
Ben Norton
Geopolitical Economy Report
| Traducir—Translate! | |
| Make fonts bigger>>> | Resize text-+= |
In insane speech, Marco Rubio asks Europe to help US recolonize Global South
PRECIS
Rubio received a standing ovation for his repugnant, utterly reactionary speech. Among those applauding was NATO's former chief, Jens Stoltenberg.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave one of the most overtly colonial speeches at the Munich Security Conference in Germany on Saturday, 14th February, where he reminisced about 500 years of Western colonialism and how it expanded to "settle new continents, build vast empires extending out across the globe.” Rubio’s nostalgic hymn to “five centuries” of Western imperialism erases who paid the price: indigenous peoples annihilated, Africans enslaved, and colonised societies gutted so Europe and the U.S. could accumulate wealth. The “missionaries, pilgrims, soldiers, explorers” he romanticises were also agents of land theft, forced conversion, and mass killings. Treating that era as a civilizational achievement rather than the apex of organised human suffering reveals the worldview animating the new Trump administration: domination dressed up as destiny.
Today, this same logic plays out on the empire’s frontiers. The genocides in Gaza, eastern Congo, and Sudan show how expendable entire populations become once they are consigned to the periphery of a crumbling imperial order. As core states scramble to maintain hegemony, those on the margins are left to starve, be bombed, or be massacred. Rubio, whom critics derisively call “Narco Rubio” over disputed allegations about Miami drug networks, epitomises this hypocrisy. While the CIA, at the behest of US presidents, has long been enabling or weaponizing drug trafficking through right‑wing militias in Latin America, Rubio orchestrated the kidnapping of Venezuela’s sitting president under the banner of “narco‑terrorism.”
Simultaneously, he champions ever harsher measures on Cuba that function as a merciless blockade, squeezing hospitals, schools, and food supplies in a country already under siege. This is not “democracy promotion”; it is a crime against humanity. Rubio’s invitation to Europe to “walk together again” is thus chilling. It signals a project of rebooted colonialism—run by the Trump, billionaire, intelligence, and Epstein elite—that risks accelerating global conflict.
Alternative Summary
The video analyzes the historical trajectory and contemporary dynamics of Western colonialism, focusing particularly on the United States’ current foreign policy stance as articulated by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The speaker outlines the rise and fall of Western empires, emphasizing that after centuries of colonial expansion, the decolonization movements following World War II liberated much of Africa, Asia, and Latin America from European and Japanese empires. Despite this, some colonial territories remain under U.S., French, and British control, but these are mostly small islands with limited populations.
The core argument centers on the renewed push by the U.S. and its European allies to reverse this decolonization and reclaim global dominance through neo-colonial means. Rubio’s speech at the Munich Security Conference is scrutinized as an explicit call to revive Western imperialism, celebrating colonial history, rejecting guilt over colonial crimes, and advocating for a united transatlantic front to “recolonize” parts of the world. Rubio frames decolonization as a product of “godless communist revolutions” and anti-colonial uprisings that weakened Western civilization, portraying such movements negatively and whitewashing the atrocities committed by colonial powers.
In contrast, China’s foreign minister Wang Yi’s speech is presented as an opposing vision advocating for genuine multilateralism, respect for sovereign equality, and defending the post-colonial global order. China promotes a multipolar world where the global south has a stronger voice and rejects imperialism and unilateralism, positioning itself as a defender of sovereignty and international law. This ideological clash between the U.S. and China encapsulates the central contradiction in current geopolitics: the U.S. aims to restore Western imperial dominance, while China seeks a more equitable and multipolar international system.
The transcript concludes by highlighting that understanding this fundamental conflict is key to comprehending many contemporary geopolitical developments, including ongoing conflicts, economic strategies, and alliances.
Highlights
- [00:01] 🌍 Historical overview: Western empires expanded for 500 years but began contracting after WWII.
- [03:53] ⚔️ Post-WWII decolonization freed most of the global south, but some colonial territories remain.
- [05:14] 🗣️ Marco Rubio’s speech explicitly praises Western colonialism and calls for recolonization.
- [08:58] 🙅♂️ Rubio rejects guilt over colonial crimes, framing them as “purported sins.”
- [20:45] ❄️ Rubio parallels the Cold War with a new Cold War against China, advocating for Western unity.
- [27:44] 🌏 China’s Wang Yi promotes multilateralism, sovereignty, and opposes U.S. unilateralism and imperialism.
- [33:53] 🔄 The U.S. and China present opposite visions for global order: neo-colonialism vs. multipolar cooperation.
Key Insights
[00:01] 🌍 The Decline of Western Empires Post-WWII: The video situates the end of formal colonial expansion after WWII as a turning point where Western empires began contracting due to war devastation, communist revolutions, and anti-colonial struggles. This period marked a significant transition from imperial dominance to decolonization, reshaping global power structures. The emphasis on this historical context is crucial for understanding the current geopolitical tensions rooted in these unresolved colonial legacies.
[03:53] ⚔️ Decolonization as a Revolutionary Movement: The speaker stresses that the wave of national liberation movements sweeping Africa, Asia, and Latin America was not merely political but deeply revolutionary, successfully dismantling centuries-old imperial orders. This success was a major historical achievement that challenged and defeated entrenched Western domination, although it left some colonial outposts, mostly insignificant in size, still under Western control.
[05:14] 🗣️ Explicit Advocacy for Neo-Colonialism by U.S. Leadership: Marco Rubio’s speech is highlighted as a rare and explicit endorsement of colonialism in the 21st century. His praise for the colonial past and call to revive Western empires reveals a deliberate ideological commitment to restoring imperial dominance. This stands in stark contrast to contemporary norms that largely condemn colonialism, making Rubio’s position a significant indicator of the aggressive posture within U.S. foreign policy circles.
[08:58] 🙅♂️ Whitewashing Colonial Atrocities: Rubio’s dismissal of colonial crimes as “purported sins” reflects a broader attempt to rewrite history by minimizing the suffering caused by imperialism. This denialism serves political purposes by fostering pride in imperial heritage and justifying ongoing aggressive policies under the guise of defending “Western civilization,” obscuring the brutal realities of colonial exploitation and violence.
[20:45] ❄️ Cold War Rhetoric Recycled for New Geopolitical Rivalry: Rubio’s framing of the current global struggle as a “new Cold War” against China revives Cold War language to justify intensified Western military and economic competition. This rhetoric attempts to unify Western powers against a common adversary, China, portraying it as a threat to Western industrial and geopolitical dominance, which serves to legitimize increasingly confrontational policies.
[27:44] 🌏 China’s Counter-Narrative Promoting Sovereignty and Multilateralism: Wang Yi’s speech articulates a fundamentally different vision emphasizing respect for all nations’ sovereignty, equality, and the importance of multilateral institutions like the UN. China positions itself as a defender of the global south and an opponent of unilateralism and imperialism, appealing to countries that resent Western dominance and wish for a more just international system. This alternative vision challenges the U.S.-led global order and offers a basis for new alliances.
[33:53] 🔄 Global Order as a Contest Between Neo-Colonialism and Multipolarity: The transcript underscores the stark contrast between U.S. and Chinese worldviews. The U.S. seeks to restore a Western-centric, imperialist order by exploiting global resources and maintaining control over international institutions. China advocates for a multipolar order respecting sovereignty and cooperation. This fundamental contradiction fuels many contemporary conflicts, economic sanctions, regime change efforts, and geopolitical realignments, making it a central axis of 21st-century international relations.
BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert.
[t4b-ticker id="1"]
Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License •
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS


