16
Be sure to share these materials with friends, kin, and workmates.
Due Dissidence
Keaton Weiss • Russell Dobular
Some of the most repugnant characters in America's power elite are going after Ruffalo, but, fortunately, their poison is not what it used to be.
BIO NOTE: Safra Ada Catz (64) is an Israeli-American business executive. She is the executive vice chair and former CEO of Oracle Corporation. She has been an executive at Oracle since April 1999, and a board member since 2001. In April 2011, she was named co-president and chief financial officer, reporting to founder Larry Ellison
This video from Due Dissidence discusses the controversy surrounding actor Mark Ruffalo, who faced backlash for criticizing a potential merger between Paramount and Warner Bros (0:00-0:25, 7:08-7:16).
Key points include:
- The Controversy: Mark Ruffalo accused the Ellison family—who are associated with the tech giant Oracle and involved in the merger—of being complicit in the humanitarian crisis in Gaza due to Oracle's technological support for the Israeli military (0:00-1:41, 7:16-7:40).
- The Backlash: Several organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, accused Ruffalo of using antisemitic tropes for linking the merger to the war in Gaza (1:48-2:43).
- The Support: Numerous prominent figures, including Jane Fonda and over 170 Jewish industry professionals, signed an open letter defending Ruffalo, arguing that his comments are a protected exercise of free speech and that linking media consolidation to foreign policy is not antisemitic (3:32-5:15, 5:35-8:02).
- Media Critique: The hosts criticize "anti-woke" and "nerd-focused" YouTube channels for siding with the merger proponents and attacking Ruffalo, suggesting these creators are motivated by algorithmic incentives or a desire to gain access to Hollywood insiders (12:12-14:57, 20:00-21:28).
The hosts conclude by highlighting the growing shift in public discourse, noting that a significant portion of American Jews now voice concerns regarding Israel's military actions, which they argue makes the "antisemitism" label increasingly ineffective as a tool to silence dissent (7:58-8:38, 22:16-24:00).
