[su_spoiler title=”Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise. ” open=”yes” style=”fancy” icon=”arrow-circle-1″]
U.S. President Whose Domestic Job-Approval is 41% Calls Chinese President Whose Domestic Job-Approval is Above 80% China’s ‘Dictator’.
And that’s not the ONLY indication of U.S. President Joe Biden’s being mentally deranged.
As I headlined on 22 August 2022, “NATO-Affiliated Poll in 53 Countries Finds Chinese the Most Think Their Country Is a Democracy”, and though 49% of Americans said “Yes” to “My country is a democracy,” 83% of Chinese did — and who is better able to say whether America is a democracy than the people who live in America are? And who is better able to say whether China is a democracy than the people who live in China are? Whereas China ranked #1 on that measure, America ranked as either #40 or #41, tied with Colombia on it, out of the 53 countries that were surveyed.
Furthermore, the only other international poll in which the residents within a number of different countries rate their own Government is the Edelman Trust Barometer, and I headlined about that on 24 March 2023, “How Nations’ Citizens Rate Their Own Government” and reported (and linked to the Edelman Trust Barometer 2022, which has the data): Whereas 39% of Americans said they trust their Government, 91% of Chinese did. Again, China ranked #1. U.S. ranked #20, out of the 28 nations that were surveyed.
FURTHERMORE: America is the only country that has been quantitatively analyzed by the most up-to-date methods in empirical political science in order to determine whether it is more of a democracy (where the Government is controlled by and reflects the priorities of its residents — more one-person-one-vote than one-dollar-one-vote) or instead more of an aristocracy (or “oligarchy”) (where the Government is controlled by and reflects the priorities of only its super-rich — more one-dollar-one-vote than one-person-one-vote — more one-dollar-one-vote than one-person-one-vote). All of those empirical studies and analyses have shown unequivocally that America is definitely an aristocracy not a democracy. Joe Biden and the U.S. Congress and the U.S. courts represent the super-rich, not the public. The evidence on this — the scientific analyses on this question — is at least as clear that President Biden represents only America’s super-rich (the richest 0.01%) as the polling-based findings are which show, essentially, that a majority of Americans recognize that their Government does NOT represent them. And, one of those scientific analyses even showed that the richest 0.01% of Americans donated 57.16% of all the money that was spent in political campaigns, and that merely the 400 richest Americans had donated 29.86% of the campaign money.
Given the empirical evidence being so unequivocally clear on this matter: Is it more likely that Joe Biden was merely mentally deranged when he said that the President of China is a ‘dictator’; or, instead, that he knows what the facts are in this matter, and was consciously lying about it? Or, might the explanation be some combination of both — that he was saying it only in order to fool the public about the matter, but that he doesn’t really care enough about the matter to find out what the empirical data on it are, much less what they show? (My guess is that it was a combination of both.)
[su_box title=”About the author” style=”bubbles” radius=”12″]Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.[/su_box]
Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]

[su_animate type=”fadeInRightBig” duration=”1.5″]
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW[/su_animate]

[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS






1 comment
RE: “Or, might the explanation be some combination of both — that he was saying it only in order to fool the public about the matter, but that he doesn’t really care enough about the matter to find out what the empirical data on it are, much less what they show? (My guess is that it was a combination of both.)”
I think I agree with your conclusion – that ‘it was a combination of both.’
However, does it really matter? I don’t know why the USA (Unjust Sordid Affliction) doesn’t just appoint a roughly equivalent jackass (hell, maybe Mr. Ed is still available?) to convey endless lies and chicanery? After all, a US’ appointee is generally forbidden from speaking extemporaneously; he or she only needs to read the teleprompter and enthusiastically – with that bogus smile – deceive the American public and execute the dictates from the festering billionaire class. Moreover, maximizing profit is paramount to corporate USA; therefore, a random organic jackass represents significant savings in comparison to the incessant bribing required for that other fictitious jackass referred to in your essay!