Home Author
Author

Lawrence Wilkerson

Lawrence B. Wilkerson (born June 15, 1945) is a retired United States Army Colonel and former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell. Since the end of his military career, Wilkerson has criticized many aspects of the Iraq War, including his own preparation of Powell's presentation to the United Nations Security Council, as well as other aspects of American policy in the Middle East, as well as criticizing Israel. As of 2024, he is a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity.Wilkerson was born in Gaffney, South Carolina. After three years of studying philosophy and English literature at Bucknell University, Wilkerson dropped out in 1966 and volunteered to serve in the Vietnam War. He told The Washington Post: "I felt an obligation because my dad had fought, and I thought that was kind of your duty." Wilkerson arrived as an Army officer piloting an OH-6A Cayuse observation helicopter and logged about 1100 combat hours over a year. He flew low and slow through South Vietnam, and was involved in one incident in which he says he prevented an atrocity by purposely placing his helicopter between a position that was full of civilians, and another helicopter that wanted to launch an attack on the position. He also had many vocal disagreements with his superiors and his own gunner crew over free-fire zones, including an incident in which one of his crew shot a wagon that wound up having a little girl inside it. He went on to Airborne School and Ranger School before receiving his Bachelor of Arts degree in English literature and graduate degrees in international relations and national security.

Col. Larry Wilkerson: Iran ROCKS Two U.S. Destroyers – 30 Refueling Jets Airborne! WAR IS HERE

by Lawrence Wilkerson
written by Lawrence Wilkerson 9 minutes read
Be sure to share these materials with friends, kin, and workmates.

Dialogue Works' Nima Alkhorshid chats with Col. (Ret/) Larry Wilkerson

Col. Larry Wilkerson: Iran ROCKS Two U.S. Destroyers – 30 Refueling Jets Airborne! WAR IS HERE

Dialogue Works

Chapter: Navigating the Strait of Hormuz and the Geopolitical Turmoil of 2026

Introduction: The Strategic Significance of the Strait of Hormuz and Operation Freedom

  • [00:08] This chapter delves into the escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint for global oil transportation, against the backdrop of the 2026 geopolitical conflict involving the United States, Iran, and their respective allies. The discussion centers around Operation Freedom, an initiative announced by then-President Donald Trump aiming to secure freedom of navigation through the Strait amid Iranian claims of control.
  • The Strait of Hormuz is described as a narrow and complex maritime passage, fraught with navigational and military challenges, making any military or escort operation highly difficult. Key vocabulary terms include freedom of navigation, blockade, escort operations, ballistic missiles, sanctions, and state-sponsored terrorism.
  • This strategic environment is compounded by broader geopolitical dynamics involving the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Israel, Russia, China, and the shifting global balance of power, particularly the rise of China and its push to supplant the U.S. dollar with the renminbi (RMB) as the world’s dominant currency.
  • The significance of this content lies in understanding the complex military, economic, and diplomatic maneuvers around the Strait, which serve as a microcosm of wider global power struggles and the looming risks of wider conflict.

Section 1: Military Challenges in Escorting Commercial Ships through the Strait of Hormuz

  • [00:46 → 06:39] The claim that American and allied ships have safely transited the Strait under Operation Freedom is scrutinized. Experts emphasize the geographical constraints of the Strait—narrow channels, dense traffic, and limited maneuvering space—which make escort operations highly challenging.
  • The U.S. Navy’s current fleet composition is inadequate for the scale of the operation. For instance, the ship Camber, classified as a Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), is primarily a converted mine-clearance vessel rather than an escort warship, thus unsuitable for high-threat escort missions.
  • There are approximately 2,000 commercial ships waiting to transit, making a one-by-one escort logistically impossible. Effective protection would entail convoy-style movements requiring 30 to 40 warships, roughly the entire current naval force available, including aircraft carriers.
  • Historical parallels are drawn to Operation Earnest Will (1988-89) during the Iran-Iraq war, when fewer ships and greater U.S. naval capability allowed for limited escort operations. The current situation, with more ships and less military advantage, is described as “logistically crazy.”
  • Important military incidents include Iran striking three commercial vessels and launching two ballistic missiles at the Camber, which retreated without engaging.
  • The speaker critiques Pentagon and White House narratives as overly optimistic or misleading, suggesting internal skepticism within the administration, notably from figures like JD Vance, regarding the feasibility and wisdom of the operation.

Key Points:

  • The Strait’s geography severely limits naval escort operations.
  • The U.S. fleet is under-equipped for large-scale escort missions.
  • Current operations risk escalating tensions without guaranteeing safety.
  • Historical precedent shows limited success with far fewer ships and less complex logistics.

Section 2: The Political and Military Dynamics in the Gulf Region

  • [09:39 → 15:40] The broader Gulf region is marked by escalating attacks, such as the assault on the UAE’s Fger oil zone, highlighting the fragile security situation.
  • The UAE’s rhetoric is described as aggressive but lacking military follow-through, with warnings of retaliation likened to an “empty threat.”
  • Israel’s military and political situation is strained, with conflicts on multiple fronts—Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Lebanon. The speaker portrays Israeli leadership as aggressive, pursuing policies with little regard for humanitarian consequences.
  • The terminology used by the Trump administration—such as “blockade”—is criticized for being inaccurate or misunderstood. A blockade implies preventing ships from passing, whereas the official stance is escorting ships through the Strait, which are fundamentally different military actions.
  • The ceasefire in the region is characterized as ineffective or non-existent, with ongoing hostilities and conflicting interpretations by U.S. and Israeli leaders.

Key Points:

  • Regional attacks continue, exacerbating tensions.
  • UAE’s military posture is challenged by reality versus rhetoric.
  • Israeli military leadership is seen as pursuing harsh measures with little international accountability.
  • Political language from the U.S. administration is inconsistent and confusing.
  • The ceasefire is fragile and possibly a pretext for continued aggression.

Section 3: Broader Geopolitical Implications – The Rise of China and Russia’s Role

  • [21:44 → 27:20] The conflict in the Gulf is embedded within a larger global power shift. Russia is a staunch ally of Iran, providing diplomatic and possibly military support, while China is actively moving to undermine U.S. economic dominance.
  • China’s support includes instructing its refineries to ignore U.S. sanctions on Iran, signaling defiance of American economic pressure.
  • The renminbi is positioned as the future global reserve currency, aiming to replace the U.S. dollar in international trade, especially in energy markets. This shift threatens U.S. financial primacy.
  • The speaker highlights the inevitability of this transition, noting that China and Russia are working in tandem to create alternatives to the SWIFT banking system and the dollar-based oil consortium.
  • This economic realignment is accelerating the decline of American global influence, exacerbated by massive U.S. national debt nearing $40 trillion and the decreasing willingness of other nations to hold U.S. debt or operate in dollars.

Key Points:

  • Russia and China are strategically supporting Iran to counter U.S. influence.
  • China is advancing the renminbi as a global currency, challenging dollar supremacy.
  • U.S. economic sanctions are losing effectiveness in the face of coordinated international resistance.
  • The shift threatens U.S. financial stability and global power status.

Section 4: The Human Cost and Regional Instability

  • [33:21 → 37:41] The war’s toll on Iran and the region is devastating, including thousands of casualties, destruction of cultural and medical facilities, and widespread suffering.
  • Iran’s new policy, including the Persian Gulf Trade Authority, mandates that all ships passing through the Strait must register and pay tolls, reflecting Iran’s assertion of sovereignty and control.
  • The conflict exacerbates divisions within the GCC and weakens U.S. alliances.
  • The speaker foresees no clear winner in the war, suggesting a Pyrrhic victory for Iran if it simply avoids defeat, but at enormous cost.
  • There is also concern about leadership crises both in Iran and in the U.S., with calls for younger, more democratic leadership in Iran being seen as a potential positive development.
  • The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza is highlighted, with an estimated 200,000 civilians trapped beneath rubble in the “New Gaza” reconstruction plans, which the speaker condemns as a cover-up of mass atrocities.

Key Points:

  • The war inflicts severe human and infrastructural damage on Iran and the region.
  • Iran asserts control over maritime traffic, complicating international navigation.
  • The conflict deepens regional fractures and undermines alliances.
  • Leadership crises exacerbate instability on both sides.
  • Humanitarian disasters, especially in Gaza, remain largely unaddressed internationally.

Section 5: The Role of Propaganda, Misinformation, and War Crimes

  • [38:14 → 51:59] Misinformation plays a significant role in shaping public perception, exemplified by absurd claims like the use of “kamikaze dolphins” as weapons, which were debunked and ridiculed.
  • The speaker condemns the use of animals in warfare as a profound moral failing and highlights the cynical propaganda efforts by military spokespeople.
  • Israeli policies toward Palestinians are described as codifying war crimes, including laws mandating the death penalty exclusively for Palestinians, and are likened to historical genocidal regimes.
  • International institutions and governments largely fail to hold Israel accountable, with political systems silencing dissent and protests, as seen in the British Parliament’s suppression of criticism against Israeli policies.
  • The U.S. is portrayed as complicit, acting as “the expediter” and “provider of the bullets,” with American taxpayers funding violence abroad.

Key Points:

  • Propaganda and misinformation distort public understanding of the conflict.
  • Ethical violations in warfare, including animal exploitation, highlight moral degradation.
  • Israeli policies are criticized as institutionalized war crimes against Palestinians.
  • Global political systems suppress dissent and accountability.
  • U.S. involvement is direct and financially supportive of ongoing violence.

Section 6: Prospects for Peace and the Future of Global Power

  • [52:44 → 58:09] The speakers express pessimism about immediate peace prospects, noting entrenched positions on both sides that are incompatible with compromise.
  • The deepening divide within GCC countries and the broader Middle East complicates any diplomatic solution.
  • The decline of U.S. global primacy and the rise of China and Russia create a multipolar world where traditional Western dominance is waning.
  • There is a call for international cooperation on critical issues like nuclear disarmament and climate change, recognizing that ongoing conflicts undermine global efforts to address existential threats.
  • The discussion closes with a somber reflection on the human cost of war and a hope for sanity to return to decision-makers, quoting Matthew Arnold’s line about “ignorant armies clash[ing] by night” to symbolize the chaos and futility of current conflicts.

Key Points:

  • Peace prospects are dim due to uncompromising demands.
  • Regional and global power shifts complicate conflict resolution.
  • International cooperation is essential for addressing broader existential risks.
  • The human toll of conflict demands urgent reconsideration of current policies.
  • Hope persists for reason and sanity to guide future decisions.

Conclusion: Lessons and Implications from the Strait of Hormuz Crisis and Regional Conflict

  • The ongoing crisis in the Strait of Hormuz underscores the profound challenges of ensuring freedom of navigation in a geopolitically volatile, geographically constrained region.
  • Military operations like Operation Freedom face severe logistical, strategic, and political hurdles, with risks of escalation and unintended consequences.
  • The conflict is not isolated but deeply intertwined with the global power realignment, especially the ascent of China and Russia, challenging U.S. dominance economically and militarily.
  • The humanitarian cost, including war crimes and the suffering of civilians in Gaza and Iran, highlights the urgent need for international attention and accountability.
  • Propaganda and misinformation distort realities, impeding constructive dialogue and understanding.
  • The future demands new leadership, regional cooperation, and global collaboration to address the overlapping crises of war, economic instability, and climate change.
  • Ultimately, the situation reflects a world at a crossroads, where failure to act wisely risks further destruction, but hope remains that reason and diplomacy can prevail.

