Should This Gaza Documentary from Israeli Filmmakers Be Cheered?
Sep 25, 2026
This video features Glenn Greenwald discussing the controversy surrounding a new documentary titled Naza, which highlights the accounts of two dozen IDF soldiers regarding their actions in Gaza (0:20 - 0:59).
Key topics discussed:
- The Documentary: Naza is directed by Israeli filmmakers Yuval Abrahamand Rachel Szor. It features anonymous interviews with IDF soldiers who confess to committing various war crimes during the conflict, driven by their own experiences with guilt and PTSD (0:20 - 2:09).
- The Controversy: Despite receiving rave reviews, the film has faced sharp criticism from some pro-Palestinian activists. Critics, such as Ali Abunimahand Muhammad Shahada, argue that the film centers Israeli perspectives instead of Palestinian voices and question the morality of giving a platform to those who perpetrated the violence (2:31 - 4:48).
- Greenwald's Perspective: Greenwald acknowledges the frustration that Palestinian testimonies are often dismissed while Israeli admissions are treated as more credible. However, he argues that in the current political climate, such admissions from IDF soldiers serve as a powerful tool to change minds and build evidence against genocide deniers, regardless of the inherent biases involved (5:45 - 9:47, 13:12 - 15:26).
- Legal/Logical Parallel: Greenwald compares this to the concept of "statements against interest" in law, explaining that admissions from a party with an interest in the opposing outcome are often viewed as more reliable and persuasive to the public (10:39 - 13:12).
Some activists and critics argue against the documentary Naza for several key reasons, primarily centering on the ethics of the production and the dynamics of how Palestinian versus Israeli voices are valued (3:05 - 4:48, 15:51 - 16:26):
- Platforming Perpetrators: Critics like Ali Abunimah have described the film as a "nauseating spectacle," arguing that it is morally wrong to provide a platform and give standing ovations to individuals who have confessed to committing horrific crimes, such as torture and murder (3:10 - 3:40).
- Centering the Wrong Voices: A common critique is that the film focuses on the perspectives of IDF soldiers—the perpetrators—rather than centering the voices and experiences of Palestinians who have lived through the genocide and documented these events themselves (5:12 - 5:22, 16:00 - 16:26).
- Hypocrisy in Credibility: Activists like Muhammad Shahada have pointed out the hypocrisy of a world that dismisses Palestinian testimony as biased or unreliable, yet labels similar accounts from Israeli soldiers as "brave" or "extraordinary" (4:02 - 4:41).
While Glenn Greenwald acknowledges these valid frustrations and the "ugly" reality of why Israeli testimonies are often deemed more credible in the West, he argues that in the current political climate, these confessions can still be a strategically useful tool to change minds and counter genocide denial (5:45 - 9:47, 13:12 - 15:26).

