CBS media turd Scott Pelley pontificates about US journalism

The Problem With Journalism? Scott Pelley Blames the Internet

When big-time reporters decide to try their hands at media criticism, the results are usually disappointing–but they can also be quite revealing.  So when a video of CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley started to making the rounds, the headlines associated with it piqued my interest. Over at the Weekly Standard, it was “CBS Anchor: ‘We Are Getting Big Stories Wrong, Over and Over Again. ‘”Well, that sounds like pretty dramatic self-criticism. But, as expected, Pelley’s media criticism mostly misses the mark.
[pullquote]   Editor’s Note: Our readers know damn well by now what we think of American “journalism”, the key component of the gigantic edifice of Orwellian propaganda sustaining the American empire in its most cynical and vicious phase. Its product largely toxic, its personnel witting or unwitting participants in a system of global criminality, and thereby undeniable accomplices, with the top ranks naturally more invested in the criminality than the plebeians below.  Fact is, US journalism, despite its immense conceits, is something of a cruel joke: it proves reliable in matters of relatively little importance, like the weather or football scores, but is totally and maliciously wrong, misleading or absent (by design) where it matters most.  Little things like who really owns this country, the real face of American “democracy,” or the actual ugly reasons for eternal war. Therefore we are not surprised that newsreader Scott Pelley sees the world through his accustomed stenotic funnel. That’s just about the scope of vision that his little brain and career ambition will allow. By the way, keep in mind that the invective is on our tab, don’t blame the author of this piece—Peter Hart— for it.— P. Greanville
Give him points for drama, though. “Our house is on fire,” he warned near the beginning of his talk at Quinnipiac University. The house is the “magnificent mansion that we call American journalism.” And Pelley did say what the headlines suggested: “We’re getting the big stories wrong, over and over again.”So what are those stories? Pelley specifically points out one: In the aftermath of the Newtown school massacre, he inaccurately reported that the shooter’s mother worked at the school. That was, in his words, “absolutely wrong.”So why do things like this happen? Well, Pelley attempts to answer by pointing a finger at technology:

Never before in human history has more information been available to more people.  But at the same time, never before in human history has more bad information been available to more people.

He moves on to the Boston marathon bombings. “Our nation was attacked by terrorists,” he explains, “and amateur journalists became digital vigilantes.”

“Innocent people were marked as suspects,” he goes on, “their pictures and their names ricocheted all over Twitter and Facebook and Reddit.”

Now we’re getting to the real point. He goes on:

That fire that started on the Internet spread to our more established newsrooms as well. In a world where everyone is a publisher, no one is an editor. And that is the danger we face today.

Editors are the people who decide that some information should be vetted before it is aired. Yes, the existence of the Internet means that rumors can spread faster–but did that really cause CNN to botch a report about a “dark-skinned” suspect, or the New York Post to put a photo of two young men on its cover, falsely suggesting they were suspects in the bombing?

To Pelley, the problem is clear: “TwitterFacebook and Reddit. That’s not journalism. That’s gossip.”

While that’s a mischaracterization, the problem with journalism isn’t the existence of Twitter; it’s the failure of some journalists to exercise sound judgment.

The idea that the big problem with journalism is that TV networks air breaking news that is inaccurate lets media off the hook.  The problem with coverage of the Iraq War was not that reporters listened to Facebook or Twitter, neither of which existed at the time of the invasion; rather, they listened too often to elite sources who were wrong. And they continue to rely on official sources to steer the news agenda.

The Internet, if anything, provides for a way for people to hear from a more diverse set of voices, and to act as a check on big media.

Pelley was right in one respect: The media’s obsession with being “first” on a story, even when that means beating out your broadcast rivals by a few seconds, is a waste of time.  True enough–and that’s a problem that is in no way related to the dangers of Reddit.

“Maybe a touch of humility would serve us better, and serve the public better as well,” Pelley declares. No argument there. But then, moments later, Pelley pronounced: “America has the best journalism in the world.”  Hey–what happened to humility!

PETER HART is one of FAIR’s senior editors and analysts. We appreciate his work. 

Print Friendly
You must share this!

One thought on “CBS media turd Scott Pelley pontificates about US journalism

  1. Two glaring points show the entire commentary was a farce whose goal was far removed from the stated purpose. First, just the mention of the Weekly Standard is enough to make a wise one, derisively laugh at what mind manipulation will doubtless follow. CHECK! Second, the farcical, self-serving descriptive phrase that we are blessed with the “Best journalism in the world” gives new meaning to the word “deception” and is a tribute the Koch/Murdoch corporate pals could toast (after the belly laughs subside at such mockery of reality). Have we breathed the fumes of the parallel universe we exist in so long that such audacious, pseudo-industry self-evaluation is treated as anything more than mere black comedy? Flashes of scenes of REAL media self analysis pop into mind from the classic expose of what is paraded as “news” every pitiful day of the week! “Network” where, after being treated to the reptilian thought processes of the Orwellian producers, factual assessments of what was true in that depiction is sadly more piercingly true today. If Pelley truly believes his own drivel, he might just qualify for a delusional personality disorder. More likely, his “assignment” was to deflect public disgust with the
    more virulent distortions of truth that the media mongrels try to frost off on the citizenry. Reality robbing and replacing truth with justifications of scurrilous actions on the part of leaders is standard form. But
    with the docile public swallowing ever larger lies, and the accompanying growing media detachment from any acknowledgement of truth, we may have seen indications of revulsion aimed towards the
    masters of deception that have brought us to the problem riddled state we exist in. Maybe, like the alcoholic who must “hit bottom” before realizing his/her destroyed life and tries valiantly to restore his
    or her former health, we as a nation may have been lead down the primrose path of pathological leaders and their devious designs that the rot is reach a level, too much to entertain. A refreshing thought, but then I used to believe in the tooth fairy…

Comments are closed.