 

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Ret. Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: Netanyahu Could Turn to Nuclear Bombs If Iran War Escalates

by Lawrence Wilkerson
written by Lawrence Wilkerson Approx 17:50 Mins • Watch / read
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
AMY GOODMAN
Democracy Now!
INTERVIEWS
Lt Col Lawrence Wilkerson
Traducir—Translate!
Make fonts bigger>>>
Resize text-+=

Ret. Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: Netanyahu Could Turn to Nuclear Bombs If Iran War Escalates

Democracy Now!
Mar 10, 2026

As President Trump gives conflicting statements about the length and objectives of the war he launched with Israel against Iran, fears are growing that the conflict could continue to expand throughout the region and beyond. Lawrence Wilkerson, retired U.S. Army colonel and former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, says the U.S. and Israel are committing wanton "war crimes" in Iran. "We have bombed civilians relentlessly. We have bombed a school. We have bombed a hospital," says Wilkerson, who also suggests Western media outlets are downplaying the extent of the damage in Israel and how successful Iran has been in defending itself. "This is a war with long legs. Trump has completely misinterpreted it," says Wilkerson. "The only one who's interpreted it correctly is Bibi Netanyahu, and I think he's ready to use a nuclear weapon, should it become as bad as it looks like it might right now, because Iran has not even began to shoot its most sophisticated missiles."

BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]

Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and valuable. 

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

DW Dispatches: Russia & Iran to Build a WAR SHIELD — China Just Stepped In

by Lawrence Wilkerson
written by Lawrence Wilkerson 17 minutes read
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Nima R. Alkhorshid
Nima AlkhorshidDIALOGUE WORKS
chats with
Col. (Ret.) Lawrence Wilkerson • Larry C. Johnson 
Traducir—Translate!
Make fonts bigger>>>
Resize text-+=

Dialogue Works
Larry C. Johnson & Col. Larry Wilkerson: Russia & Iran to Build a WAR SHIELD — China Just Stepped In
Dispatch No. 1
Summary

The video is a detailed and wide-ranging discussion featuring Col. Lawrence Wilkerson and former CIA analyst Larry C. Johnson, moderated by Nima (Alkhorshid), covering significant political, social, and geopolitical issues as of November 2025. The conversation begins by analyzing the surprising election of Zhoran Mamdani as New York City’s mayor, highlighting the socioeconomic and political dynamics behind his victory despite massive financial opposition. Mamdani is portrayed as a Muslim socialist immigrant challenging the entrenched billionaire class, symbolizing a broader rejection of predatory capitalism that has failed many Americans.

The dialogue then shifts to the legacy and influence of former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, critiquing his hawkish policies, corrupt leadership style, and profound impact on U.S. foreign and domestic policy, especially in the Middle East. Cheney’s rise is depicted as emblematic of the dysfunctional and self-serving Washington establishment, with his tenure marked by aggressive militarism and disregard for democratic norms.

The discussion further explores the ongoing geopolitical tensions involving the United States, Israel, Iran, Russia, China, and other global actors. Key points include the deteriorating U.S. military readiness, the emergence of a coordinated defense alliance between Russia, China, and Iran, and the challenges to the so-called “rules-based international order,” which the speakers dismiss as a euphemism for Western dominance enforced by power rather than law.

The panel critiques the U.S. government’s foreign policy priorities, particularly its focus on Israel’s interests at the expense of American citizens’ needs, and the reckless rhetoric and actions of Donald Trump regarding military interventions in Latin America, nuclear weapons testing, and Middle Eastern conflicts. They emphasize the growing alienation among younger generations in the U.S. toward Zionism and U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.

The conversation concludes with reflections on global environmental concerns, specifically the exploitation of Antarctic ecosystems, and the broader structural weaknesses of the United States in maintaining its global influence amidst rising multipolar power dynamics. The speakers argue that the U.S. is increasingly isolated, militarily overstretched, and economically vulnerable, while Russia and China are consolidating power and influence.

Key Insights

  •  Mamdani’s Victory as a Symbol of Political Realignment: Mamdani’s win in New York represents a significant political shift driven by grassroots frustration with entrenched elites and a rejection of the traditional bipartisan establishment. His platform challenges predatory capitalism, reflecting a broader youth-driven demand for systemic change. This points to a potential realignment in urban and national politics, where social justice and economic equity gain prominence despite opposition from wealthy interests.

  • ️ Cheney’s Role in Militarizing U.S. Foreign Policy: The detailed recounting of Cheney’s career reveals how personal connections, opportunism, and a hawkish worldview shaped decades of U.S. policy, particularly in the Middle East. Cheney’s approach disregarded diplomatic solutions in favor of military dominance, contributing to long-term instability and entrenching the military-industrial complex. His legacy highlights the dangers of concentrated power in unelected officials and the corrosive impact of corruption on governance.

  •  The Decline of the U.S.-Led “Rules-Based Order”: The discussion underscores that the so-called international rules-based order is less about codified laws and more about power dynamics — “we make the rules because we have the power.” The decline of U.S. economic and military supremacy, compounded by the rise of alternatives to the dollar system championed by Russia and China, signals a shift toward a multipolar world where U.S. unilateralism is no longer accepted or effective.

