The Greanville Post
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • MEDIA FRONT
  • BEIJING DISPATCH
  • RUSSIA DESK
  • VIRTUAL UNIV
  • NATURE
  • MUST VIDEO
  • CAPITALISM
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • MEDIA FRONT
  • BEIJING DISPATCH
  • RUSSIA DESK
  • VIRTUAL UNIV
  • NATURE
  • MUST VIDEO
  • CAPITALISM
The Greanville Post
Home ABOMINATIONS The appalling hypocrisy of US human rights concerns

The appalling hypocrisy of US human rights concerns

by Patrice de Bergeracpas February 12, 2019
February 12, 2019
Print Friendly, PDF & EmailPrint this post.

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON IT.

In a recent article on Venezuela reminding the public, and especially Americans, of the long history of institutionalised, callous hypocrisiy in US foreign policy, Senior Contributing Editor David W. Pear unearthed the following document which is yet another irrefutable proof that claims of concerns for human rights, freedom, or democracy should be treated with extreme scepticism (if not outright laughter) when coming from US officials or their multitude of flacks in the corporate media.
Washington, D.C. 20520
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
May 17, 2017
NOTE FOR THE SECRETARY
FROM: S/P -- Brian Hook

SUBJECT: (U) Balancing Interests and Values


(U) Your remarks to State Department employees on May 3 revived the debate over how far to emphasize human rights, democracy promotion, and liberal values in American foreign policy.This longstanding debate has been principally fought by two foreign policy schools.

The liberal/idealist/Wilsonian view is that other countries, including US allies, should be pressed to adopt democratic reforms and human rights practices in accordance with American preferences.

The "realist” view is that America's allies should be supported rather than badgered, for both practical and principled reasons, and that while the United States should certainly stand as moral example, our diplomacy with other countries should focus primarily on their foreign policy behavior rather than on their domestic practices as such.

Both views are deeply rooted in the US experience, both are authentically American, and as you implied in your remarks, their relative urgency tends to wax and wane over time depending on events overseas.

Beginning in the 1940s, as the US adopted a wide range of new allies during and after World War Two, the tendency of Presidents Roosevelt and Truman was to bolster US allies, while nudging them in the direction of liberal reform.

President Eisenhower's instinct was very much to bolster US allies against the risks of domestic radicalism, worldwide. He placed even greater emphasis on bolstering than did Harry Truman.

The Nixon-Kissinger foreign policy team also prioritized supporting rather than badgering.  Kissinger still remains a credible and articulate advocate for this point of view.

President Carter upended Cold War policies by criticizing and even undermining governments,especially in cases such as Nicaragua and Iran. The results were unfortunate for American interests (sic), as for the citizens of those countries. Carter's badgering of American allies unintentionally strengthened anti-American radicals in both Iran and Nicaragua. As Jeanne Kirkpatrick wrote in 1979 criticizing Carter's foreign policy, "Hurried efforts to force complex and unfamiliar political practices on societies lacking the requisite political culture, tradition, and social structures not only fail to produce the desired outcomes; if they are undertaken at a time when the traditional regime is under attack, they actually facilitate the job of the insurgents."

Kirkpatrick also made this important observation that equally applies for today: “The speed with which armies collapse, bureaucracies abdicate, and social structures dissolve once the autocrat is removed frequently surprises American policymakers and journalists accustomed to public institutions based on universalistic norms rather than particularistic relations.”


Reagan meeting with hardcore imperial apologist Jeane Kirkpatrick in the Oval Office (12/11/1984).

President Reagan endorsed Kirkpatrick's views. As he stated at the 1980 Republican convention,“The basis of a free and principled foreign policy is one that takes the world as it is, and seeks to change it by leadership and example; not by harangue, harassment or wishful thinking." Or again, from Reagan's 1981 inaugural address, with reference to US allies: “We will not use our friendship to impose on their sovereignty, for our own sovereignty is not for sale."

During Reagan’s second term, his administration began to move in the direction of more pointed pressure for liberalization with regard to allies such as Chile, South Korea, and the Philippines.But these efforts bore fruit in part because viable democratic and pro-American forces existed in each country -- and the US continued to provide vital reassurance. Reagan’s first instinct was always to back allies against adversaries, even in controversial cases, including through his second term. South Africa would be an excellent example. The approach used there was called“constructive engagement,” and in the long run it worked.

Recovering a Balanced Foreign Policy

In their own way, all three post-Cold War presidents -- Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama -- worked on relatively optimistic assumptions regarding the possibilities for positive social change overseas, as nudged forward by American power and diplomacy. No doubt this optimism was well-intentioned. But in the wake of Iraq and Afghanistan, slow economic recovery, the rise of China, and the failed Arab Spring, there is understandably less optimism today that the world can be easily democratized or reshaped simply by expressing American liberal values, or by badgering American allies. At least that is the position President Trump ran and won on, and -- if properly implemented -- this is very much in the realist tradition of US diplomacy, a mainstream and historically grounded tradition just as American as any other.

