Israel Shamir
Trump has made a U-turn. Instead of his usual TACO, he chose TITS – Trump Illustrates Terrific Sanity, as said an internet wit. He switched off the Purim War Against Iran, like a housewife turning off her gas stove. The wily Iranians followed Trump’s U-turn, ensuring it’s actually done. The most important result of this debacle: the frog of Israel that tried to compete with the ox of Iran had burst, as Aesop predicted. Israel really believed in his own fairy tale of superiority, of its world hegemony, of its control over the US, until reality came into the picture and slapped its face. Israel has actually been forced to cease killing the Lebanese people. This is a great historical turning point, giving us yet another opportunity to wake the world from its Hollywood fantasy of eternal Jewish might and eternal Jewish victimhood.
It’s not the first event of this kind. Many times, Jews have been stopped just at the brink of total victory. “Keshekvar kim’at”, – in the words of an Israeli song: you always ruin it when we’ve almost won. Putin ended the Seven Bankers’ Rule, by jailing the richest and most powerful of them, oil king Khodorkovsky, and exiling two others, media-lords Berezovsky and Gusinsky. Stalin ended the Jewish Terror by imprisoning the head executioner, Interior Minister Yahoda, and dismissing Foreign Minister Litvinov. So much about Jewish dominance in Russia, as some of the readers claim.
Do not imagine some sort of “Holocaust” in the works. Well-behaved Russian citizens of Jewish descent did not suffer in those cases, but their dream of ruling Russia was firmly shut down. Now it’s the Yankees’ turn to cut the insatiable Jewish desire for hegemony down to size, and it’s not a moment too soon: Jewish billionaires just finished strangling the American Constitutional freedom of speech and their traditional freedom to choose who is on the ballot; vide the sad fate of Mr Massie removed from Congress, and the users of TikTok encumbered by Larry Ellison’s new censorship. The Mossad should be sicced on Israel’s enemies in the PR war, World Jewish Congress President Ron Lauder tells the Jerusalem Post conference in New York City.
And it will be done whatever happens with Iranian MoU. Even if it will collapse, the Jewish goose is cooked as we see from vote in NY primaries. The Big Apple has more Jews than Tel Aviv, and still pro-Israeli candidates were defeated. Tucker Carlson is getting enormous popularity, and probably will be the next President.
The Political earthquake in New York: Israel loses its main stronghold in the US victory of Zohran Mamdani, along with his allies Brad Lander and Claire Valdés, in the Democratic Party primaries has caused open alarm in Israel. Israeli publications Yedioth Ahronoth, Maariv and The Times of Israel are describing the events as a political earthquake, as for the first time, open criticism of Israel is ceasing to be a political liability and is beginning to yield electoral victories.
Israeli analysts point out that New York, home to around 2 million Jews, has for decades been regarded as the main political and cultural centre of American Jewry and a mainstay of the pro-Israel lobby. It was here that politicians such as Chuck Schumer built their influence, and AIPAC’s activities were considered virtually untouchable. Now, it is precisely this city that is becoming a symbol of shifting public sentiment.
The Israeli press is increasingly drawing the conclusion that the victory of a new wave of Democrats signifies growing opposition to US arms supplies to Israel, mounting pressure on the pro-Israel lobby and a further weakening of AIPAC’s influence. An article in *The Times of Israel* specifically raises the question of the organisation’s future: until recently, its influence was considered unquestionable, but now even cooperation with it is becoming politically toxic for some American politicians.
Perhaps we should explain the special Jewish role in empires. The Jews were for hundreds of years traditionally compradors or middlemen; meaning they served their foreign masters and extracted goods from the natives. In long gone times, they served their Polish landlords by forcing the Ukrainian peasants to work harder. It was said (by Jewish historians, of course) that Jews squeezed six times more wealth out of the Ukraine than the Poles ever could. When Western Europe was getting recolonised by the US after WW2, Jews switched to serving the US – but still making the natives miserable. When East Europe was subjugated by the USSR (after its liberation from the German rule), the Jews there served the USSR and ruled over the natives on behalf of the Soviets. They were so awful that the natives rebelled, as in Hungary in 1956, or expelled the Jews, as in Poland in 1967. Thus, Jews have always been a subsidiary force that always hoped to seize the commanding heights – and always failed.
All the important countries of Western Europe were subjugated under US rule after the WWII. Along with the US army came the Jews, as the bearers of the new American policies. The Jews added two techniques particular to them in the process of colonisation. One, de-Christianisation, as Jews traditionally are strongly anti-Christian. Two, encouragement of mass immigration. The Jews had a valid reason to prefer it. In the normal European order of things, the Jews (and Gypsies) stuck out as foreign element. However, in multicultural Europe, Jews would be only one of many different communities.
Surprisingly enough, the main problem of the West isn’t the Jews, but politicians corrupted by the American empire. Being pro-Israel is, at least for them, just a symbol of subservience to the Deep State US. To an imperial power-broker, the Jews are a useful liability shield. If they push too far and trigger a reaction, the Jews are always there to absorb it. They are a lightning rod for trouble.
George Galloway reports: “Half of the British government positions – but all of the important offices of state – are held by Labour Friends of Israel. How did Britain wind up as a satrapy of Netanyahu’s remorselessly evil empire?” It was certainly never a desire or decision of the British people.
Recently, riots have returned to Belfast, Northern Ireland, and it’s not the IRA any more. The brutal murder of a local Irishman by a Sudanese immigranthas shaken a country that once took violent troubles in stride for many, many decades. These new troubles are the result of quite unneeded mass migration, more globalist policy implemented by comprador Jews. The Brits didn’t like it and eventually the British PM Keith Starmer announced his resignation (after a long bout of hesitant pussyfooting before he took the step). He will surely go down in history as one of the worst PMs of the UK, overtaking even Liz Truss. We might say he was finally slaughtered by his own Sudanese immigrants, and the lesson behind his political demise was recognized by President Trump: Starmer was too bloody-mindedly devoted to the Deep State.
Will the protests that have erupted in Ireland over migration lead to civil war? Could these protests spread to mainland Europe? Will Chancellor Friedrich Merz follow Starmer into shameful obscurity? He is also slavishly devoted to the Deep State and immigration and already 350,000 Germans have signed a petition calling on him to resign. And what about Macron? The French people are unhappy about him for the same very reason, although as yet there is no viable alternative free of the globalist yoke. The most important question: will Europe remain a space defined by Western cultural values in 20–30 years’ time, given the current trends of demographic replacement of the local population?
For decades, the Western elite has turned a blind eye to inter-ethnic and inter-religious conflicts for fear of being accused of racism. If everything is racism, nothing is racism – as declared by American VP Vance (“It’s kind of like how progressives for 20 years called everything racist. And if everything’s racism, nothing is racism.”). What are the moral goals of globalists today? Who are their greatest thinkers? Where are they really leading the peoples of Europe?
Europe’s native populations did not want their countries demographically transformed by mass immigration, yet their elites—deeply embedded in US-influenced globalist networks—imposed these policies with little regard for their own people. The unbeatable combination of CIA & FRS ensures that no nationally-aware leaders will break free. Certain Jewish intellectuals and advocates, such as Sweden-based Barbara Lerner Spectre, have made it clear that they support and promote these demographic transformations. As Mrs Spectre stated quite unequivocally:
“I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we are going to be part of that transformation which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”
(Here she says it: https://www.reddit.com/r/Sverige/comments/1lbywft/barbara_spectre_forteller_%C3%A5penlyst_hva_planen_for/?tl=en).
It should be noted that both of the historically-Jewish strategies noted above (de-Christian and diversify) have helped achieve the US colonisation of Europe. De-Christianised and multi-culturalised Europe was easy prey for the US Deep State. The involvement of Jews in this process was quite conscious. In my youth in the 1970’s, I worked in the BBC’s External Services in London, and I was amazed by sheer quantity of the Jews in the BBC. I asked one of my superiors, why do they draft so many Jews? He replied, the Jews are de-ethnicised, they have no loyalty to their country, they will do what we say. And the Jews were the majority in many departments of the BBC.
Recently, just a few years ago, Zionist Jews took the lead in embracing a strong anti-immigration course. For them, the most important issue was their enmity to Moslems, and by promoting anti-Islam propaganda they hoped to create support for Israel over Palestine. The role of the Jew is to lead both sides of every controversy, and immigration is no exception. Liberal Jews lead the globalist charge toward diversity, and then the Zionists are allowed to lead the reaction away from it.
The US remains hostile towards Europe as a competitor. Whenever the Euro, the coin of the EC, grows faster than the dollar, the more hostile the US gets. The US is the main motor of the Russian-Ukrainian war, and the US uses this war to weaken both Russia and Europe. The US squeezes the EC to cease buying Russian oil and gas, and offers instead that they buy it from the US for a much higher price. However, EC officials, especially the leaders of England, France and Germany, were chosen for their loyalty to the US, not to their own citizenry.
These corrupt and weak politicians cannot manage their own gas and oil supplies. They allow their Ukrainian proxies to cut their lifelines to Russian resources and enforce this loss by sanctions. This development turned out deadly when Iran closed off the Hormuz Straits. The costs of heating and industry rose to the sky, decimating the European economy. At the same time, the US pressured European industries to move to the US! Thus, all of Europe’s countries are likely to end up broke and encumbered by immigrants.
Alas, now there are no strong politicians in Europe. Leaders like Charles de Gaulle, Gerhard
Schroeder, Margaret Thatcher aren’t made any more. Corrupted and weak, EU leaders can’t get out of the frame drawn by the US Deep State, and they lead Europe toward WWIII and the end of civilisation.
The historian Dr Artem Kirpichonok explains:
Western aid is structured in a specific way — designed to create a powerful financial incentive for Ukraine’s complete victory. The EU has allocated €90 billion (2026–2027), but these loans will only be repayable to European taxpayers if Russia pays substantial reparations. The more the West gives now, the higher Ukraine’s future debt will be — and the stronger the incentive to support it to the very end, at any cost, including daily drone attacks.
This is precisely why Europe has painted itself into a corner: objectively speaking, it can afford neither a standstill nor negotiations — its material interests demand escalation, right up to attempts at military defeat.
This is a plausible scheme. Or perhaps Europe will die in a civil war between the natives and the immigrants. However, such extremes aren’t the only way out. Europe may simply slowly rot away until its collapse; for without Christianity, its elites fall into disrepute, shorn of morals, and even of self-respect. For who can respect such corrupted creatures worshipping Epstein Island, that imperial outpost of murderous Israel? A violent end is often more attractive than an ignominious retreat into barbarism. May we choose wisely when the moment to choose comes upon us. May we remember our Christian charity, so effectively erased by these two simple Jewish tactics: de-Christianize and diversify.
It reminds us the book ‘Destroy Europe” by Ilia Ehrenburg whose protagonist, a US billionaire, plots to destroy Europe so it won’t compete with the US industry. Ilya Ehrenburg was a prophet, apparently.
Edited with kind assistance of Paul Bennet.
The Current European Disease
Was Made in America
EDITOR'S NOTE—ALWAYS keep in mind that the Europeans' apparent suicidal obtuseness vis-a-vis Russia did not originate so much in European capitals as in Washington and London. For decades, since the close of WW2, when the CIA and MI6 started their penetration of Western Europe's media, trade unions, military, culture, and political class, Europe has pathetically served as a sacrificial goat and convenient buffer for America. This shameful condition has been expertly and certainly cynically obfuscated on both sides of the Atlantic by Orwellian lies, for example the notion that NATO was created to "protect Europe"—a glaring lie— instead of as an instrument of US strategic purpose against Moscow.
A handful of European statesmen like de Gaulle saw this imposture and rejected it. But most, timid mediocrities probably already compromised, simply went along with the new arrangement, and the malignancy only grew. After all, careerism and class interest recommended it. 'That's why, if a nuclear or equivalent war comes to Europe and surely much of the world, never miss sight of the fact that the main culprits for such calamity sit in America, with its Deep State, and that it has been the American ruling elites' machinations and obsessive hatred and fear of Russia, China, and any other sovereign power threatening the hegemonic interests of the Western capitalist class that truly created this awful situation. Lenin was right. At the end of the day, the enemy of humanity and life itself on this magnificent and indeed miraculous planet is capitalism's infernal spawn, imperialism. There will be no peace, not even a mild prospect of peace, until imperialism is utterly destroyed. —PG