  • ⚠️ U.S. Military Readiness at a Critical Low: The U.S. military is portrayed as fragmented, poorly led, and overstretched, with serious challenges in modernization and operational effectiveness. The lack of coordination among branches and corruption within the defense acquisition process undermines national security. This fragility limits the U.S.’s ability to project power globally and threatens to invite strategic miscalculations.

  •  Strategic Triad of Russia, China, and Iran: These countries are deepening military and economic ties, sharing advanced technologies such as Russia’s hypersonic missiles and Iran’s missile systems, and bypassing Western sanctions via alternative financial mechanisms. This alliance represents a counterbalance to NATO and Western influence, motivated by shared interests in resisting U.S. pressure and preserving regional autonomy, which complicates U.S. foreign policy options.

  •  Trump’s Foreign Policy as a Catalyst for Conflict: Trump’s posturing—ranging from brash nuclear weapons testing statements to aggressive stances toward Venezuela and Iran—reflects a reckless approach that increases global instability. His prioritization of Israel’s interests over U.S. needs, combined with inflammatory rhetoric, alienates allies and fuels domestic and international polarization, risking unintended escalation or conflict.

  •  Environmental Neglect Amid Geopolitical Turmoil: The panel highlights that amidst global strategic competition, critical ecological issues like Antarctic krill depletion and glacier melt are overlooked. This neglect threatens the health of global oceans and climate stability, demonstrating a failure of leadership to balance geopolitical ambitions with environmental stewardship, which could have catastrophic long-term consequences.

  •  Economic Deindustrialization Weakens U.S. Global Standing: The U.S. economy’s shift toward financialization and offshoring manufacturing undermines its productive capacity. Loss of industrial base and reliance on foreign supply chains reduce strategic autonomy and resilience, especially in defense production. This economic vulnerability exacerbates geopolitical challenges and diminishes U.S. leverage in international affairs.

  •  Multipolar World’s Complex Dynamics: The video details how emerging powers are not simply adversaries but are positioning themselves in a new global order, with regional actors like Central Asian countries and Gulf states playing nuanced roles. The U.S. attempts to maintain influence through alliances like the Abraham Accords may be insufficient or misplaced without addressing broader strategic realities on the ground.

  •  Information and Social Media as Battlegrounds: The rise of influential independent voices on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and YouTube challenges mainstream narratives controlled by entrenched interests, particularly regarding Zionism and U.S. foreign policy. The generational shift in attitudes, especially among under-40 populations, signals a growing skepticism toward traditional power structures and media, affecting political discourse and policy debates.

In sum, the video provides a critical and comprehensive analysis of the intersection between domestic politics, U.S. foreign policy, military readiness, global power shifts, and environmental challenges. It argues that the U.S. is at a crossroads, facing systemic internal weaknesses and an increasingly complex and multipolar international environment, while traditional narratives and power structures are being questioned both at home and abroad.

Dispatch No. 2

Richard D. Wolff & Michael Hudson: Trump’s Gamble Could Blow Up EVERYTHING

Dialogue Works
Streamed live on Nov 6, 2025Interviews 02

Summary

The video presents an in-depth analysis of the recent New York City mayoral election in which Zhortan Mamdani’s victory—portrayed as a Muslim socialist immigrant—signifies a historic shift in American politics. Despite facing over $40 million in opposition funding from wealthy Zionist donors and establishment Democrats, Mamdani won, signaling a rejection of the traditional bipartisan consensus and the entrenched political elite. The election transcended its local nature, reflecting broader national tensions within the Democratic Party and the country at large, especially concerning socialism, Zionism, and oligarchic influence.

The discussion highlights how both major parties lost ground, with the Republicans and centrist Democrats in places like New Jersey and Virginia winning local races but overshadowed by Mamdani’s symbolic victory. Mamdani’s platform, focused on municipal socialism—such as free bus rides, tenant protections, and progressive taxation—drew strong opposition framed as anti-socialist hysteria, which the commentators argue is rooted in outdated Cold War-era fears and ignorance about the varied meanings of socialism.

The video also explores the role of Zionism in the election, noting that despite opposition from prominent pro-Israel figures like Chuck Schumer, Mamdani won majority support among New York’s Jewish population, demonstrating the complexity of political allegiances. The speakers argue that the election exposed the polarization over U.S. foreign policy, especially regarding Israel and Palestine, which is expected to dominate upcoming midterm elections and reshape the Democratic Party.

Further, the panelists situate Mamdani’s win within a broader historical context of municipal socialism in America and Europe, emphasizing that such policies are neither revolutionary nor unprecedented but rather practical governance measures. The election is framed as a sign of a declining American empire grappling with systemic economic and political crises, including massive national debt, corporate influence over elections, and the erosion of democratic institutions.

Finally, the conversation underscores the challenges Mamdani will face governing New York amid federal opposition, oligarchic resistance, and the limitations of his progressive program. They suggest that Mamdani’s success depends on navigating these pressures and delivering tangible improvements to his constituents. The discussion concludes by considering the potential role of socialist leaders like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in supporting Mamdani and shaping a new left in the United States, as well as the geopolitical implications involving U.S.-China relations, positioning socialism as a possible framework for a more cooperative global order.

  • Key Insights

  •  Historic Defiance Against Establishment Politics: Zhortan Mamdani’s victory represents a profound repudiation of both Democratic and Republican establishments, which are accused of maintaining the status quo favoring Wall Street, Israel, and the wealthy elite. This signals a grassroots demand for significant political and economic change, especially among younger voters. The massive financial opposition Mamdani faced underscores the entrenched interests threatened by his platform.

