GARLAND NIXON—In this extensive conversation between Garland Nixon and Joti Brar, the discussion centers on geopolitical conflicts, particularly the war in Ukraine, and the broader implications for global imperialism, economic systems, and socialist legacies. The dialogue critiques the so-called “19-point peace plan” involving Ukraine, highlighting the puppet status of Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, who, despite signing agreements, lacks genuine authority due to internal opposition and external imperialist control. The speakers argue that NATO and Western powers, especially the US, are in denial about their defeat in Ukraine, relying on sustained military support to continue the conflict. This failure signals a shift in global power dynamics, challenging Western military and economic dominance.
CLASS ANALYSIS
-
Belarus exemplifies rational socialist planning: clean cities, organic food, and a resilient hybrid economy.
-
Richard D. Wolff & Michael Hudson: The West Is LOSING Control
Ursula von der Leyen and Josep Borrell, act primarily on behalf of NATO and U.S. neoconservative interests rather than representing the will of European voters.Approx 1 Hr. • Watch/ readDW—This discussion, dated November 20th, 2025, features Richard Wolff and Michael Hudson analyzing the deteriorating economic and geopolitical situation in Europe amid ongoing tensions related to the Ukraine conflict, U.S. tariffs, and shifting global alliances. The central theme revolves around Europe’s strategic and economic crisis driven by its dependence on the United States, the severing of cheap Russian energy supplies, and the pivot toward militarization as a response to geopolitical pressures. Europe is portrayed as trapped in a self-destructive spiral, sacrificing its industrial base and economic prosperity to serve U.S. geopolitical interests, particularly in fighting Russia and China. This shift has led to the decline of traditional manufacturing sectors in Germany, France, and other key European economies, with military-industrial stocks rising as the sole bright spot in the European markets.
-
The Tucker / Fuentes Interview: Why all the Uproar?
The Fuentes Insurgency May Challenge Trump's (and the Empire's) Slavish Deference Toward IsraelApprox 2 Hous 26 mins • Watch / readPG—The personal anecdotes about censorship, social alienation, and physical threats paint a stark picture of the risks associated with political dissent in the current polarized environment. Fuentes’ views on the societal impacts of drug use, internet culture, and pornography highlight a generational crisis that transcends politics, touching on mental health, social cohesion, and cultural continuity. His prescription for a hardline approach to immigration enforcement and political opposition reflects an urgent, zero-sum worldview driven by fears of national decline and cultural displacement.
-
The Highest Form of Democracy: The Grassroots Campaign of Yves Engler
A GENUINE RADICAL IS RUNNING IN CANADA AND THE ESTABLISHMENT IS ALREADY PLAYING DIRTY TRICKS TO STOP HIM.by Kim PetersenApprox 1 Hr 20 mins • Watch / readKIM PETERSEN—Yves Engler is a slim, bespectacled man who usually is seen wearing jeans, a button-up sleeved shirt or t-shirt. He looks like an everyday person. There is no pretentiousness. He looks like most of us. Engler epitomizes grassroots.
Engler is a writer/author/podcaster. When he writes or talks, he speaks to the aspirations of everyday people. He eschews wars, racism, and poverty. He stands for the rights of Indigenous peoples, social justice, and protecting the environment.
-
This video is an insightful conversation with VJ Prashad, director of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research, discussing China’s unique socialist development, its global role, and lessons for the Global South. Prashad emphasizes that China is still in the process of building socialism, highlighting that socialism is a complex, protracted endeavor rather than a binary state. Although China has capitalists, they do not form a capitalist class with political control, due to the Communist Party’s central role. He refutes the notion that China’s modern infrastructure and wealth disqualify it from being socialist, arguing that the elimination of poverty and social security are better indicators of socialism than skyscrapers or capitalist-style urbanization.

