• HOME
  • ABOUT
  • MEDIA FRONT
  • BEIJING DISPATCH
  • RUSSIA DESK
  • VIRTUAL UNIV
  • NATURE
  • MUST VIDEO
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
The Greanville Post
The world is as it is because the way the majority of people in the most influential nations think, act and vote is being continuously manipulated by the powerful, for the powerful. The mainstream worldview is just a giant bundle of power-serving lies and manipulations..."—Caity Johnstone
Home CAPITALISM & SOCIALISM Khrushchev’s Dishonest Attack on the “Stalin Cult” (Role of Leaders in History)

Khrushchev’s Dishonest Attack on the “Stalin Cult” (Role of Leaders in History)

by Patrice de Bergeracpas June 1, 2021
June 1, 2021
Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPrint this post.

Our articles depend on you for their effectiveness. Share with kin, coworkers and friends.

EDITED AND HOSTED BY THE GREANVILLE POST


The Finnish Bolshevik




Khrushchev's Dishonest Attack on the "Stalin Cult" (Role of Leaders in History)



TheFinnishBolshevik
 
The Khrushchev Coup (Death of Stalin & Khrushchev's Rise to Power) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xWeM... The Moscow Trials https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... Script: https://mltheory.wordpress.com/2021/0...
 
SOURCES:
THE 'CULT OF THE INDIVIDUAL' (1934-52) by Bill Bland
http://ml-review.ca/aml/BLAND/CultJVS...

Khrushchev, Report to the Central Committee, 20th Congress of the CPSU Khrushchev, "The Secret Speech" in The Crimes Of The Stalin Era, Special Report To The 20th Congress Of The Communist Party Of The Soviet Union, p. 554

J. V. Stalin, Reply to the Greetings of the Workers of the Chief Railway Workshops in Tiflis J. V. Stalin, Letter to Comrade Shatunovsky, August 1930 J.V. Stalin, Speech Delivered at the First All-Union Congress of Collective Farm Shock Brigadiers J. V. Stalin, Letter on Publications for Children Directed to the Central Committee of the All Union Communist Youth J. V. Stalin, Talk With Colonel Robins, May 13 1933 R. Medvedev, Let History Judge L. Pistrak, The Grand Tactician: Khrushchev's Rise to Power https://www.rbth.com/history/332610-w... L. Feuchtwanger, Moscow 1937 A. Tuominen, Bells of the Kremlin J. V. Stalin, An Interview with the German Author Emil Ludwig I didn't mention this in the video, but this book points out that Stalin's only involvement in the writing of his 1948 biography, was that Stalin diminished his own role. (pp. 117-121) https://archive.org/details/pdfy-nmIG...

My blog https://mltheory.wordpress.com/

TRANSCRIPT
Khrushchev’s Dishonest Attack on the “Stalin Cult” (And the Role of Leaders in History)

17 MAY 2021

Why did Khrushchev attack the “Cult of Personality”?

In 1956 the Soviet revisionist leader Nikita Khrushchev launched his attack on Stalin, the so-called “De-stalinization” and attack against the “Cult of the Individual”:

“It is of paramount importance to re-establish and to strengthen in every way the Leninist principle of collective leadership… The Central Committee… vigorously condemns the cult of the individual as being alien to the spirit of Marxism-Leninism”.
(Khrushchev, Report to the Central Committee, 20th Congress of the CPSU).

“…the cult of the individual acquired such monstrous size chiefly because Stalin himself, using all conceivable methods, supported the glorification of his own person”.
(Khrushchev, “The Secret Speech” in The Crimes Of The Stalin Era, Special Report To The 20th Congress Of The Communist Party Of The Soviet Union, p. 554)

Khrushchev attacked the cult of personality in order:
-to hijack the already existing criticism of cult-like behavior.*
-to attack his rivals by labeling them “Stalinists”
-to rehabilitate Tito
-to justify changes to policy and revision of theory

*for instance, according to Hungarian anti-communist historian Balázs Apor, there was already significant criticism of the ‘cult of personality"  before Khrushchev’s rise to power, but this criticism was never targeted against Stalin. (Source: Apor, The Invisible Shining)

Khrushchev’s project was accepted to the degree that it was, because it was legitimate to criticize the personality cult, though Khrushchev himself did it for false reasons.

Stalin Opposed the Cult of Personality

Khrushchev claimed Stalin orchestrated the Cult of Personality. But in reality Stalin always opposed it:

“I must say in all conscience, comrades, that I do not deserve a good half of the flattering things that have been said here about me…”
(J. V. Stalin, Reply to the Greetings of the Workers of the Chief Railway Workshops in Tiflis)

“You speak of your devotion to me… I would advise you to discard the ‘principle’ of devotion to persons. It is not the Bolshevik way. Be devoted to the working class, its Party, its state. That is a fine and useful thing. But do not confuse it with devotion to persons, this vain and useless bauble of weak-minded intellectuals.”
(J. V. Stalin, Letter to Comrade Shatunovsky, August 1930)

“The times have passed when leaders were regarded as the only makers of history, while the workers and peasants were not taken into account. The destinies of nations and of states are now determined, not only by leaders, but primarily and mainly by the vast masses of the working people. The workers and the peasants, who without fuss and noise are building factories and mills, constructing mines and railways, building collective farms and state farms, creating all the values of life, feeding and clothing the whole world they are the real heroes and the creators of the new life.” (J.V. Stalin, Speech Delivered at the First All-Union Congress of Collective Farm Shock Brigadiers)

“I am absolutely against the publication of ‘Stories of the Childhood of Stalin’. The book abounds with a mass of inexactitudes of fact, of alterations, of exaggerations and of unmerited praise… the important thing resides it the fact that the book has a tendency to engrave on the minds of Soviet children (and people in general) the personality cult of leaders, of infallible heroes. This is dangerous and detrimental. The theory of ‘heroes’ and the ‘crowd’ is not a Bolshevik, but a Social-Revolutionary theory. I suggest we burn this book”.
(J. V. Stalin, Letter on Publications for Children Directed to the Central Committee of the All Union Communist Youth)

Stalin never accepted being equated with Lenin. He was only a continuer of Lenin’s work, a supporter of Lenin’s program:

“Robins: …throughout Russia I have found the names Lenin-Stalin, Lenin-Stalin, Lenin-Stalin, linked together.
Stalin: That, too, is an exaggeration. How can I be compared to Lenin?”
(J. V. Stalin, Talk With Colonel Robins, May 13 1933)

”MOLOTOV (. . . stated that he is and will always be a faithful disciple of Stalin.)
STALIN (interrupting Molotov): This is nonsense. I have no students at all. We are all students of the great Lenin.”
(Unpublished Speech by Stalin at the Plenum of the Central Committee, CPSU October 16, 1952)

Who really promoted the personality Cult?

Radek

The Cult of Personality was dishonestly fostered by Stalin’s enemies, by traitors who used it to promote their own careers or used it to hide their anti-Leninist positions. A good example of this was the Trotskyist Radek:

“The first issue of ‘Pravda;’ for 1934 carried a huge two-page article by Radek, heaping orgiastic praise on Stalin. The former Trotskyite, who had led the opposition to Stalin for many years, now called him ‘Lenin’s best pupil, the model of the Leninist Party, bone of its bone, blood of its blood’… He ‘is as far-sighted as Lenin’, and so on and on. This seems to have been the first large article in the press specifically devoted to the adulation of Stalin” (R. Medvedev, Let History Judge, p. 148).

Mikoyan

On the occasion of the celebration of Stalin’s fiftieth birthday in December 1929, Anastas Mikoyan accompanied his congratulations with the demand “that we, meeting the rightful demand of the masses, begin finally to work on his biography and make it available to the Party and to all working people in our country”. (‘Izvestia’, 21 December 1929, cited in: L. Pistrak: ibid,;164).

Ten years later, on the occasion of Stalin’s sixtieth birthday in December 1939, Mikoyan was still urging the creation of a “scientific biography” (‘Pravda’, 21 December 1939, cited in: L. Pistrak: ibid,.; p. 158) of Stalin.