  •  Misunderstanding of Socialism in America: The hysteria labeling Mamdani as a dangerous socialist reflects a deeply ingrained, outdated Cold War mentality. Unlike revolutionary socialism or Marxism, Mamdani advocates a form of democratic municipal socialism—focused on practical reforms like public transit and tenant protections—which has historically been a moderate and effective governance model in American and European cities. This disconnect reveals a lack of political education and awareness in U.S. media and politics.

  •  Zionism as a Polarizing Electoral Issue: The election exposed the centrality of Zionism and U.S. foreign policy toward Israel and Palestine in American politics, particularly within the Democratic Party. Despite opposition from powerful pro-Israel figures, Mamdani secured significant support from Jewish voters, highlighting a shift in political attitudes and the complexity of identity politics. Upcoming elections are expected to be heavily influenced by this issue, potentially fracturing party unity.

  •  The Oligarchic Influence and Privatization of Elections: The discussion emphasizes how campaign financing has become dominated by wealthy donors and corporations, especially following the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Mamdani’s victory with comparatively little funding challenges this paradigm, posing a threat to the oligarchic control of American politics and raising questions about the sustainability of current electoral systems.

  • ⚖️ Challenges of Governing Amid Federal and Economic Opposition: Mamdani faces significant obstacles from both state and federal governments, which may seek to undermine his administration by cutting funding or regulatory support. The city’s economic dependence on wealthy landlords and billionaires, combined with a ballooning national debt and political polarization, constrains his ability to implement ambitious reforms, raising questions about the feasibility of municipal socialism in the current context.

  •  Geopolitical Implications and the Decline of U.S. Hegemony: The panel situates Mamdani’s election within the broader context of a declining American empire, marked by economic stagnation, political dysfunction, and rising global competitors like China and the BRICS alliance. The possibility of a socialist-led U.S. engaging in cooperative rather than confrontational international relations presents a transformative vision for both domestic and global politics.

  •  The Role of Progressive Leaders in Shaping the New Left: Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and other progressive leaders are poised to support Mamdani and help define the emerging left in the U.S., which aims to go beyond symbolic victories to address systemic inequalities. Mamdani’s independence from party machinery as a mayor gives him a unique platform to advance this agenda, although he must balance idealism with practical governance to maintain support.

This comprehensive discussion highlights the complexity and significance of the New York mayoral election as a microcosm of broader political, economic, and social transformations in the United States and beyond. The election is both a symptom and a potential catalyst for change in a deeply divided and evolving political landscape.

Dispatch No. 3

Amb. Chas Freeman: Mamdani's VICTORY, Development in the LEVANT, and the WOLFOWITZ Doctrine

Dialogue Works
Streamed live Nov 7, 2025
 

Summary

The conversation with Ambassador Chas Freeman on November 7th, 2025, covers a broad range of geopolitical issues, focusing primarily on recent developments in New York City politics, U.S. foreign policy, and Middle Eastern dynamics. The discussion begins with the election of Zhoran Mamdani, a Muslim socialist immigrant, as New York City’s mayor, highlighting the public’s demand for change driven by economic issues like housing costs and inflation rather than foreign policy or religion. Mamdani's victory signals a generational shift and growing acceptance of social justice-oriented politics among younger Americans, despite opposition and discredit campaigns from wealthy Zionist oligarchs and pro-Israel lobby groups.

The dialogue then shifts to the Middle East, reflecting on the death of Dick Cheney and his legacy of aggressive U.S. foreign policies, including the global war on terror. The ambassador analyzes the complex dynamics involving Israel, Hezbollah, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran, emphasizing Israel’s continued military actions, political fragmentation desires, and the broader regional instability. The discussion critically examines U.S. policy towards Israel, the Abraham Accords, and the influence of pro-Israel lobbying on American politics, including the polarization this creates within both domestic and foreign policy spheres.

A significant portion of the interview addresses the contentious nature of U.S. foreign policy under Donald Trump, marked by chaotic communication, inconsistent strategies, and a lack of coherent diplomacy, especially concerning Iran, Venezuela, and relations with Russia and China. The ambassador points out that the U.S. government is currently dysfunctional, with reduced policy coordination and escalating internal crises affecting global engagement.

The interview concludes with reflections on the outdated nature of the Wolfowitz Doctrine, which sought to prevent the rise of regional superpowers, noting that the current global order—with the rise of China, Russia, Iran, and alliances like BRICS—renders this doctrine obsolete. The ambassador also discusses Latin American geopolitics, especially Argentina’s economic struggles and Brazil’s emerging regional influence, underscoring the limits of U.S. hegemony in the Western Hemisphere.

Key Insights

  • ️ Mamdani's Victory Reflects Economic Priorities Over Identity Politics: Mamdani's campaign focused on tangible domestic issues like housing and inflation, not divisive foreign policy topics, signaling a shift in voter priorities. This suggests a growing impatience among urban populations, particularly youth, with status quo politics and an openness to socialist-leaning social justice frameworks, challenging older political narratives about socialism’s negative connotations in the U.S.

  •  Economic Inequality as a Central Political Force: The rising Gini coefficient and widening wealth gap underpin social unrest and political realignments. The ambassador’s analysis reveals that economic grievances are unifying diverse groups, including young voters and minorities, potentially reshaping electoral outcomes beyond traditional partisan divides.

  •  Middle East Instability Driven by Fragmented Interests: Israel’s ongoing military campaigns, combined with regional rivalries involving Hezbollah, Syria, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, demonstrate a complex geopolitical chessboard where no party seeks genuine peace but rather strategic advantage. The U.S. role oscillates between mediator and provocateur, with policies often exacerbating tensions rather than resolving them.

  •  U.S. Foreign Policy Dysfunction Under Trump: The fragmentation within the U.S. executive branch, lack of coherent policy, and chaotic communication hurt American credibility and effectiveness abroad. The reduction of the National Security Council’s role and reliance on military solutions over diplomacy undermine long-term strategic goals, risking escalation and international isolation.

  •  Pro-Israel Lobbying’s Dual Impact on U.S. Politics: The ambassador highlights how powerful Jewish oligarchs and pro-Israel organizations invest heavily to influence elections and public discourse, often conflating criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism. This creates significant tension within Jewish communities and American politics, complicating honest debate on Middle East policy.

  •  End of the Wolfowitz Doctrine and Rise of Multipolarity: The geopolitical landscape has shifted drastically with China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea forming a de facto coalition, undermining U.S. efforts to maintain unipolar dominance. This challenges traditional U.S. strategies rooted in zero-sum regional power containment, requiring a fundamental rethinking of American global engagement.

  •  Latin America as a Battleground for Influence: Brazil’s emergence under Lula and Argentina’s economic volatility illustrate the limits of U.S. dominance in its own hemisphere. The ambassador notes that aggressive U.S. tactics risk alienating regional partners and provoking opposition coalitions, complicating efforts to sustain influence amid rising multipolarity.

Expanded Analysis

Ambassador Freeman’s insights paint a picture of a world in flux, where entrenched political doctrines and alliances are being questioned amid rising economic inequality, demographic change, and geopolitical realignment. Mamdani's election in New York symbolizes broader societal shifts, particularly among the young, favoring social justice and redistribution policies over traditional Cold War-era ideological battles. This trend, while localized, could presage national political shifts, especially as dissatisfaction with elite governance rises.

The Middle East remains a volatile region where military actions, proxy wars, and ideological divides continue to fuel conflict. Israel’s aggressive tactics, framed as self-defense, are critiqued as colonial and apartheid-like practices, deepening resentment and resistance among Palestinians and neighboring states. Ambassador Freeman’s historical perspective challenges mainstream narratives by emphasizing the colonial roots of Zionism and the complex ethnic and religious mosaic of the region, countering simplistic portrayals of perpetual conflict.

U.S. foreign policy, particularly under Trump, is portrayed as erratic and militarized, lacking the diplomatic finesse necessary for conflict resolution. The fragmentation within the executive branch and the sidelining of experienced diplomats and institutions like the National Security Council highlight internal governance crises. This dysfunction not only hampers effective foreign engagement but also contributes to escalating global tensions, including nuclear brinkmanship with Russia and China.

The influence of pro-Israel lobbying in U.S. politics is a double-edged sword. While supporting Israel remains a key part of American foreign policy, the conflation of criticism with anti-Semitism stifles debate and alienates younger Jewish Americans who increasingly question Israeli policies. This evolving discourse signifies a potential shift in American Jewish identity and its political influence.

The Wolfowitz Doctrine, which shaped U.S. strategy post-Cold War by seeking to prevent the rise of regional powers, is effectively obsolete in a world where multipolarity is a reality. The emergence of a coalition of Eurasian powers and the assertion of regional actors like Brazil indicate that U.S. global dominance is being challenged, necessitating new approaches that move beyond containment and zero-sum thinking.

Finally, Latin America’s geopolitical landscape reflects these global dynamics. Economic challenges in Argentina and Brazil’s regional aspirations demonstrate that U.S. influence is no longer unchallenged in the Western Hemisphere. Heavy-handed U.S. interventionism risks fostering resistance and alliances contrary to American interests, underscoring the need for more nuanced, cooperative regional policies.

In sum, Ambassador Freeman’s discussion reveals a world grappling with profound economic, political, and strategic transformations. The intersection of domestic dissatisfaction, regional conflicts, and shifting global power structures demands adaptive, informed, and inclusive policymaking both within the United States and internationally.

 
 
 

BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]

Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and valuable. 

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Col. Larry Wilkerson: The U.S. Is Ignoring EVERY WARNING SIGN Walking Into DISASTER

by Lawrence Wilkerson
written by Lawrence Wilkerson Approx 1:16:07 • Watch / read
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Nima R. Alkhorshid
Nima AlkhorshidDIALOGUE WORKS
chats with
Col. L. Wilkerson
Traducir—Translate!
Make fonts bigger>>>
Resize text-+=
CAVEAT: Col. Larry Wilkerson, a man we have great respect for his enormous decency and honesty, not to mention, as a former member of the US military and security apparatus, specialised knowledge of strategic matters, is sometimes wrong on some facts and assumptions. I wonder, for example, about the historians who still inform his views on the Soviet Union, Stalin and communism in general. Historians in the West tend to maintain the official narratives by mutual referencing. "Sovietologists" and "Russianists" (i.e., Yale's Tim Snyder), tend to fall in this category. Their tomes, with a multitude of footnotes, often go in circles, one quoting the other, and everyone quoting someone else, all "accepted" experts, without checking their claims against the available evidence, or even simple common sense.

Under such circumstances, it's easy to be misled. Indeed, as stated earlier, few people who have been brought up in the US empire, with its ocean of self-serving lies about capitalism, let alone someone who has spent a sizable chunk of his life in the armed forces as a (distinguished) career officer, can escape the morass of longstanding biases, myths and plain lies that undergird American exceptionalism. Intelligence and goodwill often do not suffice to escape the claws of Western propaganda, especially where it counts the most, world history. And few areas of this history are more polluted than the Western views on China, Russia, or any major nation, such as Iran, seeking to secure its own sovereignty. Stay alert.

