Dec 042011
 

By Peter Symonds , WSWS.ORG


The three-day visit by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Burma (Myanmar) this week featured prominent meetings with opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and a great deal of hypocritical hype about American support for “democratic rights.” The real aim of Clinton’s visit, however, was to further the Obama administration’s concerted campaign to undermine the influence of China throughout Asia. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
Dec 042011
 

K. Ratnayake, WSWS.ORG

US calls for “democracy” in Burma are a convenient screen behind which talks with the dictatorial regime are to take place. Obama has demanded Suu Kyi’s release as the precondition for better relations, not because she is a “champion of democracy”, but because she represents sections of the Burmese bourgeoisie, who are oriented to the West and to the further transformation of the country into a cheap labour platform for transnational corporations. 


Aung San Suu Kyi is the Aquino of Burma, the bourgeois hero du jour on whom to pin the propaganda strategy of the empire. Accordingly, the American media, taking their cues from the White House,  have redoubled their campaign to make her an international hero for “democracy.”  —Eds

The release of Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi on November 14 has become an occasion for another outpouring of media panegyrics to this “icon of democracy” and speculation about the possibilities for “reform” and “democracy” in the country.

Suu Kyi, however, has already made clear that she has no intention of challenging the Burmese junta. Rather, with the backing particularly of the United States, she is seeking a deal with the country’s generals. Suu Kyi has hinted that she is ready to reverse her previous stance and call for the easing or lifting of US and European sanctions in return for concessions from the generals—all in the name of helping the Burmese people.  Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
Dec 042011
 

 ”Permissioning” is not required by the Constitution.  Period. But with the scoundrels in the High Court these days, don’t bet on it. —Eds
This piece has been annotated. Some points clearly need further debating by activists. 

BY ALLISON KILKENNY, IN  THESE TIMES

Is this what they mean by Occupying the Democratic Party? Occupy DC protest in front of the W Hotel in Washington where a Democratic party fundraiser was taking place on December 1. (Photo: NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)  

There’s an interesting debate happening right now among Occupy participants and Progressives observing the movement about what the best strategy is for the group moving forward. Rather than delving into the endless sea of advice heaved at the protesters on a daily basis about what their ten-point policy plan should look like, I want to examine the issue more broadly. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
Dec 042011
 

Al Jazeera—                                                                                                                  

Global elites are confused, reactive, and sinking into a quagmire of their own making, says author.
The ruling classes have lost legitimacy; we are witnessing a breakdown of ruling-class hegemony on a world scale. 

by William I. Robinson


SANTA BARBARA, CA
As the crisis of global capitalism spirals out of control, the powers that be in the global system appear to be adrift and unable to propose viable solutions. From the slaughter of dozens of young protesters by the army in Egypt to the brutal repression of the Occupy movement in the United States, and the water cannons brandished by the militarized police in Chile against students and workers, states and ruling classes are unable to hold back the tide of worldwide popular rebellion and must resort to ever more generalized repression. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it:
Dec 042011
 
Political Correction (Media Matters Action Network)—                                                                

The admission that the problem with a nuclear Iran is not that it would attack Israel but that it would alter the regional balance of power is incredibly significant.

MJ Rosenberg

Suddenly the struggle to stop Iran is not about saving Israel from nuclear annihilation. After a decade of scare-mongering about the second coming of Nazi Germany, the Iran hawks are admitting that they have other reasons for wanting to take out Iran, and saving Israeli lives may not be one of them. Suddenly the neoconservatives have discovered the concept of truth-telling, although, no doubt, the shift will be ephemeral. Continue reading »

Did you like this? Share it: