Home ALT MEDIANews Forensics Dispatches: From the LongBow to Oreshnik and more

News Forensics Dispatches: From the LongBow to Oreshnik and more

PLUS: China spanks Japan

by Julian Macfarlane
Approx 5 Mins • Watch / read
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

Julian Macfarlane
NEWS FORENSICS
Traducir—Translate!
Make fonts bigger>>>
Resize text-+=

From the LongBow to Oreshnik

Weapons maketh the man 


History is often determined by many things - not the least by weapons.

The English longbow, for example.


Longbows


Cannons and muskets. Machine guns. Warplanes. Submarines. Aircraft carriers. Atomic weapons. If you had weapons superior to your enemies you won, often despite differences in numbers.

Missiles and Drones



Russia’s unlimited range nuclear powered 9M730 Burevestnik missile and Poseidon torpedo, along with Oreshnik have captured the imagination of the Western media since the West has virtually no defenses against them.

Of course, the Western media don’t really understand these weapons, nor the significance of their creation and the technological leaps they represent, defining the future.

In the case of Burevestnik and Poseidon, it is the creation of practical nuclear propulsion that, of course, could be used for space war but also for peaceful purposes including the exploration and development of outer space. It is what the Americans tried to develop years ago – and failed at. It never flew … but the MIC had great artists.


A NASA project that never made it.


In the case of Oreshnik, it is Russian materials technology, especially metallurgy which makes the missile capable of hypersonic maneuverability, among other things. This too, however, is a technology with many peaceful applications.

No matter— these weapons are impressive game changers, even if the games that they change haven’t quite been played yet.

The Russians are practical and pragmatic. They also have foresight.

Strategic weapons


Keep in mind that Burevstnik, Poseidon and Oreshnik and their ilk are strategic weapons designed for a major war rather than tactical weapons.


The Russians plan supersonic and hypersonic Burevstniks!

Tactical wars


The Russians do not consider the SVO (the "Special Military Operation"  in Ukraine) as a “war’: it is a tactical conflict, something less than a war. They used Oreshnik just once in the Ukraine – as a test!

Right now, the real game changers are weapons that can be applied in the Ukraine tactically and through their success deter European warmongering.

Only one of these is-- how should I put it? –glamorous and moderately expensive with both tactical and strategic uses . That’s the Zircon missile originally developed as a naval weapon.

It costs a little over $5 million . Actually cheap compared to a Patriot battery at $1 billion, especially when you consider that Patriots cannot shoot down Russian hypersonic missiles despite the propaganda.

What I am saying is that Zircon is expensive but not too expensive for use against high value targets in a tactical scenario.

How good is it?
ATO Name: SS-N-33

Speed: Mach 8–9 (around 9,800–11,000 km/h or 6,100–6,900 mph)

Range: 1,000 km (620 miles) in a semi-ballistic trajectory; around 400-450 km at low altitudes

Propulsion : solid-fuel booster for the first stage; scramjet for sustained hypersonic flight

Altitude: 30-40 km (92,000–130,000 feet) during the cruise phase

Warhead: both conventional (300-400 kg high-explosive) and nuclear warheads

Guidance: inertial navigation and active/passive radar homing

Launch Platforms: Originally Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates and other surface ships, submarines. Now mobile ground launchers.

Advantages

Evasion: High speed reduces defense reaction time; hypersonic speed generates a plasma cloud which absorbs radio waves, for “plasma stealth” .

Maneuverability: Highly maneuverable throughout its flight path, does not follow a predictable ballistic arc

Kinetic Energy: Its kinetic energy alone is enormous and can inflict severe damage on targets of all kinds



Ground launched, it is a tactical weapon that can be used against command centers, depots, airfields, and infrastructure of all kinds.

The Drone Revolution

Arguably more significant is a breakthrough in drone technology –a revolution — that is, AI guided drones.

Right now, Russia is deploying jam-proof fiber-optic FPV platforms with a 50-kilometer range, disrupting UAF logistics and operations in all areas. The Ukrainians do too although their drones are less sophisticated. This has led to both sides targeting drone operators.

The V2U strike drone, Shahed MS001 and Tyuvik drones all make use of AI technology.


Shahed drone with AI and thermal imagingShahed drone with AI and thermal imaging



There are Chinese alternatives to the Jetson Orin –and Russia also uses Chinese electronics — but Amazon makes is sooooooo easy to get around sanctions!


NVIDIA Jetson sold by Amazon!

Russia’s new “digital predators” are capable of finding and attacking targets without human control. They are not only effective but they save drone operators’ lives – now a major consideration, with both sides in the SVO targeting operators as I mentioned earlier.

Some say that V2U is the most advanced AI drone. It was first used in the Sumy region in February 2025. By mid-May it was in action at least 50 times a day across all fronts. But the three drone types shown here all appeared more or less at the same time, and each has its special applications and advantages.


Let’s take the V2U as an example.

It can compare live imagery with digital terrain maps stored on a solid-state drive, and using a A 14-megapixel camera, laser rangefinder, and the NVIDIA Jetson Orin processor do terrain analysis and identify and strike targets—without GPS or human commands.

The Russians update onboard code weekly, training the AI through battlefield experience. It is powerful enough to fly up and down roads searching for targets, although it occasionally makes mistakes.

Large “mother drones” transport V2Us and then release them for individual strikes. In addition, it can release coordinated swarms of seven or eight V2Us, each painted with distinct wing colors for visual identification by their AIs.

These drones can organize their attacks and perform anti-air evasive maneuvers demonstrating primitive swarm intelligence that is being improved on and adapted for Russia’s long-range Shahed drones, to create fully autonomous loitering-munitions swarms that can saturate enemy defenses.


RF Drone swarms

In the meantime, the US is building supercarriers which can cost as much as $120 billion and a Golden Dome defense system that won’t work and will cost $600 billion.

The most expensive Russian drones cost about $35,000.



A note to the US War Department. You can buy me a coffee at https://buymeacoffee.com/julicow. It ‘s just $5.00. Just kidding. I know you don’t have the money.

To everyone else, please donate and keep me and Chappy and Ichi droning on every night, click HERE are on the graphic below.

Buy me a coffee


 
BEFORE you leave, PLEASE pay attention to this alert. INDISPENSABLE information!
[t4b-ticker id="1"]
 

Print this article [bws_pdfprint display=’print’]

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post, although, if we publish them, we obviously find them noteworthy and highly valuable. 

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

You may also like

1 comment

joey_n November 19, 2025 - 5:33 am

By and large, China prefers such indirect tactics to head-on confrontation.

On the one hand. But on the other hand…
Within the past month and a half I have observed a disturbing trend of netizens in China supporting Takaichi’s premiership and hawkish policy, hoping that her interference in Taiwan can give China a pretext to take revenge on Japan and collect its “blood debt” of 35 million people after 80 years. You see it in such internet comments like “It’s a deal! (一言为定)” and/or something to the effect of “No surrender this time”. To give an idea of these netizens’ mentality, when Takaichi announced once that she wouldn’t be going to the Yasukuni shrine, those same netizens complained. Contrast this with the government who has consistently warned Takaichi not to trample into Chinese affairs.

Someone else told me that netizens in what is supposedly the largest socialist state in the world tend to be nationalist and not give a hoot about international solidarity, let alone communism or socialism. I don’t know if that’s true (it’d explain a whole lot if it were), but even then, what benefit would such a war bring to China? Didn’t Mao Zedong once call the Japanese nation brothers in arms with China against militarism, imperialism and fascism? And what would Mao (or Confucius for that matter) think of the whole “blood debt” thing anyhow?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Focus Mode