Col. Larry Wilkerson: The U.S. Is Ignoring EVERY WARNING SIGN Walking Into DISASTER

 

Dialogue Works
Streamed live on Oct 28, 2025
 

Summary

The video transcript features a detailed and wide-ranging conversation with Col. Larry Wilkerson on October 28, 2025, covering critical geopolitical issues, primarily focusing on the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Middle Eastern politics, and broader global power dynamics. Wilkerson provides a candid critique of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s military actions in Gaza, highlighting the false pretext used to justify bombardments and the complex ceasefire violations involving Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. He criticises the U.S. administration, including figures like Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, and Jared Kushner, for their role in perpetuating conflict under the guise of peace negotiations, suggesting that these efforts were more about political gain than genuine peace.

The discussion extends to the Palestinian leadership, where Mahmoud Abbas is portrayed as ineffective and self-serving, with real power residing with Hamas. The handling of prisoners and detainees by Israel draws sharp condemnation for brutality and inhumane treatment, contrasted with the international double standard in media and political discourse.

Wilkerson also touches on U.S. domestic politics, particularly the impact of Trump’s influence on the MAGA movement and upcoming midterm elections, as well as unresolved issues around the assassination of political activist Charlie Kirk and the Epstein scandal, suggesting deep bipartisan complicity in covering up corruption and crimes.

The conversation shifts to broader international concerns, including U.S. policy and covert operations in Venezuela, Russia’s military developments and warnings to the West, and the evolving nuclear threat in the Levant. The complexities of U.S. and NATO relations, energy politics, and the economic implications of defence spending and AI market bubbles are also discussed.

Finally, Wilkerson delves into historical perspectives on intelligence operations during WWII, referencing the work of historian Allan Furst, and draws parallels to current global power struggles, emphasising the brutal and clandestine nature of statecraft and resistance movements.

Col Wilkerson Highlights

Key Insights

  •  Israeli Military Strategy and Political Manipulation: Wilkerson exposes the calculated nature of Israel’s military actions in Gaza, coordinated with U.S. political operatives to maintain a facade of a ceasefire while continuing aggressive operations. This underscores how geopolitical conflicts can be manipulated for political capital rather than resolved for peace, revealing the cynical use of military force as a bargaining chip. The implication is a broader pattern of deception in international diplomacy tied to domestic political agendas.

  •  Palestinian Leadership Crisis: Mahmoud Abbas is portrayed as a figurehead lacking real influence, trapped in a corrupt system that prioritizes personal gain over national liberation. This power vacuum allows Hamas and allied groups to dominate resistance efforts, complicating peace prospects. Wilkerson’s critique highlights the importance of leadership legitimacy and efficacy in conflict resolution, suggesting that without credible Palestinian leadership, peace efforts remain stalled.

  •  Human Rights Abuses in Conflict: The conversation reveals a stark contrast between international condemnation of Hamas and the overlooked, systemic abuses by Israeli authorities in prisons and detention centers. This double standard in media and political discourse fosters biased narratives that obscure the realities of occupation and conflict, hindering honest accountability and perpetuating suffering. Highlighting this imbalance calls for a reassessment of global human rights advocacy and media coverage in conflict zones.

  • ⚖️ Systemic Corruption and Political Cover-ups in the U.S.: Wilkerson draws parallels between historical political assassinations and contemporary scandals like Epstein’s, suggesting entrenched bipartisan efforts to prevent truth and accountability. This reflects a broader crisis of governance and justice in the U.S., where wealth and power insulate individuals from consequences, eroding public trust and democratic institutions. The insight stresses the need for systemic reform and vigilance against elite impunity.

  •  Geopolitical Realignments and Proxy Conflicts: The strengthening alliance between Russia and Iran amid escalating U.S.-led sanctions and military posturing signals a realignment of global power blocs. Wilkerson notes covert operations and proxy conflicts in Latin America, especially Venezuela, where private military contractors and intelligence operations create complex battlegrounds beyond traditional warfare. This insight points to the increasingly multipolar and covert nature of 21st-century conflicts, requiring nuanced diplomatic approaches.

  •  Nuclear Threat and Escalation Dynamics: The discussion around Israel’s potential use of tactical nuclear weapons introduces an alarming dimension to Middle Eastern conflicts. Wilkerson’s analysis suggests that such a move, while devastating, might paradoxically limit further escalation by creating a stark deterrent. This challenges conventional escalation theory and underscores the unpredictable nature of nuclear brinkmanship, emphasising the critical need for diplomatic de-escalation and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.

  •  Economic and Technological Pressures on Global Stability: The conversation touches on the absurdity of defence spending metrics based on GDP percentages and the artificial inflation of AI market bubbles, reflecting distorted economic priorities driven by military-industrial interests. This insight highlights how economic incentives can perpetuate conflict and contribute to systemic instability, calling for a reevaluation of economic models that prioritise profit over societal well-being and peace.

Conclusion

This video transcript reveals a profound and multifaceted analysis of contemporary geopolitical crises, exposing the intertwined nature of military strategy, political manipulation, human rights abuses, and systemic corruption. Col. Larry Wilkerson’s perspective challenges mainstream narratives, urging a deeper understanding of the forces shaping conflict and power in the modern world. His insights into leadership failures, covert operations, nuclear risks, and economic distortions provide a sobering reflection on the state of global affairs, emphasising the urgent need for transparency, accountability, and genuine diplomacy to avert further destabilization and suffering.

BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]

Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and valuable. 

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

“Russian Pilots Will Fly For Iran”: Why Israel Backed Down | Lawrence Wilkerson & Dennis Fritz

by Lawrence Wilkerson
written by Lawrence Wilkerson Approx. 36 Mins • Watch / read
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Jamarl Thomas
CHATS WITH
Col. (Rt.) Lawrence Wilkerson • Denis Fritz
Traducir—Translate!
Make fonts bigger>>>
Resize text-+=

"Russian Pilots Will Fly For Iran": Why Israel Backed Down | Lawrence Wilkerson & Dennis Fritz

Jamarl Thomas
Premiered 7 hours ago

Summary

The discussion centers on the ongoing conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, with a particular focus on the so-called Gaza ceasefire and the broader geopolitical ramifications involving Israel, Iran, Russia, China, and the United States. The guests, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson and Chief Dennis Fritz, provide critical perspectives on the legitimacy of the Gaza ceasefire, the intelligence failures or complicity surrounding Hamas’s willingness to negotiate, and the broader strategy of Israeli leadership under Benjamin Netanyahu. They argue that the ceasefire is a façade used by Netanyahu to continue military operations against Palestinians and to consolidate military strength for a potential wider conflict with Iran. The conversation also delves into the role of external powers such as Russia and China, whose support for Iran complicates the regional balance, and the likelihood of the U.S. being drawn into the conflict due to political obligations and alliances. The guests critique U.S. domestic politics, especially Congress’s silence and complicity, and emphasize the need for critical thinking regarding the narratives propagated about the conflict. They also highlight the humanitarian crisis resulting from Israeli tactics, including starvation and bombardment. Both guests foresee an escalation rather than resolution, with a possible large-scale war involving multiple Middle Eastern countries and global powers, and warn of the dire consequences this could have for the region and U.S. foreign policy.

Key Insights

  • ️ Complicity or Incompetence in Intelligence: The claim that Hamas was willing to negotiate a ceasefire for years yet the CIA and intelligence agencies were unaware or withheld this information suggests either a massive intelligence failure or deliberate complicity. This reveals the often opaque and politically motivated nature of intelligence sharing within U.S. agencies and between the U.S. and its allies. It underscores the complexity of intelligence politics where information can be manipulated to serve certain agendas rather than promote peace.

  • ⚖️ The Ceasefire as a Political Tool: Netanyahu’s pattern of using ceasefires strategically—not to end conflict but to regroup and intensify military operations—demonstrates how ceasefires can be weaponized as political tools. This tactic not only prolongs the conflict but also undermines genuine peace efforts, trapping civilians in ongoing violence and instability. It challenges the conventional understanding of ceasefires as steps toward peace and highlights the importance of scrutinizing the intentions behind peace agreements.

  •  Geopolitical Realignment and Escalation: The involvement of Russia and China in supporting Iran marks a significant shift in Middle Eastern geopolitics, turning what might have been a localized conflict into a proxy battleground involving major world powers. This alignment enhances Iran’s military capabilities and deters Israeli aggression, complicating U.S. foreign policy and increasing the risk of a broader war. The presence of Russian pilots and advanced weaponry in Iran signals a new level of military engagement that could escalate tensions rapidly.

  • ️ U.S. Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy: The guests’ criticism of the U.S. Congress for its silence and complicity in supporting Israel’s military actions reflects broader issues in American governance. Political considerations, including the influence of powerful lobbies and fear of political backlash, inhibit critical debate and accountability. This dynamic perpetuates U.S. involvement in conflicts without proper oversight or public scrutiny, raising questions about democratic governance and ethical foreign policy.

  •  Humanitarian Warfare and War Crimes: The strategy of cutting off food supplies and bombing humanitarian aid points to a form of warfare that targets civilian populations to achieve military objectives. This approach constitutes a war crime under international law and reflects a brutal tactic aimed at breaking the will of the Palestinian population through starvation and deprivation. It highlights the human cost of the conflict and the urgent need for international intervention to protect civilians.

  •  Historical Context and International Law: The discussion emphasizes that Palestinians under occupation have internationally recognized rights to resist oppression, complicating simplistic narratives that portray Hamas solely as aggressors. The mention of illegal combatants and the rights of occupied peoples challenges prevailing legal and moral frameworks, urging a nuanced understanding of the conflict grounded in international law and history. This perspective is critical for developing just and sustainable solutions.

  •  Future Outlook and Risks of Wider War: The speakers foresee no imminent end to the conflict, with the likelihood of escalation into a full-scale war involving Iran, Israel, and possibly other regional actors like Jordan, Egypt, and Iraq. The potential for U.S. military involvement is high due to political commitments and alliances. This forecast warns of devastating consequences not only for the Middle East but also for global stability, emphasizing the urgency for diplomatic solutions and re-evaluation of current policies.

Additional Analytical Commentary

The conversation reveals a pattern where official narratives—whether from the U.S. government, intelligence agencies, or Israeli leadership—obscure the realities on the ground. The guests challenge the dominant discourse, encouraging critical engagement with the facts and motives behind political decisions. The role of non-governmental actors like Jared Kushner and Witco in foreign policy highlights the blurring of lines between official and unofficial diplomacy, raising concerns about accountability and expertise.

Furthermore, the discussion about Russian pilots flying covertly in Iranian airspace to support Iran illustrates modern hybrid warfare tactics, where plausible deniability and indirect involvement become strategic tools. This practice complicates international responses and accountability, reflecting the evolving nature of global conflict.

The emphasis on the humanitarian dimension, especially the use of starvation as a weapon, draws attention to the ethical failures in conflict management and the urgent need for international legal action. The guests’ call for “wokeness” or heightened awareness represents a plea for informed public discourse and activism to challenge entrenched power structures and promote peace.

In sum, the dialogue paints a grim picture of entrenched conflict fueled by strategic deception, geopolitical rivalries, and domestic political inertia, underscoring the need for transformative approaches that prioritize human rights, transparency, and multilateral diplomacy.

BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]

Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and valuable. 

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail