
[su_spoiler title=”HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON IT.” open=”yes” style=”fancy” icon=”arrow-circle-1″]
[su_dropcap size=”4″]H[/su_dropcap]ollywood came to a grinding shame-faced halt as new charges of sexual abuse were leveled at stars like Angelina Jolie, Holly Berry, Jennifer Lawrence and Helen Mirren.
Not them, actually, but others very much like them.
“She pawed at me, breathed heavily down my neck and whispered off color remarks to me when I delivered her lunch” said the first anonymous accuser. Another claimed that a beautiful star asked him for a rubdown and spit at him when he blushingly refused. Both have been in therapy ever since and resolve to sue for all their mental care and inability to gain employment after these shocking experiences.
A third damaged soul said that he at first thought she was joking when a breathtakingly gorgeous star begged him to lick her feet while she read her mail. His religious teachings forbade any such behavior on his part and he never delivered mail to her or anyone else again, forfeiting a career at the Post Office.
After further investigation, and reading top-secret memos shared between the accusers and the revealing agency which were hacked, leaked or stolen by Russian agents, Legalienate now discounts all these claims. We learned that the SWTMOA, the organization that first made the charges, is Sexual Wishful Thinking Men Of America and might possibly be less than even handed in accepting far-fetched and remotely believable charges.
We are forwarding the results of this story to all major media, beginning with the New York Times and ending with Fox News, in the hope that they might follow through on checking the objectivity of sources before reporting hysterical fables, political lies , treacherous fictions and purposely divisive slanders as :
News ?
Source: http://legalienate.blogspot.com/2018/02/shocking-bulletin-film-industry-reels.html
[/su_spoiler]
[su_box title=”About the Author” style=”bubbles” box_color=”#7ea2c0″] Frank Scott is founding editor of legalienate.blogspot.com. He lives in Richmond, California. [/su_box]
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]
[su_box title=”” style=”bubbles” box_color=”#7978cc”]
Parting shot—a word from the editors
The Best Definition of Donald Trump We Have Found
In his zeal to prove to his antagonists in the War Party that he is as bloodthirsty as their champion, Hillary Clinton, and more manly than Barack Obama, Trump seems to have gone “play-crazy” — acting like an unpredictable maniac in order to terrorize the Russians into forcing some kind of dramatic concessions from their Syrian allies, or risk Armageddon.However, the “play-crazy” gambit can only work when the leader is, in real life, a disciplined and intelligent actor, who knows precisely what actual boundaries must not be crossed. That ain’t Donald Trump — a pitifully shallow and ill-disciplined man, emotionally handicapped by obscene privilege and cognitively crippled by white American chauvinism. By pushing Trump into a corner and demanding that he display his most bellicose self, or be ceaselessly mocked as a “puppet” and minion of Russia, a lesser power, the War Party and its media and clandestine services have created a perfect storm of mayhem that may consume us all.— Glen Ford, Editor in Chief, Black Agenda Report




2 comments
What is the point of this article exactly? I certainly hope it isn’t suggesting that powerful people (whether man, woman, or those free of such restrictive labels) don’t exploit, harass or sexually abuse people. With all the MeToo mob-rule hysteria, it is popular to imply that only men are capable of abuse – but the reality is very different. What is most dangerous about this movement (mostly based around wealthy, privileged women and their claims of abuse) is that it does absolutely nothing for the countless poor and unfashionable victims of actual sex slavery and rape – many of them children. Instead we have to feel sorry for women who worked with sleazy pervs for years and put up with their antics for the sake of wealth and fame? So – I understand this is meant to be a satire, but to me it is in very bad taste. Not trolling or anything, just concerned about real problems being overshadowed by trendy causes.
I don’t think he’s doing that at all. He agrees with you that this issues—a serious one—has been hijacked and deformed by the bourgeois feminists you allude to, and thereby trivialised in terms of the broader more urgent issues afflicting women and.or anyone in a lopsided power relationship, especially when livelihood itself is at stake.