Home ALT MEDIAPepe Escobar : How Trump’s Oily Dreams May Collapse in a Venezuelan Dark Pit

Pepe Escobar : How Trump’s Oily Dreams May Collapse in a Venezuelan Dark Pit

US energy majors balk at the sight of investing fortunes in a nation that may be engulfed by total chaos in the near future

by Pepe Escobar
Approx 30 mins. • Watch/ read
A+A-
Reset
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

Judge Napolitano
Traducir—Translate!
Make fonts bigger>>>
Resize text-+=


BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]


Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and valuable. 

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

You may also like

2 comments

Eric Arthur Blair January 11, 2026 - 11:18 pm

The US buggery of Venezuela turned out to self buggery of the US by the US.
Trump offered Venezuelan oil to the US oil company majors, which declared Venezuelan oil was “Un-Investible”.
The US incursion into Venezuela was not so much about oil, oil, oil as it was about the IDEA of oil, oil, oil, which turned out to be delusional.
Oil as a fuel to run industrial society? Only works if the EROEI is high enough, which is NOT the case for unconventional Orinoco extra heavy crude.
Oil as a means to restore the petrodollar? Even if Trump could get Venezuela to sell all it’s oil exclusively in USD (not gonna happen) this will have negligible effect of restoring the US petrodollar in world oil trade.
Oil as a means of establishing a new Ponzi scheme similar to the US shale fraud? Not if the US oil companies are unwilling to participate.
The whole cockamamie scheme was concocted by MORONS (mainly Elbridge Colby and Narco Rubio) who believed the oil industry hype / bullshit that Venezuela had 300+ billion of oil reserves ready for the taking, without actually understanding the tarry dirty nature of that oil or how dfficult it is to extract.
If only they had read my booklet explaining
“It’s the oilconomy stupid!!!” it would have saved them a lot of trouble…
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/disli90y1petqsz2g7noh/ITS-THE-OILCONOMY-STUPID-parts1to7.pdf?rlkey=s8ps9s14ym8g9kznc9c4o4jl0&st=ezqpebtz&dl=1

So why did China invest in Venezuela?
Because of Socialist Solidarity, being brothers in the Bolivaran revolution.

Reply
Eric Arthur Blair January 12, 2026 - 7:33 pm

Good to see that Ben Norton has done some research into the physical nature of Venezuela’s oil reserves
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbpdfPK8jVE
and instead of simply repeating the idiot mantra “Venezuela has the biggest proven oil reserves in the world” brainlessly spewed out by the LEMSO (Lying Establishment Media Sewer Outlets), Ben stated that most Venezuelan oil today requires imported diluent for extraction and pipeline transport.
Nevertheless there is still a long way to go for GPE to report petroleum matters properly.
Most important is to use PROPER TERMINOLOGY as specifically and precisely defined by the doyens of petroleum geophysics, namely M King Hubbert, Colin Campbell and Jean Laherrère, honest unprostituted SCIENTISTS.
Why? Because using Orwellian doublethink neo-definitions that have been pretzelised by the oil majors and oil PROPAGANDISTS (bullshit terminology and false conflations by the EIA and IEA and especially CERA) simply serve to confuse and promote LIES which then convince sucker investors to part with their money in bullshit oily ventures.
One of the biggest lies is conflating UNCONVENTIONAL shale LTO (also gas condensates* etc) with CONVENTIONAL crude oil output, lumping them together on oil output graphs, which I have explained is a BULLSHIT, in my booklet here:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/disli90y1petqsz2g7noh/ITS-THE-OILCONOMY-STUPID-parts1to7.pdf?rlkey=s8ps9s14ym8g9kznc9c4o4jl0&st=ezqpebtz&dl=1

*gas condensates are now re-branded by the propagandists as natural gas “LIQUIDS”, which is BULLSHIT because they are in fact GASES at STP. May as well describe IRON as a liquid, because it a liquid at 2000 deg Celsius. Such bullshit.

Other conflations are also highly problematic, eg describing Orinoco oil as “heavy crude”.
This confuses people into thinking Orinoco oil is the same as the heavy crude that flows out of conventional oil wells in, say Russia or Saudi Arabia.
IT IS NOT.
The proper term for Orinoco basin oil is UNCONVENTIONAL EXTRA-HEAVY crude, which does NOT flow out of wells and through pipes of its own accord.
This is essential to differentiate it from CONVENTIONAL heavy crude which DOES flow out of wells and through pipes of its own accord without needing steam injection or diluent.
The two have VERY VERY VERY different EROEI implications, which thus have HUGE economic and financial implications, which Ben also needs to research and report properly.
Other idiots keep calling shale oil “light sweet crude” because of the Goebbel-esque EIA, IEA and CERA deceitful conflations.
BULLSHIT.
Shale oil is volatile UNCONVENTIONAL LIGHT TIGHT OIL which CANNOT be fractionated into the workhorse fuels of industry and agriculture, diesel and jet fuel.
CONVENTIONAL light sweet crude however is FAR MORE VALUABLE than LTO because the forner CAN AND IS fractionated into the workhorse fuels of industry and agriculture, diesel and jet fuel.
Unless people use the proper terminologies, they will continue to be mindless brain hosts of the oil parasite propagandists who want to keep all of you ignorant and hoodwinked and invested in their SCAMS.
WAKE UP EVERYBODY, IT’S THE OILCONOMY STUPID!!!

Reply

Leave a Comment