In the case of US allies such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Philippines, the Administration is fully justified in emphasizing good relations for a variety of important reasons, including counter-terrorism (sic), and in honestly facing up to the difficult tradeoffs with regard to human rights. It is not as though human rights practices will be improved if anti-American radicals take power in those countries. Moreover, this would be a severe blow to our vital interests. We saw what a disaster Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood turned out to be in power. After eight years of Obama, the US is right to bolster US allies rather than badger or abandon them.

One useful guideline for a realistic and successful foreign policy is that allies should be treated differently -- and better -- than adversaries. Otherwise, we end up with more adversaries, and fewer allies. The classic dilemma of balancing ideals and interests is with regard to America’s allies​. In relation to our competitors, there is far less of a dilemma. We do not look to bolster America’s adversaries overseas; we look to pressure, compete with, and outmaneuver them. For this reason, we should consider human rights as an important issue in regard to US relations with China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran. And this is not only because of moral concern for practices inside those countries. It is also because pressing those regimes on human rights is one way to impose costs, apply counter-pressure, and regain the initiative from them strategically

Editor's Notes:
1. The document author, Brian Hook, as is to be expected from a guy working for the State Department, speaks perfectly the language of educated imperial flacks and global capitalism. His mind is marinated in the self-serving historical goo served up by any number of leading US academic and private institutions, starting with the Ivy League contingent, long a shameless accomplice to imperial designs as an intellectual enabler of the first order. In their (by now official) view, the US is always interested in doing the right thing, and always has the most honorable intentions, although within the limits permitted by the supposedly "legitimate" defense of its "interests", which of course are practically infinite, and never specifically defined, but understood to represent those of every American, which is a cruel and unchallenged joke indeed. In this malodorous miasma, notorious hypocrites like Woodrow Wilson, emerge as idealistic liberals, champions of international law, instead of cold-blooded imperialists and warmongers (despite their rhetoric). Cook and his ilk conveniently forget that Wilson, for one, severely repressed pacifists in the ramp-up to War in Europe, and also allowed his AG to conduct the notorious Palmer Raids during the first "red scare". J Edgar Hoover, who needs no introduction here, one of the most odious figures in US history, and certainly no champion of democracy or human rights, virtually started his career with the Palmer raids. Indeed, on August 1, 1919, AG A. Mitchell Palmer named 24-year-old Hoover to head a new division of the Justice Department's Bureau of Investigation, the General Intelligence Division (GID), with responsibility for investigating the programs of radical groups and identifying their members. 

2. The whole document never departs from the operational conceptions of realpolitik, and the defence of US hegemonic power at any cost, by definition an amoral, non-idealist approach to international relations, in practice a justification for the use of raw power, lawlessness and criminality across the globe,  yet US propaganda, aimed primarily at the American mind, is always sold on the basis of high moral ideals.


 

Creative Commons License
THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

RevisShielded: 4
All comments subject to anti-hacking filters.
  • 4
  • 51
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    55
    Shares
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestRedditEmail
previous post
Hands Off Venezuela, Canada and US Go Home!
next post
Woody Allen sues Amazon for failing to distribute his latest film and other breaches of contract

Related Articles

Conspiracy facts and the MICIMATT that truly governs the USA...

January 17, 2021

Biden Admin – Redux Deep State, Empire & Censorship

January 17, 2021

The Two Faces Of The US Empire

January 16, 2021

Guardian Smears Syria’s President With Implausible Link To Beirut’s Port Blast

January 15, 2021

Good Riddance. Sheldon Adelson Dead at 87

January 15, 2021

The Boot Is Coming Down Hard And Fast (Composite post)

January 14, 2021

Biden Exploits His Capitol Gains

January 13, 2021

Speaking of stolen elections

January 13, 2021

Raskolnikov’s Dream Come True

January 13, 2021

The Trump Administration’s Parting Outrage Against Cuba

January 13, 2021

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Look it up here

L’Internationale—sung by Chinese people. If this doesn’t move you, nothing will.

We are in an ACUTE crisis. Please help!



Always stay in touch! Sign up for free Greanville Post bulletin here.

The sons and daughters of liberty and justice may march again soon.

Why Liberals (and centrist extremists) hate leftists.

“Liberals hate leftists because leftists are a constant reminder that liberals are not the thing they pretend to be.” — ⁦@caitoz⁩ https://t.co/LsXp3AmJuq

— Ryan Knight 🌹 (@ProudSocialist) September 27, 2020

NOTE: The quote is by Caitlin Johnstone.

MORE PAGES OF INTEREST

SPECIAL SECTIONS
ARMAGEDDON
AUTHORS
WORLD DESK
PEOPLE’S HISTORY
REPUBLICATION RIGHTS

Gateways

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

If you haven’t read this, you don’t know China.

How Many People Know that Iran is a Socialist Nation? Not many. But in this fact-packed, 330 pp book, noted geopolitical analyst Ramin Mazaheri proves that this is exactly the case.

“Iran and its unique socialist system is one of the greatest untold, even hidden, stories of our era. Ramin Mazaheri’s book “Socialism’s Ignored Success: Iranian Islamic Socialism” is a detailed and very serious compilation of the author’s analyses, published by various progressive outlets in the West and now re-edited into this powerful and thought-provoking volume..”
—Andre Vltchek 

Get it today!
Available in electronic and print editions
Kindle $7.50 • Print $24.49 prime

 

Criminal elites created it. But YOUR willful ignorance perpetuates it.

Oliver Stone: The Media is the Enemy

oliverstone“Our citizens should know the urgent facts...but they don’t because our media serves imperial, not popular interests. They lie, deceive, connive and suppress what everyone needs to know, substituting managed news misinformation and rubbish for hard truths..."—Oliver Stone

The people & corps who have been murdering our planet

A carefully compiled database of climate deniers—individuals, politicians, corporations
(Click image)

TGP is part of The Voice of Nature Network

VNN-wolf-logo-4

The innocence around us.

Avenger Network / Allies

  • BLACK AGENDA REPORT
  • CAITLIN JOHNSTONE
  • Center for Global Research
  • CHINA RISING
  • COUNTERCURRENTS
  • ELECTRONIC INTIFADA
  • F. WILLIAM ENGDAHL
  • FORT RUSS NEWS
  • GLOBAL INDEPENDENT ANALYTICS
  • JASON HIRTHLER
  • JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE
  • JIMMY DORE's Fountain of Truth
  • JOHN PILGER
  • LAND DESTROYER
  • LEE CAMP (Redacted)
  • MARK TALIANO—Voices from Syria
  • MINTPRESS NEWS
  • NEWS FROM THE UNDERGROUND / MARK CRISPIN MILLER
  • PR WATCH
  • RESUMEN LATINOAMERICANO (ENGLISH ED.)
  • SILENT CROW NEWS
  • THE POLEMICIST—Jim Kavanagh
  • THE SAKER
  • TITANIC LIFEBOAT ACADEMY

Truth, at last.

“Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

henry_kissinger__secretary_of_state__washington__dc__june_2__1976

― Henry Kissinger

This is what the plutocracy that Kissinger serves really thinks of the military. All that praise and worshipping on the media is just a thick curtain of hypocrisy to maintain morale among the deceived imperial troopers.

It ennobles our lives.

Política y cultura hispánica


Nuestra nueva sección en castellano.
Haga click en la imagen.

 

READ OUR DISCLAIMER

DISCLAIMER

CLICK HERE TO READ

THE GREANVILLE POST

Disclaimer: The contents of articles published on The Greanville Post are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Greanville Post, a publication of The Voice of Nature Network, Inc., (VNN), a not-for-profit 501 (c) (3) corporation, will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Greanville Post grants permission to cross-post original The Greanville Post articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of The Greanville Post articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: greanville@gmail.com

THE GREANVILLE POST contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues, and the furtherance of peace and social justice, the defence of our planetary ecosystems, and the prevention and eventual elimination of human abuse, exploitation,.and cruelty toward any and all non-human species The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries contact us at greanville@gmail.com 


CONTACTING US & MORE


ABOUT TGP/CONTACTING US
That’s easy. Just click on the links below.
• ABOUT TGP
• CONTACTING US

Did you miss it?

  • Conspiracy facts and the MICIMATT that truly governs the USA – with CIA whistleblower Ray McGovern January 17, 2021
  • Biden Admin – Redux Deep State, Empire & Censorship January 17, 2021
  • Consent-Manufacturing For Patriot Act II Continues January 16, 2021
  • The Two Faces Of The US Empire January 16, 2021
  • The Intriguing History of Cancer Immunotherapy January 16, 2021
  • Guardian Smears Syria’s President With Implausible Link To Beirut’s Port Blast January 15, 2021
  • The Suppression Of Trump Voters Will Not Create Long Term Stability January 15, 2021
  • Good Riddance. Sheldon Adelson Dead at 87 January 15, 2021
  • COUP, COUP, KACHOO… January 15, 2021
  • National Endowment for Democracy is Now Officially “Undesirable” in Russia (Repost) January 15, 2021
  • The Orwellian Web of International Subversion: Organizations Funded by the NED January 14, 2021
  • Trump Impeached Amid Efforts to Silence Him January 14, 2021

Kitten & Golden Retriever Friendship

If you don’t, who will?

Words from an Irish patriot—

CATEGORIES – TOPICS

GATEWAYS

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

ARCHIVES

@2017 - PenciDesign. All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by PenciDesign

Translate »