An official biography was finally published in 1948. Khrushchev’s crony Mikoyan had been calling for such a biography for 20 years. But what did Khrushchev say in his ‘secret speech’? Khrushchev claimed that the book was created on Stalin’s instructions:

“One of the most chararacteristic examples of Stalin’s self-glorification and of his lack of even elementary modesty is the edition of his ‘Short Biography’. This book is an example of the most dissolute flattery”. (Khrushchev, “The Secret Speech” in The Crimes Of The Stalin Era, Special Report To The 20th Congress Of The Communist Party Of The Soviet Union, p. 554)

Grover Furr citing L.V. Maksimenkov points out that Stalin’s only involvement in the writing of his 1948 biography, was that Stalin diminished his own role. (Khrushchev Lied, pp. 117-121)

Ezhov

The right-wing opportunist and anti-Stalin traitor Ezhov was also a major builder of the “cult” around Stalin. Ezhov even demanded that the name of Moscow be changed to “Stalinodar” or “Gift of Stalin”. However, Stalin succeeded in preventing this from taking place:

“Ezhov commanded his subjects to create a project of renaming Moscow to Stalinodar (translated as “Stalin’s gift”)… But Ezhov didn’t take into account that Stalin hated plain flattery. He dismissed the suggestion as “foolish.”… There are accounts that Moscow was subject to another renaming campaign after WWII, (but Stalin refused the suggestion again)”
https://www.rbth.com/history/332610-why-bolsheviks-never-renamed-moscow

According to Sarah Davies in The Leader Cult in Communist Dictatorships: Stalin and the Eastern Bloc “On 20 May 1936, Stalin raised an item ‘On renaming towns etc.’ as a result of which the Politburo agreed to ban from 1 June 1936 the renaming of towns, small towns, district centres and railway stations.” (p. 41)

Khrushchev

However, the biggest architect of the “cult” was Khrushchev himself:

“It was Khrushchev who introduced the term ‘vozhd’ (‘leader’, corresponding to the German word ‘Fuhrer’).”
(Bland, THE ‘CULT OF THE INDIVIDUAL’ (1934-52))

At the Moscow Party Conference in January 1932, Khrushchev finished his speech by saying:

“The Moscow Bolsheviks, rallied around the Leninist Central Committee as never before, and around the ‘vozhd’ of our Party, Comrade Stalin, are cheerfully and confidently marching toward new victories in the battles for socialism, for world proletarian revolution”. (‘Rabochaya Moskva’, 26 January 1932, cited in: L. Pistrak: ‘The Grand Tactician: Khrushchev’s Rise to Power’; London; 1961; p. 159).

At the 17th Party Conference in January 1934 it was Khrushchev, and Khrushchev alone, who called Stalin “vozhd of genius”. (XVII s’ezd Vsesoiuznoi Kommunisticheskoi Partii (B.); p, 145, cited in: L. Pistrak: ibid.; p. 160).

In August 1936, during the Zinoviev-Kamenev trial, Khrushchev, in his capacity as Moscow Party Secretary, said:

“Miserable pygmies! They lifted their hands against the greatest of all men. . . . our wise ‘vozhd’, Comrade Stalin! Thou, Comrade Stalin, hast raised the great banner of Marxism-Leninism high over the entire world and carried it forward. We assure thee, Comrade Stalin, that the Moscow Bolshevik organisation — the faithful supporter of the Stalinist Central Committee — will increase Stalinist vigilance still more, will extirpate the Trotskyite-Zinovievite remnants, and close the ranks of the Party and non-Party Bolsheviks even more around the Stalinist Central Committee and the great Stalin”. (‘Pravda’, 23 August 1936, cited in: L. Pistrak: ibid,; p. 162).

At the Eighth All-Union Congress of Soviets in November 1936 it was again Khrushchev who proposed that the new Soviet Constitution, which was before the Congress for approval, should be called the ‘Stalinist Constitution’ because “it was written from beginning to end by Comrade Stalin himself”. (‘Pravda’, 30 November 1936, cited in: L. Pistrak: ibid.; p. 161).

“It has to be noted that Vyacheslav Molotov and Andrey Zhdanov did not mention any special role by Stalin in the drafting of the Constitution.” (Bland)

Why did the opportunists promote the Cult?

They did it to hide their own revisionism, to promote their own careers by trying to attach themselves to Stalin. Radek and Ezhov were conspiring against Stalin but they could never have defeated him openly. Radek and Ezhov pretended to be good loyal communists, when in fact they were not.

One might ask, “isn’t it counter-productive to foster this kind of hero-worship of Stalin, if one’s goal is to overthrow him?”. One might think it is counter-productive, yet that’s exactly what Khrushchev did successfully. Khrushchev promoted the cult more then anyone else, and used it to promote himself. But in the end he blamed the cult entirely on Stalin (who never even supported it) and Khrushchev then presented himself as some kind of great ‘democrat’ who fought against the cult!

Stalin knew that the cult was at least partially supported by traitors and opportunists, and he fought against it. He always gave credit to others, to the masses, to the party, and reminded people that the “great-man” theory of history is idealist.

The German writer Lion Feuchtwanger wrote:

“It is manifestly irksome to Stalin to be worshipped as he is, and from time to time he makes fun of it… Of all the men I know who have power, Stalin is the most unpretentious. I spoke frankly to him about the vulgar and excessive cult made of him, and he replied with equal candour… He thinks it is possible even that ‘wreckers’ may be behind it in an attempt to discredit him”.
(L. Feuchtwanger, Moscow 1937, pp. 93, 94-95)

The Finnish revisionist Arvo Tuominen wrote about a certain incident at a new years’ party in 1935. At this party Stalin parodied those who tried to suck up to him. He said:

“Comrades! I want to propose a toast to our patriarch, life and sun, liberator of nations, architect of socialism (he rattled off all the appelations applied to him in those days), Josef Vissarionovich Stalin, and I hope this is the first and last speech made to that genius this evening”.
(A. Tuominen, Bells of the Kremlin, p. 162).

Definition of “Cult of Personality”

In his attack against the “cult of Stalin” Khrushchev doesn’t treat the issue scientifically or in a marxist way at all. He never properly defines what the “Cult of Personality” even is. Khrushchev was not a theoretician, and did not understand what the role of individuals in history is. For Khrushchev, the “cult” was something vague like people singing songs about Stalin, naming cities after him, carrying pictures of him, and generally voicing their admiration and support for Stalin.

However, there is nothing inherently “cultish” or bad in admiring someone who legitimately has achieved something great. It only becomes a “cult” when the person in question is treated as an infallible god, and when people don’t simply respect his wise opinion, but uncritically accept everything without even thinking with their own brains.

Khrushchev never gave an exact explanation like this. Once again, Stalin had the correct position:

“Decisions of individuals are, always, or nearly always, one-sided decisions… In every collective body, there are people whose opinion must be reckoned with… From the experience of three revolutions we know that out of every 100 decisions taken by individual persons without being tested and corrected collectively, approximately 90 are one-sided…”
(J. V. Stalin, An Interview with the German Author Emil Ludwig)

A cult of personality promotes the idealist “great-man” theory of history. Stalin correctly said:

“the personality cult of leaders, of infallible heroes… is dangerous and detrimental. The theory of ‘heroes’ and the ‘crowd’ is not a Bolshevik, but a Social-Revolutionary theory.”
(J. V. Stalin, Letter on Publications for Children Directed to the Central Committee of the All Union Communist Youth)

The “great-man” theory is a remnant of bourgeois society and bourgeois ideology. To avoid this mistake, many Marxists today totally underestimate and disregard the importance of individuals and leaders. However, individuals and leaders do matter. It is not an irrelevant issue whether Stalin or Trotsky becomes the party leader, it is actually a very important issue.

“Marxism does not deny at all the role played by outstanding individuals or that history is made by people. But great people are worth anything at all only to the extent that they are able correctly to understand these conditions, to understand how to change them. If they fail to understand these conditions and want to alter them according to the promptings of their imagination, they will find themselves in the situation of Don Quixote… With us personages of the greatest authority are reduced to nonentities, become mere ciphers, as soon as the masses of the workers lose confidence in them”.
(J. V. Stalin, An Interview with the German Author Emil Ludwig)

To become a revolutionary leader, a person must win the support of the masses and correctly understand objective conditions.

Individuals always represent classes and tendencies. Stalin represented the proletarian political line, and thus relied on marxist theory and the support of the workers. Khrushchev represented a bourgeois line, the line which he pursued ended up restoring capitalism. Building socialism – a new superior type of system – requires a scientific theory and class consciousness. It is not easy to overthrow capitalism and the centuries of habits from class society. However, Marxist-Leninist theory provides the necessary answers for this work. In hindsight we can clearly see the erroneous policies and wrong positions introduced by the Khrushchevites, and avoid them in the future.


If you find the above useful, pass it on! Become an "influence multiplier"! 

The battle against the Big Lie killing the world will not be won by you just reading this article. It will be won when you pass it on to at least 2 other people, requesting they do the same. 


Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
It's super easy! Sign up to receive our FREE bulletin.  Get TGP selections in your mailbox. No obligation of any kind. All addresses secure and never sold or commercialised. 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Up to You.

^3000US citizens have no real political representation.

We don't live in a democracy. And our freedom is disappearing fast.

I don't want to be ruled by hypocrites, whores, and war criminals.

What about you? Time to push back against the corporate oligarchy.

And its multitude of minions and lackeys.


The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post


Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


 

 

black-horizontal

0 0 votes
Article Rating
All comments subject to anti-hacking filters.
          
1 comment 0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinVKRedditWhatsappTelegramEmail
previous post
Finnish Bolshevik: What liberals need to understand (Response to Jimmy Dore)
next post
Your Daily Tweetios

Related Articles

INDISPENSABLE—Michael Hudson interviewed by Ben Norton (Multipolarista)/ Update...

July 1, 2022

Is New Colombian President Really Left Wing?

June 30, 2022

How ‘Democracies’ Degenerate Into Minoritarian Right-Wing Governments (Aristocracies)

June 30, 2022

An example of China’s backwardness and poverty (not!)...

June 30, 2022

The Conspiracy Against Nuclear Energy: How Big Oil...

June 29, 2022

Lockdowns Actually Saved SHOCKINGLY Few Lives – Fake...

June 24, 2022

Hamas renews ties with Syria, which may signal...

June 24, 2022

Jimmy Dore Delivers Fiery Rant On Tucker Carlson

June 23, 2022

Like most regimes in the Western bloc, the...

June 21, 2022

My Run-In With A Glowie

June 14, 2022
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ajax search

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Buy me a coffee? Thanks!

I keep my mind clean. I NEVER read the NYTimes. Or watch CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc. I just don’t trust the capitalist media.

Have you done it yet?

Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days.


The American Mental No-Fly Zone


GET YOUR NEWS & EDUCATION IN REAL POLITICS / VISIT THESE SITES

The VIneyard of the Saker
The Grayzone
Richard Medhurst
Moon of Alabama
Multipolarista
The Jimmy Dore Show
New Atlas
Caitlin Johnstone
Glenn Greenwald
Caleb Maupin
China Rising/ Jeff J. Brown
Reminiscence of the Future

The PERFECT book for our time. In print and electronic editions.




“The Russian Peace Threat is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand what is driving the insane US effort to gin up a new cold war with both Russia and China…”—Dave Lindorff

Available on Amazon and other leading distributors.

POSTS OF PERMANENT INTEREST

  • INDISPENSABLE—Michael Hudson interviewed by Ben Norton (Multipolarista)/ Update with transcript →

  • Imperial Narrative Control Has Five Distinct Elements →

  • The Mainstream Worldview Is Self-Evidently Bullshit: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix →

  • World-Controlling Bilderberg Group Meeting Discovered By Journalists →

  • Plot To Take Down Anti-War Journalists Exposed! →

  • Paul Mason Says Bellingcat Launders Information For Western Intelligence →

  • Regis Tremblay sums up the Ukrainian War, from its sordid origins to its global consequences →

  • The Subtleties of Anti-Russia Leftist Rhetoric →

  • OpEds: Operation Bagration was the real D-Day →

  • Russia’s 1945 Victory Day’s Greatest Documentary (Great Videos Series)/ with subtitles →

