebels and bury in a mass grave. A better solution is to subject them to reeducation, which the Chinese have employed. Russia under Stalin used labor camps. The US, who preferred extermination, criticized both methods as human rights abuses. Hitler, btw, had gotten his idea of concentration camps from the US example in the Philippines. In the present instance, perhaps reeducation might simply be… Read more »