  • The persecution of Julian Assange →

  • Biden’s move to impose a DHS board to combat “online disinformation” hits some rough seas →

  • Margaret Kimberley: Obama wants censorship →

  • Eva Bartlett reports on the tragic Donbass war and how the revolting Western presstitutes hide the truth →

  • The Truth About Nazism in Ukraine and Elsewhere →

  • How the Ukrainian Nationalist Movement Post-WWII was Bought and Paid for by the CIA →

  • Russian small town remembers its heroic Soviet wartime past. →

  • The “Chemical Weapons” Hoax Conclusively Debunked. About Time. →

  • PAUL EDWARDS: AMERICA’S NO-FLY ZONE →

  • Under Fire from Ukraine and Misperceived by the West, The People of the DPR Share Their Stories →

Without your help, we can’t survive. It’s that simple.


 

More pages of compelling interest


SPECIAL SECTIONS
•MYTH-FREE HISTORY WITH JACQUES PAUWELS

•ARMAGEDDON
•AUTHORS
•WORLD DESK
•CAPITALISM
•THE FINNISH BOLSHEVIK

 

The Yellow Vests phenomenon explained! Is there hope for a new European left?

Gateways

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Legalities: Disclaimer, etc.


Disclaimer Notice

 

Republishing Our Articles.

Amplify the message.


The world is now facing its most threatening crisis in history. Because of that many of the “proprieties” of normal life under the regime of private property should be regarded as secondary to the survival of humanity, the innocent creatures who accompany us, and the avoidance of planetary collapse. That and stopping more devastating wars based on shameless fabrications, the entrenchment of fascism, and even a nuclear armageddon. In this damnable context, the first obligation for anyone rational and decent is to get the word out. Thus, in support of the unrestricted flow of vital information, all our original content can be reblogged or republished without permission, provided we are fully credited, with a hyperlink to the source, or (in printed matter) our full URL is displayed. Simple as that.

The Armageddon Chronicles


Indispensable reading.
earth-on fire pixabay PD 1023859_1920

 

Did you miss it?

  • RELIGION & THE TREATMENT OF GOD’S CREATURES July 3, 2022
  • You’re either with us or you’re a “systemic challenge” July 1, 2022
  • Regis Tremblay: Me A Guest on FOREIGN POLICY REVIEW PUTIN, THE BRICS AND THE WWIII July 1, 2022
  • INDISPENSABLE—Michael Hudson interviewed by Ben Norton (Multipolarista)/ Update with transcript July 1, 2022
  • Is Gustavo Petro Corrupt? A Response to Faulty Analysis on Colombia’s Election June 30, 2022
  • Is New Colombian President Really Left Wing? June 30, 2022
  • How ‘Democracies’ Degenerate Into Minoritarian Right-Wing Governments (Aristocracies) June 30, 2022
  • Scientific evidence of cats not giving a f*ck June 30, 2022
  • An example of China’s backwardness and poverty (not!) 😂 June 30, 2022
  • The Conspiracy Against Nuclear Energy: How Big Oil Built the Ecology Movement to Demonize Nuclear Energy Competition June 29, 2022
  • Imperial Narrative Control Has Five Distinct Elements June 28, 2022
  • Oliver Stone’s Ukraine on Fire, a must-see documentary June 28, 2022

Moving homage by WW I soldiers to the millions of horses, mules and other animals killed in the war. Innocent souls, victims of human evil.

Click on the image!

Tomy in May’22

 

animalito, Puntito, and Sombra. We miss you.

L’Internationale by Chinese brothers and sisters

Ode to Joy -humanity’s anthem

@2017 - PenciDesign. All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign

The Greanville Post
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • MEDIA FRONT
  • BEIJING DISPATCH
  • RUSSIA DESK
  • VIRTUAL UNIV
  • NATURE
  • MUST VIDEO

Read alsox

INDISPENSABLE—Michael Hudson interviewed by Ben Norton...

July 1, 2022

Is New Colombian President Really Left...

June 30, 2022

How ‘Democracies’ Degenerate Into Minoritarian Right-Wing...

June 30, 2022
wpDiscuz
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply